MrLemon
Banned
Posts: 2,048
Joined: Aug 2011
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
(02-24-2013 07:17 PM)cardguy Wrote: Is it really true that nobody was fat in 1969? It is hard to judge an era from one photograph.
I am sure things were alot better - but I would be interested to hear a first hand report from somebody who lived through it.
I was in high school in the early 70s. There simply wasn't anybody who was fat, except maybe a couple of typical "fat kids" and even they were more big-boned, not fat.
We ate crappy food in huge quantities too. Ate constantly. Drank beer. Lazed around.
Not only was nobody fat, we didn't even think about it. It simply wan't part of our universe.
Fast forward to the present: I was in the city and walking down the street next to a line of kids 15-20 yrs old waiting for a concert. Literally, 1/3 of the girls in that line were really fat. It was inexplicable and heartbreaking, like, I just don't even know why this could be happening.
Is it computers? Cell phones? Massive female and male neuroses?
It is NOT the food. In the 1970s food was just as crappy and ultra-processed.
The
food
has
not
changed
Why the obesity? It's insane.
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2016 03:32 PM by MrLemon.)
|
|
05-25-2016 03:30 PM |
|
|
CynicalContrarian
Peacock
     
Posts: 7,765
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 22
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
Speaking of which, a shitlord almost had his way :
Too fat for Facebook: photo banned for depicting body in 'undesirable manner'
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2...are_btn_tw
Facebook has apologized for wrongly banning a photo of plus-sized model Tess Holliday for violating its ‘health and fitness’ advertising policy
Cherchez la Femme, an Australian group that hosts popular culture talkshows with “an unapologetically feminist angle”, said Facebook rejected an advert featuring Tess Holliday, a plus-sized model wearing a bikini, telling the group it violated the company’s “ad guidelines”.
After the group appealed against the rejection, Facebook’s ad team initially defended the decision, writing that the photo failed to comply with the social networking site’s “health and fitness policy”.
“Ads may not depict a state of health or body weight as being perfect or extremely undesirable,” Facebook wrote. “Ads like these are not allowed since they make viewers feel bad about themselves. Instead, we recommend using an image of a relevant activity, such as running or riding a bike.”
In a statement on Monday, Facebook apologized for its original stance and said it had determined that the photo does comply with its guidelines.
|
|
05-26-2016 04:06 AM |
|
|
911
Crow
    
Posts: 5,193
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 59
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
(05-25-2016 03:30 PM)MrLemon Wrote: It is NOT the food. In the 1970s food was just as crappy and ultra-processed.
The
food
has
not
changed
Why the obesity? It's insane.
Corn syrup wasn't as prevalent. GMOs, hormones, antibiotics, BPAs/hormonal disruptive compounds as well. Also, those 60s kids didn't grow up with that crap, they were born in the 40s and 50s, whereas GenY/millenials were exposed to it from birth.
Fat acceptance contributes, but it could also be just a symptom of capitulation rather than causality.
λ ό γ ο ς
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2016 04:57 AM by 911.)
|
|
05-26-2016 04:13 AM |
|
The following 3 users Like 911's post:3 users Like 911's post
debeguiled, str8_thggn, Tim in real life
|
Mercenary
Hummingbird
    
Posts: 3,337
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 66
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
(05-26-2016 04:43 AM)Dalaran1991 Wrote: (05-25-2016 02:16 PM)Mercenary Wrote: I have some photos of my father from the 1970s where he went to the beach with his buddies.
In various photos him and his are friends lined up with all of them carrying their girlfriends on top of their shoulders just like in this photo here:
![[Image: 9bec50d880b8a1ef90c683b7d421d253.jpg]](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/9b/ec/50/9bec50d880b8a1ef90c683b7d421d253.jpg)
Can you imagine this today ?
Most girls are too fat to be lifted by a man and most dudes are too weak to carry a girl piggyback style.
All those girls are huge WB. From hairstyle, to feminine face, adorable smile, and hot bod.
If your father and his friends were the "average guys" back at the time, holy shit what a wonderful time that was!!!! Its not even comparable to the average guy now.
I would say that my father and his friends were pretty average looking like the dudes in this photo. They weren't ripped guys with huge biceps and 6 packs.
You have to always remember that none of the technology we have today existed then, so the only times a girl would get approached and asked out on a date is if a guy did it in person himself or possibly called her house and managed to get past her cockblocking parents.
Emails, the internet, cell phones and especially smartphones have ensured that a girl has so many thirsty guys chasing her, (most of which would be too nervous to approach her in person) that she can permit herself to be lazy with her appearance, and also get fat and bitchy with no negative consequences.
A girl who didn't take care of her appearance (or god forbid) got fat and bitchy back in the 1960s/1970s would have no one approaching her in person for years, or possibly ever.
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2016 05:49 AM by Mercenary.)
|
|
05-26-2016 05:46 AM |
|
The following 9 users Like Mercenary's post:9 users Like Mercenary's post
scrambled, Khan, TheOllam, debeguiled, CanExPat, 262, Hades, TravelerKai, lemko
|
Mercenary
Hummingbird
    
Posts: 3,337
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 66
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
(05-26-2016 04:13 AM)911 Wrote: (05-25-2016 03:30 PM)MrLemon Wrote: It is NOT the food. In the 1970s food was just as crappy and ultra-processed.
The
food
has
not
changed
Why the obesity? It's insane.
Corn syrup wasn't as prevalent. GMOs, hormones, antibiotics, BPAs/hormonal disruptive compounds as well. Also, those 60s kids didn't grow up with that crap, they were born in the 40s and 50s, whereas GenX/Y were exposed to it from their birth.
Fat acceptance contributes, but it could also be just a symptom of capitulation rather than cuasality.
This is very true. Most of the chemicals in our food, water and medication did not exist back then.
Our food, beverages and medicines are not only making us fat....they are also making men weaker because of all the weird chemical contents.
Food & drink companies in particular have done everything possible to make sure their products as addictive as humanely possible mostly by adding sugar to absolutely everything they can, even bread, soup, all cereals, ready meals, most beverages and anywhere else they can cram it in.....so even if you think you are eating healthy, you are probably still getting fatter, weaker or addicted.
Here is a list of the many different names for sugar as an ingredient:
Agave nectar
Barbados sugar
Barley malt
Barley malt syrup
Beet sugar
Brown sugar
Buttered syrup
Cane juice
Cane juice crystals
Cane sugar
Caramel
Carob syrup
Castor sugar
Coconut palm sugar
Coconut sugar
Confectioner's sugar
Corn sweetener
Corn syrup
Corn syrup solids
Date sugar
Dehydrated cane juice
Demerara sugar
Dextrin
Dextrose
Evaporated cane juice
Free-flowing brown sugars
Fructose
Fruit juice
Fruit juice concentrate
HFCS (High-Fructose Corn Syrup)
Honey
Icing sugar
Invert sugar
Malt syrup
Maltodextrin
Maltol
Maltose
Mannose
Maple syrup
Molasses
Muscovado
Palm sugar
Panocha
Powdered sugar
Raw sugar
Refiner's syrup
Rice syrup
Saccharose
Sorghum Syrup
Sucrose
Sugar (granulated)
Sweet Sorghum
Syrup
Treacle
Turbinado sugar
Yellow sugar
and more names for the artificial stuff:
Acesulfame-K
Alitame
Aspartame
Caloric Sweeteners
Crystalline Fructose
Cyclamates
D-Tagatose
Erythritol
Glucose Syrup
Glycerol
HSH Hydrogenated Starch
Hydroslsates
Isomalt (Palatinat)
Lacititol
Mannitol
Neohesperdine
Neotame
Polydextrose
Polyols
Saccharin
Sorbitol
Stevia
Sucralose
Sugar Alcohols
Thaumatin
Trehalose
Xylitol
|
|
05-26-2016 11:32 AM |
|
The following 6 users Like Mercenary's post:6 users Like Mercenary's post
kaotic, debeguiled, Ocelot, CanExPat, Enigma, TravelerKai
|
Merenguero
Crow
    
Posts: 4,369
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation: 71
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
(05-25-2016 03:30 PM)MrLemon Wrote: (02-24-2013 07:17 PM)cardguy Wrote: Is it really true that nobody was fat in 1969? It is hard to judge an era from one photograph.
I am sure things were alot better - but I would be interested to hear a first hand report from somebody who lived through it.
I was in high school in the early 70s. There simply wasn't anybody who was fat, except maybe a couple of typical "fat kids" and even they were more big-boned, not fat.
We ate crappy food in huge quantities too. Ate constantly. Drank beer. Lazed around.
Not only was nobody fat, we didn't even think about it. It simply wan't part of our universe.
Fast forward to the present: I was in the city and walking down the street next to a line of kids 15-20 yrs old waiting for a concert. Literally, 1/3 of the girls in that line were really fat. It was inexplicable and heartbreaking, like, I just don't even know why this could be happening.
Is it computers? Cell phones? Massive female and male neuroses?
It is NOT the food. In the 1970s food was just as crappy and ultra-processed.
The
food
has
not
changed
Why the obesity? It's insane.
I don't understand it and probably never will. I can and probably do eat more than any morbidly obese person, yet as far as being in shape, I'm easily top 1 to 3% in the D.C. area (that's not saying very much), top 5% in Miami and top 10% in Southern California. I do tons of cardio and weights (I've only been good about doing weights for the last three years), but that can't be what separates me from all of these fat slobs. I'm lost.
Edit: Also, I constantly see really, really unhealthy looking people buying extremely healthy food and fairly in-shape people buying garbage and it just confuses me even more. I see tons of thin (not necessarily in shape, more waify) Asian people buying pure sugar all the time.
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2016 02:56 PM by Merenguero.)
|
|
05-26-2016 02:47 PM |
|
|
General Stalin
Crow
    
Posts: 5,037
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 124
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
Not to digress from this lovely discussion about sugar and obesity rates - but as pretty, thing, and feminine as these 60's broads are, remember this was the generation that ruined everything. These were the bra burners. The ones who started leaving the kitchen for college and the office. These were the baby boomers who started an epidemic of divorce in the 80's and 90's. This is the generation that started raising their children in single parent homes and destroying the traditional family dynamic.
Not saying it's wrong to see them as attractive girls. Surely they were - it was a sexy time in America. Girls were less reserved, more sexually liberal, etc. The most endearing thing about these photos is that no one had smartphones.
|
|
05-26-2016 03:01 PM |
|
The following 5 users Like General Stalin's post:5 users Like General Stalin's post
Monty_Brogan, Dismal Operator, Sooth, 262, TravelerKai
|
Mercenary
Hummingbird
    
Posts: 3,337
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 66
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
(05-26-2016 03:01 PM)General Stalin Wrote: Not to digress from this lovely discussion about sugar and obesity rates - but as pretty, thing, and feminine as these 60's broads are, remember this was the generation that ruined everything. These were the bra burners. The ones who started leaving the kitchen for college and the office. These were the baby boomers who started an epidemic of divorce in the 80's and 90's. This is the generation that started raising their children in single parent homes and destroying the traditional family dynamic.
General Stalin:
If OP decides to start posting again he's gonna kick your ass
From his last post on the forum:
(05-04-2013 10:13 AM)tenderman100 Wrote: Hey, I am a baby boomer. And I have worked my ass off. I have three degrees. I have held corporate jobs, started two businesses, running one now.
I haven't taken a fuckin' nickle from the government. But I have sure PAID the government a lot. All along I have contributed to social security and medicare/medicaid. Income taxes. Sales taxes.
Trust me there are LOT of us baby boomers out there who have yet to take a single dime from you 20-30 somethings, so quit the moaning about my generation.
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2016 03:14 PM by Mercenary.)
|
|
05-26-2016 03:13 PM |
|
The following 6 users Like Mercenary's post:6 users Like Mercenary's post
General Stalin, debeguiled, Conscious Pirate, Huey, TravelerKai, Tokyo Joe
|
debeguiled
Peacock
     
Posts: 7,759
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 117
|
RE: High School Fashions in 1969 -- Nobody was fat
Taking a poke at other generations is a layup.
The majority of the people in every generation are ok, getting along the best they can, and have no say in what the politicians, corporatists, or attention whores do to characterize their cohort.
Trashing a whole generation based on the actions of the mendacious few, while satisfying, is an intellectual cul de sac. Get if off your chest if you have to, to blow off steam, just don't imagine it to be an accurate representation of the millions who are being misrepresented and reduced to a simple characterization. Yeah, we all know how good it feels, how righteous, to take a moment to say that [selected group] has fucked it all up. No really, they really have, they really deserve it, unlike the criticisms of my generation.
The elites laugh at how easily they can divide us, based on race, age, sex, whatever, it is almost too easy for them, and we play into their hands when we focus on stuff like this.
“That sig BTW is a very asinine anti-family anti-parent quote. You live in a country where 40% of children grow up without a biological father, yet somehow “the greatest burden a child must bear is the unlived life of its parents”? Sorry but this is fruity Boomer nonsense.”
911
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2016 05:15 PM by debeguiled.)
|
|
05-26-2016 05:11 PM |
|
|
Cobra
Ostrich
   
Posts: 2,653
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation: 166
|
|
05-26-2016 06:30 PM |
|
The following 2 users Like Cobra's post:2 users Like Cobra's post
Smooth Operator, debeguiled
|