I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
Tinder App
Author Message
WomenLuvDeez Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 126
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 1
Post: #7176
RE: Tinder App
(10-30-2018 12:13 PM)corsega Wrote:  Consider this: the average male on Tinder gets one match per thousand swipes. This was from a study done a couple years ago.

Holy hell that can't be true.. I get on average 50-150 matchs in the states per day(I have the paid for edition so I get unlimited swipes but I still selectively swipe because too many whales on it compared to bumble where I live), but in South America I get maybe 200+ per day with a high conversion rates of dates/fucks (more dates/fucks in S.A. than the states though) but according to photo feeler I am top 20% in looks and have professional photos with my IG attached showing a few T.V. shows I have been in for some value.

But back to the topic 1 match per 1 thousand? Can you link that study? I cannot believe that to be true.

"For each man must learn to live within the citadel of himself."
-Marcus Aurelius
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2018 11:00 AM by WomenLuvDeez.)
11-01-2018 10:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
dtpilgrim Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 90
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 6
Post: #7177
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 10:14 AM)mellowsedge Wrote:  lets say 10000 random swipes
500 matches
50 I will send a feeler text (450 are fugly - either fat or ugly - I live in the UK what do you expect!)
10 will converse with me
5 will date
3 will actually go on a date, 2 will flake

The 3 dates were either too fat, face not pretty enough or something. ROI very poor.

I'm focussing on night game. Besides, I got banned from Tinder.

Those are actually pretty good rates, given that you actually only had 50 elligible matches as opposed to 500. A 1/5 response rate is not bad, and a 1/3 conversation rate to date is actually pretty good. I've rarely had girls flake though, that might be less of a cultural thing here.

***

But anyways I'm curious about you guy's text game. The ratio's will always be around a 1/3 response rate and a 1/5 conversation to date rate, but I'm wondering what you guys are actually saying to the girls in text, or how many responses you tend to exchange and over what time period?

Being an OK-looking guy, like a 6.5/7 I get the sense I'm being put into a weird conversational purgatory where girls expect me to have a conversation with them over the course of a week+, and also to never have a single awkward thing said during the entire time. For the last 2 years I've found it increasingly harder to strike the perfect balance in conversation and I feel like I'm acting more and more beta because whenever I make too much of a forward proposal I will get ghosted rather than rewarded for making a bold move.

It's really confusing to me and I'm wondering if guys are in the same pattern. I've literally had over 20+ times, when I got a girl to actually respond to a text and have a conversation, (so that's like 1/4 out of a pool of 80 matches), where it all follows a similar pattern.

1. Tried and tested evocative opener > Get response
2. Bit of boring questions mixed with some tried and tested lines > Get interest
3. Make a quick proposal to meet > Get immediate radio silence or a rebuff
4. Sometimes I'll ask what's up (pointless obviously) and it's like > "I first want to have a FUN conversation with someone blabla / I don't know you yet"

I'm at a loss nowadays what the fuck is supposed to qualify as a fun conversation? And why the radio silence when proposing a meet up while that's what the app is designed for in the first place.

I can fully accept and understand that because of my looks-based value I'm classed in a different category than Chad. But I just don't get what kind of category this is supposed to be and how I should deal with it.
11-01-2018 11:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
WomenLuvDeez Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 126
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 1
Post: #7178
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 11:22 AM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 10:14 AM)mellowsedge Wrote:  lets say 10000 random swipes
500 matches
50 I will send a feeler text (450 are fugly - either fat or ugly - I live in the UK what do you expect!)
10 will converse with me
5 will date
3 will actually go on a date, 2 will flake

The 3 dates were either too fat, face not pretty enough or something. ROI very poor.

I'm focussing on night game. Besides, I got banned from Tinder.

Those are actually pretty good rates, given that you actually only had 50 elligible matches as opposed to 500. A 1/5 response rate is not bad, and a 1/3 conversation rate to date is actually pretty good. I've rarely had girls flake though, that might be less of a cultural thing here.

***

But anyways I'm curious about you guy's text game. The ratio's will always be around a 1/3 response rate and a 1/5 conversation to date rate, but I'm wondering what you guys are actually saying to the girls in text, or how many responses you tend to exchange and over what time period?

Being an OK-looking guy, like a 6.5/7 I get the sense I'm being put into a weird conversational purgatory where girls expect me to have a conversation with them over the course of a week+, and also to never have a single awkward thing said during the entire time. For the last 2 years I've found it increasingly harder to strike the perfect balance in conversation and I feel like I'm acting more and more beta because whenever I make too much of a forward proposal I will get ghosted rather than rewarded for making a bold move.

It's really confusing to me and I'm wondering if guys are in the same pattern. I've literally had over 20+ times, when I got a girl to actually respond to a text and have a conversation, (so that's like 1/4 out of a pool of 80 matches), where it all follows a similar pattern.

1. Tried and tested evocative opener > Get response
2. Bit of boring questions mixed with some tried and tested lines > Get interest
3. Make a quick proposal to meet > Get immediate radio silence or a rebuff
4. Sometimes I'll ask what's up (pointless obviously) and it's like > "I first want to have a FUN conversation with someone blabla / I don't know you yet"

I'm at a loss nowadays what the fuck is supposed to qualify as a fun conversation? And why the radio silence when proposing a meet up while that's what the app is designed for in the first place.

I can fully accept and understand that because of my looks-based value I'm classed in a different category than Chad. But I just don't get what kind of category this is supposed to be and how I should deal with it.

If you already have working lines that get the number, then once you have that you need to set up something fast before the next chad does as pretty much any girl that's 6/10+ swipes right and gets a automatic match for the most part. Lately I just say, "now that we've matched does that mean were official?" with the typical response being a highly positive one and 90% of the messages I start out with that I get the number within 3-4 more messages(It works for me, so I'd give it a try. If it doesn't work then go back to your material).

If a girl says she wants to get to know you more, all I can contribute to that is: https://www.rooshv.com/the-talking-ratio as I rarely get that issue.

"For each man must learn to live within the citadel of himself."
-Marcus Aurelius
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2018 11:40 AM by WomenLuvDeez.)
11-01-2018 11:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Sender Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 128
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 7
Post: #7179
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 10:14 AM)mellowsedge Wrote:  lets say 10000 random swipes
500 matches
50 I will send a feeler text (450 are fugly - either fat or ugly - I live in the UK what do you expect!)
10 will converse with me
5 will date
3 will actually go on a date, 2 will flake.

The 3 dates were either too fat, face not pretty enough or something. ROI very poor.

I'm focussing on night game. Besides, I got banned from Tinder.

Probably a wise move to convert to night game. I'm still learning that the hard way, I think.

What did you get banned for?

Treat any relationship like you're Bill Murray in 'Ground Hog's Day'
11-01-2018 11:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
jacknap Offline
Banned

Posts: 217
Joined: Aug 2018
Post: #7180
RE: Tinder App
I've noticed they chilled a bit on the banning. The realized that disposing of male clientele who basically fund their whole venture are not an unlimited resource lol. Still shows how little they give a fuck about guys - though that's hardly surprising in this male hating world.
11-01-2018 12:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
JimBobsCooters Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 456
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 10
Post: #7181
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 09:48 AM)redbeard Wrote:  I know I sound like a broken record here, but I'm having less success on Tinder than ever, and I have to think it's due to Instagram. Even slightly above average girls are racking up thousands of followers on Instagram, and they don't know how to handle all the male attention. I know this to be true because I've had girls follow me and still ignore my DM's, not even reading them. If they don't open my messages, they must have hundreds more jamming up their phones.

Maybe it's my game, maybe not. Either way I'm emphasizing IRL game more than ever now.

Do you refresh your age to keep it low? I can only imagine that if someone has aged say 3 years since the start of tinder that you've aged out of an awful lot of girls ranges. How many 22 year old girls have their ages set above 25 in the west?

Would love to know the average age search range for girls, I genuinely wonder if I even show on most of the girls that I've swiped on.
11-01-2018 03:30 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
griffinmill Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 700
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 8
Post: #7182
RE: Tinder App
^^ I've matched with girls 10 years younger than me. But girls who like older men are in the minority. I'd imagine young girls have their age range no higher than 5 or 6 years above their own.
11-01-2018 03:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
redbeard Online
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,839
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 71
Post: #7183
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 03:30 PM)JimBobsCooters Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 09:48 AM)redbeard Wrote:  I know I sound like a broken record here, but I'm having less success on Tinder than ever, and I have to think it's due to Instagram. Even slightly above average girls are racking up thousands of followers on Instagram, and they don't know how to handle all the male attention. I know this to be true because I've had girls follow me and still ignore my DM's, not even reading them. If they don't open my messages, they must have hundreds more jamming up their phones.

Maybe it's my game, maybe not. Either way I'm emphasizing IRL game more than ever now.

Do you refresh your age to keep it low? I can only imagine that if someone has aged say 3 years since the start of tinder that you've aged out of an awful lot of girls ranges. How many 22 year old girls have their ages set above 25 in the west?

Would love to know the average age search range for girls, I genuinely wonder if I even show on most of the girls that I've swiped on.

I'm 25....I did not think I'd be considered out of their age range, yet here we are. I'll try this in a bit, but the problem is that I look more like 28-29.

1 Year NoFap Veteran --- No Days Off in Trump's America
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2018 04:00 PM by redbeard.)
11-01-2018 03:59 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
corsega Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,044
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 31
Post: #7184
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 09:48 AM)redbeard Wrote:  I know I sound like a broken record here, but I'm having less success on Tinder than ever, and I have to think it's due to Instagram. Even slightly above average girls are racking up thousands of followers on Instagram, and they don't know how to handle all the male attention. I know this to be true because I've had girls follow me and still ignore my DM's, not even reading them. If they don't open my messages, they must have hundreds more jamming up their phones.

Maybe it's my game, maybe not. Either way I'm emphasizing IRL game more than ever now.

It's not due to Instagram. It's due to increasing male competition on Tinder itself.

See above.

(11-01-2018 10:56 AM)WomenLuvDeez Wrote:  
(10-30-2018 12:13 PM)corsega Wrote:  Consider this: the average male on Tinder gets one match per thousand swipes. This was from a study done a couple years ago.

Holy hell that can't be true.. I get on average 50-150 matchs in the states per day(I have the paid for edition so I get unlimited swipes but I still selectively swipe because too many whales on it compared to bumble where I live), but in South America I get maybe 200+ per day with a high conversion rates of dates/fucks (more dates/fucks in S.A. than the states though) but according to photo feeler I am top 20% in looks and have professional photos with my IG attached showing a few T.V. shows I have been in for some value.

But back to the topic 1 match per 1 thousand? Can you link that study? I cannot believe that to be true.

I have used professional photos of top male models and gotten less matches than that a day.

So forgive me if I'm a bit skeptical...

Regardless, if you truly are getting 50-150 matches per day, then you are objectively a 9/10 male. Maybe even higher. With those numbers, you are probably top 1% of profiles in your city.

Here is the study:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.01952.pdf

(11-01-2018 11:22 AM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 10:14 AM)mellowsedge Wrote:  lets say 10000 random swipes
500 matches
50 I will send a feeler text (450 are fugly - either fat or ugly - I live in the UK what do you expect!)
10 will converse with me
5 will date
3 will actually go on a date, 2 will flake

The 3 dates were either too fat, face not pretty enough or something. ROI very poor.

I'm focussing on night game. Besides, I got banned from Tinder.

Those are actually pretty good rates, given that you actually only had 50 elligible matches as opposed to 500. A 1/5 response rate is not bad, and a 1/3 conversation rate to date is actually pretty good. I've rarely had girls flake though, that might be less of a cultural thing here.

The Netherlands and Germany probably have the lowest flake rates in the world. Definitely a cultural thing. I think I've told you to post your messages here for analysis - I'll repeat - this is the ONLY way to know if you are saying something that is turning these girls off.

(11-01-2018 03:30 PM)JimBobsCooters Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 09:48 AM)redbeard Wrote:  I know I sound like a broken record here, but I'm having less success on Tinder than ever, and I have to think it's due to Instagram. Even slightly above average girls are racking up thousands of followers on Instagram, and they don't know how to handle all the male attention. I know this to be true because I've had girls follow me and still ignore my DM's, not even reading them. If they don't open my messages, they must have hundreds more jamming up their phones.

Maybe it's my game, maybe not. Either way I'm emphasizing IRL game more than ever now.

Do you refresh your age to keep it low? I can only imagine that if someone has aged say 3 years since the start of tinder that you've aged out of an awful lot of girls ranges. How many 22 year old girls have their ages set above 25 in the west?

Would love to know the average age search range for girls, I genuinely wonder if I even show on most of the girls that I've swiped on.

Age ranges don't (really) matter. They only determine who shows up in your random queue. If you like a girl and you're not in her age range, you still show up in her like queue.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2018 04:13 PM by corsega.)
11-01-2018 04:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like corsega's post:
Sender, WomenLuvDeez, jacknap, redbeard
Humpty Pump n Dumpty Offline
Banned

Posts: 14
Joined: Oct 2018
Post: #7185
RE: Tinder App
Tinder will die in the next few years. It’s become expensive and useless. I’ve had more luck direct messaging girls on IG.
11-01-2018 05:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
WomenLuvDeez Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 126
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 1
Post: #7186
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 04:03 PM)corsega Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 09:48 AM)redbeard Wrote:  I know I sound like a broken record here, but I'm having less success on Tinder than ever, and I have to think it's due to Instagram. Even slightly above average girls are racking up thousands of followers on Instagram, and they don't know how to handle all the male attention. I know this to be true because I've had girls follow me and still ignore my DM's, not even reading them. If they don't open my messages, they must have hundreds more jamming up their phones.

Maybe it's my game, maybe not. Either way I'm emphasizing IRL game more than ever now.

It's not due to Instagram. It's due to increasing male competition on Tinder itself.

See above.

(11-01-2018 10:56 AM)WomenLuvDeez Wrote:  
(10-30-2018 12:13 PM)corsega Wrote:  Consider this: the average male on Tinder gets one match per thousand swipes. This was from a study done a couple years ago.

Holy hell that can't be true.. I get on average 50-150 matchs in the states per day(I have the paid for edition so I get unlimited swipes but I still selectively swipe because too many whales on it compared to bumble where I live), but in South America I get maybe 200+ per day with a high conversion rates of dates/fucks (more dates/fucks in S.A. than the states though) but according to photo feeler I am top 20% in looks and have professional photos with my IG attached showing a few T.V. shows I have been in for some value.

But back to the topic 1 match per 1 thousand? Can you link that study? I cannot believe that to be true.

I have used professional photos of top male models and gotten less matches than that a day.

So forgive me if I'm a bit skeptical...

Regardless, if you truly are getting 50-150 matches per day, then you are objectively a 9/10 male. Maybe even higher. With those numbers, you are probably top 1% of profiles in your city.

Here is the study:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.01952.pdf

Damn I feel bad for the lower 80% guys then that are barely getting ANY match's. I have done some modeling/acting but I don't consider myself a 9/10 but if you give me a PM I'll send you my IG & a pic of my tindr where you can see the amount of matchs. Only problem I have with some of them are turning them from numbers to actual dates sometimes, but even then I still have maybe 7-9 I am texting now which I have a few things lined up for next few weeks.

"For each man must learn to live within the citadel of himself."
-Marcus Aurelius
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2018 07:11 PM by WomenLuvDeez.)
11-01-2018 07:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes WomenLuvDeez's post:
jacknap
Redbaron Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 64
Joined: Feb 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #7187
RE: Tinder App
Been using tinder to pipeline Taiwan before I get there.

Some of my matches look innocent as hell, others like a horny Lucy Liu, all look like they need Redbaron in their lives.

Every successful person loves the game. The chance to prove his worth, to excel, to win.
11-02-2018 04:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RougeNoir Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 998
Joined: Feb 2012
Reputation: 7
Post: #7188
RE: Tinder App
Every time I'm about to delete the app, I get a decent bang from it. It's best purpose is to sample your look among the local women out of state/country and visit where you have the best reception.
11-02-2018 09:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
corsega Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,044
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 31
Post: #7189
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 07:09 PM)WomenLuvDeez Wrote:  Damn I feel bad for the lower 80% guys then that are barely getting ANY match's. I have done some modeling/acting but I don't consider myself a 9/10 but if you give me a PM I'll send you my IG & a pic of my tindr where you can see the amount of matchs. Only problem I have with some of them are turning them from numbers to actual dates sometimes, but even then I still have maybe 7-9 I am texting now which I have a few things lined up for next few weeks.

Update: WomenLuvDeez and I have been testing and I can confirm he's a very attractive guy. He fits the "tall teddy bear Chad" phenotype.

Also, he's getting 50-150 matches because he wasn't being selective about swipes, so this puts his numbers in good perspective.

He sent me some of his Tinder messaging and I've been able to give him some tips on how to appear less gamey/nice guy.

If you're reading this, getting matches, and having trouble getting girls out on dates, it's probably your text game. Happy to look over any texts if guys want to PM me.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
11-03-2018 07:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes corsega's post:
redbeard
dtpilgrim Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 90
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 6
Post: #7190
RE: Tinder App
(11-01-2018 04:03 PM)corsega Wrote:  The Netherlands and Germany probably have the lowest flake rates in the world. Definitely a cultural thing. I think I've told you to post your messages here for analysis - I'll repeat - this is the ONLY way to know if you are saying something that is turning these girls off.

Thanks for the offer. I had to set up a new MM profile, get 100 matches and make my profile international so I could text in English first, so that took a while. I can't share my other texts as they're not in English so it just wouldn't work.

Here's a sample of a decent conversation I'm having.

[Image: Ncwvo5Q]

https://imgur.com/a/Ncwvo5Q
(This post was last modified: 11-05-2018 03:17 PM by dtpilgrim.)
11-05-2018 03:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
No More Mr. Soy Boy Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 379
Joined: Jul 2018
Reputation: 5
Post: #7191
RE: Tinder App
(11-05-2018 03:16 PM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 04:03 PM)corsega Wrote:  The Netherlands and Germany probably have the lowest flake rates in the world. Definitely a cultural thing. I think I've told you to post your messages here for analysis - I'll repeat - this is the ONLY way to know if you are saying something that is turning these girls off.

Thanks for the offer. I had to set up a new MM profile, get 100 matches and make my profile international so I could text in English first, so that took a while. I can't share my other texts as they're not in English so it just wouldn't work.

Here's a sample of a decent conversation I'm having.

[Image: Ncwvo5Q]

https://imgur.com/a/Ncwvo5Q

Do you really believe she is beautiful?
11-05-2018 04:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
dtpilgrim Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 90
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 6
Post: #7192
RE: Tinder App
(11-05-2018 04:18 PM)No More Mr. Soy Boy Wrote:  
(11-05-2018 03:16 PM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 04:03 PM)corsega Wrote:  The Netherlands and Germany probably have the lowest flake rates in the world. Definitely a cultural thing. I think I've told you to post your messages here for analysis - I'll repeat - this is the ONLY way to know if you are saying something that is turning these girls off.

Thanks for the offer. I had to set up a new MM profile, get 100 matches and make my profile international so I could text in English first, so that took a while. I can't share my other texts as they're not in English so it just wouldn't work.

Here's a sample of a decent conversation I'm having.

[Image: Ncwvo5Q]

https://imgur.com/a/Ncwvo5Q

Do you really believe she is beautiful?

It's more a persona/way of talking I'm running on tinder if that makes sense.
11-05-2018 04:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
jacknap Offline
Banned

Posts: 217
Joined: Aug 2018
Post: #7193
RE: Tinder App
Anyone else get the error where there's 'no one new to swipe on' but there almost certainly is.

Think it's low key shadow ban? Often times it goes back to normal though or my account is under review? I noticed tinder is getting more relaxed on the banning finally. Probably realizing being ban happy on customers will eventually lead to zero revenue. So props past 2 weeks or so tinder. It's been this way since yesterday though, usually fixes a lot faster. I still can message and I get a few matches trickle in still 1-3. Not nearly as much as when I can actively swipe though.
11-05-2018 05:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
corsega Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,044
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 31
Post: #7194
RE: Tinder App
(11-05-2018 05:43 PM)jacknap Wrote:  Anyone else get the error where there's 'no one new to swipe on' but there almost certainly is.

Think it's low key shadow ban? Often times it goes back to normal though or my account is under review? I noticed tinder is getting more relaxed on the banning finally. Probably realizing being ban happy on customers will eventually lead to zero revenue. So props past 2 weeks or so tinder. It's been this way since yesterday though, usually fixes a lot faster. I still can message and I get a few matches trickle in still 1-3. Not nearly as much as when I can actively swipe though.

You try changing your distance to be lower, or age range? Or logging out and back in?

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
11-06-2018 03:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes corsega's post:
WomenLuvDeez
corsega Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,044
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 31
Post: #7195
RE: Tinder App
(11-05-2018 03:16 PM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 04:03 PM)corsega Wrote:  The Netherlands and Germany probably have the lowest flake rates in the world. Definitely a cultural thing. I think I've told you to post your messages here for analysis - I'll repeat - this is the ONLY way to know if you are saying something that is turning these girls off.

Thanks for the offer. I had to set up a new MM profile, get 100 matches and make my profile international so I could text in English first, so that took a while. I can't share my other texts as they're not in English so it just wouldn't work.

Here's a sample of a decent conversation I'm having.

[Image: Ncwvo5Q]

https://imgur.com/a/Ncwvo5Q

Your writing style is good in general. I wouldn't use a male model account. That will make it too easy. Use a photo of a normal guy.

Two adjustments:
1) Don't compliment girls, especially not off the open.
2) You're not pushing towards a meetup. You're texting just to text. I'm seeding the date within 4 messages and attempting to close in 8-10.

Did you ever read Playing With Fire or were you just in the group? I recommend it.

P.S. Ik praat Nederlands. Je kan me wel een PM versenden als je wil.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018 03:57 AM by corsega.)
11-06-2018 03:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
yang2287 Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 79
Joined: Mar 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #7196
RE: Tinder App
(11-05-2018 03:16 PM)dtpilgrim Wrote:  
(11-01-2018 04:03 PM)corsega Wrote:  The Netherlands and Germany probably have the lowest flake rates in the world. Definitely a cultural thing. I think I've told you to post your messages here for analysis - I'll repeat - this is the ONLY way to know if you are saying something that is turning these girls off.

Thanks for the offer. I had to set up a new MM profile, get 100 matches and make my profile international so I could text in English first, so that took a while. I can't share my other texts as they're not in English so it just wouldn't work.

Here's a sample of a decent conversation I'm having.

[Image: Ncwvo5Q]

https://imgur.com/a/Ncwvo5Q

Can't believe she already hit the wall at 25

Anyway, you gave too much compliments

Get the girl to qualify

Get her to invest more (send blocks of text or questions)

Move her to whatsapp (always be closing)

I think for some Tinderellas, it pays to move fast and close after 8-10 msgs pushing for same day or next day meet up

But i have a feeling you can screen away potential FWB by moving too fast as well. Kinda confusing what these girls want
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018 04:43 AM by yang2287.)
11-06-2018 04:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes yang2287's post:
corsega
Sender Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 128
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 7
Post: #7197
RE: Tinder App
What do you guys think is the best way to deal with backstory when pipelining? I'm in Poland next week and not sure whether to tell matches that I'm only staying a couple of weeks or to imply that I'll be visiting regularly for 'work reasons'.

Roosh's take in his new book is this:

If a girl is responsive, she’ll likely ask for your backstory of why you’re visiting or what you do. You can play the tourist angle or hint that you’re developing long-term ties to her country. The sluttier a girl, the more she won’t mind banging a tourist for a few days, but it helps to plant the seed that you may stay a while so she has a reason to invest in you. Weave a story where it’s not obvious you’ll bang her and then immediately leave the country.


My matches tend be older -- around 30ish -- so I'm leaning towards long-term. However, on the other hand in his last podcast Roosh seemed to think that polish girls prefer darker skinned guys (which I am one) for short term or ONS.

Not quite sure how to play it.

Treat any relationship like you're Bill Murray in 'Ground Hog's Day'
11-06-2018 05:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
yang2287 Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 79
Joined: Mar 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #7198
RE: Tinder App
(11-06-2018 05:47 AM)Sender Wrote:  What do you guys think is the best way to deal with backstory when pipelining? I'm in Poland next week and not sure whether to tell matches that I'm only staying a couple of weeks or to imply that I'll be visiting regularly for 'work reasons'.

Roosh's take in his new book is this:

If a girl is responsive, she’ll likely ask for your backstory of why you’re visiting or what you do. You can play the tourist angle or hint that you’re developing long-term ties to her country. The sluttier a girl, the more she won’t mind banging a tourist for a few days, but it helps to plant the seed that you may stay a while so she has a reason to invest in you. Weave a story where it’s not obvious you’ll bang her and then immediately leave the country.


My matches tend be older -- around 30ish -- so I'm leaning towards long-term. However, on the other hand in his last podcast Roosh seemed to think that polish girls prefer darker skinned guys (which I am one) for short term or ONS.

Not quite sure how to play it.

My story is that i am living between cities for work or collaboration etc 6 weeks here, 6 weeks there

But don't ask don't tell is the default policy. Most girls assume you are local if you are pipelining correctly (Using GPS spoof instead of TinderPlus)

Knowing the right time to schedule dates is the key here. They don't mind if you are away from the city for a few weeks. Interesting people travel all the time anyway, that's a DHV

I never say i am a tourist, i see it tends to have an ugly connotation. You kind of take on the sins of all the previous tourists (see: pump and dump, stag parties, vomiting, pissing, approach spammers)
(This post was last modified: 11-06-2018 06:01 AM by yang2287.)
11-06-2018 05:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like yang2287's post:
Sender, corsega
zamfir112 Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 232
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #7199
RE: Tinder App
Tinder is dead in sweden.i have pro photos.look like 7/10 sometimes 8/10.and i only match with 3-5 girls out of 100 swipes.useless these girls are not realistic at all.
im deleting the app
11-06-2018 09:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes zamfir112's post:
playeronecheck
griffinmill Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 700
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 8
Post: #7200
RE: Tinder App
(11-06-2018 05:47 AM)Sender Wrote:  My matches tend be older -- around 30ish -- so I'm leaning towards long-term. However, on the other hand in his last podcast Roosh seemed to think that polish girls prefer darker skinned guys (which I am one) for short term or ONS.

Not quite sure how to play it.

I've had lots of success in Poland and I'm Irish; blue-eyed and pale-skinned.

I have heard from many guys that girls there prefer darker guys. But it hasn't hampered my success.
11-06-2018 10:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication