Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
Author Message
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 19,326
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 219
Post: #1
Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
I wanted to share an outstanding article by blogger Herbert Purdy:

http://herbertpurdy.com/?p=903

Feminism: the enemy inside us all
Quote:Women today (and many men: the so-called ‘White Knights’ and ‘Man-ginas’) should be in no doubt that the feminism they espouse is not going to liberate them. In fact it seeks to enslave them, and destroy them.

With its emphasis on ‘sisterhood’ and solidarity, and the alleged objectification of women by men (that, they say, fails to recognise the worth of women beneath their looks), do they know that the movement they are following grew out of the radical political culture of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, August Bebel and their 20th century heirs such as Herbert Marcuse? And from the concomitant principles of the existentialist movement, also of the 20th century, principal amongst whom were Jean Paul Sartre and his (literal) bedfellow, Simone de Beauvoir?

Do they understand that modern feminism grew out of this left-wing revolutionary culture, and that the most obvious proof of this is its wilful redefinition of patriarchy to mean control of women by men? In fact the fight against patriarchy is one of the cornerstones of Marxism, and has been since its inception. It was around long before feminism started articulating it, and it means the rule of the father not the rule of men. (‘Patr’ is an ancient Sanskrit word for father, and ‘archon’ means ruler in the Greek.)

In fact, patriarchy was a benign rule, better defined as ‘patrimonialism’ – a term first coined by Max Weber in the early 20th century. It was an expression of the protective love that fathers have for their children and their families that found its ultimate expression in the patrimonial love of monarchs for their people. But Marxism, stands implacably opposed to the rule of the father, which it sees as the cornerstone of the ‘bourgeois’ family.
Feminism’s version of the evil hegemony of patriarchy, purports to show that our social systems have been constructed by men who have an implicit vested interest in keeping women in submission – to their advantage. This is utter nonsense. The facts speak for themselves.

Society has grown and evolved for millennia out of the need for security and economic prosperity in order to stave off intermittent starvation and the threat of invasion. Social organisation evolved for the betterment of everyone. Men played their protective part in its development, and women played their part in a complementary role in the home as homemakers and child rearers (although history shows us that there were some very powerful women leaders of ancient societies, which even further gives the lie to feminism’s evil patriarchy).

It is only in recent centuries that the increase in economic wealth in developed nations, gained by this social development, has given women the freedom to take a higher political profile. It is only the freedom from grinding poverty and the threat of foreign invasion, and the rule of law developed by social evolution that has allowed that.

And, in case anyone forgets, this has also been the case for men. Men in general have never had any social power either. They too were slaves to their families, responsible for their wellbeing. They too were the vassals and serfs. They too were freed from the grinding subsistence that has characterised most of human society from time immemorial. Men and women both have had a rough time throughout history on the long walk to freedom through social and economic development.

Yet, based on the false feminist redefinition of patriarchy, what is now happening is a fight for control of society by women. There is a war going on – a class war – where the classes that are being set against one another are women and men. Women are invading every male space and threatening men’s sanctuaries – just because they can. Society is being divided along the fault-line of gender by women, who have, lock, stock and barrel, bought an alien, divisive ideology – feminism – which is a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all and conform us to its way of life.

Feminism’s true purpose is political power and influence, not liberation of anybody – least of all women. It’s adherents talk about the hegemony of patriarchy (aka men), but it is they who are intent on hegemony. It is they who have redefined egalité - social or political equality – that cry of true 18th century revolution, to mean equality qua sameness (and now parity of numbers in all walks of life, which really is nonsense). It is the women feminists who want to impose an alien political ideology on us all, one that is built on hatred, social upheaval and revolution, and which is anathema to everything western capitalist democracies stand for.

Feminism is not a liberal movement. Its roots do not lie in the European Enlightenment ideals of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It draws its sustenance from the ideals of communism and the submission of people to the collective (the ideas of sisterhood and solidarity of women expose this).

Put simply, feminism is communism in a skirt, and it is fundamentally against the grain of modern capitalist societies such as we have in America, Canada and Britain: these are the prime targets of its undermining infiltration because they are quintessential examples of capitalism – yet the women of these societies, who are its main beneficiaries, are giving it oxygen, and even promoting it.

One after the other, in the 20th century, we saw Marxist/communist states fail. Those states dismantled the private family. They brought women out into the work force as equal units of economic production rather than as creators and curators of the social capital: the family and children; and they took those children into collective state guardianship, supplanting the parents’ authority, especially that of the father.

Those states fell because their underpinning ideology simply didn’t resonate with the spirit of ordinary folk, who wanted freedom and individualism – and, yes, capitalism, consumerism and private family life: that framework enshrined in western capitalist democracy in which life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness can be expressed.

Today, in America, Canada and Britain, this angry communist creed is coming up hard against capitalist democracy. With feminism amongst us, women are threatening men, and they are tearing their own society apart. All the aggression is coming from women toward men, and I fear that a time is coming when men will turn and say enough is enough, and when that happens, battle really will be joined.

I am prepared to bet that most women today in the developed world would declare themselves in favour of feminism without realising that they are espousing an ideology that seeks to enslave them, not liberate them; and is breaking up their families, removing fathers from their children’s lives, and alienating their menfolk whom they need as husbands, fathers, brothers, supporters and protectors.

In the Trojan War, when the Greeks managed to get the infamous wooden horse holding soldiers into Troy, those soldiers sneaked out in the night and opened the gates to the enemy. The city was sacked and Troy was defeated. The men and boys were put to the sword, and the women and girls carried off into enforced slavery.

Women today are opening the gates of our society to the social enemy of feminism. They will have a lot to answer for one day – and that day might be sooner than they think (if they think at all, that is.)


Feminism is an ideology of deep hatred for men and family - their base lies in Marxism and its true goals are destruction of the family and the removal of any patriarchal power.

In the end we can all correctly assume who profits the most from that destruction - it certainly is not the wide majority of women except for a paltry few.
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2014 03:22 PM by Simeon_Strangelight.)
09-16-2014 03:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 12 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
assman, TigerMandingo, Old Fritz, Spectrumwalker, Wadsworth, solo, 911, Super_Fire, Blancpain, Samseau, puckerman, Laner
Old Fritz Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 781
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 6
Post: #2
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
I've posted this before but it must be stated here again. Much of the rhetoric used by the hard left (feminist, social activist, social justice warriors) today was used by Bolsheviks and their followers as they were overthrowing the Russian Tsars. They talked about equality and peasants rights and workers rights and womens rights. Shit.. they even had a woman's day.

But this was just a way for the Bolsheviks to gain power; and it worked. Many of those people that talked about equality soon found out it was a load of crap; but it was too late for them. Many of the "useful idiots" were put in gulags or lined sent to the basement of that building (cant recall the name at this point) and shot in the back of the head. They suffered this fate because they outlived their usefulness.

The same thing happened when the Soviets helped set up that iron curtain. We had Polish, East German, Czechoslovakian, etc groups that talking about rights and preached other leftist rhetoric. Of course many of these people were disposed of as well.

Many of the social activist from the left that came here during the 1960's and 1970's (hippies, feminist, anti Vietnam war protesters) came over here to talk about "rights" and the patriarchy. They promoted homosexuality, feminism, and did things that would make the government assume more control; with the intent of destroying the family. KGB called it "Active measures" and they are still doing it today.

I'm simplifying a lot of this but it's the gist of what happened. Much more to say but still. At worse, feminism will become deglamorized and we will see Neo feminist; kind of like how we see neo nazis today.
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2014 08:13 PM by Old Fritz.)
09-16-2014 08:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like Old Fritz's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, puckerman, assman, CynicalContrarian, Super_Fire, Samseau, demolition, Laner
MdWanderer Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,149
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 29
Post: #3
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
(09-16-2014 03:08 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  One after the other, in the 20th century, we saw Marxist/communist states fail. Those states dismantled the private family. They brought women out into the work force as equal units of economic production rather than as creators and curators of the social capital: the family and children; and they took those children into collective state guardianship, supplanting the parents’ authority, especially that of the father.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that explain why the USSR had female soldiers fighting during WWII long before women were allowed to join the US Military?
09-16-2014 08:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes MdWanderer's post:
puckerman
Saga Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 475
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 13
Post: #4
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
(09-16-2014 08:28 PM)MdWanderer Wrote:  Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that explain why the USSR had female soldiers fighting during WWII long before women were allowed to join the US Military?

Maybe it was partially that, but it was also a matter of desperation. Russia had seen such policies before, as female soldiers had also been used by Kerensky's government during WWI. However, aside from a number of pilots and a few other exceptions, most women were used in support roles and not in combat arms...common-sense practicality trumped ideology.

In fact, 'equality of the sexes' was one of those issues to which the USSR was regularly giving lip service but it never amounted to anything more than that. For instance, they reserved half the (inconsequential rubber-stamp) legislature for women but positions of actual power were held almost exclusively by men for its entire history.
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2014 09:30 PM by Saga.)
09-16-2014 09:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Saga's post:
Simeon_Strangelight
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 19,326
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 219
Post: #5
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
(09-16-2014 09:20 PM)Saga Wrote:  
(09-16-2014 08:28 PM)MdWanderer Wrote:  Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't that explain why the USSR had female soldiers fighting during WWII long before women were allowed to join the US Military?

Maybe it was partially that, but it was also a matter of desperation. Russia had seen such policies before, as female soldiers had also been used by Kerensky's government during WWI. However, aside from a number of pilots and a few other exceptions, most women were used in support roles and not in combat arms...common-sense practicality trumped ideology.

In fact, 'equality of the sexes' was one of those issues to which the USSR was regularly giving lip service but it never amounted to anything more than that. For instance, they reserved half the (inconsequential rubber-stamp) legislature for women but positions of actual power were held almost exclusively by men for its entire history.

Partly ideology, partly propaganda shots and partly desperation, since the USSR would have never survived the onslaught of the Germans if they had not been highly supported and supplied by the US long before the war. In a way they mobilized whomever they could - even women.

The US government and big US companies built the infrastructure necessary to create the Communist "Superpower" - Antony Sutton detailed it quite well with ample documentation in his books.

Even with that aid they barely managed. Out of desperation even the Vikings used women to fight in the wars, but usually those were situations where the enemy was about to wipe out the whole people, so that women were chipping in instead of waiting to be raped and slaughtered a little bit later.

In the Communist countries feminism was of course supported to a degree. Based on previous Bolsheviks experiments with the destruction of the family law they knew that they could not go full womens' lib on it. If they had done that, the economic system could not have sustained the flood of single mothers and uncaring incel men. They knew that they had to keep the family intact out of simple survival, which explains why Western style feminist books were banned in the USSR, but women were publicly portrayed as glorious workers and were given special days.

While I do believe that they had plans to destroy the family in the end there too, it never came to that, because their economic system was just so ineffective that they would have never been able to pull it off and still survive.
(This post was last modified: 09-17-2014 12:19 AM by Simeon_Strangelight.)
09-17-2014 12:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
Lizard King, Super_Fire, TooFineAPoint, Samseau, Laner
Off The Reservation Away
Banned

Posts: 2,488
Joined: Jul 2015
Post: #6
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
Bump worthy thread
01-23-2018 11:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Off The Reservation's post:
paullyFIRE, Laner
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 19,326
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 219
Post: #7
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
The eerie thing is that ever since that article the feminists and SJWs have begun to use the same rhetoric as the Bolsheviks in the past.

Class guilt was renamed white guilt, and the oppressive bourgeoisie was replaced with oppressive Whites, oppressive men and overall oppressive capitalist system - that remained. Nowadays if you are not some kind of oppressed minority, then obviously you must be the oppressor who inherently profits from white male guilt.

Similarly as in Communism they have recreated the stifling of free speech where anyone who is pointing out the madness of feminism, the idiocy of the gay-free-love or transgender madness even while pointing to science - he is decried as a hate monger and is risking loss of his livelihood/career. In Germany and other European countries you are decried a Nazi and hate monger whenever you point out that opening the borders to unfitting Muslim and sub-Saharan immigrants has not only created an unprecedented crime wave, but in the long term will wipe out Europe - then you are fined huge sums and even incarcerated - losing your job is the very minimum.

Currently people are already beginning to stifle their online activities and I guess soon everyone will be careful with his opinions. My guess is that the first re-education gulags will reappear again in the next decades if things go the way they do.
01-24-2018 02:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 13 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
Super_Fire, Syberpunk, amity, DJ-Matt, Aurini, MKE-Ed, Blancpain, Aquarius, sterling_archer, Sgt, Samseau, debeguiled, Laner
Off The Reservation Away
Banned

Posts: 2,488
Joined: Jul 2015
Post: #8
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
(01-24-2018 02:35 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  The eerie thing is that ever since that article the feminists and SJWs have begun to use the same rhetoric as the Bolsheviks in the past.

Class guilt was renamed white guilt, and the oppressive bourgeoisie was replaced with oppressive Whites, oppressive men and overall oppressive capitalist system - that remained. Nowadays if you are not some kind of oppressed minority, then obviously you must be the oppressor who inherently profits from white male guilt.

Similarly as in Communism they have recreated the stifling of free speech where anyone who is pointing out the madness of feminism, the idiocy of the gay-free-love or transgender madness even while pointing to science - he is decried as a hate monger and is risking loss of his livelihood/career. In Germany and other European countries you are decried a Nazi and hate monger whenever you point out that opening the borders to unfitting Muslim and sub-Saharan immigrants has not only created an unprecedented crime wave, but in the long term will wipe out Europe - then you are fined huge sums and even incarcerated - losing your job is the very minimum.

Currently people are already beginning to stifle their online activities and I guess soon everyone will be careful with his opinions. My guess is that the first re-education gulags will reappear again in the next decades if things go the way they do.

Marxism seeks to corrupt everything.
01-25-2018 12:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Off The Reservation's post:
debeguiled, estraudi
N°6 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,597
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 26
Post: #9
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
(09-16-2014 08:10 PM)Old Fritz Wrote:  I've posted this before but it must be stated here again. Much of the rhetoric used by the hard left (feminist, social activist, social justice warriors) today was used by Bolsheviks and their followers as they were overthrowing the Russian Tsars. They talked about equality and peasants rights and workers rights and womens rights. Shit.. they even had a woman's day.

Yes, Trotsky was the banks' man to destroy the legacy of the Third Rome, take its gold and enforce equality by destroying the Petrine Tsars and a huge swathe of the middle class (including the upper middle class Volga Germans).

It was Trotsky which brought abortion, no-fault divorce, communal canteens and the 'liberation' of women from marriage to Russia. After Trotsky and the Anarchists were exiled, the powers that be in the West fused their heirs with global capitalism against Russia be creating the 60s counter-culture. This is now the Boomer socially and financially liberal establishment (globalism) which destroyed the domestic masculine working classes and opposes Putin - the anti-thesis of Trotsky having rebaptised Russia.
01-25-2018 02:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like N°6's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, 911, debeguiled, Laner, Super_Fire, estraudi
N°6 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,597
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 26
Post: #10
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
(01-24-2018 02:35 AM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  The eerie thing is that ever since that article the feminists and SJWs have begun to use the same rhetoric as the Bolsheviks in the past.

I watched a Russian documentary recently about the liberal victim groups which are springing up in the West. It cited these five stages of persecution of social conservatism/ tradition.

1. Tolerance
2. Acceptance
3. Celebration
4. Forced participation
5. Punishment

I estimate that we are at the latter stages of stage 3 at the minute although we can see some high profile figures in stage 4 where their public careers can be ruined if they display a disturbing lack of zeal.
01-25-2018 02:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 7 users Like N°6's post:
Samseau, Super_Fire, 911, debeguiled, estraudi, Richard Turpin, Greenjacket
puckerman Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,555
Joined: Nov 2013
Reputation: 14
Post: #11
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
Link no longer works. Thanks for posting the text of the article.
01-26-2018 02:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes puckerman's post:
Simeon_Strangelight
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 19,326
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 219
Post: #12
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
His Twitter is online, but hasn't been updated since almost a year.

Possibly no longer alive - he had some well researched articles on his site.

https://twitter.com/herbert_purdy
01-26-2018 03:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Lunostrelki Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 460
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 15
Post: #13
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
Feminism is just the new class contradiction that the communist movement came up with after the Cold War emphatically invalidated the original "virtuous workers vs capitalist parasites" narrative.

The only part of communism that doesn't change is its hatred-and-jealousy-fueled cult of atheist dialectics.
(This post was last modified: 01-29-2018 10:42 AM by Lunostrelki.)
01-29-2018 10:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
911 Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 5,444
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 59
Post: #14
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
Feminism has supplanted Civil Rights, once there wasn't much left to change or repeal in terms of racial discrimination by the 1970s. Feminism, which was introduced by paid agents like Steinem, is itself approaching that late stage where it's no longer as potent as a tool for social upheaval, so its framework has to move further out to shakier notions like gender wage gap, but even that cycle is getting played out.

So enter "Gay Rights", introduced in the 1990s as the next iteration in socially disruptive identity politics. And now that "gay marriages" have been legalized and gay rights have been fully enforced, trans rights and the marginalization of normal gender roles is the new campaign.

In the bigger picture, it's about using these marginal activists as revolutionaries committed to overthrowing the social order in order to further the oligarchs' goals of complete social and economic control. In order to do this, values have to be redefined. They know what the moral order really is, and you don't, and now that you are morally wrong, you have no rights. E. Michael Jones distills this here:




λ ό γ ο ς
01-29-2018 12:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 7 users Like 911's post:
N°6, Simeon_Strangelight, Syberpunk, Super_Fire, Kid Twist, estraudi, Richard Turpin
N°6 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,597
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 26
Post: #15
RE: Feminism – a puppet of Marxism that seeks to divide and rule us all
E Michael Jones has nailed it. I often think about the married man's wage (unions and guilds of fathers organising themselves so that their families could have a share of the profits).

The above excerpt could have described my office. Most of the associates and directors are women. The CEO doesn't need to pay them the family supplement because these women are mostly the second earners - the allowance has shifted from being paid by the CEO to female employees' husbands.
01-29-2018 01:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like N°6's post:
911, Super_Fire
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication