Roosh V Forum

Full Version: Places with Surprisingly Ugly Girls
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
In light of Roosh's recent disappointment in the quality of the girls in Denmark and recalling Mixx's surprise by the butter faces in Brazil, it might be the right time to hear other guys' disappointments.

What places surprised and/or disappointed you by how substandard the quality of girls were?

What expectations did you have goin in?
Reykjavik (Iceland): I saw 1.5 attractive girls in 5 days - loads of overweight chicks with bad skin and big butts
Icelandic people have surprisingly good skin, which I think is due to the sulfur in the water. I rarely saw bad acne. In fact I remember the one time I did see it (grocery stock boy at the Kroner store).

The girls didn't blow me away, but they were definitely better than Washington D.C. Also you get a large variance of quality depending on the night venues you go to.
Maybe to weigh in on the Nordic countries. Swedish girls are not as hot as people always say. Yes, you have quite a number of stunners but the average is not really that much higher than in many other countries. Still good, but not insanely good as some guys say or think. So there is a surprise element. Denmark is a bit lower on quality with fewer stunners as well but in my opinion still totally fine.

Maybe India should be mentioned concerning a poor overall level of female beauty. Not sure whether it's surprising with that kind of poverty there.
Lisbon. I was surprised at the lack of quality. Body wise, they are still better than N American girls as they are generally slim. But, I saw very few girls with pretty faces.
(03-28-2011 12:17 PM)Roosh Wrote: [ -> ]Icelandic people have surprisingly good skin, which I think is due to the sulfur in the water. I rarely saw bad acne. In fact I remember the one time I did see it (grocery stock boy at the Kroner store).

The girls didn't blow me away, but they were definitely better than Washington D.C. Also you get a large variance of quality depending on the night venues you go to.

I noticed the great skin as well. As a matter of fact when I got back, everyone said my skin was the best it had ever been. I agree that my skin got really good down their drinking the pure water they have.
(03-28-2011 12:17 PM)Roosh Wrote: [ -> ]Icelandic people have surprisingly good skin, which I think is due to the sulfur in the water.

Couldn't it just be lack of sun damage?
(03-28-2011 06:33 PM)kimleebj Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-28-2011 12:17 PM)Roosh Wrote: [ -> ]Icelandic people have surprisingly good skin, which I think is due to the sulfur in the water.

Couldn't it just be lack of sun damage?


Having visited Iceland myself, this is my theory as well. Locations that have cooler climates and lower sun light are actually better for those with a fair complexion. To me it doesn't matter how dark their complexion is as long as it is a clear one.
Hungary, Budapest - I have been 3x and nothing to rave about women wise. The best ones were the street hookers who are crazy sexy, but I still have a thing for women of this country.

Sweden is still the best I have seen by a long shot, different strokes for different folks.
Washington, DC USA has ugly women for such a large/diverse city. I was in Philly couple weeks ago and that place crushes DC. Same thing go's for Baltimore and even some of the 2nd tier city's like Charlotte, which have prettier women than DC. Also, the ratio is so bad here that it seems like even the overweight women don't need to compete at all to get male's attention as they realise that guy's are desperate.
(03-28-2011 11:10 PM)Hokie30 Wrote: [ -> ]Washington, DC USA has ugly women for such a large/diverse city. I was in Philly couple weeks ago and that place crushes DC. Same thing go's for Baltimore and even some of the 2nd tier city's like Charlotte, which have prettier women than DC. Also, the ratio is so bad here that it seems like even the overweight women don't need to compete at all to get male's attention as they realise that guy's are desperate.

So true

very sad
(03-28-2011 11:10 PM)Hokie30 Wrote: [ -> ]Washington, DC USA has ugly women for such a large/diverse city. I was in Philly couple weeks ago and that place crushes DC. Same thing go's for Baltimore and even some of the 2nd tier city's like Charlotte, which have prettier women than DC. Also, the ratio is so bad here that it seems like even the overweight women don't need to compete at all to get male's attention as they realise that guy's are desperate.

You must have been in the wrong places. Philly's one of the fattest cities in the US, DC one of the "least fat":

http://www.menshealth.com/fattestcities2010/
(03-28-2011 11:10 PM)Hokie30 Wrote: [ -> ]Washington, DC USA has ugly women for such a large/diverse city. I was in Philly couple weeks ago and that place crushes DC. Same thing go's for Baltimore and even some of the 2nd tier city's like Charlotte, which have prettier women than DC. Also, the ratio is so bad here that it seems like even the overweight women don't need to compete at all to get male's attention as they realise that guy's are desperate.

I agree. The problem with DC is that the more attractive women live in the surrounding suburbs. As far as those articles are concerned I never trust them. I use the eye test and being a long time resident of this area I can tell that DC is a women arrid environment. The ratio of attractive women to men is just horrible here.
(03-28-2011 11:10 PM)Hokie30 Wrote: [ -> ]Washington, DC USA has ugly women for such a large/diverse city. I was in Philly couple weeks ago and that place crushes DC. Same thing go's for Baltimore and even some of the 2nd tier city's like Charlotte, which have prettier women than DC. Also, the ratio is so bad here that it seems like even the overweight women don't need to compete at all to get male's attention as they realise that guy's are desperate.

LOL!

I have never heard a good thing about DC. I wonder why it is such a shithole? I guess only over-educated, chubby chicks stay or move to DC?
If I had a dollar for every guy who has never been to DC posting some "study" that says it's the best for singles.....

Ten minutes on a Saturday night is all you need to debunk that nonsense.
I have been in the DC area for about 10 years. The only beautiful women here are the international students or embassy workers who pop in and out. The black women here are generally very good looking, unfortunately most of them have been beaten down emotionally and physically so badly that its impacted their beauty. My buddy just moved here from Orlando and he is hating life! I'm so disappointed in the quality of girls here. My theory is that they are over worked like mules/horses----rode hard! Women don't appear to be happy. Even a 4 or a 5 can be considered appealing if they effin smile more often! Best bet for quality women is to simply take your weekend game to Philly or NY.
Wow. Well, I can now say that I'm certain which major east coast city I will not be re-locating to after graduation.

I had no idea DC was that bad. The descriptions you guys are throwing out sound similar to what I see here in college, and I don't want to deal with that again once my 4 year sentence is up.

I'd rather work in Charlotte or Philly.
(03-28-2011 08:37 PM)rudebwoy Wrote: [ -> ]Hungary, Budapest - I have been 3x and nothing to rave about women wise. The best ones were the street hookers who are crazy sexy, but I still have a thing for women of this country.

Sweden is still the best I have seen by a long shot, different strokes for different folks.


First of all,i wanna say hello to everybody cause i'm new around here.

Second,it seems like we weren't in the same Budapest.I lived in the hungarian capital for 3 three months,so i think i know them very well.

The average hungarian girls is:

Tanned,tight,lithe bodies,cute,long hair,intelligent,sweet.

I'm not saying they are flawless but definetley above average.
AND:Definetely NOT lacking in diversity.To be honest, the most diverse in europe as far as what i saw.

Watch out for the hookers,sometimes they can be veeeery mean!

I think your expression sounded a bit downgraded,in particular cause you mentioned the (let' be honest ,always overhyped swedish girls as comparison).

Of course taste's differ,but on the otherside i think the swedes aren't that special at all.

How i see the swedes(visited 2 times):

It seems that they put a lot of effort in their appeareance,which is good, but they often do it in a fake way.
They pretty much make it up with there "blondness".
They're not all blond at all but lot of the darker shaded ones bleach their hair too and fake tans are also visible in some cases.
They have ,thicker(not fat,just more meat) bodies,but(scandinavians in general) lacking on gracility,effeminacy.

Also i think their facial features are a bit on the masculine side.

In terms of looks i did not saw too much diversity,at least if you compare them for example to some eastern european countries.

So if you're not just into blond lookalike girls,besides some brunettes,there's not much to go for.

In my opinion, a bit of hype.

However, no offense, that's just what i experienced.
Vickers - touche my friend. The thing with Budapest I wasn't balled over or breaking my neck that much. I am on Hungarian girl dating spree right now, so I don't want to sound like a hypocrite. I guess I expected alot more than what I saw, however socially I think it would be a great place b/c it has not suffered the prague effect yet!

There is nothing more that I hate than girls who bleach there hair and are clearly not natural blondes. I would have to somewhat disagree with your assessment, I found my neck sore from twisting so much. But alot can be said for women that know how to dress and put themselves together, the Swedes have this down.
(03-29-2011 06:50 PM)rudebwoy Wrote: [ -> ]Vickers - touche my friend. The thing with Budapest I wasn't balled over or breaking my neck that much. I am on Hungarian girl dating spree right now, so I don't want to sound like a hypocrite. I guess I expected alot more than what I saw, however socially I think it would be a great place b/c it has not suffered the prague effect yet!

There is nothing more that I hate than girls who bleach there hair and are clearly not natural blondes. I would have to somewhat disagree with your assessment, I found my neck sore from twisting so much. But alot can be said for women that know how to dress and put themselves together, the Swedes have this down.

Maybe you expected more like what you saw.

But really, why was that,what did you expected ?

Hey, i mean the majority of the people i know and spoke with identify hungarian girls with pornstars.
(The hungarians i spoke with are sick of this at all)

Was that what you didn't get, just the hookers you liked on the streets(who mostly fit the "porn-slut" criterias)?

Really,i'm just curious,cause i did not saw too much bad points,to argue on anyway.
I went with my ex and she raved on about how hot the girls are! I am not saying they are ugly but the 3x I went I did not see much to write home about. I would rate them as cute!

I don't really associate them as being porn stars, I tend to give that title to czech girls.
(03-29-2011 07:30 PM)rudebwoy Wrote: [ -> ]I went with my ex and she raved on about how hot the girls are! I am not saying they are ugly but the 3x I went I did not see much to write home about. I would rate them as cute!

I don't really associate them as being porn stars, I tend to give that title to czech girls.

What's the difference IYO between cute and hot?

Are these two differrent attributes,or is hot an upgrade for cute?
What does a girl (or boy) need to be hot or cute?


So anyway that proves it that tastes are different.

But your ex, i mean a girl said that they are hot.

How can a girl rate a girl as hot?

I mean pretty or nice is okay,but hot?
(03-29-2011 07:30 PM)rudebwoy Wrote: [ -> ]I went with my ex and she raved on about how hot the girls are! I am not saying they are ugly but the 3x I went I did not see much to write home about. I would rate them as cute!

I don't really associate them as being porn stars, I tend to give that title to czech girls.

The only difference I saw between Hungarian and Czech girls is that the Hungarians seem to be somewhat curvier, with rounder booties. Majority of the Czech girls have the runway model kind of body.

There was a time, maybe 7 or 8 years ago when there were a lot of Hungarian girls in Toronto. They came in to work as strippers. And any stripclub you went to, the Hungarian girls were probably the hottest.
(03-29-2011 08:07 PM)ManAbout Wrote: [ -> ]
(03-29-2011 07:30 PM)rudebwoy Wrote: [ -> ]I went with my ex and she raved on about how hot the girls are! I am not saying they are ugly but the 3x I went I did not see much to write home about. I would rate them as cute!

I don't really associate them as being porn stars, I tend to give that title to czech girls.

The only difference I saw between Hungarian and Czech girls is that the Hungarians seem to be somewhat curvier, with rounder booties. Majority of the Czech girls have the runway model kind of body.

There was a time, maybe 7 or 8 years ago when there were a lot of Hungarian girls in Toronto. They came in to work as strippers. And any stripclub you went to, the Hungarian girls were probably the hottest.

IYO is there a difference between hot and cute?

Is hotness a national trait or does it only depend on the person himself?
I had Hungarian model gf for a couple years. Damn near flawless.

I spent a summer in Budapest with her family. I thought Hungarian girls were comme ci comme ca.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Reference URL's