Post: #1

Post: #2

Surely those legs have been touched up on Photoshop. God damnnn

Post: #3

Seems more of a fat victim than a wall victim. Her face still looks good, and her elephant thighs are a product of childbirth and poor nutrition / exercise, not likely to be due to age.

Post: #4

(06-07-2013 03:30 AM)Handsome Creepy Eel Wrote:  Seems more of a fat victim than a wall victim. Her face still looks good, and her elephant thighs are a product of childbirth and poor nutrition / exercise, not likely to be due to age.

Post: #5

Yikes. I find fat legs more unattractive than fat arms. They look more permanent.

Post: #6

she keeps on fallin'

Post: #7

Bitch needs to hit the treadmill.

Post: #8

Sitting at a piano doesn't exactly burn the calories.

Post: #9

J.LO is 43 and she still looks good IMO. It's on how much you want it.

Post: #10

Is there a difference between getting fat and hitting the wall?

If she lost all that weight, I wouldn't consider her a wall victim.

Post: #11

She was always a little on the chubby side, with big hips and no tits! For me, a girls real shape is revealed by her upper arms. If they are floppy, she is not working out and she will join the fat-club in the future. Those knees looks like porridge. But like all western woman say "I have given birth to a child"

Post: #12

(06-07-2013 11:55 AM)Clyde Wrote:  J.LO is 43 and she still looks good IMO. It's on how much you want it.

Yep. Keys is a musician/singer. She can do what she does at any weight (though I hate to see someone so young let herself go). J.Lo is by profession a dancer first, basically an athlete who needed to always be in top shape to do what she does. She never lost that pride in looking and feeling her best. She dropped twins and got back to the gym asap. You're right - Keys doesn't care enough to do the same.

Post: #13

That bitch has got CANKLES!

Post: #14

Even at her best, Keys didn't have a great body. She's small-breasted, and has a flat/wide ass. With added weight, those kinds of asses can really get ugly. Her gift is that she's very pretty.

Post: #15

Are these pics from 2013?

There is still hope, right?

She has been fat before. I remember when she had chest hair too.

Post: #16

I don`t wanna come across as negative...but chest hair doesn`t sound very promissing.

Post: #17

Post: #18

(06-07-2013 03:49 PM)ghostdog Wrote:  

By the way...

(12-24-2012 06:46 PM)ghostdog Wrote:  also can't look at the face the same again after this

http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-18945-...#pid333736

What do you do on the internet, ghostdog?

Post: #19

The supposed "chest hair" thing isn't a bid deal. Any number of women, if you look close enough, probably have that. Some women have really hairy forearms, and depending on the ethnicity, it's very dark. Let's not even talk about the legs, which some women tend to leave unshaved in the winter when they're wearing a lot of slacks and dark stockings/leggings.

Post: #20

At fist I was thinking, "Oh god, not another wall thread," then I clicked and thought, "Since when did Alicia Keys procreate with an elephant?" Seriously, those legs are FUCKED UP.

Post: #21

Alicia Keys, waist-down shot from another angle.

Post: #22

She's on the dreamer bulk.

Post: #23

Here calves are as big as her thighs should be. Yegh!

Post: #24

Truly shocking - I remember Prince getting all obssessed with her back in the day and she was having none of it - I guess he's not so cut up anymore...

I was in love with a girl a few years back and it never happened - she was very pretty but for a young girl had quite big arms. I imagine at some point The Wall will appear and those big arms may become big everything.

I look forward to that day and running into her again. I want her to feel the shame!

Post: #25

Sorry, I wouldn't fuck her. She's flat out fat and nasty. I like spinners, not elephant calves.