Post: #112

(01-01-2017 10:21 AM)chakalaka Wrote:  

(01-01-2017 10:07 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  It's been about 70 years.

Just about everyone involved is dead of old age.

Sure as hell there is nobody on this forum that actually suffered directly.

"Feelz" is not a relevant argument for shutting this discussion down.

If people want to make a thread discussing why the sky is actually down and the ground is actually up then more power to them. Stifling discussion has long been demonstrated to compound ignorance and breed discontent.

It is always better to air this stuff and bring evidence to light.

Your distorting what I wrote. And your being intelectually dishonest for the sake of winning an argument.

I didn´t say" directly" but family members. I don´t expect a survivor camp to be posting in RVF.

There was already a family member who mentioned an aunt being killed. This for me is both fresh and close to home.

Secondly didn´t advocated the discussion being shut down. I actually said:
"But obviously should be discussed freely. " The fact it´s illegal to discuss it works against it. Because it gives a vibe of something to hide.

You can´t reproach people who had innocent family members killed getting passionate about a discussion of how they´re were killed. Since the important is they were killed. If by gas or bullets can be discussed. But it´s irrelevant in the bigger picture. Even if the number is less (like the red cross report). It´s still a massacre. The fact the numbers are less doesn´t take away the monstrosity of the event.

What I would like to understand is both nazism and communism can de defeated. Most improtant than forbidding the holocaust discussion would be to forbidden communism. Because communism is the root of all evil. And probably was the cause of Nazism. Which was the cause of the spread of communism. Sooner than later I hope to be possible start spending money to defeat communism and any form of excessive statism.

I'm not blaming you of doing it deliberately, but you posted something and I replied, then a minute or two later your post was edited.

I edited mine in reply to some extent but you would be well aware of the what your original post read and what the gist of my post was responding to.

In future I will quote the text directly to avoid this confusion or reply only after an hour has passed. Generally speaking though I prefer to keep threads clear of excessive quotations.