Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
Gold digger experiment
Author Message
Hooligan Harry Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 879
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 67
Post: #21
RE: Gold digger experiment
(10-31-2011 10:11 AM)Roosh Wrote:  But a lot of guys have a line with chicks who want "sponsorship" where you're basically paying for a whore. If she starts expecting shit in order to put out, I have to bow out. Maybe I'll relax this line when I get older (I'm sure I'll have to), but even if I was rich now I don't think I could play that sponsorship game, even if that meant my quality was a bit less.

Im in the same boat. The thought of paying for it is a bit of a mental thing I guess, although at the end of the day we are always paying for it in some capacity. Either in time, effort, emotionally or financially, we are going to pay. Still, not for me just yet either although I may be open to the idea when I am older. Im still going to want to fuck 22 year olds when Im 60, but I doubt I am going to want to have them in my life for anything else but busting a nut.

I think there would be unseen benefits of something like this though. The most important of which is that they understand the score. You are going to fuck other women and she needs to keep herself in order or she will be replaced.

I think for me what was the most interesting thing that came from this though is that it shows how women react to high status men. The sort of guy in that profile would be rare for most of them and they know it. The reaction could only be described as "beta behaviour" from a womans perspective.

No different to what sort of response a very good looking chick gets on a dating site. Tons of men fawning over her and throwing compliments her way.

Moma Wrote:Hooligan, bear in mind that these lizards can also hook these ballers by getting pregnant. That's game for lizards. The Eddie Murphy/Posh Spice or Nas/Kelis sting still has me flabbergasted.
50K per month for the child.

So it ultimately works best if the guy gets his shyt snipped because I know with one's house swarming with these 8's (the first lizard you posted is the type that can get ships to sail for war), a baller will want to hit that raw from time to time.

Many of us can achieve a similar lifestyle (merely go to a third world country where you can hit dimes for tuppence LITERALLY) so one knows what it is like to be a millionaire of pussy per se.

Damned right Im gonna be fuckin raw!!!!

I agree and disagree really. The threat of pregnancy is always looming over your head if you bang them raw. I have a problem in that as I get older Im getting lax with condoms. I always pull out, but still. If its a current fuck buddy or a gold digger, the odds of them falling pregnant to trap you are pretty much the same.

Based on what I have seen, the best way to minimise your odds is to date younger chicks!!! As soon as women hit 30 they start to approach baby making mania. If you are banging older broads you are in a far higher risk category when it comes to pregnancy. Sperm donors are not needed when they are 23 and have their "careers" ahead of them. They are most certainly needed when they are 32 and they realise that career is a crock of shit. I think that when they are younger, if they fall pregnant, its normally going to be a mistake. If they are older, its far more likely that it was calculated.

But its always a risk, I agree

With regards to having this sort of lifestyle in a third world country? Again, not unless you are paying for it. The exchange of money is actually a clincher in the whole dynamic I think. Most women are not going to be prepared to share you or have you fuck other women in front of them. Sure you might get a few that are bisexual, but you are ALWAYS dealing with quasi relationship shit. You simply cannot get away from it.

Women in third world countries are also far more conservative than the sluts in the west. Our women are always DTF and one night stands and sex only relationships are nothing unusual for them. In third world countries you have to navigate and manage your women far more I have found and they are going to be clingy.

Its almost as if paying draws a line in the sand with them. I think the only way this could be matched without cash is if you are very famous. Like Leonardo diCaprio or George Clooney type famous. They would resign themselves to the fact that there is simply no way they could contain him.

Vacancier Permanen Wrote:That's an awesome yet extremely telling experiment HH. I am not the least surprised the least by the results. And totally agree with you that when you reach a certain level of success/money, game becomes quite irrelevant as these hot babes/bitches will come to you and look for you.

I disagree with that. There is no doubt money makes it easy to pick women up and also fuck them, but if you are a useless chud with a fat wallet you are going to be taken advantage of. Women dont respect weak men no matter how good looking or wealthy they may be, so game is still important.

There is balance in everything. Money at this level is a game changer, although all it allows you to do is dictate everything on your terms. Managing that though is still going to require a way with bitches and if you have zero game you are going to have problems.

Money is a short cut, its not a long term solution to everything.

Jalous Wrote:So why don't you take the experiment further and meet up with some of these girls? Play the part, dress well, meet them in an expensive hotel lobby and just act really aloof. If they're as keen as you say there is a good chance that they'll throw themselves at you.

Dude no doubt you probably could scam your way into a few pairs of panties. I do think though that this is quite common already and you probably find that the site is packed full of posers.
10-31-2011 10:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Hooligan Harry's post:
Icarus, Vacancier Permanent, Tactician, Built to Fade
Post Reply 


Messages In This Thread
Gold digger experiment - Hooligan Harry - 10-31-2011, 01:57 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - endobendo - 10-31-2011, 07:58 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - babelfish669 - 10-31-2011, 03:27 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Luckystar - 10-31-2011, 08:42 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Roosh - 10-31-2011, 10:11 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - joehoya - 10-31-2011, 01:59 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Gmac - 10-31-2011, 06:18 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Hooligan Harry - 10-31-2011 10:16 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - seniol - 06-25-2016, 03:03 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Moma - 10-31-2011, 02:14 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Jalouse - 10-31-2011, 02:59 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Timoteo - 10-31-2011, 03:07 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Roosh - 10-31-2011, 04:39 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Gmac - 10-31-2011, 04:55 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - MikeCF - 10-31-2011, 04:58 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Gmac - 10-31-2011, 06:41 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - esperar - 01-15-2012, 08:48 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Timoteo - 10-31-2011, 10:04 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Excelsior - 11-01-2011, 01:20 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Lief - 11-01-2011, 05:56 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - themaxx - 11-13-2011, 02:59 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - UrbanNerd - 10-31-2011, 09:15 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - metalhaze - 10-31-2011, 10:30 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - scorpio - 10-31-2011, 11:48 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - ColSpanker - 11-01-2011, 08:17 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - mammal - 01-18-2018, 11:47 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - justgottaask - 11-01-2011, 04:30 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Roosh - 11-01-2011, 05:27 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Jalouse - 11-01-2011, 06:23 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - babelfish669 - 11-01-2011, 09:50 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - pitt - 11-02-2011, 02:52 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - SamBellamy - 11-02-2011, 11:46 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Prowl - 11-02-2011, 12:07 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - el mechanico - 11-03-2011, 10:18 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - James_London - 11-09-2011, 02:54 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Deluge - 11-13-2011, 04:55 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - wolf - 01-25-2012, 06:07 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Deluge - 01-25-2012, 06:37 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - pitt - 11-03-2011, 03:11 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - SamBellamy - 11-03-2011, 04:23 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - gonzoman925 - 11-03-2011, 06:20 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - ccurtis189 - 11-03-2011, 09:14 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Wizard - 11-04-2011, 06:41 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Steven Lurkel - 11-04-2011, 06:44 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Duke Castile - 01-25-2012, 03:56 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Raoul - 02-01-2012, 08:36 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - esperar - 06-27-2012, 12:11 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - keepreal - 06-30-2012, 07:06 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Atlantic - 09-07-2014, 11:55 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Lovecraft - 09-07-2014, 01:19 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Atlantic - 09-07-2014, 03:00 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - runsonmagic - 09-07-2014, 09:04 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Atlantic - 09-07-2014, 09:08 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - runsonmagic - 09-07-2014, 10:09 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Suits - 06-01-2016, 08:36 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - FastBang King - 01-09-2018, 11:43 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - polar - 01-10-2018, 11:24 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - C-Note - 01-09-2018, 11:54 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - polar - 01-14-2018, 09:48 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Akwesi - 01-11-2018, 05:17 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - puckerman - 01-12-2018, 09:15 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - xxMarco - 01-13-2018, 05:34 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - treypound - 01-13-2018, 08:49 AM
RE: Gold digger experiment - Tactician - 01-19-2018, 07:53 PM
RE: Gold digger experiment - jabba - 02-01-2018, 02:51 AM

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication