I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
Government should pay women to date losers
Author Message
JimNortonFan Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 933
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 22
Post: #1
Government should pay women to date losers
Hate to give Huff Post page views but:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/17...n&ir=Women

or go here:

http://governmentsgetgirlfriends.wordpress.com/867-2/


Looks like the incel losers have hit rock bottom.

This guy needs to watch this video:





Then he can do this:

[Image: 63913567.jpg]

After she's done with him:

[Image: an-american-soup-kitchen.gif]

This is the program he should advocate:

[Image: fembot.jpg]

That would stimulate high tech as well as incel losers.
05-19-2013 08:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like JimNortonFan's post:
Andy_B, Suits, EDantes, RoastBeefCurtains4Me
Andy_B Offline
Wingman
***
Gold Member

Posts: 607
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 2
Post: #2
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
I literally burst out laughing.
05-19-2013 08:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
LooTa Offline
Banned

Posts: 221
Joined: Dec 2012
Post: #3
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
He can pay a whore to do anything he wants out of his own pocket.
05-19-2013 08:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Parlay44 Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 6,579
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 67
Post: #4
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
Quote:involuntary celibacy

Laugh

Team Nachos
05-19-2013 09:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
2Wycked Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,607
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 130
Post: #5
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
Good find on that wordpress site, JimNortonFan.

Per usual, the comments on the opening page are not entirely good. Women, as usual, pretend female incels exist - the blog operator says who really cares because they have to go on dates in his system. A comment named "helly" responds saying everybody should be buying and selling in an appropriate sexual system. LOL

Another comment provides a list of things to do to "be a better person." They actually list treating women like you would treat a man. Must be a woman commenting, because no self-respecting man would say some dumb shit like that. I would never kick a woman's ass - but I reserve the right to if a man is really acting up. The comment points out to do things for youself, not about sex - which is good advice in general - but it seemed to be framed through a women's view that sex just happens if you show up.

Didn't read any more.

Old Chinese Man Wrote:  why you wonder how many man another man bang? why you care who bang who mr high school drama man
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2013 09:34 AM by 2Wycked.)
05-19-2013 09:33 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Exactaking Offline
Banned

Posts: 222
Joined: Jan 2013
Post: #6
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
I thought government forced losers to pay women?
05-19-2013 09:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Exactaking's post:
Kingsley Davis, Young T.R., Professor Fox, Caligula, JoyStick, Sancho
2Wycked Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,607
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 130
Post: #7
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
Edit - I don't know why my comment posted twice.

Old Chinese Man Wrote:  why you wonder how many man another man bang? why you care who bang who mr high school drama man
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2013 09:46 AM by 2Wycked.)
05-19-2013 09:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Avarence Offline
Wingman
***
Gold Member

Posts: 615
Joined: Oct 2012
Reputation: 0
Post: #8
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
All I saw was "Huffington Post" and "Government should pay..."

Same old shit.
05-19-2013 11:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Avarence's post:
Sombro, CRR
scorpion Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,524
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 257
Post: #9
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
These "incels" (or more accurately, hopeless omega losers) need to realize that they aren't entitled to any female attention. If, for whatever reason, you have completely failed at attracting the opposite sex, that is nature's way of informing you that your genetic package is unfit for reproduction.

Why should an omega loser have any access to pussy? Pussy ain't free. You've got to work for it one way or another. If a man cannot successfully achieve access to pussy, why the fuck would any woman want to mix her genes with his defective Y chromosomes? It's a sign of gross evolutionary unfitness if a man cannot find some way to access pussy. A woman would have to be out of her mind to want anything to do with a loser like that, because she'd be handicapping her children's chances of reproduction by mixing her genes with those of an unfit man.

This is the reason that women absolutely despise lower betas/omegas. Their hatred runs so deep that these men are, in effect, totally invisible to the average woman. That's by design. The male sex is nature's laboratory. The Y chromosome evolves the fastest out of any human genome, because of this very phenomenon. Fit men mate. Weak men are ignored.

Nature doesn't give a fuck if you are short or tall, muscular or weak, etc....at the end of the day all that matters is if you're able to get your dick wet, because that's the only way your genes get a ticket to the next generation. If you can't do that, then you don't deserve a ride, and you sure as fuck don't deserve big daddy government to lend you a helping hand just to get your nut off.

"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.” - Romans 8:18
05-19-2013 12:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 27 users Like scorpion's post:
bacon, 662LetGo, Professor Fox, LooTa, JoyStick, Lemmo, thebassist, Cincinnatus, durangotang, Invisible Jester, DjembaDjemba, CRR, Matrixdude, RaccoonFace, Mr. D, Brosemite, Irenicus, DJ-Matt, TravelerKai, Roadrunner, iop890, TheWhiteWolf, Nevsky, Geomann180, Handsome Creepy Eel, Comte De St. Germain, CaptainChardonnay
JimNortonFan Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 933
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 22
Post: #10
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
Scorpion,

You have to look at the fact that quality men who make society work are crapped on by women now.

Peacocks and parasites are valued more than guys who contribute to civilization.

It's a perverse incentive system that has the potential to do a lot of damage.

What women require for access is damaging to everyone. The peacock's tail and deer's antlers are the best analogies. The male animal wastes metabolic resources producing features that have no value for survival of the species as a whole. They just attract females because the tail and antlers are surrogates for fitness. It's not actual fitness the females are attracted to, it's signs of fitness that can be false. The tail reduces ability to dodge predators, spikes are sufficient to defend against predators, antlers are overkill.

Females can't judge quality very well so they go for outward signs that are surrogates for it. I'd had enough of this shit when I saw assholes who put shit in their hair to make it look like they just crawled out of bed getting attention.

Some dude who goes to work every day to feed his family, some cop who protects us from the bad guys, some soldier, sailor or airman who defends us, the farmer who feeds us, those real men don't have time to put shit in their hair. The women know this and want the man of leisure. Fuck them.

Some asshole with a barbed wire tattoo and no real job but who acts alpha and raw dogs dozens of women is a leech who makes messes for better men to clean up. The rest of us pay taxes to deal with his misbehaving emotionally damaged bastards.

I think the incels should shut up and either MGTOW or get some Game. Or just shut up. OTOH I can't blame them for being frustrated and angry with what's going on. As a group though they are VERY resistant to Red Pill.
05-19-2013 12:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 17 users Like JimNortonFan's post:
kbell, le tigre, w00t, DarkTriad, HeyPete, Suits, bachelor tax, Cincinnatus, Avon Barksdale, Sombro, Matrixdude, RatInTheWoods, eradicator, Mr. D, Brosemite, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Nevsky
Samseau Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 14,355
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 290
Post: #11
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 12:04 PM)scorpion Wrote:  These "incels" (or more accurately, hopeless omega losers) need to realize that they aren't entitled to any female attention. If, for whatever reason, you have completely failed at attracting the opposite sex, that is nature's way of informing you that your genetic package is unfit for reproduction.

Why should an omega loser have any access to pussy? Pussy ain't free. You've got to work for it one way or another. If a man cannot successfully achieve access to pussy, why the fuck would any woman want to mix her genes with his defective Y chromosomes? It's a sign of gross evolutionary unfitness if a man cannot find some way to access pussy. A woman would have to be out of her mind to want anything to do with a loser like that, because she'd be handicapping her children's chances of reproduction by mixing her genes with those of an unfit man.

This is the reason that women absolutely despise lower betas/omegas. Their hatred runs so deep that these men are, in effect, totally invisible to the average woman. That's by design. The male sex is nature's laboratory. The Y chromosome evolves the fastest out of any human genome, because of this very phenomenon. Fit men mate. Weak men are ignored.

Nature doesn't give a fuck if you are short or tall, muscular or weak, etc....at the end of the day all that matters is if you're able to get your dick wet, because that's the only way your genes get a ticket to the next generation. If you can't do that, then you don't deserve a ride, and you sure as fuck don't deserve big daddy government to lend you a helping hand just to get your nut off.

Disagree with everything posted above. There is no such thing as someone who deserves to get laid. There is no such thing as someone who does not deserve to get laid. There is no morality of sex.

The idea that women choose mates based on fitness is also laughable. Women fuck losers over successful men everyday. I know tons of doctors, programmers, lawyers, engineers, who can't get sex to save their lives.

The Huffington Post article raises a good point - there is no reason why women should have sex with one man or another. Women are merely attracted to the "winners," so if the government, as the head alpha male, suddenly declares men who are socially useful as the "winners" and give large subsidies for them to spend on dating women then it would be good for society writ large as there would be strong sexual incentives for men to do socially productive work.

This idea is not without historical precedence, either, as Ancient Athens used to have state subsidized prostitution for any male citizen, on top of the vast array of female (or male) sex slaves they could purchase, on top of the many marriage options the average man back then had. In Ancient Sparta, successful soldiers were the ones who got the most sex as well.

In Rome, victorious soldiers would be paraded around the city as a massive boost to their value, thereby guaranteeing their sexual success. This also used to occur in America before the Vietnam War. (One of the many reasons why vets of WW2 and Korea actually were successful in life compared to the homeless broken vets of Vietnam and after.)

The strong do what they can while the weak suffer what they must. If a state wishes to promote the sexual success of one group of men over another, then that's totally within the prerogative of the state since they have the power to do so. That's why the mark of a healthy state is one that promotes the interests of it's most useful men while doing its best to marginalize the bums and criminals.

Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.

Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2013 12:25 PM by Samseau.)
05-19-2013 12:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 26 users Like Samseau's post:
JimNortonFan, Therapsid, Don, kbell, phoenix101, Matt Forney, Ziltoid, Caligula, DarkTriad, HeyPete, Lemmo, Suits, Tresor, Cincinnatus, eradicator, captndonk, Matrixdude, Hannibal, Mr. D, Brosemite, DJ-Matt, iop890, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Geomann180, Nevsky, Burt Gummer
Kabal Away
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,704
Joined: Dec 2012
Reputation: 44
Post: #12
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
"Government should pay women to date losers."

We already have that. It's called welfare.

#NoSingleMoms
#NoHymenNoDiamond
#DontWantDaughters
05-19-2013 12:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 16 users Like Kabal's post:
le tigre, username, Caligula, eradicator, SpiderKing, AnonymousBosch, Invisible Jester, Conscious Pirate, TravelerKai, Roadrunner, EDantes, Rhyme or Reason, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Nevsky, Burt Gummer, Jean Valjean
scorpion Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,524
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 257
Post: #13
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
You have both misapplied what I wrote to apply to the majority of beta men when I was specifically referring to lower betas and omegas.

This is the bottom 10% of the male population from a genetic perspective. These are guys with some kind of defect, be it physical or psychological that prevents them from successfully interacting with women.

My point was that a situation where such men have no access to women is perfectly reasonable. Defective men should not be receiving female attention. Nature simply does not want defective Y chromosomes entering the gene pool, which is why women have innate disgust or outright blindness toward omegas.

A blue collar bad boy with a prison record is not necessarily an omega. Neither is an unemployed musician. They may not be productive citizens on a societal level, but that doesn't matter, and isn't what I was talking about. I'm simply talking about evolutionary success from a genetic level. They're productive men from a reproductive standpoint, which is ultimately what matters in terms of the long-term evolution of humanity. If you're mother nature testing out human DNA templates, the most important criterion is not how intelligent or how productive or how good looking your human is, but how likely they are to reproduce. If you don't nail that first point, nothing else matters, because it won't stick around for long.

From a societal perspective, the state has an interest in promoting the reproduction of beta men, not omega men. If we roughly assign the bottom 10% of men as omega and the top 10% as alpha, that leaves 80% betas. This is the group that makes civilization possible and and whose sexual access should be guaranteed through marriage/monogamy.

The problem is that these "incels" view themselves as aggrieved betas when they are, in fact, omega losers who have failed to demonstrate reproductive fitness (evidenced by the fact that they complain online about being celibate and beg for government assistance rather than taking the initiative toward self-improvement like a worthy man would).

The key takeaway here is the distinction between the beta and the omega. The beta is the bedrock of society. The omega is a failed beta whose genes have no business in the next generation. Lumping omegas in with the greater mass of betas is simply poisoning the gene pool with maladaptive reproductive traits.

"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.” - Romans 8:18
05-19-2013 12:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 9 users Like scorpion's post:
JimNortonFan, void, Professor Fox, Cincinnatus, Invisible Jester, Irenicus, TravelerKai, iop890, Nevsky
Samseau Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 14,355
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 290
Post: #14
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
But the article is talking about incels, not deformed weirdo's. Most incel's are not seriously deformed or physically broken in any way. Most incel's just had a shitty childhood.

Contributor at Return of Kings. I got banned from twatter, which is run by little bitches and weaklings. You can follow me on Gab.

Be sure to check out the easiest mining program around, FreedomXMR.
05-19-2013 12:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Therapsid Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,357
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 17
Post: #15
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 12:46 PM)scorpion Wrote:  A blue collar bad boy with a prison record is not necessarily an omega. Neither is an unemployed musician. They may not be productive citizens on a societal level, but that doesn't matter, and isn't what I was talking about. I'm simply talking about evolutionary success from a genetic level.

They're successful from a genetic standpoint only in a limited sense.

You could say they'll be more likely to pass on their genes. To the extent this is true, and I'm not sure it is, it's really more because the upper classes have chosen through late marriage and comparatively low rates of childbirth out of wedlock to have fewer children. Having lots of sex doesn't really translate like it used to because of contraception, except among low IQ people.

But why would a ex-convict bad boy not necessarily be an omega? Simple - because women are still hardwired to desire physically strong, intimidating, and confident men because of millions of years of evolution in primitive hunter-gatherer societies. But only the last of these traits is actually adaptive in modern post-industrial civilization.

Women being attracted to alphas is arguably non-adaptive in the modern world in the same way that Westerners packing on pounds from eating carb and sugar-rich diets is. It made sense for people to quickly gain weight from carbohydrates in pre-agricultural societies, but now it's maladaptive and produces obesity, diabetes, and premature aging. In the same way natural selection favored traditional alphas in primitive hunter-gatherer societies which, as Steven Pinker and others have shown, suffered from atrociously high levels of homicide and warfare. But many of these alpha characteristics are no longer adaptive except insofar as they appeal to female sexual hardware inherited from the primordial past.
05-19-2013 01:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Therapsid's post:
Brosemite, Jean Valjean
scorpion Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,524
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 257
Post: #16
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 12:56 PM)Samseau Wrote:  But the article is talking about incels, not deformed weirdo's. Most incel's are not seriously deformed or physically broken in any way. Most incel's just had a shitty childhood.

I think it's mostly psychological problems that limit omegas/incels more than physical deformities. I'm sure some of that is attributable to childhood issues as you point out. Some of it is also just genetic. These are the guys who are just hopeless from a social perspective for whatever reason. The wiring just doesn't connect. The vast majority of them will be socially awkward/inept for their entire lives, and as a result they will have tremendous difficulty successfully interacting with women and passing on their genes. It's unfortunate for them personally, but evolution is not about the emotional well-being of the individual, but rather the reproductive well-being of the species. That's just how nature works whether we like it or not. Besides, as a society we treat the omega better than he has been at any time in history: video games and porn are enough to totally occupy most.

"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.” - Romans 8:18
05-19-2013 01:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like scorpion's post:
Brosemite, TravelerKai
NY Digital Offline
Alpha Male
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,008
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 16
Post: #17
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
Scorpion, that is wrong.

The porn and video game industry is what's making them omega.you're throwing out thousands of years of evolution for video games and porn. These "omegas" came to this earth because their ancestors reproduced.
05-19-2013 02:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes NY Digital's post:
RoastBeefCurtains4Me
Don Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 248
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 12
Post: #18
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 12:04 PM)scorpion Wrote:  These "incels" (or more accurately, hopeless omega losers) need to realize that they aren't entitled to any female attention. If, for whatever reason, you have completely failed at attracting the opposite sex, that is nature's way of informing you that your genetic package is unfit for reproduction.

Why should an omega loser have any access to pussy? Pussy ain't free. You've got to work for it one way or another. If a man cannot successfully achieve access to pussy, why the fuck would any woman want to mix her genes with his defective Y chromosomes? It's a sign of gross evolutionary unfitness if a man cannot find some way to access pussy. A woman would have to be out of her mind to want anything to do with a loser like that, because she'd be handicapping her children's chances of reproduction by mixing her genes with those of an unfit man.

This is the reason that women absolutely despise lower betas/omegas. Their hatred runs so deep that these men are, in effect, totally invisible to the average woman. That's by design. The male sex is nature's laboratory. The Y chromosome evolves the fastest out of any human genome, because of this very phenomenon. Fit men mate. Weak men are ignored.

Nature doesn't give a fuck if you are short or tall, muscular or weak, etc....at the end of the day all that matters is if you're able to get your dick wet, because that's the only way your genes get a ticket to the next generation. If you can't do that, then you don't deserve a ride, and you sure as fuck don't deserve big daddy government to lend you a helping hand just to get your nut off.

I had a colleague in high school, he was tall, good looking, fit, and smart(went on to become a computer engineer i believe). His only 'defect' was that he was shy and lacked self-esteem, and for that reason he was a kiss-less virgin by 20. Didn't speak to him since, i'm pretty sure he got laid since then, but i don't think much changed overall. I have another friend, he's 24, top of his class studying medicine, IQ over 140, also a virgin. It's true he doesn't really invest in his appearance, and he's kind of awkward, but i'm sure that he'll grow up to be a much more valuable member of society than you will ever be, yet you judge him as an 'evolutionary mistake', just because he can't get his dick wet in this crazy fucked up society we live in. When I think of an 'incel', i picture them, and because of that, i find your post absolutely disgusting and devoid of any value.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2013 05:50 PM by Don.)
05-19-2013 05:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 13 users Like Don's post:
, phoenix101, Ziltoid, Suits, Lucario, captain_shane, Irenicus, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Nevsky, Burt Gummer, TheMadGreek, TTQQTT, astrosleuth
scorpion Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,524
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 257
Post: #19
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 05:41 PM)Don Wrote:  I had a colleague in high school, he was tall, good looking, fit, and smart(went on to become a computer engineer i believe). His only 'defect' was that he was shy and lacked self-esteem, and for that reason he was a kiss-less virgin by 20. Didn't speak to him since, i'm pretty sure he got laid since then, but i don't think much changed overall. I have another friend, he's 24, top of his class studying medicine, IQ over 140, also a virgin. It's true he doesn't really invest in his appearance, and he's kind of awkward, but i'm sure that he'll grow up to be a much more valuable member of society than you will ever be, yet you judge him as an 'evolutionary mistake', just because he can't get his dick wet in this crazy fucked up society we live in. When I think of an 'incel', i picture them, and because of that, i find your post absolutely disgusting and devoid of any value.

This is a forum for men, Don. If you want to cry about being offended by the stark expression of the harsh truths of the sexual marketplace maybe you should point your browser to Jezebel. Frankly, I don't give a fuck about your hurt feelings, or how upset you are by the incontrovertible assertion that your friends will be by definition evolutionary failures if they don't reproduce. I don't write posts with the express intention of making Don feel good about his friends. If you object to the argument I presented I encourage you to submit a counterargument of your own rather than vomit up some drivel about how offended you are, like some aggrieved woman who takes everything personally.

The entire point of my argument, which you somehow glossed over, probably due to the distraction of your misty-eyed, homo-erotic recollections of your old friends, was that nature doesn't care how tall, or smart or good-looking people are if they can't figure out how to reproduce. Their positive qualities will most likely exit the gene pool if they lack the all-important ability to sheath their dick in a vagina with regularity. You may find that a disgusting truth, but it's a truth nonetheless.

"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.” - Romans 8:18
05-19-2013 06:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like scorpion's post:
Brosemite, TravelerKai, Roadrunner, Frank Rook, Comte De St. Germain
Don Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 248
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 12
Post: #20
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 06:29 PM)scorpion Wrote:  This is a forum for men, Don. If you want to cry about being offended by the stark expression of the harsh truths of the sexual marketplace maybe you should point your browser to Jezebel. Frankly, I don't give a fuck about your hurt feelings, or how upset you are by the incontrovertible assertion that your friends will be by definition evolutionary failures if they don't reproduce. I don't write posts with the express intention of making Don feel good about his friends. If you object to the argument I presented I encourage you to submit a counterargument of your own rather than vomit up some drivel about how offended you are, like some aggrieved woman who takes everything personally.

The entire point of my argument, which you somehow glossed over, probably due to the distraction of your misty-eyed, homo-erotic recollections of your old friends, was that nature doesn't care how tall, or smart or good-looking people are if they can't figure out how to reproduce. Their positive qualities will most likely exit the gene pool if they lack the all-important ability to sheath their dick in a vagina with regularity. You may find that a disgusting truth, but it's a truth nonetheless.

Ok, i'll break it to you fast because I already wasted enough time. I agree with the proposition that "nature doesn't care how tall, or smart or good-looking people are if they can't figure out how to reproduce". What I am saying is this:

All you are doing is attacking and pointing fingers and calling names. Contrary to what you think, you are not sharing any "harsh sexual marketplace truths", at least you didn't with your original post, you are simply being a dick. You are spiteful and you prove that with your shit post above that's made 90% of indirect or direct attacks against me. And because you obviously were unable to extract my argument from the examples i posted, i'm going to lay it down as simple as I possibly can:
There are some good men that are incels just because of bad circumstances(ex. my future doc friend) that shouldn't be labeled as 'hopeless omega losers' by some dipshit that calls himself 'Scorpion', they deserve respect because some of them will grow up to be valuable members of society, and good beta male husbands(which are the glue to society), so treating and labeling them as genetic failures is absurd. I can tell you see yourself as a big deal, trust me, you're not, get over yourself.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2013 07:17 PM by Don.)
05-19-2013 07:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Don's post:
le tigre, Irenicus, astrosleuth
le tigre Offline
Male Feminist

Posts: 6
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 0
Post: #21
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 12:41 PM)Kabal Wrote:  "Government should pay women to date losers."

We already have that. It's called welfare.

Post of the thread.





More seriously, I don't think they need to pay women to date losers. Just decriminalize prostitution. The amount of bullshit that accompanies unpaid sex would greatly diminish. Market forces.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2013 07:13 PM by le tigre.)
05-19-2013 07:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like le tigre's post:
bacon, username, Invisible Jester, Off The Reservation, Mikan, Nevsky, TheMadGreek, astrosleuth
le tigre Offline
Male Feminist

Posts: 6
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 0
Post: #22
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 07:05 PM)Don Wrote:  [quote='scorpion' pid='449961' dateline='1369006188']
There are some good men that are incels just because of bad circumstances(ex. my future doc friend) that shouldn't be labeled as 'hopeless omega losers' by some dipshit that calls himself 'Scorpion', they deserve respect because some of them will grow up to be valuable members of society, and good beta male husbands(which are the glue to society), so treating and labeling them as genetic failures is absurd. I can tell you see yourself as a big deal, trust me, you're not, get over yourself.

Exactly, Don. These are the real alphas ("tall, good looking, fit, and smart" doctor), the kind of people who built this crumbling civilization.

Not some self-promoting pickup artist wearing a fuzzy hat and spouting routines.
(This post was last modified: 05-19-2013 07:17 PM by le tigre.)
05-19-2013 07:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
scorpion Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,524
Joined: Sep 2012
Reputation: 257
Post: #23
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
Don, you are comically insecure. I'm not specifically calling you and your friends those names. Those posts were not aimed at you or them in particular. If you feel threatened and offended by terms like "evolutionary failure", "hopeless", "unfitness" and "omega", that speaks to your self-identification as a person (or as the friend of a person) who meets those descriptions.

In other words, the problem isn't with what I'm saying, it's with your perception of what I'm saying.

Really, I don't think you're cut out for this place if you're that sensitive. We like to speak the truth here (as we see it, at least) and don't like to hold back to preserve the feelings of weepy-eyed chodes. I wouldn't be disappointed if you never posted again. If you think I'm a dick I encourage you to place me on ignore.

"For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in us.” - Romans 8:18
05-19-2013 07:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes scorpion's post:
Samseau
JimNortonFan Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 933
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 22
Post: #24
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
Scorpion,

I basically agree with you about the 10:80:10 thing but the issue isn't that only 10% of incompetent guys are being cut out. The percentage grows every year.

You may be thinking Dungeons and Dragons playing omegas should be cut from the gene pool. That's fine. The problem is that it's evolving to where only alpha and faux alpha (barbed wire tattoo types) can score. Check out the latest date lab thread with the Dr. who got rejected for not being flirtatious enough. This is a quality guy who is too good for the woman who rejected him. She will be begging for a guy like him once she hits the wall.

We're not just talking about getting some, nor pure biology. It's an issue of reproducing societies that can function. If you're one of the guys who's written that off and is enjoying the decline I'm wasting my time typing this, it's just I've never seen you post anything to that effect so I don't know where you stand on having any hope for things getting better.
05-19-2013 07:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like JimNortonFan's post:
Suits, RoastBeefCurtains4Me
Don Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 248
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 12
Post: #25
RE: Government should pay women to date losers
(05-19-2013 07:19 PM)scorpion Wrote:  Don, you are comically insecure. I'm not specifically calling you and your friends those names. Those posts were not aimed at you or them in particular. If you feel threatened and offended by terms like "evolutionary failure", "hopeless", "unfitness" and "omega", that speaks to your self-identification as a person (or as the friend of a person) who meets those descriptions.

In other words, the problem isn't with what I'm saying, it's with your perception of what I'm saying.

Really, I don't think you're cut out for this place if you're that sensitive. We like to speak the truth here (as we see it, at least) and don't like to hold back to preserve the feelings of weepy-eyed chodes. I wouldn't be disappointed if you never posted again. If you think I'm a dick I encourage you to place me on ignore.

I'm not offended, threatened, or 'weepy-eyed', pumpkin. With every post you make, you just further validate my point. I made an argument in my last post, that you completely ignored just to attack me, yet again. I will not ignore you, because I wouldn't waste that time. I also don't care if you think i'm 'cut out for this place'. Your posts are just mental diarrhea aimed at different people that happen to cross your path at that particular point in time, you add no value, and you're obviously unable to discuss an abstract concept in an objective matter, and that makes you, in my opinion, not 'cut out for this place'.
05-19-2013 07:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Government and the family unit for.petes.sake 0 440 04-21-2019 10:47 PM
Last Post: for.petes.sake
  Men want sex with fat women, but don't want to date them Horus 88 17,756 12-29-2018 10:51 AM
Last Post: Borges
  Ask for Angela Campaign to hit Australia (For women who feel unsafe on a date). Rush87 30 5,043 10-22-2018 06:20 AM
Last Post: Cattle Rustler

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication