StrikeBack
Ostrich
   
Posts: 2,133
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 92
|
|
02-18-2015 02:16 AM |
|
The following 1 user Likes StrikeBack's post:1 user Likes StrikeBack's post
Chaos
|
H1N1
Ostrich
   
Posts: 2,167
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 118
|
RE: Lifter's Lounge
(02-18-2015 09:12 PM)RexImperator Wrote: Thanks, those were a good read.
I wonder if I need to strengthen my glutes.
I believe my hip flexors are very tight.
Is the leg press worth doing if you are squatting?
With regards to your last question, the answer is it depends, what are your goals?
For me personally, having large legs and glutes and doing a lot of cardio, my goals are to get stronger without increasing the size of my legs. For me, the leg press simply takes time and energy away from movements/loadings that would directly increase my strength, and italso gives a hypertrophy focus that I don't want. For me, therefore, the leg press is not 'worth doing'.
If you have skinny legs, don't have primarily athletic goals/are aesthetics focused, or just need a bit more size to keep getting stronger, then it definitely has merit, and is a good addition to your program.
|
|
02-19-2015 05:55 AM |
|
|
the chef
Woodpecker
 
Posts: 491
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 7
|
RE: Lifter's Lounge
(This post was last modified: 02-19-2015 08:14 PM by the chef.)
|
|
02-19-2015 08:09 PM |
|
The following 1 user Likes the chef's post:1 user Likes the chef's post
Giovonny
|
dads
Kingfisher
  
Posts: 840
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 10
|
RE: Lifter's Lounge
So I'm getting to the close of my bulk (unintentional dirty bulk, as the holidays were particularly bad in terms of what I was putting into my body) and I'm getting ready to start cutting. I've been doing 3 days a week, full body (8, 8, 6, 6, 6 on main lifts). Would the best way to minimize muscle loss be to double down on reps and cut weight in half (e.g. Instead of 185x8, 195x8, 205x6, 215x6, 225x6, go 135x16, 145x16, so on)? Or should I continue with my usual program?
|
|
02-19-2015 09:30 PM |
|
|
H1N1
Ostrich
   
Posts: 2,167
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 118
|
RE: Lifter's Lounge
(02-19-2015 09:30 PM)dads Wrote: So I'm getting to the close of my bulk (unintentional dirty bulk, as the holidays were particularly bad in terms of what I was putting into my body) and I'm getting ready to start cutting. I've been doing 3 days a week, full body (8, 8, 6, 6, 6 on main lifts). Would the best way to minimize muscle loss be to double down on reps and cut weight in half (e.g. Instead of 185x8, 195x8, 205x6, 215x6, 225x6, go 135x16, 145x16, so on)? Or should I continue with my usual program?
I'm going to start sounding like a broken record, but what are your goals? You can certainly cut weight and keep making strength gains (almost certainly not mass gains unless you're getting some help). Stick with your current program, unless you're bored and need a change, and listen to your body.
I've said it before, in this thread and others, but here I go again:
Performance based goals are, in my view, the best way to consistently make progress, both for strength and aesthetics UNLESS you are already a competitive bodybuilder at some level (and that means you live the life and actually do shows). For everyone else, even the terminally vain, performance based goals are the best way of achieving the physique you want. Diet then becomes a matter of eating in such a way that you are able to continually make progress with some aspect of your training, allowing for the fact that not all areas will progress linearly.
Put simply, show me a guy who can OHP his BW, squat and dead 500+, knockout 100 pressups any time, and run a 6 minute mile, and I'll show you a guy with a physique that anyone would desire.
|
|
02-20-2015 05:43 AM |
|
The following 5 users Like H1N1's post:5 users Like H1N1's post
Kieran, Giovonny, StrikeBack, Bushido, Ringo
|
StrikeBack
Ostrich
   
Posts: 2,133
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 92
|
RE: Lifter's Lounge
Thanks dog24, the more I share, the more I learn.
Totally agree with H1N1 on performance-based goals. That's what I focus on as well, and my physique shall reflect my strength and fitness. The other positive side effect of such pursuit is that you avoid the mental trap of being miserable with your physique fluctuations and diet changes, very common with amateur bodybuilders / recreational lifters.
Deluge Wrote:I'm pretty happy with how I look shirtless at the moment, but I might have a problem. So I have a bulging chest, popping out lats and v shaped upper body, but a friend who saw me shirtless randomly told me my skin around my belly looked saggy.
Up until now I just assumed it was the last fat I had to cut, I was never obese or anything so I never thought it'd be saggy. There's still some fat there so I can't be sure till I cut down a little more, but I'm really hoping I won't need surgery or something to fix it. If it is a skin problem, it won't be significant enough to look bad per se, but it might mean I can't get a visible 6 pack
Before you speculate any further or listen to more broscience and stress yourself out, just go book a DEXA scan. I'm not sure how much it costs, as I get it extra cheap ($33 a scan from a bulk buy ages ago), but it shouldn't be too expensive. If you're 15% BF or more, you don't have a loose skin issue to worry about, unless you have a history of obesity earlier on.
Also, loose skin in the lower belly affects the bottom 2 of your 8-pack abs, not the better known 6-packs. It's not really a problem unless you're going for a bodybuilding contest.
StrikeBack's Wife School
|
|
02-22-2015 01:52 AM |
|
|
Spike
Hummingbird
    
Posts: 2,922
Joined: Jun 2011
Reputation: 54
|
RE: Lifter's Lounge
Can't believe I did 250 crunches 3 times a week for nearly 20 years without any impressing results (not even the faintest sight of a six pack) and now that i'm doing weighted abs exercises 3 times a week for just 2 months, my abs are growing like a motherfucker.
- leg raises from a bench (3 x 15)
- weighted crunches with cable machine ( 15 x 120 pounds, 15 x 130 pounds, 10 x 140 pounds, 5 x 150 pounds) and I'm just getting used to the exercise, will lift more soon.
- 3 sets of woodchoppers 15 times each side
FUCK every other ab exercise.
38 years old. Can't wait for summer.
Book - Around the World in 80 Girls - The Epic 3 Year Trip of a Backpacking Casanova
My new book Famles - Fables and Fairytales for Men is out now on Amazon.
(This post was last modified: 02-22-2015 02:02 PM by Spike.)
|
|
02-22-2015 02:00 PM |
|
The following 5 users Like Spike's post:5 users Like Spike's post
Giovonny, BallsDeep, Bushido, slubu, heavy
|
Hades
Banned
Posts: 3,652
Joined: Feb 2012
|
RE: Lifter's Lounge
(02-19-2015 10:28 PM)StrikeBack Wrote: Leg press doesn't add much strength but can add a lot of useless mass, as H1N1 says. I don't want to gain useless mass that slows me down. However, if you have very skinny legs, knock yourself out.
If you read up on what elite level lifters are doing (chinese oly lifters, captain kirk, etc.) in terms of lower body work, you'd be hard pressed to find anybody who doesn't do leg curls, extensions, and leg press as assistance work. Most of them tend to get a substantial amount of lifting volume in by bodybuilding.
By extension, I don't think that any 'useless' mass is really all that useless at all. If you're hell bent on beating a double bodyweight back squat you can do a lot worse than twenty rep death sets of leg press as assistance work.
A lot of bodybuilders also argue that doing shit like 100 rep arm curl sets (a very fun exercise, start with the bar and creep up a pound or two at a time) flush the muscles with blood and promote healing. I don't care how the mechanism works but occasional high rep work seems to help recovery like nothing else. At the very least it can break up monotony in the gym.
(02-24-2015 10:36 AM)slubu Wrote: Do you guys workout when you are sick with a cold? Symptoms starting today...
Deadlifting seems to clear the sinuses.
I also drink when I'm sick.
Haven't been sick in like two years though.
(This post was last modified: 02-24-2015 11:18 AM by Hades.)
|
|
02-24-2015 11:12 AM |
|
The following 1 user Likes Hades's post:1 user Likes Hades's post
alexdagr81
|
H1N1
Ostrich
   
Posts: 2,167
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 118
|
RE: Lifter's Lounge
(02-24-2015 11:12 AM)Hades Wrote: (02-19-2015 10:28 PM)StrikeBack Wrote: Leg press doesn't add much strength but can add a lot of useless mass, as H1N1 says. I don't want to gain useless mass that slows me down. However, if you have very skinny legs, knock yourself out.
If you read up on what elite level lifters are doing (chinese oly lifters, captain kirk, etc.) in terms of lower body work, you'd be hard pressed to find anybody who doesn't do leg curls, extensions, and leg press as assistance work. Most of them tend to get a substantial amount of lifting volume in by bodybuilding.
By extension, I don't think that any 'useless' mass is really all that useless at all. If you're hell bent on beating a double bodyweight back squat you can do a lot worse than twenty rep death sets of leg press as assistance work.
A lot of bodybuilders also argue that doing shit like 100 rep arm curl sets (a very fun exercise, start with the bar and creep up a pound or two at a time) flush the muscles with blood and promote healing. I don't care how the mechanism works but occasional high rep work seems to help recovery like nothing else. At the very least it can break up monotony in the gym.
I wouldn't actually disagree with any of this, and I probably wasn't clear in my previous post. If your goal is a bigger back squat, or performance in a power/oly lift, or pure aesthetics, then leg press, leg curls etc are excellent. A bigger muscle has the potential to be a stronger muscle, and forcing hypertrophy through more quickly by pumping the muscle than it would occur simply by back squatting is a sensible way of achieving your goal.
However, if your goals are more athletic/military/combat performance related, leg press/curls etc are a poor time investment. For example, with a more than 2x bw squat already, my strength in the back squat is not limiting my progress as far as my own performance goals are concerned. Indeed, a slower rate of progress in it, perhaps due to the absence of leg press/curl etc, none-the-less leaves me with the energy and lack of muscle soreness to prioritise other movements (eg sandbag getups) that may not build leg muscles, but do make me a better fighter/soldier/athlete, but also a weaker squatter.
Although I advocate (incessantly) that people set performance goals, there is no reason to suggest my performance goals are 'better' than other valid ones. Being a good power lifter is a legitimate pursuit, and a WR squat is in itself an excellent performance goal. It's just not my performance goal and my training reflects that.
I am please that on a frantic rereading of my post on leg press, I'm not contradicting myself.
|
|
02-24-2015 11:49 AM |
|
|