Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
Women's March on Washington
Author Message
Conscious Pirate Offline
Wingman
***
Gold Member

Posts: 883
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 24
Post: #426
RE: Women's March on Washington
Aussie media has jumped on this predictably. Just read the self righteous nonsense in this article...

Self Righteous Nonsense


I think we should agree & amplify with meme warfare. This can only push more moderate & fed up men to our cause with the eventual apocalypse spoken of above not actually occurring. This should be a forum project methinks. A new thread is in order.

It's a dog-eat-dog world, there are no victims, just those who are being honest to the reality that they are operating within, and those whose reality isn't honest - jariel

Ask not for whom the camel toes. It toes for thee - Steve McMahon
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2017 12:48 AM by Conscious Pirate.)
02-08-2017 12:47 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Conscious Pirate's post:
debeguiled
StrikeBack Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,528
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 73
Post: #427
RE: Women's March on Washington
My contribution to the upcoming meme warfare:

"Women threatening men with a day of peace and quiet"

Make Australia No Worries Again!
02-08-2017 12:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 15 users Like StrikeBack's post:
Conscious Pirate, John Michael Kane, spokepoker, IveBeenFramed, Leonard D Neubache, Renzy, MOVSM, C-Note, Matsufubu, debeguiled, DJ-Matt, Professor Fox, Ocelot, Enoch, Handsome Creepy Eel
John Michael Kane Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,383
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 61
Post: #428
RE: Women's March on Washington
(02-08-2017 12:58 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  My contribution to the upcoming meme warfare:

"Women threatening men with a day of peace and quiet"

Sub-caption: By leaving, the feminist women realized they had nobody to listen to their whining except other women, started a catfight, soon got bored and returned home to their hen-pecked husbands. The end.

John Michael Kane's Datasheets: Master The Credit Game: Save & Make Money By Being Credit Savvy
Boycott these companies that hate men: King's Wiki Boycott List

Try not to become a man of success but rather to become a man of value. -Albert Einstein
(This post was last modified: 02-08-2017 01:06 AM by John Michael Kane.)
02-08-2017 01:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like John Michael Kane's post:
estraudi, MKE-Ed
Easy_C Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,821
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 16
Post: #429
RE: Women's March on Washington
(02-08-2017 12:47 AM)Conscious Pirate Wrote:  Aussie media has jumped on this predictably. Just read the self righteous nonsense in this article...

Self Righteous Nonsense


I think we should agree & amplify with meme warfare. This can only push more moderate & fed up men to our cause with the eventual apocalypse spoken of above not actually occurring. This should be a forum project methinks. A new thread is in order.


Already doing that.

I've found that accusing even the slightest deviation from groupthink as some kind of fascism, coupled with ample use of the word "fuck" seems to quickly ingratiate yourself to leftist crowds.
02-08-2017 02:38 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
NilNisiOptimum Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 586
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 3
Post: #430
RE: Women's March on Washington
The morning radio show I listen to had a good description of this "strike".

"A strike without demands is a hissyfit."

"Nothing comes easier than madness in the world today
Mass paranoia is a mode not a malady"
Bad Religion - The Defense
02-08-2017 01:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like NilNisiOptimum's post:
C-Note, YoungBlade
Zelcorpion Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 6,675
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 166
Post: #431
RE: Women's March on Washington
Good article by an Ex-Muslim woman who grew up in Pakistan and experienced what Hijab-freedom and empowerment truly is:

[Image: 2291.jpg]

Trojan Horses in Women's Movement
by Khadija Khan
February 11, 2017 at 5:00 am
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/9913/...s-movement

Send


It must be so convenient, while marching in the safe confines of Washington DC, to advocate that other women -- far away -- be genitally mutilated, married off in childhood, and beaten and violated in their own homes. These women in hijabs marching on Washington do not have to live in this "Utopia." They are comfortably living in the "infidel West," protected from such barbarity.

The Western culture that allows women to shout into microphones is not even necessarily the culture these women believe in; it is often just a tool they use to promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism, religious intolerance and imposition of theocratic beliefs.

Does Linda Sarsour really think that people have gone so mad that they will give up the civil liberties that their ancestors earned through the centuries, merely for interest-free loans?

The hypocrisy is that Sarsour's bold lifestyle in the US portrays that deep down she herself loathes the suppressing conditions that she promotes for the poor women of the Muslim world, who actually have to live with them. Coming from a conservative Muslim society, I know the culture she yearns for would never allow her to launch such activism without permission from her "guardian" men.

The dissenting voices of the oppressed are fighting on two fronts. They are being crushed by their own totalitarian regimes and at the same time by Western apologists for these tyrants.

Why do women who believe in equal rights for women, pick as their spokesperson someone who one minute boasts of her supposed dissent as "patriotism," while the next minute advocating chopping off other womens' genitals? It is like choosing a hangman to campaign against the death penalty, or the head of ISIS to campaign for same sex marriages.

The principles of "dissent," of which they claim to be so proud, and to have borrowed from religious sources, are actually the modern world's liberal values and human rights -- just those rights values they seem to be trying to destroy.

From the other side of their mouths, however, they are trying to impose Islamic sharia law on the West. Unfortunately, sharia is openly antagonistic to Western values and human rights.

How can cults that believe in dominating others call themselves progressive, when their entire message runs counter to the spirit of tolerance and social coexistence?

The champions of sharia have always said they wish to establish a "righteous" form of government, made by divine law, and presumably to that end, they implant their set of rules -- such as allowing no debate or criticism on their beliefs, or such as segregating sexes -- to destroy modern democracies.

It must be so convenient, while marching on Washington DC, to advocate that other women -- far away -- be genitally mutilated, married off in childhood, and domestically beaten and violated -- and all the while, in the safe confines of Washington, to stay silent on issues of truly massive abuse: floggings; acid burnings; chopping off limbs or heads, or burning, drowning or burying people alive.

These women in hijabs marching on Washington DC do not have to live in this "Utopia." They are comfortably living in the "infidel West', protected from such barbarity.

The values they are enjoying here are the values of the enlightened world and have nothing to do with the culture they are trying to impose on others.

The culture that is allowing women such as Linda Sarsour to shout into microphones is not even necessarily the culture these women believe in; it is often just the culture they are using to promote totalitarian ideas such as anti-Semitism, religious intolerance and the imposition of theocratic beliefs through infiltration or force.

The culture to which Sarsour says she aspires, allows mutilating women but does not allow women to speak in a loud tone, let alone speaking through microphones. Hence, she owes her current privileges to her American identity.


Muslim activist Linda Sarsour one minute boasts of her supposed dissent as "patriotism," while the next minute advocates chopping off other womens' genitals. (Image source: Seriously.TV video screenshot)
Sarsour stated in a tweet on May 13, 2015: "You'll know when you're living under Sharia Law if suddenly all your loans & credit cards become interest free. Sound nice, doesn't it?"

Then she wrote on an April 29, 2014 tweet: "@RobertWildiris I don't drink alcohol, don't eat pork, I follow Islamic way of living. That's all Sharia law is."

It would be nice if the only requirements of sharia were avoiding alcohol or pork were; there happens, however, to be an ocean of dos and don'ts that fall into the category of "I follow Islamic way of living."

The ocean Sarsour never bothered to mention, but that the world witnesses every day, exists from the Saudi palaces to the caves of Afghanistan and Raqqa.

The culture that Sarsour desires to impose on the world -- along with promises to waive interest on loans -- does not allow women to interact with unrelated men, drive cars, ride bicycles, attend sports events, leave the house without permission, or wear makeup and clothes that reveal their body parts, let alone address a crowd.

Women would also need four male witnesses to prove a rape, or risk being stoned to death for "adultery."

Does Sarsour really think that people have gone so mad that they will give up all of their civil liberties and freedom that their ancestors earned through the centuries, merely for interest free loans?

The hypocrisy is that her bold lifestyle in the US portrays that deep down, she herself loathes the suppressing conditions that she likes promoting for the poor women of the Muslim world who actually have to live with them.

How would these women in hijabs like to spend a few weeks under the totalitarian regimes about which they love to brag?

Three British girls who followed the call of ISIS leader Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi slipped into Syria to join the jihad, only to be desperate over the mistake they had made; one is believed dead.

Kadiza Sultana, Shamima Begum and Amira Abase, intoxicated by ISIS propaganda, entered Syria to join the holy mission and be ISIS brides.

Sultana reportedly was killed in a Russian airstrike while too scared to try an escape from ISIS, fearing extreme torture and public execution if caught.

The whereabouts of the other two are still unknown, apart from rare contact reported between them and their families.

Sophie Kasiki, a French girl who also managed to break away from the ISIS stronghold in Raqqa with her four-year-old son, said she risked death if caught to try to save her son. She defined the ordeal of being with ISIS as "a journey into a hell from which there seemed no return."

Samra Kesinovic, a 17 year old Austrian girl, was reportedly beaten to death by ISIS fighters when she was caught trying to flee, after being "gifted" by her partner to another ISIS fighter as a sex slave.

The irony is that Linda Sarsour and her followers say they love Hamas and caliphates like the one established by Abu Bakar al-Baghdadi, or Saudi and Iranian regimes -- but of course they do not live in them.

Sarsour has doubtless been put forward by men to promote their soft image as they themselves cannot boast about the rights they are giving to their women.

Coming from a conservative Muslim society, I know the culture she yearns for would never allow her to launch such activism without permission from her "guardian" men.

How come she forgot to mention that in Saudi Arabia and many other Muslim states, her kind of activism would cost a woman her family, her honour and probably her life.

A court in the state of Washington suspended the ban on travelers from seven mainly Muslim countries imposed by the President Trump last week.

Would any judge or influential person dare refute the order of, say, the Saudi King, a sharia council of Iran, a member of a royal family from a Middle Eastern country, a military dictator or the Hamas leaders Sarsour apparently so admires?

You cannot even imagine in your worst nightmares dissenting in those sharia-compliant territories, but yes, dissent is allowed in the US and the West, where people are freely allowed to speak their thoughts.

These are not the values of the alien land she professes to admire; these were fought for and earned by the people of the West with their blood.

The progressives' one-sided love affair with extremists will never serve the purpose of promoting equality.

In fact, it could be counterproductive. In Egypt, the conservative men used women as protestors to overthrow Husni Mubarak's regime, but once the Muslim Brotherhood, which spearheaded the Morsi regime, took control, the whole world watched in shock as they imposed sharia on everyone -- most of all on those women. The Morsi regime later punished women who protested the Iranian-style sharia that it was imposing.

The same imams who were the moving spirits behind Egypt's revolution were then delivering fatwas [religious opinions] to rape the same women who had been marching in the streets for their rights. According to al Arabiyya:

"An Egyptian Salafi preacher, said raping and sexually harassing women protesters in Cairo's Tahrir Square is justified, calling them "crusaders" who "have no shame, no fear and not even feminism.... Abu Islam added that these women activists are going to Tahrir Square not to protest but to be sexually abused because they had wanted to be raped...And by the way, 90 percent of them are crusaders and the remaining 10 percent are widows who have no one to control them.. "

Around 80 women were molested in one night alone, when the Morsi government was ousted and people came out to celebrate his departure.

Those are the views Sarsour is trying to sell.

The same men these liberals and progressives are trying to empower, once enthroned, would declare them apostates and inflict the worst imaginable punishments on them for the "crimes" they are committing by promoting the set of values they think bring harmony in the world.

The dissenting voices of the oppressed are fighting on two fronts. They are being crushed by their own totalitarian regimes and at the same time by apologists for these tyrants whom the marchers are empowering -- probably without even realizing what massive harm they are doing.

Khadija Khan is a Pakistan-based journalist and commentator.


I noticed when I listened to ex-Muslim talks that especially white convert women experienced a stupendous amount of attention once they put on the Hijab and became Muslim. You can be a literal 5 like Linda Sarsour and get suddenly the attention of a female 9. Those women get non-stop marriage offers, get thousands of emails all across the world. That happened to marginally attractive American converts that talked about their experiences.

Essentially the Hijab and the conversion raises your SMV at least among Muslims tremendously - you become a superstar. If you add some feminist-marxist ideology then it becomes even more exhilerating.

The truth is that sharia is much more than lack of interest and other such things. And as for "lack of interest" - that is bullshit as well. It was meant to be that way, Christianity is also initially against usury, but the truth is that Islamic banking credit cards and loans have such a massive fee structure that you would wish for a low-interest rate. The globalist bankers have completely taken over the so-called Islamic banks.

Women's march - my ass.

Someone should have stood on the sidelines shouting: "Whose bitch this is?"

On Twitter: https://twitter.com/Zelcorpion
02-11-2017 12:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Zelcorpion's post:
spokepoker, Disco_Volante, MOVSM, Libertas
Teedub Offline
International Playboy
******
Gold Member

Posts: 3,844
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 59
Post: #432
RE: Women's March on Washington
Bar nurses, if women went on strike for a whole week, nothing would really happen, we'd sort it.

Men, on the other hand...

If you've never met a forum member - I'll assume you're lying
02-11-2017 02:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Latinopan Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,986
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation: 19
Post: #433
RE: Women's March on Washington
(02-11-2017 12:08 PM)Zelcorpion Wrote:  I noticed when I listened to ex-Muslim talks that especially white convert women experienced a stupendous amount of attention once they put on the Hijab and became Muslim. You can be a literal 5 like Linda Sarsour and get suddenly the attention of a female 9. Those women get non-stop marriage offers, get thousands of emails all across the world. That happened to marginally attractive American converts that talked about their experiences.

Essentially the Hijab and the conversion raises your SMV at least among Muslims tremendously - you become a superstar. If you add some feminist-marxist ideology then it becomes even more exhilerating.

Women's march - my ass.

Someone should have stood on the sidelines shouting: "Whose bitch this is?"

There is a particular fetishism among Muslims men with women from other cultures becoming Muslim, this is in part with the conquest ideology of the Muslim world, and with the fetishism of Muslim men with white women, this is what motivate ISIS to attack and rape Yazidis people, and wanting to impregnate Yazidis women.

Having a women from Europe or USA to be a Muslim turn them on the same way they feel when they conquer a village of Yazidis people. Having Western women wearing Hijab is like putting your flag on enemy territory, and they make sure these Western women are front center in any public gathering, or every TV show or interview.

A good example in Britain is Myriam Francois-Cerrah, every time there is a discussion on TV about Islam and religion she is the one sent to speak.

[Image: Myriam-Francois-Cerrah-British-Islam.jpg]

Believe me, Muslim men love that Western men have to watch one of their own women wearing a Hijab on TV talking abut how great their religion and Alla is.

And you are right, random 5s become 9.9 once they become Muslim, they will get marriage proposals and will be treated like royalty.
02-12-2017 08:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Latinopan's post:
Samseau, spokepoker, Handsome Creepy Eel, Ocelot
Hypno Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 373
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 4
Post: #434
RE: Women's March on Washington
[Image: funny_pictures_5.jpg]
02-20-2017 11:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 11 users Like Hypno's post:
debeguiled, Handsome Creepy Eel, Samseau, John Michael Kane, captndonk, CaptainChardonnay, Transsimian, MKE-Ed, DJ-Matt, spokepoker, Ocelot
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
Rainbow Deploraball - January 19th, Washington DC Gmac 157 18,790 02-02-2017 11:39 PM
Last Post: CynicalContrarian

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication