Roosh V Forum
"Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Printable Version

+- Roosh V Forum (https://www.rooshvforum.com)
+-- Forum: Main (/forum-1.html)
+--- Forum: Everything Else (/forum-4.html)
+--- Thread: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate (/thread-74018.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6


"Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Baphomet - 09-06-2019 07:55 AM

"Marriage rates have steadily declined over the past few decades, and now researchers from Cornell University are offering up a possible explanation: there just aren’t as many economically-attractive men for unmarried women to meet as there used to be."


https://www.studyfinds.org/why-are-marriage-rates-down-study-blames-lack-of-economically-attractive-men/

Of course, it's the man's fault...

So let me get this straight. Women spend their prime child-bearing years prostituting themselves to their Corporate husbands, "you go girling" up the ladder. Meanwhile, the leftist feminist culture pounds men and boys into the dirt as "oppressors" and "rapists".

After riding the wave of cocks and femisocialfuckery, they look at the men that they and their harpy sisters have spent a decade pissing on, and suddenly they wonder where their "husband" (Translation - Piggy Bank) is going to come from?

[attachment=42344]


RE: "Econimically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marraiage Rate - Manbeline - 09-06-2019 08:02 AM

As long as the government sponsors and have women make more money being single than being married, it's going to remain that way. Child support, divorce rewards -- I dont even see divorce as a negative for women anymore -- they all favor women and take a huge chunk of money away from the producers of society. Women are easy cattle to the government. Men are more responsible and tend to be more critical of the government. This also makes them less lenient on them, which is why the government uses all these proceedings and a gun to make sure they get money from the producers, us, while eating the benefits of a consumer-heavy society, single mothers and women in general.

Knock down the government, we will get our wish overnight.


RE: "Econimically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marraiage Rate - Leonard D Neubache - 09-06-2019 08:03 AM

Maybe consider changing that user name, B.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Baphomet - 09-06-2019 08:26 AM

(09-06-2019 08:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Maybe consider changing that user name, B.

Sounds important to you! You want to pay for my gold upgrade so that I can?


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Leonard D Neubache - 09-06-2019 08:45 AM

(09-06-2019 08:26 AM)Baphomet Wrote:  
(09-06-2019 08:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Maybe consider changing that user name, B.

Sounds important to you! You want to pay for my gold upgrade so that I can?

Do you want to?


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Eazy_E - 09-06-2019 08:48 AM

If you were born in 1954, like my old man, by the time you got up to dating age, we still had a society where being able to hold a job and not being a drunkard or a wife beater was the threshold to be a good catch.

Now, you gotta be tall, not too much, just 6'4 or more. You need your own place, nothing opulent, just three bedrooms. A car, nothing fancy, just a German import. You need good credit, not to good, just 800 at minimum. You need money, not the sky, just six figures. Meanwhile, all she brings to the table is somebody else's kids.

Men are economic drop outs because the dating pool is a garbage can. Why kill yourself working 75 hours a week if it doesn't really buy you into a higher class of woman when it's a lot easier to work part time, live with three other dudes, and numb the pain with weed, porn, and video games? Garbage women create garbage men, not the other way around.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Dr. Howard - 09-06-2019 08:55 AM

(09-06-2019 08:45 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  
(09-06-2019 08:26 AM)Baphomet Wrote:  
(09-06-2019 08:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Maybe consider changing that user name, B.

Sounds important to you! You want to pay for my gold upgrade so that I can?

Do you want to?

If Leonard pays for it, he also gets to pick your new name.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - sanbruno - 09-06-2019 09:12 AM

Women overwhelingly work in leach industries and paper pushing roles, yet have the gall to look down upon the men that actually add value to our economy and keep the lights on in their open format, feminized offices. Unless you are a fire fighter or law enforcement, blue collar work is almost completely written off by modern women.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - scorpion - 09-06-2019 09:13 AM

(09-06-2019 08:48 AM)Eazy_E Wrote:  Men are economic drop outs because the dating pool is a garbage can. Why kill yourself working 75 hours a week if it doesn't really buy you into a higher class of woman when it's a lot easier to work part time, live with three other dudes, and numb the pain with weed, porn, and video games? Garbage women create garbage men, not the other way around.

This is the crucial point. Men are capable of creating surplus economic value through their labor, which they have historically traded to women for sex and family formation. Male economic surplus is the basis of family formation. Without the economic surplus that allows a man to provide for a family, women will do the logical thing in that scenario: try to get impregnated out of wedlock by a violent alpha male and hope the child is resilient enough to survive with limited parental investment (see: the lower-class black community). Conversely, if men know they are unable to generate an economic surplus sufficient to allow them to successfully form a family with a quality woman, they will opt out of the game entirely. They will deliberately choose to generate only the bare minimum required to maintain whatever standard of living they personally desire.

If we want to encourage family formation we need to encourage men's ability to generate economic surplus, which means shutting down immigration, de-funding the bloated, female-centric university system and removing all affirmative action and quotas for the hiring of women.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - monsquid - 09-06-2019 09:25 AM

"Additionally, women on both the low end and high end of the socioeconomic spectrum face a harder time finding an economically compatible mate."

What's going on here? You would think that the women on low end would be happy to find anyone who makes more money, excuse me 'economically attractive,' than themselves. This just shows you how delusional women are.

Like Greg Adams says on YouTube, once she's had a taste of Chad or Tyrone on the cc, she can never go back. Yes, even when it makes all the sense in the world to be with that decent normal guy when she's dead broke and hitting the wall at 180mph going backwards, she will still harbor dreams of trying to lock down her dream Chad or Tyrone. Of course they want nothing to do with her.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Manbeline - 09-06-2019 09:29 AM

(09-06-2019 08:48 AM)Eazy_E Wrote:  Why kill yourself working 75 hours a week if it doesn't really buy you into a higher class of woman when it's a lot easier to work part time, live with three other dudes, and numb the pain with weed, porn, and video games? Garbage women create garbage men, not the other way around.
Welcome to why socialism kills. It destroys incentives.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - [email protected] - 09-06-2019 10:48 AM

When 4chan regulars have a greater insight of sexual market dynamics than ivy league researchers you know you are in clown world.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Leonard D Neubache - 09-06-2019 11:05 AM

(09-06-2019 08:55 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  
(09-06-2019 08:45 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  
(09-06-2019 08:26 AM)Baphomet Wrote:  
(09-06-2019 08:03 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Maybe consider changing that user name, B.

Sounds important to you! You want to pay for my gold upgrade so that I can?

Do you want to?

If Leonard pays for it, he also gets to pick your new name.

Nah. As long as it's not something equally blasphemous I don't really care. He can change it to "Leonard is a chump" if he likes. But the avatar has to go in the bin with the old name.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - infowarrior1 - 09-06-2019 11:20 AM

@scorpion

And at the same time gradually pare back all welfare that subsidizes single motherhood.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - worldwidetraveler - 09-06-2019 11:25 AM

Tucker has been hammering on this topic for some time. I don't see it getting any better. More women are attending college. More women in management. I am reading women are the big winners in the Trump economy. All sorts of programs geared towards helping women when it comes to work. Makes it harder for them to find a "suitable" mate once they achieve some success.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Kid Twist - 09-06-2019 11:26 AM

(09-06-2019 09:13 AM)scorpion Wrote:  
(09-06-2019 08:48 AM)Eazy_E Wrote:  Men are economic drop outs because the dating pool is a garbage can. Why kill yourself working 75 hours a week if it doesn't really buy you into a higher class of woman when it's a lot easier to work part time, live with three other dudes, and numb the pain with weed, porn, and video games? Garbage women create garbage men, not the other way around.

This is the crucial point. Men are capable of creating surplus economic value through their labor, which they have historically traded to women for sex and family formation. Male economic surplus is the basis of family formation. Without the economic surplus that allows a man to provide for a family, women will do the logical thing in that scenario: try to get impregnated out of wedlock by a violent alpha male and hope the child is resilient enough to survive with limited parental investment (see: the lower-class black community). Conversely, if men know they are unable to generate an economic surplus sufficient to allow them to successfully form a family with a quality woman, they will opt out of the game entirely. They will deliberately choose to generate only the bare minimum required to maintain whatever standard of living they personally desire.

If we want to encourage family formation we need to encourage men's ability to generate economic surplus, which means shutting down immigration, de-funding the bloated, female-centric university system and removing all affirmative action and quotas for the hiring of women.

I have to reply and re-post these two great posts. Well done, gentlemen.

Thumb up


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Renzy - 09-06-2019 11:35 AM

Just more proof that women aren't going to be happy no matter what, and that they don't understand the incentives their behaviors create (or don't care) so there's no point listening to them or letting them influence public policy.

When men earn more than women and you have lots of "economically attractive" men, women complain that it's proof of systemic sexism since there's more high earning men than women, and argue that this is "why we need feminism" to close the pay gap. When it's reversed and you've got women earning as much or more then men, then they'll bitch and whine about how there's not enough "economically attractive" men because every wahmen is entitled to a stable of eligible bachelors who make at least as much, preferably more, than she does.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Bienvenuto - 09-06-2019 12:02 PM

(09-06-2019 11:35 AM)Renzy Wrote:  Just more proof that women aren't going to be happy no matter what, and that they don't understand the incentives their behaviors create (or don't care) so there's no point listening to them or letting them influence public policy.

When men earn more than women and you have lots of "economically attractive" men, women complain that it's proof of systemic sexism since there's more high earning men than women, and argue that this is "why we need feminism" to close the pay gap. When it's reversed and you've got women earning as much or more then men, then they'll bitch and whine about how there's not enough "economically attractive" men because every wahmen is entitled to a stable of eligible bachelors who make at least as much, preferably more, than she does.


Women:
We should get to have our cake and eat it too...
(Example number - 1,345,678,974,329)


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - SilentOne - 09-06-2019 12:11 PM

They want equal pay, but for their husbands to make more than them...
Wtf


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - nek - 09-06-2019 12:16 PM

(09-06-2019 11:35 AM)Renzy Wrote:  Just more proof that women aren't going to be happy no matter what, and that they don't understand the incentives their behaviors create (or don't care) so there's no point listening to them or letting them influence public policy.

When men earn more than women and you have lots of "economically attractive" men, women complain that it's proof of systemic sexism since there's more high earning men than women, and argue that this is "why we need feminism" to close the pay gap. When it's reversed and you've got women earning as much or more then men, then they'll bitch and whine about how there's not enough "economically attractive" men because every wahmen is entitled to a stable of eligible bachelors who make at least as much, preferably more, than she does.

Odd this is, we do the same with children, but we don't let them vote.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - tugofpeace - 09-06-2019 12:20 PM

(09-06-2019 12:11 PM)SilentOne Wrote:  They want equal pay, but for their husbands to make more than them...
Wtf

lol. mind = blown


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - mr_ks - 09-06-2019 12:21 PM

As women continue to dominate the corporate landscape, higher-quality men will continue to leave and will be marked by lower incomes compared to their female counterparts. Quality men do not compete with women, so will have no desire to spend time in the corporate environment, prefering a life with more flexibility and free time, and lower incomes atleast until later on. Therefore, modern man should focus on developing his personality, character, business knowledge and experiences, so he can be a better partner to financially secure career-women who have worked for many years and have financial stability.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - balybary - 09-06-2019 12:24 PM

They want equal pay, but for their husbands to make more than them...

And the rich husband has to go back from work early everyday to entertain/take care of his entitled wife


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Captainstabbin - 09-06-2019 12:45 PM

(09-06-2019 09:13 AM)scorpion Wrote:  If we want to encourage family formation we need to encourage men's ability to generate economic surplus, which means shutting down immigration, de-funding the bloated, female-centric university system and removing all affirmative action and quotas for the hiring of women.

Along with all welfare programs as infowarrior1 said - but it'll never happen. Men don't have the stomach for it. Things will "progress" toward an economic doomsday, then, when the free money dries up, women will find their place and men will either become men again or die off. Traditionally-minded men will pick up the pieces and start again.

The cycle has existed since society began.


RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate - Eazy_E - 09-06-2019 01:28 PM

I'll be the first to admit I'm a shit stain on the underwear of life. I just turned 33, live with my mother and sister, dropped out of college, and prefer to work easy jobs. I mean, my old man died six years ago this Christmas, so I like being around to help my mother so it's beneficial for both of us, but.. the other side of the coin is, I have the opportunity to travel and have fun that I wouldn't otherwise. I'm posting this from Budapest. I quit my job a month ago so I could go backpacking in Colorado and then I'll be in Europe for two months and after I get back, I'll probably do a little road trip in the states because October is a good outside time.

But that's what life is for me, I'd work from 7-3, leave work and then go mountain biking or fishing or do stuff around the house. It's honestly pretty good.

And I'm supposed to give that up for a fat American bitch with a lot of miles on the odometer? Sorry, that's not a fair trade.