Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
Author Message
Brodiaga Offline
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,447
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 79
Post: #26
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-09-2014 03:12 PM)Deuce Anna Half Wrote:  6.5/10. WB if she wasn't lazy and nuts.

If this cunt is a 6.5 then most girls are 8 and above.

PS. WNB.
PPS. I just came back from SEA.
12-09-2014 06:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Brodiaga's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, amity
Brodiaga Offline
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,447
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 79
Post: #27
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-09-2014 03:37 PM)Agastya Wrote:  I don't understand her focus on white men in particular. Has she not walked into Apple's cafeteria and seen the hordes of Asian and Indian employees, many of whom work in higher positions? There may be a light racialized glass ceiling, but that could also be due to any number of factors. Silicon Valley CEO's definitely aren't discriminating against Indians, Chinese, etc. in their hiring practices, and slight underrepresentation in the boardroom doesn't equal some grand white supremacist conspiracy. I dislike how entire ethnic groups are completely ignored in feminist narratives.

It should also be noted that there are more female tech/science workers and fewer feminists among Indians and East Asians. What a coincidence.
12-09-2014 06:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Brodiaga's post:
infowarrior1, Feisbook Control, Sp5, Benoit, Ocelot, Handsome Creepy Eel
Blunt Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 782
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 15
Post: #28
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
Men are Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley is men.

Female participation is artificial.
12-09-2014 06:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Blunt's post:
Days of Broken Arrows, Feisbook Control, freeuser, Ocelot
RawGod Offline
Hummingbird
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 3,085
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation: 35
Post: #29
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
I'm willing to wait until women form their own alternative Silicon Valley, exclude all men, and create tech that changes the world.

Dr Johnson rumbles with the RawGod. And lives to regret it.

I have had this sig since 2015 and received thousands of post likes; yet not one person has commented on my sig. Perhaps you're familiar with the work it parodies? Let me know!
12-09-2014 06:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like RawGod's post:
SteveMcMahon, Feisbook Control, Benoit, Handsome Creepy Eel, Samseau, DJ-Matt
SteveMcMahon Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 588
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 104
Post: #30
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
Quote:Kane worked for five years in operations, technical marketing, and developer relations at a number of infrastructure companies in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Soapy tit-wank soft jobs, every one of them. The equivalent of being the guy who restocks the vending machines at Nasa claiming he works in the space industry. Do fuck off, darling.

Quote:Often frustrated by the unexamined assumptions of her industry and irritated by the incompetence of her managers,

Translation: entitled, troublemaking twat who quickly got found out and shown the door by every firm unlucky enough to hire her, which is why she worked for "a number" of companies in only five years. People who are good at their jobs don't change employer every few months.

Quote: she began blogging about technology culture and management dysfunction at startups

If you can't do, blog.

Quote:She maintains a lively and often profane Twitter persona

She's an arsehole and has too much time on her hands.

Quote:she caustically dismisses the arguments of the kinds of men who tried her patience when she worked for them,

Take THAT, bastards who gave me a job!

Quote:and generously amplifies the ideas of writers and thinkers she admires, mostly women and minorities.

She retweets SJW knob-gobblery from other embittered, barely-employable losers with a chip on their shoulders.

Quote:Silicon Valley actually is: a sexist and racist wealth distribution mechanism

[Image: giphy.gif?w=320]

Quote:Really important functions, like marketing, sales, business development, finance, and legal, become underfunded and under-resourced. We often end up with companies with great technology that are nonetheless dying because they could not execute from a nontechnical standpoint.

[Image: f4get.jpg]

Quote:Over 50 percent of women will leave by the halfway point in their careers

By choice. Because they have babies and don't like working 60 hour weeks in cramped server rooms with guys who smell of sweat and Doritos.

Quote:We are not getting hired, and we are not getting promoted, and we are being systematically driven out of the industry.

Says the woman who was hired by "a number" of Silicon Valley firms in the space of five years, but kept having to move on because she thought she knew better than the men who employed her.

Quote:the reality is that tech companies centralize power and wealth in a small group of privileged white men.

[Image: 2qa4x06.jpg]

Quote:On Twitter, you blow the minds of people who’ve never seen a feminist critique before

[Image: f4h0p.jpg]

Laugh7
12-09-2014 06:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 20 users Like SteveMcMahon's post:
Praetor Lupus, Grange, Dusty, Kingsley Davis, Professor Fox, spokepoker, El Chinito loco, DJ-Matt, Feisbook Control, billbudsocket, Benoit, Glaucon, Ocelot, Hedonistic Traveler, kazz, sixsix, bojangles, Handsome Creepy Eel, Patriarch, Gnu
SteveMcMahon Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 588
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 104
Post: #31
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-09-2014 06:25 PM)RawGod Wrote:  I'm willing to wait until women form their own alternative Silicon Valley, exclude all men, and create tech that changes the world.

Scientists Invent Dildo That Can Remove Spiders

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/scien...0907081886
12-09-2014 06:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like SteveMcMahon's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, SupaDorkLooza
perverted sage Offline
Banned

Posts: 131
Joined: Sep 2014
Post: #32
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-09-2014 06:26 PM)SteveMcMahon Wrote:  
(12-09-2014 06:25 PM)RawGod Wrote:  I'm willing to wait until women form their own alternative Silicon Valley, exclude all men, and create tech that changes the world.

Scientists Invent Dildo That Can Remove Spiders

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/scien...0907081886

They've actually spend money on thisHuh

[Image: gcbs.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 12-09-2014 07:01 PM by perverted sage.)
12-09-2014 06:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Grange Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 587
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 4
Post: #33
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-09-2014 06:58 PM)perverted sage Wrote:  
(12-09-2014 06:26 PM)SteveMcMahon Wrote:  
(12-09-2014 06:25 PM)RawGod Wrote:  I'm willing to wait until women form their own alternative Silicon Valley, exclude all men, and create tech that changes the world.

Scientists Invent Dildo That Can Remove Spiders

http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/scien...0907081886

They've actually spend money on thisHuh

[Image: gcbs.jpg]

That's a humor site, man, it's not real.

If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts. - Camille Paglia
12-09-2014 07:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Grange's post:
SteveMcMahon, Handsome Creepy Eel, amity
MrLemon Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,048
Joined: Aug 2011
Post: #34
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
I saw a woman like this take down an entire company once, based on false harassment charges. That company was HALF women. Who all lost their jobs. That's exactly how this works.

Rule for all managers: fire, fire, fire a chick like this as quick as you can. Do it in the first 3 months and she can't fuck you up. At some companies they literally have squads of examiners that look at the new employees to find the potential destroyers.
12-09-2014 10:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like MrLemon's post:
SteveMcMahon, Sp5, freeuser, Master Of My Own Kingdom
Feisbook Control Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 830
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 42
Post: #35
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
Agree2

Pretty much what I expected: entitlement, cultural Marxism, a desire to stifle opposition or anyone she doesn't like, etc.

What I love though is the unintended consequences: "What if we said that we are not going to invest in cisgender, heterosexual white men for the next 10 years, and we’re going to fund a diversity of technologists instead?"

Well I don't know, maybe they'd all move somewhere else? Elsewhere in the West? Singapore? Bangalore?

Further to that, who is "we"? People want money. It's as simple as that. Do you think people work in dirty, dangerous or boring jobs for the joy of it, or for social justice? Likewise, do people invest their money in risky places, often overseas (where there are differing and difficult laws) for the joy of it, or for social justice? It's laughable to me that she criticises programmers for being so unable to see the bigger picture, and therefore inhibit the success of companies, when she is even worse. Then again, she's a Marxist going on about all the usual failed approaches and ideologies.

Actually, more than that, just looking at her pictures I know that she's out of her fucking mind. You can't deal with crazy people and expect anything but craziness.
12-09-2014 11:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Feisbook Control's post:
SteveMcMahon
WD-40 Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 332
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 14
Post: #36
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
By now, men in tech know how the game works.

First girls laughed in your face all the way through high school and college because you- as a nerd- were presumptuous enough to want to date them. Instead, you got to grind through gazillions of math and comp sci problem sets and program until 5 am in the morning to meet your deadlines, while having to listen to girls getting plowed all night in the dorm room next door.

So finally you're out of college and spent several years working your way up through the cubicle farms, and now the bitches are screaming privilege.

Still can't get a date. Must be because you're a douchenozzle.
12-10-2014 12:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 9 users Like WD-40's post:
etshella, SteveMcMahon, freeuser, Feisbook Control, Handsome Creepy Eel, Grange, DJ-Matt, perverted sage, Troll King
AnonymousBosch Away
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,374
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 262
Post: #37
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-09-2014 11:10 PM)Feisbook Control Wrote:  Actually, more than that, just looking at her pictures I know that she's out of her fucking mind. You can't deal with crazy people and expect anything but craziness.

She's a classic narcissist: note her narcissistic fury in the tweets above when C.H. Sommers lightly - and I mean lightly - challenges her self-construct.

Why would anyone look at someone who responds to light criticism as an irrational, destructive force and take them remotely-seriously, let alone offer them a public and vocal platform for their narcissism? This person will be toxic to any team environment, male or female. Get them the hell out of your company structure as quickly as possible, because all they can add is toxicity.

This is the problem with SJW's. They believe in utter equality and lack the capacity for critical thinking, so they'll look at a race line up and think, "ooh, this is the horse for me!"

[Image: lame-horse-3.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2014 12:55 AM by AnonymousBosch.)
12-10-2014 12:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 9 users Like AnonymousBosch's post:
spokepoker, Benoit, SteveMcMahon, Feisbook Control, Ocelot, Hedonistic Traveler, bojangles, Handsome Creepy Eel, DJ-Matt
Shitlord Offline
Banned

Posts: 43
Joined: Oct 2014
Post: #38
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
She needs to get over her entitlement issues. Men don't owe her shit.
12-10-2014 04:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
freeuser Offline
Robin
*

Posts: 148
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 0
Post: #39
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
Disgusting. This makes my blood boil. I see nothing but hatred for men and bitternsbitterness in this freak. I mean look at what she says:

Quote: but the broader point is that I would like these old, rich, white male thought leaders to stop being the center of our field

Quote:And the third thing I’d like to change is money. Changing the way money flows in Silicon Valley is critical. VCs will give a startup run by women $100,000, but then the company that is run by privileged men gets $500 million. So I would change the allocation of venture capital. What if we said that we are not going to invest in cisgender, heterosexual white men for the next 10 years, and we’re going to fund a diversity of technologists instead?

I hope this is not serious and a parody like the Anne Gus articles. Please tell me this isn´t serious.
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2014 06:14 AM by freeuser.)
12-10-2014 05:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RawGod Offline
Hummingbird
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 3,085
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation: 35
Post: #40
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-10-2014 05:30 AM)freeuser Wrote:  Disgusting. This makes my blood boil. I see nothing but hatred for men and bitterns in this freak.

I noticed that too.


Attached File(s) Image(s)
   

Dr Johnson rumbles with the RawGod. And lives to regret it.

I have had this sig since 2015 and received thousands of post likes; yet not one person has commented on my sig. Perhaps you're familiar with the work it parodies? Let me know!
12-10-2014 05:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like RawGod's post:
SteveMcMahon, Feisbook Control, Ocelot, Handsome Creepy Eel, spokepoker
freeuser Offline
Robin
*

Posts: 148
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 0
Post: #41
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-09-2014 01:10 PM)Private Man Wrote:  She just wants fat checks deposited regularly because she has the feelz about this subject.

Sadly, some White Knight will step up and deposit those checks.

She already has been whiteknighted and received a check by the author of this pathetic interview:

Quote:(Disclosure: MIT Technology Review subscribes to Model View Culture, as it subscribes to many other publications, and Jason Pontin once made a small contribution to support an issue of the journal.)

Laugh4
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2014 05:46 AM by freeuser.)
12-10-2014 05:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like freeuser's post:
SteveMcMahon, Sp5, Feisbook Control, Handsome Creepy Eel
Benoit Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,155
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 21
Post: #42
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
Being mentally ill female with zero emotional control is the ideal way to encourage men to discriminate against you.

The fact that she still managed to get several Silicon Valley jobs and now runs a website and magazine would seem to demonstrate that people have been going out of their way to support her. And that's despite her public image being so toxic that any right-minded person would instantly avoid like the plague

"I'd hate myself if I had that kind of attitude, if I were that weak." - Arnold
12-10-2014 06:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Benoit's post:
SteveMcMahon, Sp5, Feisbook Control
SteveMcMahon Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 588
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 104
Post: #43
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-10-2014 05:44 AM)freeuser Wrote:  
(12-09-2014 01:10 PM)Private Man Wrote:  She just wants fat checks deposited regularly because she has the feelz about this subject.

Sadly, some White Knight will step up and deposit those checks.

She already has been whiteknighted and received a check by the author of this pathetic interview:

Quote:(Disclosure: MIT Technology Review subscribes to Model View Culture, as it subscribes to many other publications, and Jason Pontin once made a small contribution to support an issue of the journal.)

Laugh4


This is like all those hipster SJW faggots who were sending Zoe Quinn money via her Patreon, then licking her crusty e-twat by promoting her "game".

What the fuck is wrong with these people?

[Image: 1zczqiv.jpg]
AIDS?

[Image: nqpcsp.jpg]
Jason Pontin: doesn't even lift

Here's what SJW mangina Jason Pontin said on Twitter:

Quote:Nothing so confirms @shanley's critique than the anger and venom I received today for even interviewing her.

This is like saying "Nothing so confirms Herr Hitler's critique of the Jews than the anger and venom I received for interviewing him in Der Sturmer".
12-10-2014 06:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 7 users Like SteveMcMahon's post:
Benoit, Sp5, Feisbook Control, Ocelot, Hedonistic Traveler, Handsome Creepy Eel, amity
Sp5 Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,696
Joined: Feb 2013
Post: #44
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
Well, Milo's doing a profile of this toxic bitch, should be fun to read:

https://twitter.com/shanley/status/54238...13/photo/1
12-10-2014 06:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Sp5's post:
SteveMcMahon, Benoit
Benoit Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,155
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 21
Post: #45
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-10-2014 06:26 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  Well, Milo's doing a profile of this toxic bitch, should be fun to read:

https://twitter.com/shanley/status/54238...13/photo/1

Up now:
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Londo...en-Shanley
Quote:There are plenty of theories floating around about why Shanley hates white men, and in particular Marc Andreessen, so much. Whatever Matter discovered when it started asking questions about her, it was apparently enough to send her into paroxysms of panic and rage and move her to terminate their interview arrangements. To my mind, only one explanation covers all the bases. It's controversial, sure, but hear me out: Andreessen must be her real dad.

"I'd hate myself if I had that kind of attitude, if I were that weak." - Arnold
12-10-2014 06:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Benoit's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Feisbook Control
SteveMcMahon Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 588
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 104
Post: #46
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
(12-10-2014 06:26 AM)Sp5 Wrote:  Well, Milo's doing a profile of this toxic bitch, should be fun to read:

https://twitter.com/shanley/status/54238...13/photo/1

Milo opens an industrial-sized can of Whoop-Ass:

THE MADNESS OF QUEEN SHANLEY

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Londo...en-Shanley

Quote:Most developers in Silicon Valley know feminist agitator and Twitter troll Shanley Kane's name from Hacker News, a sort of reddit for the people building social networks. She and her supporters regularly appear to derail discussion and spew the sort of nonsense about "oppression" and "patriarchy" that leaves some asking whether her entire internet persona is a satirical creation designed to discredit feminism.

[Image: u5kj1dU.png]

Media types know her from Twitter, where she seems incapable of going a day without publishing a string of four-letter obscenities, and with which she holds forth at length and in ugly, childish language about the things she says are working against women and minorities in the technology industry: mainly, the "racism" and "sexism" of the "white men" she has dedicated her life to hating. (Investor Marc Andreessen is a particular bête noire.)

[Image: OkWN1zS.png]

Some of the battles Kane has fought on behalf of the sisterhood include objecting to the use of the device terminology "master" and "slave" (they're "oppressive", apparently), flouncing off websites for being called out on parasitic financial practices, telling women that if they have a male co-founder he will probably rape them one day and attacking prominent academics such as Vivek Wadhwa, who works tirelessly on behalf of women and minorities in Silicon Valley.

By any reasonable person's definition, and even by the standards of Silicon Valley, Kane is an abusive engine of discord, creating precisely the opposite conditions to those needed for happy co-operation between the sexes. So how did she land a feature-length profile in Matter, Silicon Valley's long-read organ of choice—even though her paranoia and control freakery eventually screwed up what would probably have been a fawning profile and left journalists and readers alike aghast at her childishness and self-destructiveness?

(In case you're not familiar with the story, follow those two links, which have to be read to be believed. Evidently Matter started calling around, asking people about Kane's personal and professional life in preparation for their profile of her and her work—doing journalism, in other words—and she threw a hissy fit and started defaming and smearing the journalists in question, who were respectable professionals, beyond reproach in their dealings with her.)

And why did the eminently reasonable Jason Pontin at MIT Technology Review make space for her in the pages of his esteemed magazine, and ask her a set of ludicrously softball questions she might almost have provided herself? What is it that these bright people are seeing in Kane's work that so eludes the rest of us?

"I wanted her point-of-view to be communicated as clearly as possible, and with all the feeling she brings to the subject," Pontin told me privately, reflecting the view of other journalists, who preferred not to be named, that Kane may be combative on Twitter but that she is doing "important work."

I'll take your word for it on "important," dudes. Mainly because I don't understand what most of her tweets mean. This, for example, is evidently designed for more erudite folks than me.

[Image: Mgy0DWN.png]

Anyway, that explanation about important work seems to miss the point: Kane's behaviour would not be tolerated by any other person in the technology industry, and it is not justified by any serious achievements. Only because she professes to be a feminist activist is her abusive behaviour put up with, and even tacitly endorsed, by the establishment.

This reflects the low expectations we've developed of feminists elsewhere in public life. That sounds unfair, because of course everyone believes in the fundamental equality of the sexes. But, these days, feminism has become associated with shrieking third-wave harpies, misandrists and lesbians, with the result that fewer than 1 in 5 women now identifies as a feminist. Modern feminism has lost the argument with ordinary women by openly declaring its hatred of men and getting hung up on weird academic irrelevances rather than, say, the plight of millions of genuinely oppressed women in the Middle East.

We effectively allow these far-left social engineers, who spend their lives trying to make men feel inferior about their gender and skin colour (yes, the irony is lost on them), to say what they want and behave as they please out of misplaced middle-class guilt—a sneaking suspicion that they probably have a point. But they don't: they're bullies and attention seekers, hawking snake oil.

One of the most infuriating things about women like Kane, according to female journalists I have spoken with over the past few years, is how her aggressive radicalism prevents ordinary people with more reasonable opinions from speaking up. She drowns out valid perspectives of other women with remorseless, relentless ideological fury, and leaves other women apprehensive about expressing their views.

Anyone who has spent time working in the technology industry, or writing about it, will be familiar with receiving a text or email from a female colleague that says: "Do you think I can say this? Or will Shanley go after me?" That is a horribly destructive legacy, far better befitting the word "oppression" than any of the meaningless trivialities Kane squeals and shrieks about on Twitter all day.

That's why so many people object to her voice being prioritised over others, and that's what observers mean when they call her an intolerant bully. Kane whines about the silencing of women by men, but it is she who has the greatest gagging effect on other ladies in the tech industry.

Kane's tweets paint a picture of a woman in abject misery and pain, who needs therapy more than she needs further public exposure. Drama is never far away. So it almost seems cruel for reporters and editors to continue to indulge her neuroses and personal mythologising. But Jason Pontin's sympathetic questioning, designed to avoid another Matter-style meltdown at least did readers the service of showing how poorly developed Kane's economic thinking is.

But why would technology companies act against their best interests and not hire and promote competent women or people from other marginalized groups?
It comes down to what their interests actually are. If their interests were better serving the world, using technology as a force for social justice, and equitably distributing technology wealth to enrich society … sure, they’d be acting against their interests. But the reality is that tech companies centralize power and wealth in a small group of privileged white men. When that’s the goal, then exploiting the labor of marginalized people and denying them access to power and wealth is 100 percent in line with the endgame. A more diverse tech industry would be better for its workers and everyone else, but it would be worse for the privileged white men at the top of it, because it would mean they would have to give up their monopoly on money and power. And they will fight that with everything they’ve got, which is why we see barriers to equality at every level of the industry.


Kane has been responsible for instigating or sustaining a number of witch-hunts, including one against Pax Dickinson, the fired former chief technology officer of Business Insider, who was thrown under the bus for some (admittedly idiotic and tasteless) Twitter comments. He sees his downfall as a free speech issue and Kane as a public menace.

"I wanted to work towards a tech industry that exhibited true tolerance of everyone and allowed free expression, but Shanley and people like her have made it impossible," Dickinson says. "The people in the tech industry who actually contribute to innovation need to realize that if they don’t fight back against the Shanleys of the industry, they’ll be allowing people like her to kill the goose who lays the golden eggs.

"[Former Mozilla CEO, forced out of his job for his objection to gay marriage] Brendan Eich is the canonical example. If they can force him out they can force anyone out, no matter their technological contributions."

There are problems not only with Shanley Kane's brand of feminism, which is sociopathic and divisive in the extreme, but with her approach to argument, too. It's not just that she doesn't like men discussing women's issues. She doesn't even like other women discussing them, complaining when she is not treated as the de facto authority on women in the technology industry, despite her loathsome treatment of everyone around her.

It's true that her writing at Model View Culture, the media startup she cofounded, and which she says is profitable, is more measured than her Twitter persona. And she was evidently on best behaviour for her interview in Technology Review, cognisant of how well her usual language would go down with that magazine's readership. But her standard mode of operation is vicious attack on anyone who does not agree with her pronouncements, and her lust for attention seems insatiable. When Kane says she wishes people would stop writing about her, it is obviously a brazen lie.

Perhaps if men knew a bit more about the sort of woman in tech their well-meaning initiatives support, they would be a bit more cautious about supporting the feminist cause. Kane, after all, isn't grateful for their help. "Men in tech don't support women in tech," she claims. "They assault, rape, harass, stalk us, make jokes about it, say silent about what happens to us."

That will come as a surprise to the thousands of hand-wringing liberals in the tech industry who bang on endlessly about the importance of redressing the gender balance in technology jobs. But in any case, the women in tech movement probably does women more harm than good, as prominent women in successful technology jobs, a category Kane has never belonged to, keep quietly admitting.

But there's no reasoning with someone who believes that sexism against men is structurally impossible. Here's Kane's solution to the gender problem in California's tech companies: "I would change the allocation of venture capital. What if we said that we are not going to invest in cisgender, heterosexual white men for the next 10 years, and we’re going to fund a diversity of technologists instead?" This is, apparently, a serious proposal.
Kane has no understanding of how business and investment work, so she ascribes everything that has gone wrong in her career and those of her fellow travellers to sexism. The prism of feminist rage robs her of self-awareness and the ability to think critically about how to make sure everyone has equal access to the tools of wealth creation—a premise with which few would argue.
The problem is, she's being taken seriously by the media as an authentic voice of feminism, when most women in the tech industry are as horrified by her as the men. As with any troll, in sucking oxygen and enthusiasm out of worthwhile discussions about, say, female education or minority hiring policies, Kane makes life worse for everyone.

Silicon Valley's most abusive, foul-mouthed and obnoxious critic is a good example of the sort of rabid harpy that puts normal women off careers in technology. Yet she and her hate-filled Twitter account are indulged relentlessly by the media establishment, given the sort of platform other campaigners can only dream of. It is mystifying.

I experienced some of her and her acolytes' language and tactics personally when I indicated that I would be writing this profile in what was, I thought, rather a neutral tweet. "Jesus fucking Christ," she broadcast to her followers. "Let the harassment campaigns begin!" And when a reader pointed out that journalism wasn't equivalent to harassment, she sent him a message that was 30% profanity.

In Kane's world, journalism is harassment, questioning is dissent, and dissent is unforgivable treachery of the noble struggle against heteropatriarchal oppression. Here's a typical example of what passes for debate in Shanley Kane's world: mindless fury, expletives and a total absence of argument, directed at a fellow feminist for the crime of questioning, crowned with an almost unbelievably infantile "your face" insult.

[Image: 3y0tDHS.jpg]

This is playground-level discourse at its most preposterous. But then, Shanley Kane doesn't like journalists or academics very much. We have an annoying habit of calling out hypocrisy, thinking for ourselves—rejecting the "listen and believe" approach favoured by feminist agitators—and, well, calling out bullies when we see them.

[Image: 5f5ZSuj.png]

It's reasonable to expect a journalist to look into, for example, suggestions that Shanley's home life doesn't quite match the furious public pronouncements she makes, especially given that she goes out of her way to ruin the lives of men like Pax Dickinson. She's said to be shacked up with a—yes, you guessed it—white male VC. And as for her statements about inherited wealth, well. I'll leave that one as an exercise to the reader.

There are plenty of theories floating around about why Shanley hates white men, and in particular Marc Andreessen, so much. Whatever Matter discovered when it started asking questions about her, it was apparently enough to send her into paroxysms of panic and rage and move her to terminate their interview arrangements. To my mind, only one explanation covers all the bases. It's controversial, sure, but hear me out: Andreessen must be her real dad.

I mean, what else could possibly explain such sustained bitterness and vitriol? The swearing, the name-calling, the foot-stomping? The more I think about it, the more it makes sense. She probably pays her half of the mortgage on whatever palatial Pac Heights digs she shares with her investor husband from daddy's millions, resenting every cent of her dependence on the success of others.

Andreessen, miserabile dictu, did not return a request for comment.
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2014 07:01 AM by SteveMcMahon.)
12-10-2014 06:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like SteveMcMahon's post:
Hedonistic Traveler, Handsome Creepy Eel, DJ-Matt, Feisbook Control, Troll King
placer Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 483
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 10
Post: #47
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
I have looked at and read some of the articles at Model View Culture. Shanley claims it's profitable, but I have my doubts.

It's a low-budget act. As just one example: Instead of licensing professional fonts from a font foundry, it uses free Google webfonts. The site doesn't even bother hosting them; they just point to Google's copy of the fonts. That's something a third-rate Wordpress blog would do, not a professional web magazine.

The site has no ads and its business model is selling $50 annual subscriptions. Anyone can claim they have zillions of subscribers, but its Alexa ranking is well above 100,000, which is hardly a popular site. RooshVForum.com, as a point of comparison, is in the top 20,000.

I'm proud to be a part of a forum that called out A Rape on Campus for being a lie long before anyone else questioned the story.
12-10-2014 07:50 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like placer's post:
freeuser, SteveMcMahon, Sp5, Feisbook Control
bojangles Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 4,180
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 57
Post: #48
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
It's not profitable, I reckon she's living off some simp

Don't forget to check out my latest post on Return of Kings - 6 Things Indian Guys Need To Understand About Game

Desi Casanova
The 3 Bromigos
12-10-2014 08:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like bojangles's post:
SteveMcMahon, placer, Feisbook Control, Gnu
sixsix Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 762
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 39
Post: #49
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
As we speak, she's having a twitter meltdown directed at that faggot author:

***

Jason Pontin (Verified account)
@jason_pontin
1/ What I'd say to @nero's profile of @shanley: her Twitter persona is a more-or-less indefensible shtick, an act; http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-Londo...en-Shanley
9:41 AM - 10 Dec 2014

Shanley ‏@shanley 7m7 minutes ago
[email protected]_pontin you're actual going to link people to a hate filled misogynist MRA takedown by a known harasser where YOU ARE A SOURCE?

Shanley@shanley 6m6 minutes ago
[email protected]_pontin and call my activism an "indefensible schtick"? Fuck you, fuck the MIT tech review

Shanley ‏@shanley 5m5 minutes ago
[email protected]_pontin you don't have the moral character to stand up for me for an interview *you asked for* that will get me harassed for weeks?

Milo Yiannopoulos ‏@Nero 5m5 minutes ago
@jason_pontin So if I start calling feminists disgusting cunts on Twitter but write intelligently on my blog, you’ll interview me too?

***

Hahaha, it's always awesome to see another White Knight being cannibalized by these mentally unbalanced freak shows.
It's beautiful, his next 2 tweets indicate he was sticking up for her. He thought her Twitter persona was just a thought-provoking act. Turns out, she's dead serious. Quelle surprise.

***

Jason Pontin (Verified account)
@jason_pontin
2/ It's a performance, meant to provoke. Read @ModelViewMedia, which is serious, and whose tone my Q&A with @shanley accurately captures.
9:44 AM - 10 Dec 2014

Jason Pontin (Verified account)
@jason_pontin
3/ I don't agree with all of @ModelViewMedia. But it is a serious critique of Silicon Valley, and must be read seriously.
9:55 AM - 10 Dec 2014
(This post was last modified: 12-10-2014 08:15 AM by sixsix.)
12-10-2014 08:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like sixsix's post:
SteveMcMahon, Sp5, bojangles, Benoit, freeuser, spokepoker
bojangles Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 4,180
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation: 57
Post: #50
RE: Bitter non-entity says men are the problem with Silicon Valley
Haha that guy is more of a faggot then the faggot

Don't forget to check out my latest post on Return of Kings - 6 Things Indian Guys Need To Understand About Game

Desi Casanova
The 3 Bromigos
12-10-2014 08:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication