Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
The Hillary Clinton thread
Author Message
RexImperator Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,552
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 27
Post: #876
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
[Image: maxresdefault.jpg]

Bella, horrida bella
et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno
05-25-2016 09:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like RexImperator's post:
911, J. Spice, Built to Fade
LeoneVolpe Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,593
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 40
Post: #877
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Jesus Christ, have you guys seen this?! This bitch needs to be in prison, if not for the e-mail scandal than certainly for being a traitor to this nation if she manages to slither her way in. Trump MUST win!

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidenti...-100-days/

Quote:Below are just a few of the extreme immigration positions held by Clinton.

(1) Expanding Unconstitutional Executive Amnesty

Perhaps one of the most radical aspects Clinton’s open borders platform is that she is openly campaigning on defending and even expanding President Obama’s unconstitutional executive amnesties.

“You can count on me to defend President Obama’s executive actions on DACA and DAPA when I am president,” Clinton said, referring to Obama’s 2012 (DACA) and 2014 (DAPA) executive amnesties, which gave work permits and access to federal benefits to millions of illegal immigrants.

Clinton’s campaign website states that, as President, she will “defend President Obama’s executive actions to provide deportation relief for DREAMers and parents of Americans and lawful residents.” Meaning, Clinton will allow millions of illegal immigrants to remain in the United States, receive work permits to legally fill American jobs, and get access to federal benefits paid for by U.S. taxpayers.

In addition, Clinton’s website says she will “extend those actions to additional persons with sympathetic cases if Congress refuses to act.”

If Congress continues its refusal to act on comprehensive immigration reform, Hillary will put in place a simple, straightforward, accessible system for parents of DREAMers and others with a history of service and contribution to their communities to be able to make their case and be eligible for deferred action as well.

However, as Sen. Jeff Sessions has pointed out, Congress has acted on so-called “comprehensive immigration reform” and it has rejected it. Sessions explains that the reason any executive-ordered amnesty is unconstitutional is because “the President’s action erases the laws Congress has passed in order to implement laws Congress has refused to pass.”

Sessions said that “Congress considered and rejected these changes to immigration law in 2006, 2007, 2010, 2013, and 2014.”

While Clinton is pushing for immigration policies that would expand migration rates, polls show that the American electorate overwhelming wants immigration levels to be frozen or reduced—including 92% of the GOP electorate and 83% of the American electorate overall.

Moreover, according to an October Rasmussen survey, most Americans still oppose Obama’s unconstitutional executive amnesty. A Kellyanne Conway poll found that by a 2-1 margin, voters believe that illegal immigrants should be encouraged to return home by shutting off their access to U.S. jobs and welfare.

(2) Amnesty Within 100 Days

Clinton has pledged to enact amnesty within her first 100 days in office. As NBC recently reported: “If elected, the former secretary of state has promised to build on President Obama’s executive actions and introduce comprehensive immigration reform during her first 100 days in office.”

Clinton’s website has explained that by “comprehensive immigration reform,” Clinton means full citizenship for illegal immigrants, which would give them welfare access, voting privileges, and the ability to bring over their family members through chain migration.

“As president, Hillary will fight for comprehensive immigration reform that provides a full and equal path to citizenship,” Clinton’s website states.

Full amnesty for the illegal immigrant population will cost U.S. taxpayers $6.3 trillion, according to a report from the Heritage Foundation.

Clinton’s pledge for amnesty perhaps explains why she won the endorsement of open borders advocate Luis Gutierrez–who has previously said “I have only one loyalty… and that’s to the immigrant community.”

In return, Clinton has heaped praise on Gutierrez, declaring that “few people have done as much as Luis to make sure that when it comes to America’s policies on immigration, those policies reflect America’s values. He organizes, strategizes, preaches, teaches, inspires, cajoles, whatever it takes to keep this movement moving forward.”

Interestingly, Paul Ryan also won the early endorsement of Gutierrez prior to being elected as House Speaker. As Bretibart News has previously reported, Ryan’s views on foreign migration, foreign trade, and foreign wars are more similar to Hillary Clinton’s views than those of GOP presumptive nominee Donald Trump.

(3) Freezing deportations

Clinton has said that, as President, that she will essentially freeze deportations.

“I would not deport children. I do not want to deport family members either,” Clinton declared in March. Clinton’s pledge not to enforce U.S. immigration law as President represents an essentially unprecedented departure from the nation’s history of enforcing immigration law.

The Center for Immigration Studies’ Mark Krikorian described Clinton’s pledge as “a breathtaking step toward open borders.”

As the Washington Post reported: “Clinton’s pledge not to deport any illegal immigrants except violent criminals and terrorists represents a major break from President Obama, and it could vastly increase the number of people who would be allowed to stay in the country.”

Clinton’s vision erases entirely the protections that U.S. immigration laws are supposed to afford American citizens: such as protecting Americans from losing a job to an illegal immigrant, preventing the sapping of school and hospital resources, as well as defending the voting privileges and enfranchisement of U.S. citizens (giving citizenship to illegal immigrants allows them to cancel out the votes of native-born American citizens).

The implication of Clinton’s platform– i.e. that illegal entry is not in and of itself a deportable offense–represents a central pillar of the open borders credo: namely, that millions of people can illegally come to the country, take jobs, attend U.S. schools, receive affirmative action, apply for federal benefits, and give birth to children who receive birthright citizenship.

Moreover, waiting until after a violent conviction has been obtained to deport an illegal alien means that immigration laws were enforced far too late–i.e. they were not enforced until after an American was victimized, raped, or murdered by a criminal alien. A federal policy that waits to enforce immigration laws until after there is a criminal conviction would mean admitting and releasing criminals by the hundreds of thousands, and letting them roam free until after they have committed a crime, and have been apprehended, tried, and convicted for that crime.

As Sen. Sessions has explained, immigration laws ought to remove criminal aliens before they are convicted of a violent crime. “Our goal should be to keep 100% of dangerous aliens out of the United States… we need to remove potentially violent offenders before they hurt innocent families—before the irreversible occurs.”

(4) There’s no need to secure the border because it’s already “the most secure border we’ve ever had”

Even as tens of thousands of migrants continue to pour across our southern border, Clinton has declared that the border is “the most secure border we’ve ever had”– suggesting that she does not feel it is necessary to take additional actions to secure it. Clinton argues that since the border is already secure, it is time to give amnesty to the millions of migrants who have entered illegally.

“We have the most secure border we’ve ever had… The Republicans, the opponents, no longer have an argument,” Clinton said during a March CNN/Univision Democratic debate. “We enhanced the border security. That part of the work is done… Everybody who I know who has looked at it says it is OK. We have a secure border. There’s no need for this rhetoric and demagoguery that still is carried out on the Republican side. You’ve run out of excuses. Let’s move to comprehensive immigration reform with a path to citizenship.”

(5) Closing Detention Centers

On her website, Clinton pledges to “end family detention and close private immigrant detention centers”.

“Hillary believes we should end family detention for parents and children who arrive at our border in desperate situations. We have alternatives to detention for those who pose no flight or public safety risk, such as supervised release,” Clinton’s website explains.

This again represents a radical step in further dismantling what little immigration enforcement is now in place. Clinton is essentially saying that she will not detain new incoming illegal immigrants, but will instead release them into the interior of the United States.

(6) Obamacare for illegal aliens

Clinton has repeatedly said that she supports giving Obamacare to illegal immigrants. Clinton’s website says that Clinton wants to “Expand access to affordable health care to all families… She believes we should let families—regardless of immigration status—buy into the Affordable Care Act exchanges.”

Chelsea Clinton echoed this sentiment while campaigning for her mother. “It’s so important to extend the Affordable Care Act to people who are living and working here, regardless of immigration status, regardless of citizenship status,” Chelsea Clinton said in March.

(7) Full path to citizenship

Clinton has pledged to use federal resources to ensure that millions of more foreign migrants are able to vote in U.S. elections:

There are millions of people in America who could be naturalized, but for one reason or another, they’re not. So let’s help more of our neighbors claim their rights. It’s so powerful, so precious, to be a citizen of the United States!

To be able to vote in our elections, to have a voice in our future, and I want to take down the barriers that are holding people back. So here’s a few things I will do: I will work to expand fee waivers, so more people seeking naturalization can get a break on the costs. I will increase access to language programs to help people boost their English proficiency. I will enhance outreach and education so more people know their options and are engaged in the process. I don’t want anyone who could be a citizen to miss out on that opportunity.

Polling data suggests that Clinton’s voter importation plan will overwhelmingly benefit the Democratic Party.

A 2011 Pew survey found that Hispanics have a more negative view of capitalism (55%) than do supporters of Occupy Wall Street (47%). A 2012 Pew Hispanic Center survey found that 75% of Hispanics prefer bigger governments that provide more services as opposed to smaller governments that provide fewer services.

Political scientists have documented how mass immigration helps Democratic politicians. As University of Maryland’s James Gimpel noted: “the enormous flow of legal immigrants into the country — 29.5 million 1980 to 2012 — has remade and continues to remake the nation’s electorate in favor of the Democratic Party.”

Reuters has similarly reported: “Immigrants favor Democratic candidates and liberal policies by a wide margin, surveys show, and they have moved formerly competitive states like Illinois firmly into the Democratic column and could turn Republican strongholds like Georgia and Texas into battlegrounds in the years to come.”

(8) Expanded refugee resettlement

Hillary Clinton has called for a massive expansion in Middle East migration.

As Donald Trump has observed, “Crooked Hillary wants a radical 500% increase in Syrian refugees.”

Indeed, last year Clinton called for admitting 65,000 Syrian refugees—on top of the roughly 30,000 refugees and asylees the U.S. already admits from the Middle East each year. Adding in refugees from across the Muslim world, this means that under Clinton’s plan, the U.S. would admit at least 105,000 thousand refugees from the Muslim world annually.

“I’ll work to ensure that every single refugee who seeks asylum in the United States has a fair chance to tell his or her story, this is the least we can offer people fleeing persecution and devastation,” Clinton said in December.

As Breitbart News has previously reported, below is a more detailed breakdown of Islamic migration that would occur in her first term under the minimum numbers she has put forward thus far:

– 374,000 refugees/asylees from the Middle East during her first term, based on DHS data.

– 420,000 refugees/asylees from the Muslim world during her first term.

– 560,000 permanent migrants from the Middle East during her first term.

– 730,000 permanent migrants from the Muslim world during her first term.

According to a September 2015 Rasmussen survey, only 5% of likely voters said that they wanted the U.S. to admit more than 100,000 refugees from the Middle East.

Women oppose Clinton’s plan to bring more than 100,000 refugees from the Middle East by a remarkable 21-to-1 margin, with 84 percent opposing and four percent supporting.

Democrat voters oppose Clinton’s refugee plan by a 17-to-1 margin with 87 percent opposing and five percent supporting.

Most remarkably, 85 percent of black voters oppose Clinton’s refugee agenda with less than one percent of black voters supporting her plan.
(This post was last modified: 05-25-2016 10:45 PM by LeoneVolpe.)
05-25-2016 10:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like LeoneVolpe's post:
El Chinito loco, Handsome Creepy Eel, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, sixsix, Samseau, eradicator, Nevsky, Built to Fade
El Chinito loco Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 4,683
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 71
Post: #878
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Hillary is a neo-con.

She's not even really a liberal which is even more hilarious how the dopey cunt brigade all rally around this rapacious mummy wearing a mao suit.

What neo-cons believe in:

Exploitative labor agreements that benefit the richest individuals at the expense of the entire middle class. This means opening up the flood gates to legalize illegals and also more h1b until it breaks any salary competition in skilled white collar professions.

Expanding foreign military intervention at all costs to protect Israel as well as to enrich the existing military industrial complex.

While expanding foreign military intervention reducing the effectiveness of the U.S. military by cutting costs and funneling it into private contractors. This directly endangers U.S. servicemen lives.

Central bank monetary policy which subsidizes global elites in Europe on board the neo-con train, the finance industry, and corporate interests.

Long term reduction of all constitutional rights across the board if it doesn't support the narrative. Bye bye freedom of speech, gun rights, property, etc.. hello to domestic spying, excessive search and seizure, corporate prison system, etc..

Anti-democratic manipulation of "chosen one" candidates and votes to solely benefit establishment elites. If your choice of beverages for the forseeable future is coke or pepsi it's not really a choice at all.

Fulfilling globalist objectives of protecting the top tier elite and their famillies while creating a disefranchised middle class that is easily manipulated. In the long run this means increasing the poor and letting in lots of uneducated and criminally orientated third world immigrants to hamstring the middle class aka the latin-america scenario.
05-25-2016 11:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 21 users Like El Chinito loco's post:
Canopus, RaccoonFace, LeoneVolpe, Khan, Handsome Creepy Eel, DamienCasanova, Nevsky, estraudi, eradicator, Kaizen, MKE-Ed, AManLikePutin, Orion, Leonard D Neubache, John Michael Kane, Enoch, Dismal Operator, MMX2010, Prince of Persia, TravelerKai, Built to Fade
The Beast1 Offline
Peacock
******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,610
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 85
Post: #879
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Here's a question for the group:

If Hillary decides to drop out for whatever reason is it past the point of no return for the Democrats to run someone else? Aren't there deadlines for the Democrats to get a name onto the ballots in each state? That time is quickly running out.
05-26-2016 09:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like The Beast1's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Built to Fade
DamienCasanova Offline
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,240
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation: 33
Post: #880
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
(05-26-2016 09:45 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Here's a question for the group:

If Hillary decides to drop out for whatever reason is it past the point of no return for the Democrats to run someone else? Aren't there deadlines for the Democrats to get a name onto the ballots in each state? That time is quickly running out.

The rules for the DNC are different than the RNC. In the DNC's rules, The Dems can take all of the delegates at their convention and give them to ANYONE they want. She could very easily say, i'm dropping out for "health" reasons, and i'm pledging all my delegates to Joe Biden/Elizabeth Warren, and put them in her spot.
(This post was last modified: 05-26-2016 12:13 PM by DamienCasanova.)
05-26-2016 12:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like DamienCasanova's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, [email protected], Built to Fade
Paracelsus Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,188
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 149
Post: #881
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
(05-26-2016 12:12 PM)DamienCasanova Wrote:  
(05-26-2016 09:45 AM)The Beast1 Wrote:  Here's a question for the group:

If Hillary decides to drop out for whatever reason is it past the point of no return for the Democrats to run someone else? Aren't there deadlines for the Democrats to get a name onto the ballots in each state? That time is quickly running out.

The rules for the DNC are different than the RNC. In the DNC's rules, The Dems can take all of the delegates at their convention and give them to ANYONE they want. She could very easily say, i'm dropping out for "health" reasons, and i'm pledging all my delegates to Joe Biden/Elizabeth Warren, and put them in her spot.

Good luck if they do. That's like putting Obama II/Obama Ultra Edition on the ticket. And Trump can actually make himself the younger candidate if that happens!

Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
05-26-2016 09:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Paracelsus's post:
DamienCasanova, Built to Fade
Dusty Offline
Peacock
******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,861
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 82
Post: #882
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread



Take care of those titties for me.
05-27-2016 07:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Dusty's post:
Brodiaga, spokepoker, MMX2010, Built to Fade
bigrich Offline
Robin
*

Posts: 196
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 0
Post: #883
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
[Image: Eu98WwP.jpg]

Who is she going after with this ad? Flexible dudes who grow beards and have tattoos to mock masculinity?
05-27-2016 11:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
BassPlayaYo Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 555
Joined: Oct 2015
Reputation: 3
Post: #884
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread


05-28-2016 10:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like BassPlayaYo's post:
eradicator, 911, spokepoker, Built to Fade
Paracelsus Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,188
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 149
Post: #885
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
(05-27-2016 11:13 PM)bigrich Wrote:  [Image: Eu98WwP.jpg]

Who is she going after with this ad? Flexible dudes who grow beards and have tattoos to mock masculinity?

This is an appeal to guys on the fringes of the MRA movement. Which is amusing since the Iron Clit again wrongfoots it: all she'll get is hipsters who already vote for her and/or Bernie Sanders. And she'll turn off most women with this because the guy has a rape stare going. "Hilary Clinton, the candidate for rapists everywhere ... after all, she's married to Bill Clinton."

Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
05-28-2016 10:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Paracelsus's post:
bigrich, Built to Fade
MMX2010 Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,015
Joined: Dec 2014
Post: #886
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
According to Scott Adams' blog, that ad above is a hoax.
05-28-2016 10:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
eradicator Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,313
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 43
Post: #887
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-us...hilis-psa/

False according to snopes. Would have been hilarious if true. It will be interesting to see if the establishment democrats abandon her or not if she implodes due to stupidity.

Team yoga pants
[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UoeQOC-5iw&t=143s[/video]
05-29-2016 04:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes eradicator's post:
bigrich
TrifeLife Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 322
Joined: Apr 2015
Reputation: 9
Post: #888
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Sorry if this is a silly question:

How does one vote in national presidential polls?
05-29-2016 09:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
eradicator Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,313
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 43
Post: #889
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
(05-29-2016 09:57 AM)TrifeLife Wrote:  Sorry if this is a silly question:

How does one vote in national presidential polls?

I am pretty sure they call people up randomly and ask if they would like to participate in a political poll, it will take 2 minutes, and ask a couple of questions about the upcoming election etc.

It's not a silly question at all.

Team yoga pants
[video=youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UoeQOC-5iw&t=143s[/video]
05-29-2016 11:40 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes eradicator's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Orion Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 600
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 8
Post: #890
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
(05-27-2016 11:13 PM)bigrich Wrote:  [Image: Eu98WwP.jpg]

Who is she going after with this ad? Flexible dudes who grow beards and have tattoos to mock masculinity?

This is a typical image of a reformed 21. century male.

Where his "masculine" appearance is not an essence, but just a satirical play, in the same way that camp culture is not low bourgeoisie in essence, but just an appearance.

"Eyes speak what heart tells them"
05-29-2016 11:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Orion's post:
estraudi
MMX2010 Offline
Banned

Posts: 3,015
Joined: Dec 2014
Post: #891
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
The best part about that hoax is that so many people believed in it. The hoaxer was able to make clear exactly what we feel about Hillary Clinton by hoaxing us so easily.
05-29-2016 11:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like MMX2010's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, eradicator, bigrich, Built to Fade
911 Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 5,193
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 59
Post: #892
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Secretary of State blows a gasket in a conference.




(starts at 9s - ignore the long intro and the rest of the vid after 46s)

Pantsuit doing a great job representing the USA in Africa there.

λ ό γ ο ς
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2016 07:11 PM by 911.)
05-29-2016 07:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like 911's post:
debeguiled, Lizard King, Built to Fade
El Chinito loco Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 4,683
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 71
Post: #893
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
(05-29-2016 07:07 PM)911 Wrote:  Secretary of State blows a gasket in a conference.




(ignore the long intro and the rest of the vid, starts at 9s)

Pantsuit doing a great job representing the USA in Africa there.

You can see those rumors of Hillary being a cunt being validated from time to time in little incidents like this. She can only hide her sociopathic nature behind that facade for so long. Noone liked her as secretary of state when she was in Asia as well. General commentary I heard from the local press was that she was cold and disinterested.

Just like other crazies once you poke them with the right stick they tend to give the shark eyes. Then all is revealed.
(This post was last modified: 05-29-2016 07:13 PM by El Chinito loco.)
05-29-2016 07:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like El Chinito loco's post:
911, Lizard King, estraudi, Built to Fade
CaptainChardonnay Away
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,111
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 36
Post: #894
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
(05-27-2016 11:13 PM)bigrich Wrote:  [Image: Eu98WwP.jpg]

Who is she going after with this ad? Flexible dudes who grow beards and have tattoos to mock masculinity?

I googled this to check if it was real. Unfortunately its not
05-29-2016 07:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
911 Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 5,193
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 59
Post: #895
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Two great editorials from a center-left site, they're not Trump fan but they made a very solid analysis about why Pantsuit will fail miserably, calling for the Dems to dump the Crooked One for Crazy Bernie:

Quote:"Her supporters insist that she has already been “tried and tested” against all the attacks that can be thrown at her. But this is not the case; she has never been subjected to the full brunt of attacks that come in a general presidential election. Bernie Sanders has ignored most tabloid dirt, treating it as a sensationalist distraction from real issues (“Enough with the damned emails!”) But for Donald Trump, sensationalist distractions are the whole game. He will attempt to crucify her. And it is very, very likely that he will succeed.

...This campaigning style makes Hillary Clinton Donald Trump’s dream opponent. She gives him an endless amount to work with. The emails, Benghazi, Whitewater, Iraq, the Lewinsky scandal, Chinagate, Travelgate, the missing law firm records, Jeffrey Epstein, Kissinger, Marc Rich, Haiti, Clinton Foundation tax errors, Clinton Foundation conflicts of interest, “We were broke when we left the White House,” Goldman Sachs… There is enough material in Hillary Clinton’s background for Donald Trump to run with six times over.

Trump will capitalize on his reputation as a truth-teller, and be vicious about both Clinton’s sudden changes of position (e.g. the switch on gay marriage, plus the affected economic populism of her run against Sanders) and her perceived dishonesty. One can already imagine the monologue:

“She lies so much. Everything she says is a lie. I’ve never seen someone who lies so much in my life. Let me tell you three lies she’s told. She made up a story about how she was ducking sniper fire! There was no sniper fire. She made it up! How do you forget a thing like that? She said she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, the guy who climbed Mount Everest. He hadn’t even climbed it when she was born! Total lie! She lied about the emails, of course, as we all know, and is probably going to be indicted. You know she said there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq! It was a lie! Thousands of American soldiers are dead because of her. Not only does she lie, her lies kill people. That’s four lies, I said I’d give you three. You can’t even count them... Nobody trusts her. Check the polls, nobody trusts her. Yuge liar.”

http://static.currentaffairs.org/2016/02...presidency

Trump is gonna pummel her!

Here's the other article from the same site:

Quote:Hillary Clinton has what might be termed a “trust death spiral.” She begins by having the public think she is untrustworthy. Then, in response to accusations that she is untrustworthy, she says things that make her sound even more untrustworthy. Because there’s no point at which she’ll simply break free and come clean, things can only ever get worse for Hillary Clinton. If you point out that her positions have changed (making her somewhat untrustworthy), she responds by insisting that they haven’t changed (making her even more untrustworthy). If a report says she is misrepresenting the situation with her email, she will then misrepresent the report itself.

This is a problem not just because it decreases public trust; it also treats voters like they must be incredibly stupid. It’s brazenly insulting to people’s intelligence to simply deny that a report says what it says. And because people are more intelligent than that, they don’t like it when you try to pull tricks like this.

That fatal flaw means that Clinton is in terrible trouble. As this publication has explained in detail before, Clinton suffers from the fact that her weaknesses are those that Donald Trump is well-positioned to exploit. Trump is uniquely strong against Clinton, and Clinton is uniquely weak against Trump. One core problem is that nobody ever seems to go from disliking Clinton to liking her, while plenty of people seem to go from disliking Trump to liking Trump.

http://static.currentaffairs.org/2016/02...presidency

λ ό γ ο ς
05-29-2016 09:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like 911's post:
Samseau, Handsome Creepy Eel, spokepoker, MMX2010, Prince of Persia, Built to Fade
Lizard King Offline
Pelican
****

Posts: 1,626
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 27
Post: #896
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Can anyone expand on the recent reports that the FBI want to indict her?

http://www.globalresearch.ca/breaking-hi...es/5527829

https://twitter.com/Ricky_Vaughn99/statu...2423865344
(This post was last modified: 05-30-2016 01:26 PM by Lizard King.)
05-30-2016 01:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Sweet Jones Offline
Sparrow

Posts: 115
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 0
Post: #897
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
^ I can't expand with sources, but my personal opinion is that the author of that HuffPo article didn't have the best sources. FBI have been extremely tight-lipped about the whole thing. You know, 'you take a shot at the king, you better not miss' is their kind of philosophy in this investigation, I would think.
05-30-2016 09:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
eskimobobseal Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,037
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 14
Post: #898
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Take one moment and think about the media coverage Donald Trump would be getting right now if HE had mishandled top secret classified information vital to our national security on a private email server thereby breaking federal law while lying about it.

Just...think about that for a second.

We live in an inverted reality.

05-30-2016 11:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like eskimobobseal's post:
Lizard King, rpg, eradicator, DamienCasanova, spokepoker, LeoneVolpe, MMX2010, Built to Fade
bigrich Offline
Robin
*

Posts: 196
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 0
Post: #899
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Aspiring porn director Susan Sarandon thinks Hillary Clinton will be indicted.

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/susan-...le/2592837

In the video in the link above, Sarandon said she would not give Hillary permission to spend her tax dollars. I agree 100%.
06-02-2016 02:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Libertas Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 4,213
Joined: Sep 2013
Reputation: 87
Post: #900
RE: The Hillary Clinton thread
Hillary's speech today, though I only saw snippets of it, was the best thing she's done so far. The things she's said weren't new, but the one vulnerability Trump does have persuasion wise against her is that people are afraid of him, and she did her best to hammer that home today. We can talk all we want about Trump's game, and its the most magnificent I've ever seen as you all know what I've written on it. For all his skill, people will not vote for someone they're afraid of.

Trump is already doing his best to shake these things off, and he is doing OK, but I do think it's crucial that he at least have someone with foreign policy "cred" as his running made, much as we here may detest it. Doesn't have to be a full-blown neocon, just someone who has the perception of authority on the subject.

Either that or name his cabinet on the campaign trail, which we might have seen some hints of.

Read my Latest at Return of Kings: 11 Lessons in Leadership from Julius Caesar
My Blog | Twitter
06-02-2016 05:55 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Libertas's post:
spokepoker, MMX2010, Built to Fade
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  22 year-old former Clinton campaign staffer and SJW activist charged with pedophilia Vienna 9 4,283 07-12-2018 07:02 AM
Last Post: fugly1000
  Man Claims To Be Bill Clinton's Illegitimate Son numanist 13 9,535 06-22-2017 01:31 PM
Last Post: 911
  HILARIOUS: Hillary Clinton Campaign Manager redpillage 1 4,193 12-04-2016 09:23 AM
Last Post: Killer Joe

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication