Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
How Whack is The New York Times?
Author Message
iop890 Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,920
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation: 93
Post: #76
RE: How Whack is The New York Times?
(08-04-2018 02:21 PM)iop890 Wrote:  By the way fellow Straight White Males™, I can't recommend enough keeping an eye out on instagram or other social media for black/mixed girls that post this kind of stuff all day. I've banged a few 9's in my life, but I basically never pull those bangs up in the mental fap-bank. The slightly mentally ill BLM/Afrocentric/whatever Eritrean 7 with braids though? Those bangs were life changing.

Example
08-05-2018 08:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes iop890's post:
The Lizard of Oz
Captainstabbin Offline
Hummingbird
*****

Posts: 3,376
Joined: Apr 2015
Reputation: 23
Post: #77
RE: How Whack is The New York Times?
Candace was mocking Sarah and Twitter suspended her account:

[Image: tumblr_pczwaboYfS1tfpkqdo1_1280.jpg]



After enough backlash, they claimed it was just an error:

[Image: tumblr_pd04muwRZH1w9qs8jo1_1280.jpg]
08-06-2018 12:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 10 users Like Captainstabbin's post:
Barron, spokepoker, Handsome Creepy Eel, DJ-Matt, gework, Jetset, Leonard D Neubache, BlueMark, Super_Fire, Cr33pin
kbell Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,031
Joined: Jul 2011
Reputation: 27
Post: #78
RE: How Whack is The New York Times?

This antiwhite editor almost got a bolt-on Chinese tech person injured.
08-06-2018 09:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like kbell's post:
Captainstabbin, Handsome Creepy Eel, Transsimian, spokepoker
torridon747 Offline
Banned

Posts: 1,213
Joined: Nov 2015
Post: #79
RE: How Whack is The New York Times?
That paints VICE pretty badly. They're getting quite the reputation for being shitty journalists without morals or ethics. Hopefully they get shut out of the market soon
08-06-2018 09:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like torridon747's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, spokepoker, Jetset
Jetset Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,329
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 42
Post: #80
RE: How Whack is The New York Times?
[Image: 1*_kJFXaTHbcet2XuETtEtkQ.png]

Vice: it's the journalistic equivalent of that sketchy plumber you had to sue.

Hidey-ho, RVFerinos!
08-07-2018 07:04 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Jetset's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
budoslavic Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,278
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 28
Post: #81
RE: How Whack is The New York Times?
Bumping this old thread. Sarah Jeong is back in the news.



From The Federalist:
Quote:NYT Writer With History Of Racist Tweets Urges Left-Wingers To Boycott NYT

September 27, 2019 By David Marcus

In an unconventional move on Friday, New York Times editor Sarah Jeong advised her followers that boycotting the newspaper that employs her is an excellent way to support “dissenting views” within the company. Dissenting from what, exactly, she doesn’t make clear, but obviously she must think something is very wrong at the paper of record if she is essentially calling for a boycott.


The tweet came in reply to another tweeter who bemoaned the cancellations as self indulgent, saying it does nothing. Not so fast, replied Jeong. In fact, she informs us, cancelled subscriptions are an important metric that the Grey Lady uses to distinguish between “real” outrage (scare quotes hers) and superficial outrage.

Jeong is herself no stranger to outrage. Upon being hired by the Times a year ago, tweets surfaced in which she described how awful, horrible, and even subhuman white people are. Presumably Jeong believes the reaction to her tweets was superficial outrage. Nonetheless, the Times did respond.

This was the Times’ statement: “Her journalism and the fact that she is a young Asian woman have made her a subject of frequent online harassment. For a period of time she responded to that harassment by imitating the rhetoric of her harassers. She sees now that this approach only served to feed the vitriol that we too often see on social media. She regrets it, and the Times does not condone it.”

Strong stuff, full of excuses and half apologies. A few months later, Times editorial page editor James Bennet told me he agreed the incident exposed a double standard that is hard to defend. Presumably even the acknowledgement of this double standard would be an example of one of the things at the Times that Jeong and her lonely fellow leftists dissent from. After all, we all know what a hive of conservative vitriol the paper of record is.

At most businesses, it is frowned upon for employees to encourage customers to boycott their products. But increasingly, this kind of performative progressivism from Jeong and others is the Times’ product. They are less a news outlet than an arbiter of good and acceptable taste in political and cultural issues, as its 1619 Project and the leaked transcript of a meeting about it show. Their job isn’t to report news, but to establish and police social norms.

In this context, it is easy to see why Jeong felt comfortable tweeting what she did and why the Times will not punish it. She’ll probably get a promotion. The inmates have taken over the asylum at the nation’s most noted newspaper, and now they are recruiting subscribers to help in their mutiny.

Blatant bias was already a reason to doubt the Times. Now we can add total editorial dysfunction to this list. After all, when one of the paper’s own editors is calling for boycotts to fix the problems, how are we supposed to trust anything they print?

Edit.


(This post was last modified: 09-28-2019 09:09 AM by budoslavic.)
09-28-2019 08:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like budoslavic's post:
Canopus, Handsome Creepy Eel
eradicator Online
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,311
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 43
Post: #82
RE: How Whack is The New York Times?
It goes without saying she was in love with multiple chads who didn’t know she existed/white god theory

Team yoga pants
[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UoeQOC-5iw&t=143s[/video]
09-28-2019 06:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes eradicator's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  New York legalizes late-term abortions ilostabet 45 5,564 02-10-2019 11:13 PM
Last Post: 911
  Men are wearing miniskirts now (New York Post article) jordypip23 32 7,718 06-25-2018 09:47 AM
Last Post: Bluto
  New York Times declare we're at the "age of the twink" Roosh 23 5,552 06-03-2018 10:04 PM
Last Post: Jetset

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication