Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
Author Message
Roosh Offline
Eagle
*******

Posts: 19,887
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 420
Post: #1
No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
Over 50 videos of a 15-year-old girl allegedly being statutory raped (at the minimum) was displayed on Pornhub. The authorities have taken no action so far. Why wouldn't the government take action against child porn? If they happen to be the source of it. This may be a strong clue that Pornhub is a government controlled entity, probably the CIA.

Quote:A 15-year-old girl who was missing for a year has been reunited with her mother after she spotted videos of her being sexually abused on Pornhub.

Christopher Johnson, 30, has been arrested in Florida after he got the teenager pregnant and posted nearly 60 videos of her online since she disappeared last November, police say.

The unnamed girl, who claimed Johnson took her to have an abortion, is now reunited with her mother after the videos were posted on Periscope, Pornhub, Modelhub, Snapchat and other websites months after she went missing.

Detective Adam Granit from Davie Police Department said: '(The girl) is either fully nude (or) topless in all videos and performs oral sex and sexual intercourse in at least two of the videos.'

In the videos, the girl was with a bald man police recognized as someone the girl was seen with in February when a convenience store clerk noticed her and called authorities.

...

The girl told detectives that many of the porn videos had been made at Johnson's apartment, according to a police report.

Johnson denied having sex with the girl, but 'the victim stated that she got pregnant from the defendant and he took her to the clinic to have an abortion,' Detective Adam Granit wrote in the report.

No other details about the victim were provided, including why she left home or where she is now.

Johnson is charged with lewd and lascivious battery on a child and is being held on a $75,000 bond at Broward County Jail.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...rrest.html

Pornhub actually verified her account:


Roosh
http://www.rooshv.com
02-13-2020 08:53 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 15 users Like Roosh's post:
Days of Broken Arrows, gework, budoslavic, Leonard D Neubache, Athanasius, Paracelsus, MusicForThePiano, Augustus_Principe, John Michael Kane, Handsome Creepy Eel, HermeticAlly, DJ-Matt, Samseau, fokm, Sankt Michael
Days of Broken Arrows Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,105
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 211
Post: #2
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
No arrests at Pornhub, but the cops in Maryland will put teenagers on the sex registry if they're caught "sexting" each other.

When companies exploit minors, there's no problem. When teens write naughty words to one another, they're marked for life.

Your government at work.
(This post was last modified: 02-13-2020 08:59 PM by Days of Broken Arrows.)
02-13-2020 08:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 29 users Like Days of Broken Arrows's post:
Roosh, Leonard D Neubache, budoslavic, Rob Banks, MusicForThePiano, bacani, billbudsocket, Buck Wild, BBinger, Augustus_Principe, Dr. Howard, estraudi, John Michael Kane, Handsome Creepy Eel, TigOlBitties, Bitter End, HermeticAlly, Brebelle3, DJ-Matt, Maurice Ravel, azulsombra, Samseau, Thersites, Dismal Operator, fokm, HOD, Australia Sucks, Sankt Michael, puckerman
Repo Offline
Hummingbird
*****

Posts: 3,418
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 24
Post: #3
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
Looks like she must have used a fake ID since they verify if the actors are 18+ years old. Regardless, my understanding is that sites like this are now responsible for the content they host, whether they did their due diligence or not. These laws are why Craigslist shut down their personal section, because they realized their was no way they could stop the flood of prostitutes.
02-13-2020 08:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Repo's post:
Leonard D Neubache, Rob Banks, Handsome Creepy Eel, Samseau, Sankt Michael
PapayaTapper Online
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,446
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 153
Post: #4
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
"Shit that happens in Florida" should be a thread

_______________________________________
- Does She Have The "Happy Gene" ?
-Inversion Therapy
-Let's lead by example


"Leap, and the net will appear". John Burroughs

"The big question is whether you are going to be able to say a hearty yes to your adventure."
Joseph Campbell
(This post was last modified: 02-13-2020 09:05 PM by PapayaTapper.)
02-13-2020 08:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like PapayaTapper's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Zex
Rush87 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,629
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 26
Post: #5
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
"A 15-year-old girl who was missing for a year has been reunited with her mother after she spotted videos of her being sexually abused on Pornhub".

The mother was looking at porn? Wait... The mother was looking at so much porn that she found her daughter amongst the millions of porn videos online. Hold on... Her daughters missing for a year and she's watching porn. Odd.
(This post was last modified: 02-13-2020 09:20 PM by Rush87.)
02-13-2020 09:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 9 users Like Rush87's post:
RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Captainstabbin, Latan, billbudsocket, Handsome Creepy Eel, JiggyLordJr, joost, Sankt Michael, Donfitz007
PapayaTapper Online
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,446
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 153
Post: #6
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
^See my post above yours

_______________________________________
- Does She Have The "Happy Gene" ?
-Inversion Therapy
-Let's lead by example


"Leap, and the net will appear". John Burroughs

"The big question is whether you are going to be able to say a hearty yes to your adventure."
Joseph Campbell
(This post was last modified: 02-13-2020 10:58 PM by PapayaTapper.)
02-13-2020 10:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like PapayaTapper's post:
Tactician, eradicator, Handsome Creepy Eel, JiggyLordJr, roberto
budoslavic Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,615
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 29
Post: #7
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
More tweets from @LailaMickelwait.



(This post was last modified: 02-13-2020 11:26 PM by budoslavic.)
02-13-2020 11:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like budoslavic's post:
gework, Leonard D Neubache, Roosh, Handsome Creepy Eel, Samseau, Phil619sd
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 13,423
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 216
Post: #8
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
Dupe

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
(This post was last modified: 02-13-2020 11:31 PM by Leonard D Neubache.)
02-13-2020 11:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 13,423
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 216
Post: #9
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
Satanic theocracy. I used to think the Iranians were exaggerating when they called America the great satan but I guess they were just ahead of the curve on the JQ.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
02-13-2020 11:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 10 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
aeroektar, MusicForThePiano, bacani, FilipSRB, Handsome Creepy Eel, HermeticAlly, DJ-Matt, redbeard, Australia Sucks, Sankt Michael
Gimlet Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 299
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 7
Post: #10
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-13-2020 09:13 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  
"A 15-year-old girl who was missing for a year has been reunited with her mother after she spotted videos of her being sexually abused on Pornhub".

The mother was looking at porn? Wait... The mother was looking at so much porn that she found her daughter amongst the millions of porn videos online. Hold on... Her daughters missing for a year and she's watching porn. Odd.

If your 15 year old daughter goes missing for this amount of time, scouring porn should be a part of the search.
02-13-2020 11:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Gimlet's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Tactician, sevenster
gework Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,551
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 78
Post: #11
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-13-2020 11:25 PM)budoslavic Wrote:  

The coomers will know.
Shut. It. Down.

This should become the slogan to shut down porn sites.
(This post was last modified: 02-13-2020 11:43 PM by gework.)
02-13-2020 11:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
wannable alpha Offline
Sparrow

Posts: 94
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 1
Post: #12
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
Pornhub does the bare minimum when it comes to removing non consensual porn. But is certainly more active in removing child porn. The system they have created results in such videos slipping through.
From https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opini...rnhub-down

"Pornhub is generating millions in advertising and membership revenue with 42 billion visits and 6 million videos uploaded per year. Yet it has no system in place to verify reliably the age or consent of those featured in the pornographic content it hosts.

In fact, all that is needed to upload pornography onto Pornhub is an email address. No government-issued ID is required, not even to become “verified” with its trusty blue checkmark that makes everything seem a-OK.

I know this, because I tried it.

It took me under 10 minutes to create a user account and upload blank test content to the site, which went live instantly. I could have then gone on to become Pornhub-verified, and all I would need to do is send a photo of myself holding a paper with my username. That’s it.

It is no surprise that Pornhub admitted to verifying the trafficked 15-year-old girl who was raped in 58 videos on its site. The official Twitter account for Pornhub wrote in response to the breaking story that the 15-year-old girl had been a verified member. After quickly realizing it had just admitted to assisting in her being trafficked, the account deleted the tweets, but the evidence of the admission still exists in this tweet response and in others."
02-14-2020 01:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes wannable alpha's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Captainstabbin Offline
Hummingbird
*****

Posts: 3,626
Joined: Apr 2015
Reputation: 23
Post: #13
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-14-2020 01:36 AM)wannable alpha Wrote:  It took me under 10 minutes to create a user account and upload blank test content to the site, which went live instantly. I could have then gone on to become Pornhub-verified, and all I would need to do is send a photo of myself holding a paper with my username. That’s it.

Reddit does the same thing. They usually want you to use a wrinkled piece of paper so it's harder to photoshop a different name.

I guarantee there are plenty of underage girls on every porn/gonewild/webcam/etc type site out there. They aren't all kidnapped and doing it against their will though. Most of them are just wanting attention or trying to support a drug habit.

It's sad to know there are that many women who are so damaged at such a young age.
02-14-2020 01:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Sombro Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,078
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 18
Post: #14
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-13-2020 11:38 PM)Gimlet Wrote:  
(02-13-2020 09:13 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  
"A 15-year-old girl who was missing for a year has been reunited with her mother after she spotted videos of her being sexually abused on Pornhub".

The mother was looking at porn? Wait... The mother was looking at so much porn that she found her daughter amongst the millions of porn videos online. Hold on... Her daughters missing for a year and she's watching porn. Odd.

If your 15 year old daughter goes missing for this amount of time, scouring porn should be a part of the search.



02-14-2020 02:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Sombro's post:
puckerman
MusicForThePiano Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 394
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 12
Post: #15
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
Porn sites shut down --> dad bod wankers cant wank --> pressure on the boiler rises --> no knowledge of game + lost in a satanic society --> random attacks and assaults in public increase ten fold --> authority gets bolder and cracks down on more freedoms

All a part of the dialectic. Seen this coming from a million miles away. Spend two generations getting the males hooked on porn, separate their sexual desire from reality, then create some drama, and cold turkey disconnect it all, all that redirected rage and fury and pent up angst now has nowhere to go so more gammas and sigmas will act out accordingly, making it seem like there needs to be more (((control))).

You would think that if there was no porn, male female relations would start to normalize, well this may be true, but not in a society where everything is engineered (((from a certain point of view))).
Porn was a jewish psy-op from the very first technicolor print to the final death throes among a fallen society where screams can be heard on every street at any hour of the day.

You can't cheat nature.
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2020 04:42 AM by MusicForThePiano.)
02-14-2020 04:41 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like MusicForThePiano's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Bitter End, Barron, Samseau, JiggyLordJr, 911, Australia Sucks, Sankt Michael
mattxyzx Offline
Pigeon

Posts: 1
Joined: Oct 2019
Reputation: 0
Post: #16
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
That's asbolutely disgusting. Imagine the hypocrisy... what if the perp was white?
02-14-2020 05:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
d'Aversa Offline
Banned

Posts: 370
Joined: Oct 2019
Post: #17
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
There's no way they will just shut down multi-million dollar industry because of that. Especially that it's controlled by you know who. Also keep in mind that this woman is a radical feminist that pushes the view that grown women are abused in porn industry despite consenting and receiving money. I doubt she'd have this consideration for men who have made bad decisions. Men have to bear the consequences while girls have their advocates and can do no wrong.
02-14-2020 10:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like d'Aversa's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Yatagan
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 13,423
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 216
Post: #18
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
I sometimes wonder, if you woke up to find yourself Emperor-King of your country and decided to set a bar for cultural standards at "the 1950's", what percentage of the population would enter into open revolt against you?

This is a really ugly question that raises it's head when topics come up like banning pornography or even merely banning easy access to it. Even so-called conservatives start getting all "let's not be too hasty, here!"

I'm beginning to accept that as a peoples we are so far gone that 95% would not concede to go back to the ways of their great grandfather's civilization. No matter the benefits it offered, they would fight tooth and nail to protect their own present vices.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2020 11:00 AM by Leonard D Neubache.)
02-14-2020 10:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 13 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Tactician, wannable alpha, Rob Banks, Yatagan, MusicForThePiano, Samseau, Professor Fox, Dismal Operator, TheFinalEpic, redbeard, Sankt Michael, Diocletian
Dr. Howard Offline
Peacock
******
Gold Member

Posts: 6,681
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 78
Post: #19
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
I'd like to add on to Roosh's CIA conspiracy theory. Lets say Pornhub, or something like it is a government asset. Here are the steps that would make it useful:
1. Let underage content slip through via insanely poor verification methods like they have right now
2. Track IP's and user accounts of who is using the site
3. Make the site free to a maximum amount of people use it

^ all of those already exist, now for the control part

4. Release to the press, in some sort of giant bust/operation that many of the people in popular videos on the site are underage, that the site is now being shut down and its records seized by the government.
5. When convenient, contact anyone who has used that website and let them know that the government now has it on record that they have been a consumer of child pornography. Threaten to press charges unless they cooperate with some other sham investigation.
6. Profit/imprison/enslave

Not likely you say? Back in the 80s when Traci Lords did nearly the same thing by using a fake ID to 'act' in adult films the producers etc. of the films she was in were arrested despite her being the one providing the forged identification.

Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
02-14-2020 11:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Dr. Howard's post:
Leonard D Neubache, Handsome Creepy Eel, Tactician, redbeard, 911, Sankt Michael
eradicator Offline
Peacock
******
Gold Member

Posts: 6,551
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 44
Post: #20
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
I don’t get it, but I’m not a lawyer. Pornhub is owned by mindgeek, or (((mindgeek))) if you like.

They are a Canadian company that own porn hub and youporn and other sites.

If a sex trafficking crime happens in Florida, USA and is uploaded onto the net to a site that a Canadian company owns, who exactly is in any sort of position to shut down a foreign company?

Who would file the charges, what would the crime be, and is there any legal precedent to shutting down a website?

I can think of Napster and whatnot, but this is a bit different as it involves user uploaded content, some of the performers are underage, and who exactly is going to police this?

And how is going on Twitter and tweeting “it needs to be shit down!” going to change anything. That is a bit line screaming out my window that a company in Canada should be shut down. Or that the internet should be shut down , who is going to shut down the internet

Team yoga pants
[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UoeQOC-5iw&t=143s[/video]
02-14-2020 11:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 13,423
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 216
Post: #21
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-14-2020 11:22 AM)eradicator Wrote:  I don’t get it, but I’m not a lawyer. Pornhub is owned by mindgeek, or (((mindgeek))) if you like.

They are a Canadian company that own porn hub and youporn and other sites.

If a sex trafficking crime happens in Florida, USA and is uploaded onto the net to a site that a Canadian company owns, who exactly is in any sort of position to shut down a foreign company?

Who would file the charges, what would the crime be, and is there any legal precedent to shutting down a website?

I can think of Napster and whatnot, but this is a bit different as it involves user uploaded content, some of the performers are underage, and who exactly is going to police this?

And how is going on Twitter and tweeting “it needs to be shit down!” going to change anything. That is a bit line screaming out my window that a company in Canada should be shut down. Or that the internet should be shut down , who is going to shut down the internet

It's rather simple. There are plenty of international treaties relating to the sale or general provision of child pornography. America files an extradition order for the people involved and Canada either complies or the matter goes to a tribunal.

It might be a crude example but if someone on the Canadian side of the border shoots across the border and kills someone on the American side it's not as if both nations have to sit there twiddling their thumbs "because the Canadian didn't kill anyone on Canadian soil and the Americans can't prosecute the Canadian guy unless he's in America".

Extradition for facilitating child abuse is common international law. So is shutting down websites.

If nothing is done about this then it's not because nothing can be done about it. It's because Trump's DOJ is soft on pedophiles and extra soft on Jewish child pornographers.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2020 11:47 AM by Leonard D Neubache.)
02-14-2020 11:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Rob Banks
Roosh Offline
Eagle
*******

Posts: 19,887
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 420
Post: #22
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-14-2020 11:22 AM)eradicator Wrote:  I don’t get it, but I’m not a lawyer. Pornhub is owned by mindgeek, or (((mindgeek))) if you like.

They are a Canadian company that own porn hub and youporn and other sites.

If a sex trafficking crime happens in Florida, USA and is uploaded onto the net to a site that a Canadian company owns, who exactly is in any sort of position to shut down a foreign company?

Who would file the charges, what would the crime be, and is there any legal precedent to shutting down a website?

I can think of Napster and whatnot, but this is a bit different as it involves user uploaded content, some of the performers are underage, and who exactly is going to police this?

And how is going on Twitter and tweeting “it needs to be shit down!” going to change anything. That is a bit line screaming out my window that a company in Canada should be shut down. Or that the internet should be shut down , who is going to shut down the internet

It's a simply matter for CIA to have front companies registered behind front companies. The "owner" or "CEO" is just a hired worker to the public face. I believe Elon Musk is also such an individual.

Roosh
http://www.rooshv.com
02-14-2020 12:07 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Roosh's post:
Leonard D Neubache, bacon, DJ-Matt, Rob Banks, MusicForThePiano, HOD
jeffreyjerpp Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 542
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation: 14
Post: #23
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-14-2020 10:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I sometimes wonder, if you woke up to find yourself Emperor-King of your country and decided to set a bar for cultural standards at "the 1950's", what percentage of the population would enter into open revolt against you?

This is a really ugly question that raises it's head when topics come up like banning pornography or even merely banning easy access to it. Even so-called conservatives start getting all "let's not be too hasty, here!"

I'm beginning to accept that as a peoples we are so far gone that 95% would not concede to go back to the ways of their great grandfather's civilization. No matter the benefits it offered, they would fight tooth and nail to protect their own present vices.

No chance the Cathedral would crack down on porn, ever.

It is one of their most important sedatives, along with junk food, mindless entertainment, alcohol, and actual pharmaceutical sedatives.

People in the USA, men especially, know they're getting screwed and the country is in a downward spiral. But what's the incentive to rebel when they have full stomachs, a place to sleep, unlimited delicious junk food, and HD videos of naked teenage girls?

The globalists placate every biological drive to prevent men from doing what they historically would do if they were hungry/horny/oppressed, which is freak the f*ck out and start rioting (or worse).

The moment American men start to get seriously hungry (for food, real sexual stimulus, political representation, or anything else), watch out. Things will get very serious, very fast.
02-14-2020 01:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like jeffreyjerpp's post:
kel, Handsome Creepy Eel, Leonard D Neubache, Tactician, MusicForThePiano, Dismal Operator, sevenster, Samseau
Dr. Howard Offline
Peacock
******
Gold Member

Posts: 6,681
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 78
Post: #24
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-14-2020 11:22 AM)eradicator Wrote:  I don’t get it, but I’m not a lawyer. Pornhub is owned by mindgeek, or (((mindgeek))) if you like.

They are a Canadian company that own porn hub and youporn and other sites.

If a sex trafficking crime happens in Florida, USA and is uploaded onto the net to a site that a Canadian company owns, who exactly is in any sort of position to shut down a foreign company?

Who would file the charges, what would the crime be, and is there any legal precedent to shutting down a website?

I can think of Napster and whatnot, but this is a bit different as it involves user uploaded content, some of the performers are underage, and who exactly is going to police this?

And how is going on Twitter and tweeting “it needs to be shit down!” going to change anything. That is a bit line screaming out my window that a company in Canada should be shut down. Or that the internet should be shut down , who is going to shut down the internet

Being a Canadian company makes me even more suspicious. Canada is a haven for organized crime and white collar lawlessness. There is a good reason that organizations like the Hells Angels, Sicilian Mafia and Chinese Triads have significant, public presences there. White collar laws are more toothless than regular criminal laws, which are already weak (armed robbery + assault with a weapon is like...5 years)

If you want to add a conspiracy layer, it would be easy for an international intelligence agency like the CIA or Mossad to 'allow' a criminal syndicate to operate a business like this. Its how the drug trade works in America america.

Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
02-14-2020 01:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Dr. Howard's post:
Leonard D Neubache, 911
Lunostrelki Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 488
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 16
Post: #25
RE: No action taken against Pornhub for displaying child porn
(02-14-2020 10:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I sometimes wonder, if you woke up to find yourself Emperor-King of your country and decided to set a bar for cultural standards at "the 1950's", what percentage of the population would enter into open revolt against you?

This is a really ugly question that raises it's head when topics come up like banning pornography or even merely banning easy access to it. Even so-called conservatives start getting all "let's not be too hasty, here!"

I'm beginning to accept that as a peoples we are so far gone that 95% would not concede to go back to the ways of their great grandfather's civilization. No matter the benefits it offered, they would fight tooth and nail to protect their own present vices.

I'm usually for liberty and constitutional rights, but I know no historical examples of a nation extricating itself from degeneracy because the people somehow collectively decided they wanted to be good again.

I was going to write up a long analysis of how technology and reliance on empirical thinking led us to abandon traditional order and morals, but it would be preaching to the choir. What really needs to be said is that our world is certainly under the rule of some evil specter that has lured us away from the memory of divine creation and truth.

The devil, as we should probably call it, got us to murder our sovereigns and let them be replaced by cabals of technically genius but morally ignorant charlatans we call the "globalist elites," but that is actually too flattering a term for these crooks, who have none of the greatness of vision or paternal ambition that the storied (if flawed and often brutal) rulers of the past had. The devil has conquered the world by leading man away from God, taking advantage of his sensory instincts through appeals to physical comfort, the visible fruits of science, and insatiable hatred rooted in a godless, jealous conception of "naturalistic" justice, rather than follow the benevolence of divine Law.

Man without divinity is spiritually dead. People have fallen to degeneracy before on a lesser scale, but the devil has detonated one spiritual atom bomb after another on human civilization. It is confident that it will mop up the stragglers in short order, and it takes young women like the ones described in the OP to be its sex slaves.

It's useless to try to win based on "proof," because empirical "proof" itself is just an instrument in the devil's toolbox, to be used the way that Orwell described the Party using engineering and science in subordination to doublethink. "Proof" is powerless, and the devil has power second only to that of God. Either you believe in and follow Him, or you don't. It's that simple. The enemy's gate is down.
(This post was last modified: 02-14-2020 02:11 PM by Lunostrelki.)
02-14-2020 01:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 11 users Like Lunostrelki's post:
Aurini, gework, Handsome Creepy Eel, Leonard D Neubache, Kid Twist, Rob Banks, MusicForThePiano, Monty_Brogan, 911, Sankt Michael, Samseau
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication