Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
Tinder App
Author Message
zamfir112 Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 213
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #7201
RE: Tinder App
Poland is fine.Sweden is like USA on steroids. the welfare state and making prostitution illegal plus the influx of male migrants make things here awful.really really bad.pussy is way overvalued here
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018 11:05 AM by zamfir112.)
11-06-2018 11:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Sender Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 128
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 7
Post: #7202
RE: Tinder App
(11-06-2018 10:16 AM)griffinmill Wrote:  
(11-06-2018 05:47 AM)Sender Wrote:  My matches tend be older -- around 30ish -- so I'm leaning towards long-term. However, on the other hand in his last podcast Roosh seemed to think that polish girls prefer darker skinned guys (which I am one) for short term or ONS.

Not quite sure how to play it.

I've had lots of success in Poland and I'm Irish; blue-eyed and pale-skinned.

I have heard from many guys that girls there prefer darker guys. But it hasn't hampered my success.

I think Roosh's point in that particular podcast was that they see darker skinned guys only suitable for flings rather than LTR. Not that they prefer them overall -- or even prefer them for flings ABOVE fair skinned dudes. To phrase it more accurately, dark(er) men ain't husband material.

I'm sure there's plenty of whit(er) guys getting polish bangs for both the short and long-term.

Treat any relationship like you're Bill Murray in 'Ground Hog's Day'

In control of my density
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018 12:18 PM by Sender.)
11-06-2018 11:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
asiaslayer Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 130
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 2
Post: #7203
RE: Tinder App
For those of you saying don't super like girls or you'll appear "beta"...

How else are you supposed to get on their radar with the thousands upon thousands of chumps already liking them? They're not going to swipe through all these dudes. At least super liking her will make you more noticeable to her. At least for Asia, I've had better luck super liking a girl than not.
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018 11:26 AM by asiaslayer.)
11-06-2018 11:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes asiaslayer's post:
quaker13
corsega Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,044
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 31
Post: #7204
RE: Tinder App
(11-06-2018 09:37 AM)zamfir112 Wrote:  Tinder is dead in sweden.i have pro photos.look like 7/10 sometimes 8/10.and i only match with 3-5 girls out of 100 swipes.useless these girls are not realistic at all.
im deleting the app

If you had actually read the thread before chiming in with your uninformed opinion, you would know that matching with 3-5 girls out of 100 swipes is FAR above average.

I'll repeat. The average guy matches with one girl per 1000 swipes.

You are doing 30-50x better than the average guy on Tinder.

Good riddance, though. Less competition for me.

(11-06-2018 05:47 AM)Sender Wrote:  What do you guys think is the best way to deal with backstory when pipelining? I'm in Poland next week and not sure whether to tell matches that I'm only staying a couple of weeks or to imply that I'll be visiting regularly for 'work reasons'.

Roosh's take in his new book is this:

If a girl is responsive, she’ll likely ask for your backstory of why you’re visiting or what you do. You can play the tourist angle or hint that you’re developing long-term ties to her country. The sluttier a girl, the more she won’t mind banging a tourist for a few days, but it helps to plant the seed that you may stay a while so she has a reason to invest in you. Weave a story where it’s not obvious you’ll bang her and then immediately leave the country.


My matches tend be older -- around 30ish -- so I'm leaning towards long-term. However, on the other hand in his last podcast Roosh seemed to think that polish girls prefer darker skinned guys (which I am one) for short term or ONS.

Not quite sure how to play it.

Keep it as vague as possible. Only reveal your cards when she presses you on it. Most girls won't. Then, she believes whatever she wants to believe, and you have the greatest chance of success with the greatest number of girls.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018 12:16 PM by corsega.)
11-06-2018 12:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes corsega's post:
Sender
True Balla Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 177
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 4
Post: #7205
RE: Tinder App
(11-06-2018 11:25 AM)asiaslayer Wrote:  For those of you saying don't super like girls or you'll appear "beta"...

How else are you supposed to get on their radar with the thousands upon thousands of chumps already liking them? They're not going to swipe through all these dudes. At least super liking her will make you more noticeable to her. At least for Asia, I've had better luck super liking a girl than not.

I always use my superlikes and get results.
11-06-2018 01:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
jacknap Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 166
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #7206
RE: Tinder App
(11-06-2018 03:53 AM)corsega Wrote:  
(11-05-2018 05:43 PM)jacknap Wrote:  Anyone else get the error where there's 'no one new to swipe on' but there almost certainly is.

Think it's low key shadow ban? Often times it goes back to normal though or my account is under review? I noticed tinder is getting more relaxed on the banning finally. Probably realizing being ban happy on customers will eventually lead to zero revenue. So props past 2 weeks or so tinder. It's been this way since yesterday though, usually fixes a lot faster. I still can message and I get a few matches trickle in still 1-3. Not nearly as much as when I can actively swipe though.

You try changing your distance to be lower, or age range? Or logging out and back in?

yeah it didn't work. It would either say 'oops something went wrong' or just wouldn't adjust to a different distance. I just waited a day and it was restored. think my account was under review and then it was just restored. I don't get into fights or anything but I'm pretty direct so girls unmatch a lot and if the cite reasons it leads to reports and sometimes bans. If I water down my game though it's equally as frustrating so I just gotta deal with it.

Though like I said tinder has been less ban happy lately. They probably banned too many paying members and realized they're messing their revenue streams.
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018 09:59 PM by jacknap.)
11-06-2018 09:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Turkish Snowcone Offline
Banned

Posts: 12
Joined: Oct 2018
Post: #7207
RE: Tinder App
test
11-06-2018 10:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RenegadeAu Offline
Male Feminist

Posts: 1
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation: 0
Post: #7208
RE: Tinder App
(11-06-2018 01:12 PM)True Balla Wrote:  
(11-06-2018 11:25 AM)asiaslayer Wrote:  For those of you saying don't super like girls or you'll appear "beta"...

How else are you supposed to get on their radar with the thousands upon thousands of chumps already liking them? They're not going to swipe through all these dudes. At least super liking her will make you more noticeable to her. At least for Asia, I've had better luck super liking a girl than not.

I always use my superlikes and get results.

I have found super likes tend to work more with Asian girls. My experience with caucasians is they think your a bit of a try-hard and don't respond.
11-07-2018 05:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RespectivePerspective Offline
Game Denialist
Gold Member

Posts: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
Post: #7209
RE: Tinder App
Having been of High School age when chat rooms and AIM was a literal goldmine, i’ve been lucky to have enjoyed most all of the best eras in these social media/online dating platforms. I was able to replicate the success as MySpace came around, Facebook, and a good deal of the dating sites as well.

I reminisce only with fondness for these memories, but at some point, it always came to an end. Once it becomes widely known by the media, or when the “MySpace/Facebook/IG/Tinder,etc. axe murdering serial killer” slanders any hope of being able to ever interact again from a position of trust, I couldn’t replicate my previous results with any kind of ease, assuming I even produced results. Eventually, everything that’s been good to you with these apps/sites will be ruined for various reasons.

Although I am not prepared to say Tinder and the others are a sinkhole just yet, there’s no question that the way we used to make these programs work for us back 5-15 years ago is no longer an optimal leading strategy.

This is kind of a problem I see all over the internet, and I can only surmise that when these companies became wealthy, they stopped utilising simplicity, i.e. basic matching algorithms, and have continuously pursued structuring their products around AI power and ideology. Now the rules for success with Tinder has become ever more exclusive.

Personally, I don’t feel particularly threatened by this, primarily because I had always been able to count upon a handful of pictures to proof my looks and story well enough to at least get to the next step in the process. Similar to some of the other stories I read in this thread, I too was increasingly stunned why these same non-professional, but decently shot photos on my basic consumer gear quality equipment was no longer getting my coveted 7+ preference at a frequency that ought to make sense. Even if said quality of these photos would’ve resulted in women rating me as a 8-9 not even a couple years prior, the standard for how women percieve us in photos has changed for the worse. In photos where women had said in the past (i’m early 30’s, but most say I look around 25) that my looks rate out at the cusp of elite, if not actually elite in some circles, I used no touch up softening or any other processing. That’s just how I looked, straight up. Now, I’m thinking my “nothing to hide because i’m at least considered good looking enough” approach is insufficient in 2018, and comes off as amateurish.

While it kind of annoys me that I can go from appearing as an 8-9 to the women I courted just a few short years ago in an instant cell phone selfie, to falling behind somebody far more average looking, but more astute in their visual strategy for commanding her attraction, I suppose it’s just the way things are going to be from now on if you want to relive those good old days somehow.

Although i’m confident that these are fairly simple adjustments for myself, it does feel a bit cheapened in the sense that I suspect it’s unlikely i’m going to consider the attention from this Tinder crowd as desirable. Despite owning a lot of nice expensive stuff and having a career that a less humble man would love to wear on his sleeve, it was just never in my character to show off like that, notwithstanding the negative attention it inevitably attracts from your whingeing critics.

Great advice in here, and it’s good to know i’m not alone. Tinder is definitely not for everyone, and in this day and age, it’s even a challenge for those of us who have otherwise always been able to count on their looks/pics to make the online market worthwhile no matter the platform. This calendar year has been the biggest kick in my online dating nuts in the 16-17 years i’ve been using this, but it’s starting to become clear how this market is evolving. Wish I had better advice for some of the others, but I cannot claim in good faith that there’s a one size fits all solution here.
11-07-2018 06:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes RespectivePerspective's post:
corsega
corsega Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,044
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 31
Post: #7210
RE: Tinder App
(11-07-2018 06:41 PM)RespectivePerspective Wrote:  Having been of High School age when chat rooms and AIM was a literal goldmine, i’ve been lucky to have enjoyed most all of the best eras in these social media/online dating platforms. I was able to replicate the success as MySpace came around, Facebook, and a good deal of the dating sites as well.

I'm envious. Wish I was into this stuff back in the days before online dating was big. I would have crushed!

Professional photos are becoming a de facto standard now, which is levelling the playing field for guys without Game. It's unfortunate for sure.

The next step for guys that still want to hack the system will be morphing/retouching photos, or just going ahead and getting plastic surgery.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2018 07:05 PM by corsega.)
11-07-2018 07:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RespectivePerspective Offline
Game Denialist
Gold Member

Posts: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
Post: #7211
RE: Tinder App
Even with digital touch up and surgery, it seems to never have the lasting appeal of your real, natural appearance. Women seem fairly astute in recognising the difference (your YMMV, of course), and it kind of works out naturally by just the sheer number of men who have objectively attractive measurements, yet are complete failures with women because they cannot harness such gifts into a psychological edge as well, while a guy who may have broken his nose a couple times getting in fights and having a face only a mother can love can still attract the better looking woman due to how he carries himself, flaws and all. I kind of worry for some of the younger guys who might end up becoming confused about how to balance real life interaction with their adapted online persona, because the regularly accepted methods for success are so different, and can really contradict each other to where getting to know one person is more like getting to know multiple personalities or something.
(This post was last modified: 11-07-2018 08:12 PM by RespectivePerspective.)
11-07-2018 08:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RespectivePerspective Offline
Game Denialist
Gold Member

Posts: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
Post: #7212
RE: Tinder App
The lack of trust with online dating such as Tinder is also a bit understated as a reason for some of our woes, I think. As hard as it may be to believe now, there was a time when you could get on the AOL local chat room in the mid 1990's, type "a/s/l?" or something to that effect, and then in less than 5 minutes time, you will be IM'ing with a girl who is real, of the same ready to mingle mindset, and without having to sort through any spam. ZERO.

It was the best of times, of course, but nothing so wonderful can ever be allowed to continue existing in such a favourable state, and after it gets on Grandma's radar after watching a daytime tv news show about Charlie the IM Chatting Chainsaw Murderer, the trolls, standoffishness, and flaking started to become endemic in certain online circles right away. It's one of the things that killed the AOL chat rooms of old, for certain.

Worse, this tension created by the lack of trust has also caused me to sabotage what may have been promising leads in at least a couple instances I recall. If the woman's eagerness seems disproportionate to how I perceive her likely options, I have at times become suspicious of them and proceeded with more caution than I normally would, leading to missed opportunities and deflating momentum out of sheer disbelief or uncertainty that any high value woman who has used internet dating could possibly behave like a normal, sociable human being worth getting to know. I've gotten a somewhat good feel for scammers over the years, and have thankfully never been had out of anything that I was too upset to lose, but picking up on the indicators will still elude me every now and then to result in wasting minutes here and minutes there. Not much in a single session, but it adds up over time and takes a toll on everybody online who just wants to know somebody is who they say they are.
11-07-2018 08:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes RespectivePerspective's post:
Redbaron
KMK Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 46
Joined: Dec 2017
Reputation: 0
Post: #7213
RE: Tinder App
Any point in making dummy facebook accounts for new tinder profiles now?
11-08-2018 01:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
N°6 Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,276
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 26
Post: #7214
RE: Tinder App
If you have the cheap tinder gold rate grandfathered in, I’d say it’s more cost effective to selectively and exclusively swipe between 1900 and 2000 each week night and on Sunday while occasionally moving your account where your SMV is higher.

In theory this will stop your ELO from tanking.
11-08-2018 03:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
zamfir112 Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 213
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #7215
RE: Tinder App
Even if your perfect you wont get a chance with 7s 8s or 9s here in scandinavia.vs daygame or nightgame atleast they will let you talk to them to run your game.online dating in scandinavia is dead.go out in the real life
11-08-2018 08:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
yang2287 Online
Game Denialist

Posts: 46
Joined: Mar 2018
Reputation: 1
Post: #7216
RE: Tinder App
(11-08-2018 03:09 AM)N°6 Wrote:  If you have the cheap tinder gold rate grandfathered in, I’d say it’s more cost effective to selectively and exclusively swipe between 1900 and 2000 each week night and on Sunday while occasionally moving your account where your SMV is higher.

In theory this will stop your ELO from tanking.

This is very very close to my current strategy

1- Get tinder gold

2- Get your gps spoofed method working (see chrome change cordinates or Android GPS spoof )

3- Don't swipe, let the girls swipe

4-Use gold to select so each time i swipe its a 100% match rate

5- After a few days, move profile to another city of high SMV, get New boost, GET ELO increased, return to local market

This way i never have to reset my account


PS: i dont talk about getting a good bio and model level photos, this is basic by now


Tinder is a female toy store selling d**cks, even if she is married or in LTR with joe beta, she is one swipe away from a new d**ck.

The problem is when you swipe left, you take yourself off the shelf

And seeing the way these women use tinder, they show up, select a toy from the store and delete tinder only to show up in 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months for a new toy

why take yourself off the shelf by swiping left

And we know what swiping right to everyone does to your ELO

BTW the idea of swiping to everything during boost as Tinder urges you on is a scam, it destroys your ELO

For me the ELO score is more important than having a fantastique bio

You can have a wonderful bio, but if no one gets to see it (and Tinder hides your profile) whats the point?

My experiment is to know if flake rate is greatly decreased if a girl likes your profile first

Secondly expect to match girls points below your SMV with this method, but this is normal in Tinder.

With this method, i am getting one match per day, which is a huge upgrade for me (black guy in France) where i used to get 1 match per month
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2018 11:58 AM by yang2287.)
11-08-2018 11:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
dtpilgrim Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 89
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 6
Post: #7217
RE: Tinder App
(11-07-2018 07:05 PM)corsega Wrote:  
(11-07-2018 06:41 PM)RespectivePerspective Wrote:  Having been of High School age when chat rooms and AIM was a literal goldmine, i’ve been lucky to have enjoyed most all of the best eras in these social media/online dating platforms. I was able to replicate the success as MySpace came around, Facebook, and a good deal of the dating sites as well.

I'm envious. Wish I was into this stuff back in the days before online dating was big. I would have crushed!

Professional photos are becoming a de facto standard now, which is levelling the playing field for guys without Game. It's unfortunate for sure.

The next step for guys that still want to hack the system will be morphing/retouching photos, or just going ahead and getting plastic surgery.

Corsega, I'm interested in your instagram strategy. After your posts I'm thinking yeah I need to get into that Instagram game as the barrier of entry is lower than I initially thought, especially considering the competition on tinder is 98% unappealing men, it's actually easier to distinguish yourself. I also bought an HD camera so I can make good pics.

I'm wondering what approach you take with your instagram profile? Or if you have an example of really good instagram profiles? More in the sense of reachable do-able instagram profiles, of average to above average looking guys who communicate a solid lifestyle, as opposed to straight up male models. I.e. the 2000-10.000 followers tier guys. My current idea is to just take 80% of my pics from other peoples instagrams to fraud a traveler lifestyle and then interlace with my own pro pics. I'm also considering just buying a pre-made instagram account that comes with 5000 followers off the bat, call it internet equity if you will.

But I have to admit I'm at a fucking loss what these chicks want to see in a guys instagram page. I don't understand what they consider to be value and what is considered to be bunk. Anyways I'll show my sample instagram profile soon with what I'm going for.
11-08-2018 01:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
corsega Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,044
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 31
Post: #7218
RE: Tinder App
(11-08-2018 01:40 PM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-07-2018 07:05 PM)corsega Wrote:  
(11-07-2018 06:41 PM)RespectivePerspective Wrote:  Having been of High School age when chat rooms and AIM was a literal goldmine, i’ve been lucky to have enjoyed most all of the best eras in these social media/online dating platforms. I was able to replicate the success as MySpace came around, Facebook, and a good deal of the dating sites as well.

I'm envious. Wish I was into this stuff back in the days before online dating was big. I would have crushed!

Professional photos are becoming a de facto standard now, which is levelling the playing field for guys without Game. It's unfortunate for sure.

The next step for guys that still want to hack the system will be morphing/retouching photos, or just going ahead and getting plastic surgery.

Corsega, I'm interested in your instagram strategy. After your posts I'm thinking yeah I need to get into that Instagram game as the barrier of entry is lower than I initially thought, especially considering the competition on tinder is 98% unappealing men, it's actually easier to distinguish yourself. I also bought an HD camera so I can make good pics.

I'm wondering what approach you take with your instagram profile? Or if you have an example of really good instagram profiles? More in the sense of reachable do-able instagram profiles, of average to above average looking guys who communicate a solid lifestyle, as opposed to straight up male models. I.e. the 2000-10.000 followers tier guys. My current idea is to just take 80% of my pics from other peoples instagrams to fraud a traveler lifestyle and then interlace with my own pro pics. I'm also considering just buying a pre-made instagram account that comes with 5000 followers off the bat, call it internet equity if you will.

But I have to admit I'm at a fucking loss what these chicks want to see in a guys instagram page. I don't understand what they consider to be value and what is considered to be bunk. Anyways I'll show my sample instagram profile soon with what I'm going for.

I assume you read my balanced guide to IG game thread?
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-66379.html

I think Instagram game is highly overrated. I would not recommend getting into it if you have to "fraud" living a cool life. Instagram is only useful if you're actually cool.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
11-08-2018 02:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
dtpilgrim Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 89
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 6
Post: #7219
RE: Tinder App
(11-08-2018 02:07 PM)corsega Wrote:  
(11-08-2018 01:40 PM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-07-2018 07:05 PM)corsega Wrote:  
(11-07-2018 06:41 PM)RespectivePerspective Wrote:  Having been of High School age when chat rooms and AIM was a literal goldmine, i’ve been lucky to have enjoyed most all of the best eras in these social media/online dating platforms. I was able to replicate the success as MySpace came around, Facebook, and a good deal of the dating sites as well.

I'm envious. Wish I was into this stuff back in the days before online dating was big. I would have crushed!

Professional photos are becoming a de facto standard now, which is levelling the playing field for guys without Game. It's unfortunate for sure.

The next step for guys that still want to hack the system will be morphing/retouching photos, or just going ahead and getting plastic surgery.

Corsega, I'm interested in your instagram strategy. After your posts I'm thinking yeah I need to get into that Instagram game as the barrier of entry is lower than I initially thought, especially considering the competition on tinder is 98% unappealing men, it's actually easier to distinguish yourself. I also bought an HD camera so I can make good pics.

I'm wondering what approach you take with your instagram profile? Or if you have an example of really good instagram profiles? More in the sense of reachable do-able instagram profiles, of average to above average looking guys who communicate a solid lifestyle, as opposed to straight up male models. I.e. the 2000-10.000 followers tier guys. My current idea is to just take 80% of my pics from other peoples instagrams to fraud a traveler lifestyle and then interlace with my own pro pics. I'm also considering just buying a pre-made instagram account that comes with 5000 followers off the bat, call it internet equity if you will.

But I have to admit I'm at a fucking loss what these chicks want to see in a guys instagram page. I don't understand what they consider to be value and what is considered to be bunk. Anyways I'll show my sample instagram profile soon with what I'm going for.

I assume you read my balanced guide to IG game thread?
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-66379.html

I think Instagram game is highly overrated. I would not recommend getting into it if you have to "fraud" living a cool life. Instagram is only useful if you're actually cool.

I like my life and I think it's cool, but the market doesn't. So I might as well play along and give the market what it wants.

https://postimg.cc/MfB73zvc
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2018 04:23 PM by dtpilgrim.)
11-08-2018 04:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
corsega Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,044
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 31
Post: #7220
RE: Tinder App
(11-08-2018 04:22 PM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-08-2018 02:07 PM)corsega Wrote:  
(11-08-2018 01:40 PM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-07-2018 07:05 PM)corsega Wrote:  
(11-07-2018 06:41 PM)RespectivePerspective Wrote:  Having been of High School age when chat rooms and AIM was a literal goldmine, i’ve been lucky to have enjoyed most all of the best eras in these social media/online dating platforms. I was able to replicate the success as MySpace came around, Facebook, and a good deal of the dating sites as well.

I'm envious. Wish I was into this stuff back in the days before online dating was big. I would have crushed!

Professional photos are becoming a de facto standard now, which is levelling the playing field for guys without Game. It's unfortunate for sure.

The next step for guys that still want to hack the system will be morphing/retouching photos, or just going ahead and getting plastic surgery.

Corsega, I'm interested in your instagram strategy. After your posts I'm thinking yeah I need to get into that Instagram game as the barrier of entry is lower than I initially thought, especially considering the competition on tinder is 98% unappealing men, it's actually easier to distinguish yourself. I also bought an HD camera so I can make good pics.

I'm wondering what approach you take with your instagram profile? Or if you have an example of really good instagram profiles? More in the sense of reachable do-able instagram profiles, of average to above average looking guys who communicate a solid lifestyle, as opposed to straight up male models. I.e. the 2000-10.000 followers tier guys. My current idea is to just take 80% of my pics from other peoples instagrams to fraud a traveler lifestyle and then interlace with my own pro pics. I'm also considering just buying a pre-made instagram account that comes with 5000 followers off the bat, call it internet equity if you will.

But I have to admit I'm at a fucking loss what these chicks want to see in a guys instagram page. I don't understand what they consider to be value and what is considered to be bunk. Anyways I'll show my sample instagram profile soon with what I'm going for.

I assume you read my balanced guide to IG game thread?
https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-66379.html

I think Instagram game is highly overrated. I would not recommend getting into it if you have to "fraud" living a cool life. Instagram is only useful if you're actually cool.

I like my life and I think it's cool, but the market doesn't. So I might as well play along and give the market what it wants.

https://postimg.cc/MfB73zvc

That actually looks pretty good from a frauding perspective. Just make sure that everything you post, past/future/etc. is congruent. Girls are super-stalkers, they will go through everything possible to suss you out.

(But we're getting off topic. Let's take this to the Instagram thread! I'm interested in discussing further and I think guys could learn from you)

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
(This post was last modified: 11-08-2018 04:46 PM by corsega.)
11-08-2018 04:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes corsega's post:
dtpilgrim
NoMoreTO Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 372
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation: 8
Post: #7221
RE: Tinder App
On another note, old dutch guy launches lawsuit to be able to lie on tinder about his age.

https://globalnews.ca/news/4643245/tinde...e-hookups/
11-08-2018 10:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes NoMoreTO's post:
Brodiaga
RespectivePerspective Offline
Game Denialist
Gold Member

Posts: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
Post: #7222
RE: Tinder App
Even having read most of the first and last 10 pages of this thread, i'm still somewhat confused about what happens to your profile's visibility depending on your swipe habits...

So if you have Tinder gold and only swipe right on those who did so for you first, does matching right swipe for right swipe 100% of the time help move you closer to the top of the deck for the women in your "seeking" parameters?

Or is the percentage inconsequential, with it being weighed more favourably towards volume and time spent using the app?

I could just be imagining things, but it seems to work better for me when I tend to swipe right as a default move when I get matches using Tinder gold. When I would reject all the morbidly obese heifers immediately, I seem to get less fanfare over intervals that don't seem as fluid and natural as before. I've only been doing the Tinder thing for a couple weeks, so i'm still a bit green in my knowledge of this app's tendencies and how its been evolving.
(This post was last modified: 11-09-2018 12:20 AM by RespectivePerspective.)
11-09-2018 12:19 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
N°6 Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,276
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 26
Post: #7223
RE: Tinder App
Tinder Gold selective swiping of those who’ve right swiped you v discrimitory left and right swiping

Women who see your profile without you right swiping them first tend to have short stacks of interested men. This means they have lower ELO scores than women with tall stacks. You’ll have to date down if you only interact with women who’ve right swiped you first and you won’t be taking advantage over the male population by using mass daily swipes.

Mass positive daily swiping could harm your ELO so I’d suggest selecting interested tinder gold women during non-peak hours, then swiping normally with discrimination during a peak hour.

During an off peak day or when you’re not using the app, send your account to another country where your SMV is higher.
(This post was last modified: 11-09-2018 12:53 AM by N°6.)
11-09-2018 12:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RespectivePerspective Offline
Game Denialist
Gold Member

Posts: 46
Joined: Dec 2014
Reputation: 1
Post: #7224
RE: Tinder App
(11-09-2018 12:52 AM)N°6 Wrote:  Tinder Gold selective swiping of those who’ve right swiped you v discrimitory left and right swiping

Women who see your profile without you right swiping them first tend to have short stacks of interested men. This means they have lower ELO scores than women with tall stacks. You’ll have to date down if you only interact with women who’ve right swiped you first and you won’t be taking advantage over the male population by using mass daily swipes.

Mass positive daily swiping could harm your ELO so I’d suggest selecting interested tinder gold women during non-peak hours, then swiping normally with discrimination during a peak hour.

During an off peak day or when you’re not using the app, send your account to another country where your SMV is higher.

Thanks, mate.

So if you somehow tried to limit your right swipes only on those women who are going to be valued/scored higher, then the algorithm will not favour your visibility with similarly higher valued/scored women, irrespective of the % of right swipes matched with those women?

Apologies if that same question has been asked multiple times already; i'm usually not this slow, but i've had a little trouble digesting some of these details.
11-09-2018 01:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
N°6 Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,276
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 26
Post: #7225
RE: Tinder App
To increase the chances of being right swiped by higher valued women, you need to join the top of their stacks when they are most likely to be swiping and that is during mid-evening. This is why I think you should use your unlimited tinder gold swipes fairly selectively during peak hours.

With the tinder gold pre selected list, you’ll see that most women here are those with short stacks because men who haven’t already right swiped them are more visible to them. Those you do match from this pre selected list, should be engaged in conversation ASAP as part of the ELO score relates to social engagement.
11-09-2018 01:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: asianirish1, 3 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication