I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
The female e-celeb thread
Author Message
Chiosboy90 Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 270
Joined: May 2017
Reputation: 7
Post: #301
RE: Lauren Southern and Brittany Pettibone on the consequences of hypergamy
Did you read my post? I said loud and clear, I wouldn't and a lot of people as well on the comments on him, shit talk on Matt for not fighting those 50kg faggots if he wasn't always talking about "being Alpha" and talks down to other men. Did you read that?

The whole point is, he is not a lover, not a fighter, out of shape since decades, no family, writtes books about how to "make love with Philippine women" and shit talks on a married white man with a family.

That is a nationalist?

What the hell? Any other similar guy you would criticize into oblivion.
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2019 07:24 AM by Chiosboy90.)
06-21-2019 07:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Chiosboy90's post:
Elmore, Teedub, Handsome Creepy Eel
Elmore Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 343
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #302
RE: Lauren Southern and Brittany Pettibone on the consequences of hypergamy
(06-21-2019 07:20 AM)Sword and Board Wrote:  I remember on the return of kings website one of the leading shills and his cohorts with their multiple accounts were tirelessly attacking Forney and trying to undermine him until Roosh intervened. Forney must have really done something good to piss (((them))) off so much they went to Defcon1 on him.

Are you really suggesting that a guy with 3000 subscribers on his MGTOW YT channel, is a person of interest to Mossad, who've acted by using Alt Accts to run him off a PUA's internet forum?



06-21-2019 07:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Elmore's post:
Chiosboy90
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,746
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 209
Post: #303
RE: Lauren Southern and Brittany Pettibone on the consequences of hypergamy
(06-21-2019 06:46 AM)The Catalyst Wrote:  Can someone confirm that Antifa were not pervasive in Cleveland, that there was no harassment outside of the video, that there was no reason to believe the Antifa had weapons or that anything bad would've happened to Matt had he not ran away?

My impression of the video, it looks awfully suspicious that the Antifa didn't feel at all threatened by Matt. Yes, yes I realise liberals are very bad at recogising threats. But it definitely had a mafia style vibe, that they knew Matt couldn't fight back "or else".

I don't suppose you recall the public mood when Trump's inauguration was nigh.

I thought at the time that for any Right wing celebrity (no matter how minor) to turn up without an armed escort was dumber and statistically more dangerous than participating in a bull run. If you think the Left is bad now, back then they were rabid in every sense but the literal one. I'm surprised there weren't deaths particularly because it only takes one good kick to the head while you're down or solid punch to the back of the head while you're up to be killed if you're unlucky.

Considering the lop-sided legal fallout from the Unite the Right rally Forney was correct to avoid conflict at all costs. If he'd laid those two faggots out (luck/skill/whatever) then odds are he'd be prosecuted now or later for a hatecrime, and the fanboys gushing over what a man he was would mysteriously ghost the second Forney asked for contributions to a legal fund or even bail.

The neo-Right is riddled with little more than screeching manchildren and lulzfags.

You'll find the real deal where people don't have social media accounts.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
06-21-2019 07:49 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
PapayaTapper, Handsome Creepy Eel, BBinger
Sword and Board Offline
Robin
*

Posts: 136
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #304
RE: Lauren Southern and Brittany Pettibone on the consequences of hypergamy
(06-21-2019 07:35 AM)Elmore Wrote:  
(06-21-2019 07:20 AM)Sword and Board Wrote:  I remember on the return of kings website one of the leading shills and his cohorts with their multiple accounts were tirelessly attacking Forney and trying to undermine him until Roosh intervened. Forney must have really done something good to piss (((them))) off so much they went to Defcon1 on him.

Are you really suggesting that a guy with 3000 subscribers on his MGTOW YT channel, is a person of interest to Mossad, who've acted by using Alt Accts to run him off a PUA's internet forum?




I didn't say that at all.
06-21-2019 07:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
ilostabet Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 623
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 19
Post: #305
RE: Lauren Southern and Brittany Pettibone on the consequences of hypergamy
Using that video to criticize MF is stupid; MF turning on a long-time friend for internet points is even stupider (and dishonorable).

Don't call it a grave, it's the future you chose.
06-21-2019 07:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes ilostabet's post:
911
Elmore Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 343
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #306
RE: Lauren Southern and Brittany Pettibone on the consequences of hypergamy
(06-21-2019 07:57 AM)ilostabet Wrote:  Using that video to criticize MF is stupid; MF turning on a long-time friend for internet points is even stupider (and dishonorable).

I dont know Forney's work, or him in any capacity beyond that video, in which he made baseless and slanderous allegations of adultery about a married man with a kid, with zero proof or sources. That is beyond the pale. He's also made claims that Mark Collett is Mi5, which again was presented without sources or proof. From what i've heard he seems toxic and joyless.
06-21-2019 08:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Elmore's post:
Chiosboy90, Suits, Enoch
Teedub Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,182
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 81
Post: #307
RE: Lauren Southern and Brittany Pettibone on the consequences of hypergamy
(06-21-2019 07:49 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The neo-Right is riddled with little more than screeching manchildren and lulzfags.

Think it's the internet in general, not the neo-right. Even when people do punch or fight with antifa/migrants, it still isn't good enough for many, including some on here.

Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. - H L Mencken
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2019 10:13 AM by Teedub.)
06-21-2019 10:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Teedub's post:
Elmore
david.garrett84 Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 980
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 33
Post: #308
RE:
(06-21-2019 07:22 AM)Chiosboy90 Wrote:  Did you read my post? I said loud and clear, I wouldn't and a lot of people as well on the comments on him, shit talk on Matt for not fighting those 50kg faggots if he wasn't always talking about "being Alpha" and talks down to other men. Did you read that?

The whole point is, he is not a lover, not a fighter, out of shape since decades, no family, writtes books about how to "make love with Philippine women" and shit talks on a married white man with a family.

That is a nationalist?

What the hell? Any other similar guy you would criticize into oblivion.

No, I would not criticize him or another similar guy into oblivion, unlike you, basically because I.. do.. not.. care.

Go read the AOC thread: many of us are sick of criticizing her, except for laughs. The real question is how to counter people of her ilk, not the boring approach taken by others to constantly call her stupid. If we’re sick of criticizing a global figure like AOC, why would most of us want to criticize Matt? He’s not a SJW so it would never interest me in the slightest.

You’re confusing my more or less total indifference for any drama Matt is in with some kind of unqualified support for him in his dramas. Other than having no desire to see him get hurt, as antifa wanted, I leave him to do as he sees fit. It’s his life and his core views are ours in essence. Why engage in friendly fire so much?

Based on what I know about his Stefan accusations, he should provide evidence.

Based on what I know about what happened with Aurini (and I know little), I can say I don’t understand why Matt did what he did. Perhaps there’s more to it.

But I’ve no interest in forum-litigating these matters with any vitriol.

He has his own business regarding other people and their feuds amongst themselves. Whatever beefs Matt Forney has with others, including Aurini, is one of our smallest problems.

1,000 people have said Matt is overweight. Move on.
1,000 people have said Matt can’t get laid. Move on.
1,000 people have said Matt is gamma or said it in other words. Move on.

Meanwhile.. The majority of us don’t really care or totally don’t care.

There’s a difference between calling someone a hypocrite or pointing out flaws matter-of-factly (Simeon and eradicator did the latter quite tactfully) and brutish trash talk.

If you think Matt has gone totally out of line and is allegedly vitriolic, I do not see how being viotrolic back at him, however justified people feel, is the answer. It also kinda of shits in threads and therefore leaves a bad stench.

I’m much more concerned with tradthots and the two guys who fucked over Robinson, endangering his life, than rather inconsequential feuds between people who frequent this forum. They are capable of taking care of themselves and arguing for themselves.
06-22-2019 02:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like david.garrett84's post:
debeguiled, Thot Leader
gework Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,296
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 67
Post: #309
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
Milo said on the latest episode of Milo and I, a show on Gavin McInnes' FreeSpeech.TV, that Lauren Southern had engaged in conjugal rights with literally every guy in the movement. I wonder if Molyneux got his slice.

I stand corrected when I said she was an interesting wifer-upper. Those who were tough on them were right.

This has helped crystalise the big problem with women who market themselves with their looks; something which seems to be dramatically on the rise. Some women are able to dramatically addle their minds with colossal amounts of male attention. With that, male attention becomes devalued, leaving the junkie seeking new highs by the most sought after attention. And the false abundance creates an environment where you do the least important, superficial things; and put off the important things.

I'm not averse to women in the movement, but they're going to have to look like Thatcher, Phyllis Schlafly or Camille Paglia.
07-23-2019 08:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like gework's post:
Genghis Khan, Thot Leader
Rorogue Offline
Banned

Posts: 807
Joined: Feb 2018
Post: #310
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
(07-23-2019 08:49 PM)gework Wrote:  I'm not averse to women in the movement, but they're going to have to look like Thatcher, Phyllis Schlafly or Camille Paglia.


Even women who look like that would have men buying their bathwater today.
07-23-2019 08:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Rorogue's post:
Yatagan, gework
ScannerLIV Offline
Pigeon

Posts: 37
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 0
Post: #311
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
What about married conservative women?
07-23-2019 09:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
la bodhisattva Offline
Kingfisher
***
Silver Member

Posts: 506
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 8
Post: #312
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
My annoyance with these women is that they were given a platform on the virtue of their relative attractiveness. They bring nothing unique or nuanced and parroted the most basic red pill talking points that you could easily get on this forum, typically with guys just tossing out gems of well-reasoned, thought-provoking critiques of the culture wars. And these are just guys. They don't have TV gigs, huge patreons, or a massive Twitter following. (Though I do commend and respect Lauren Southern's work on the South African farmer genocide...provided she's more than just the person in front of the camera.)

While I agree with most to all of the girls' positions, they are not in any way an intellectual authority. They are entry-level red pill thinkers. At least women like Camille Paglia and Christina Hoff Sommers have decades of study and scholarship to back up their positions - PhD level anti-third wave feminists. I respect their views and could cite them in an academic paper or discussion. With the e-thot red pillers, you can only nod in agreement and think, "Yeah, no shit. We've been seeing/saying this for months/years. Any suggestions on how to address the particular issue?"

They have the following of thought leaders. They're just thot leaders.
07-23-2019 10:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like la bodhisattva's post:
Yatagan, debeguiled, Renzy
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,746
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 209
Post: #313
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
Let's go a bit deeper here.

99% of conservative e-celebs are doing exactly the same as Southern et-al. Selling some sort of feelz for e-bux.

Southern is selling "my vaguely plausible conservative girlfriend" feelz.
Molyneaux is selling "my no-longer-missing academic bro-dad" feelz.

But what you'll notice about all these people is that they're not setting trends. They're monetising feels based on trends that are being crowdsourced in the first place. /pol for example isn't getting its direction from Molyneaux or Southern. It's the other way around. These e-celebs are merely trying to keep up while balancing popularity with the stragglers (why they flirt with ethnic identarianism but won't commit).

I stopped watching this stuff a long time ago and the effect was not dissimilar from ceasing to watch free-to-air television. You go to the source material entirely and you immediately realize that these youtubers are not thought leaders, they're thought monetizers. They just attach various feelz to sell the product.

Here's a question to ask when considering the content of anyone who makes a living based on their e-presence.

Do they ask you to do anything difficult? To make any personal sacrifices (other than to send them ebux)?

Or do they promote the underlying sense that merely listening to them speak The Truth™ means that you're on the right track?

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
(This post was last modified: 07-24-2019 03:13 AM by Leonard D Neubache.)
07-24-2019 02:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 11 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
Captainstabbin, Simeon_Strangelight, Jones, Aurini, VNvet, Emancipator, Deusleveult, Sooth, iop890, Thot Leader, BBinger
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 18,347
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 216
Post: #314
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
(07-23-2019 08:49 PM)gework Wrote:  Milo said on the latest episode of Milo and I, a show on Gavin McInnes' FreeSpeech.TV, that Lauren Southern had engaged in conjugal rights with literally every guy in the movement. I wonder if Molyneux got his slice.

I stand corrected when I said she was an interesting wifer-upper. Those who were tough on them were right.

This has helped crystalise the big problem with women who market themselves with their looks; something which seems to be dramatically on the rise. Some women are able to dramatically addle their minds with colossal amounts of male attention. With that, male attention becomes devalued, leaving the junkie seeking new highs by the most sought after attention. And the false abundance creates an environment where you do the least important, superficial things; and put off the important things.

I'm not averse to women in the movement, but they're going to have to look like Thatcher, Phyllis Schlafly or Camille Paglia.

That's not how women work who are attractive. Milo is no credible source. Obviously he would have blown everyone if they were interested, but for women - even slutty women - it's different.

Her ex with the costume was good-looking and I can believe that she did it with Richard Spencer. Stefan might be on the list due to being on the road with her for so long. But is that really surprising if a single woman goes out and spends lots of time with some masculine and charismatic men? I would say that this is logical.

Though who cares - as we noted before - the women with any meaningful impetus are all married or engaged while supporting their men.
07-24-2019 03:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
Leonard D Neubache, VNvet
Captainstabbin Offline
Hummingbird
*****

Posts: 3,263
Joined: Apr 2015
Reputation: 23
Post: #315
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
(07-24-2019 03:06 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  That's not how women work who are attractive. Milo is no credible source. Obviously he would have blown everyone if they were interested, but for women - even slutty women - it's different.

My thinking is that, if it was a lie, she would have issued a denial.

Instead, she suspiciously quits her public life just before the accusations were made, then says nothing.
07-24-2019 03:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Captainstabbin's post:
Enoch, Dr. Howard, Thot Leader
MichaelWitcoff Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 408
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 11
Post: #316
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
They just read men’s articles and repeat the information on camera in revealing outfits.

Return Of Kings contributor and best-selling author of "On The Masons And Their Lies."
07-24-2019 03:38 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like MichaelWitcoff's post:
Matsufubu, Psygnosis89, Thot Leader
Rorogue Offline
Banned

Posts: 807
Joined: Feb 2018
Post: #317
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
That is how women who have low self esteem act, regardless of how hot they are.

Someone said she was dumped by a bunch of boyfriends in high school and got obsessed/stalkerish. Seems she has some screws loose.

A hot thot who has normal self esteem would certainly not give it up for everyone. She just couldn't get enough of the attention though. She was a slave to it and was happy to give her body to anyone.

It is common knowledge she fucked Allum Bokhari, who is a scrawny nerd.

(07-24-2019 03:06 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  
(07-23-2019 08:49 PM)gework Wrote:  Milo said on the latest episode of Milo and I, a show on Gavin McInnes' FreeSpeech.TV, that Lauren Southern had engaged in conjugal rights with literally every guy in the movement. I wonder if Molyneux got his slice.

I stand corrected when I said she was an interesting wifer-upper. Those who were tough on them were right.

This has helped crystalise the big problem with women who market themselves with their looks; something which seems to be dramatically on the rise. Some women are able to dramatically addle their minds with colossal amounts of male attention. With that, male attention becomes devalued, leaving the junkie seeking new highs by the most sought after attention. And the false abundance creates an environment where you do the least important, superficial things; and put off the important things.

I'm not averse to women in the movement, but they're going to have to look like Thatcher, Phyllis Schlafly or Camille Paglia.

That's not how women work who are attractive. Milo is no credible source. Obviously he would have blown everyone if they were interested, but for women - even slutty women - it's different.

Her ex with the costume was good-looking and I can believe that she did it with Richard Spencer. Stefan might be on the list due to being on the road with her for so long. But is that really surprising if a single woman goes out and spends lots of time with some masculine and charismatic men? I would say that this is logical.

Though who cares - as we noted before - the women with any meaningful impetus are all married or engaged while supporting their men.
(This post was last modified: 07-24-2019 03:54 AM by Rorogue.)
07-24-2019 03:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Aurini Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 1,874
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 90
Post: #318
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
(07-24-2019 02:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Let's go a bit deeper here.

99% of conservative e-celebs are doing exactly the same as Southern et-al. Selling some sort of feelz for e-bux.

Southern is selling "my vaguely plausible conservative girlfriend" feelz.
Molyneaux is selling "my no-longer-missing academic bro-dad" feelz.

But what you'll notice about all these people is that they're not setting trends. They're monetising feels based on trends that are being crowdsourced in the first place. /pol for example isn't getting its direction from Molyneaux or Southern. It's the other way around. These e-celebs are merely trying to keep up while balancing popularity with the stragglers (why they flirt with ethnic identarianism but won't commit).

I stopped watching this stuff a long time ago and the effect was not dissimilar from ceasing to watch free-to-air television. You go to the source material entirely and you immediately realize that these youtubers are not thought leaders, they're thought monetizers. They just attach various feelz to sell the product.

Here's a question to ask when considering the content of anyone who makes a living based on their e-presence.

Do they ask you to do anything difficult? To make any personal sacrifices (other than to send them ebux)?

Or do they promote the underlying sense that merely listening to them speak The Truth™ means that you're on the right track?

Related.

Quote:YouTube and Patreon created e-celebrities the same way the Disney club used to recruit child actors, just without the sodomy part. Before he was kicked from Patreon, Sargon made almost $12,000 a month in earnings from people who are either gullible or voyeuristic and like to see a guy do his little song and dance as the butt of a joke that everybody understands but him. Once he fulfilled his usefulness to the system, they cut him off like Britney Spears’ hair.

Sargon then totally trainwrecked UKIP for which he was running as a EU Parliament candidate together with other online grifters and trashbags who do not understand that the stick of a snarky YouTube comment does not translate into the real world. These people are, at the end of the day, just plebs, and plebs ruin everything they touch.

None of these people are leaders. The crowd will always elect people who resemble them and who are just as incompetent, greedy, loud and stupid as they are. The Right does not need more celebrities who are trying to enrich themselves; it needs to build up power bases and make people reliant upon it. We cannot trust the crowd to do this because they are inherently selfish and incapable. Instead, we need patricians who can grant patronage of sorts, in the way that was common in ancient Rome.

E-Celebs not only fail to push their audience into meaningful action, they'll actively undermine anybody who is. Social Media is a narcissism engine, which is why I've largely disengaged from the Internet.

My website.
Now streaming on the DLive platform..
07-24-2019 09:31 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Aurini's post:
Leonard D Neubache, Sooth, iop890
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,746
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 209
Post: #319
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
^Imagine trying to find a Right wing e-celeb that could do 20 pushups. I can't think of any off the top of my head. Crowder? Who knows.

Then imagine how fast their viewership would collapse if at the beginning of every video they merely did 20 pushups. The soykin would crush each other in the stampede for the exit door.

That's another ugly fact about virtually the entire Right wing e-movement. The reason guys like Moly and Styx and Peterson and PJW are so popular is because their T levels are down in the double-digits and they don't make their viewership feel threatened, nor do they ask of them to become anything other than the softbellied neckbeards they already are.

That's also why Roosh's popularity will always cap out too. These guys can't connect with anyone they know or even suspect is capable of approaching women and having sex with them. Virgins cannot stand Chads, even if the Chad is offering them a way forward.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
07-24-2019 11:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
GT777733, Aurini, Emancipator, Matsufubu, Thot Leader, Syberpunk
Captain Gh Offline
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,866
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 16
Post: #320
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
^ Not an expert of the alt right... but Peterson's reach extends FAR ABOVE the Alt Right. You may not like that he's not "fighting THE fight... but you can't take away the fact that he's a legit psychological clinician... and not a puppet teacher that just parroted a buch of textbooks to get his diplomas!

The man legitimately worked in the prison system, and consulted for multi million dollar companies. I'm not a fan of everything he says... but the man deserve the fame he has.
07-25-2019 05:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Captain Gh's post:
TooFineAPoint, Thot Leader, bacani
Sooth Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,199
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 18
Post: #321
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
It's not in the interest of anyone making a living on youtube to have people stop consuming and start producing.
07-25-2019 06:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
pitbullowner Offline
Robin
*

Posts: 173
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 0
Post: #322
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
(07-24-2019 02:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I stopped watching this stuff a long time ago and the effect was not dissimilar from ceasing to watch free-to-air television. You go to the source material entirely and you immediately realize that these youtubers are not thought leaders, they're thought monetizers. They just attach various feelz to sell the product.

Converting commies with feels would be a better strategy. It would create unification and help us get back on track to ejecting cancerous policy and policymakers from making a presence.

Ecelebs of the right wing strand only capture feels and monetize right wing feels. (Indignation,frustration,annoyance,reluctance)

It's only preaching (and leeching off of) to the choir

Left wing ecelebs capture the youth with a more aggressive feels tactic ; decadence, unbridled escapism, consumerism, lust etc.

I've seen once of my friends a staunch tea party conservative while she was single in 2008, get married to a liberal man, and her views changed immensely. I mean, it must have been a relief for her to be able to fully implement her emotional modus operandi after divorcing her conservative (but still beta) 1st husband.

There needs to be a right wing crossover. Left wingers do it too easily because women have the power to vote.

I'm thinking something along the lines of parables by jesus or the parable of Samuel to King David silas be something that would work.

Your actions speak louder than your words, son.
-My father, R.I.P.

My newly crafted Twitter handle
(This post was last modified: 07-25-2019 08:05 PM by pitbullowner.)
07-25-2019 08:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Thot Leader Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 808
Joined: Feb 2018
Reputation: 11
Post: #323
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
(07-24-2019 02:59 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  I stopped watching this stuff a long time ago and the effect was not dissimilar from ceasing to watch free-to-air television. You go to the source material entirely and you immediately realize that these youtubers are not thought leaders, they're thought monetizers. They just attach various feelz to sell the product.

Here's a question to ask when considering the content of anyone who makes a living based on their e-presence.

Do they ask you to do anything difficult? To make any personal sacrifices (other than to send them ebux)?

Or do they promote the underlying sense that merely listening to them speak The Truth™ means that you're on the right track?

I think a lot of Stefan's material has encouraged people to do the hard work of self-improvement--reading/studying, putting in hours at work, trying to be attractive, cut toxic people out of your life (he got in trouble for that one). Your point is valid when it comes to the right but I think Stef is an exception.

(07-24-2019 03:38 AM)MichaelWitcoff Wrote:  They just read men’s articles and repeat the information on camera in revealing outfits.

<sperg out time> This is the whole key to everything and I don't get why more people don't get it. People respond to Milo's allegations as if Lauren's sex life is what's at issue here (it kind of it, but it's a distant second or third).

She claims to be on the right, meaning pro-traditionalism, meaning among other things believing that men and women are inherently different in a way that justifies traditional gender roles, to some extent.

And what has she been doing with her prime fertility years? Getting men to write and produce her material in exchange for sex, while other men bankroll her in exchange for fantasizing about her. Basically prostitution with extra steps. But simply selling her body isn't even the most un-trad thing she's done here.

In selling herself she's directly promoted the false narrative that women can do anything that men can do, i.e. are interchangeable with men, except that women are beautiful. This is one of the central lies that props up globohomo.

Lauren Southern never had principles, she just hamstered herself into believing whatever would bring her fame, money, travel experiences, and access to high status men--no different than any other thot.
08-04-2019 11:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Thot Leader's post:
Aurini
gework Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,296
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 67
Post: #324
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
Candace Owens has filed off. Think she's about 28-29.

[Image: EDYcuAsW4AEm7Zw.jpg]

Telling those who have used the game to snap up decent picks and those who have squandered that on marketing their hips.

I like Candace. I've not seen her frontage and she seems to dress quite low-key. She also has quite close to the center of her corpus the importance of the family, though we're still not there. The husband seems quite serious, having donated £100,000 to The Brexit Party.

----

One thing I've been thinking of recently is the idea that it seems to me that many higher-end women who market themselves based on their looks as biological conservatives who have heard little if anything that would orientate those impulses into socially useful choices. These women tend to be a bit more sharp and not so taken by pussy-footing, self-deprecating leftism. They're not at odds with being self-interested, as opposed to leftists who can't confront their self-interest. But rather than being channeled into a long-term plan, a man, a family it appears self-interest get routed into status, handbags and all other manner of thottery.

Any insights on this?
09-02-2019 07:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 18,347
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 216
Post: #325
RE: The female e-celeb thread (formerly: Lauren Southern et al thread)
Married at 28/29 is about what the Alpha-Fucks-Beta-Bucks lifestyle model optimizes them to do.

Good for her to use her mini-fame to attract the most high-tier man she could get.

Though as a side-note - welcome to the White tribe - my guess is that her smart genes will just dissipate into the "colonizer" ones. Moderate mixing of the races isn't particularly relevant and she certainly fits that nicely being attractive and smart.

However we should not forget that she is still somewhat of a leftist, just a more sane one. Turning Point USA is what the Zionists tell you should be the utmost right-wing in the country - anyone to the right of them is a Nazi of course. And again - I can hardly even blame her or the likes of Dave Chappelle (who I like) to repeat some globohomo talking points, since they control so much of the narrative. Once you go more to the right you think that this is the end of the rainbow of truth. And likely going further would bomb their careers, so maybe it's better. Not that Candace really needs a career now having married into more money.

Her husband likely has some natural Game and immense sexual market value, so who knows - they may stay happily married.

Wish them luck.
(This post was last modified: 09-03-2019 03:59 AM by Simeon_Strangelight.)
09-03-2019 03:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
ilostabet, gework
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  The Female Teacher-Male Student Caught Having Sex Thread Cattle Rustler 1,034 547,176 Today 11:29 AM
Last Post: balybary
  Glamourous Chinese Female Web Celeb Exposed - Her Apartment is full of Dogshit WalterBlack 16 2,796 10-01-2019 09:46 AM
Last Post: BlueMark
  Billy Corgan, a rare red pill celeb, sticks it to SJW sacred cows amity 67 30,404 03-01-2018 02:57 AM
Last Post: Super_Fire

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication