Post: #1

I remember some people on this forum predicting this:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/d...x-on-house

Two old Irish men in friendly and not sexual relationships, the oldest of whom apparently understands that he doeasn't have much time left in this world, marry to pass a house from one to other without taxes.

I think it's all right to abuse a stupid system that has lost it's values. The only problem is that people who live to procreate and raise the future of the society are in no way privileged any more.

Both man praise the LGBT rights that allow them to this. Interesting - is it just lip service to not get any complaints from them or serious sentiments? Or maybe they are they secretly gay anyway?

What are your thoughts? Would you do that?

I think it would be hilarious to explain to a girl that you are already married but not for love, but to some old dude to get inheritance. Interesting how they would take it.

Post: #2

Smart men.

Post: #3

(12-23-2017 05:32 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  Smart men.

True, but it's still pretty gay.

Post: #4

Eh,they just playing the game .let em cook.

Post: #5

Years ago, when this was only being debated, I announced that if it became law, I would marry my brother for the benefits, and being more than equal.
Better yet. Marry a dog, and claim her puppies as dependents. That's only a matter of time.
Wait until the space aliens land. And apply for welfare

Post: #6

Quote:"I think it's all right to abuse a stupid system that has lost it's values."

Basically.

Post: #7

Post: #8

Post: #9

Ultimately this is a victory for the system. Losing a little tax revenue is nothing compared to manipulating straight men in to marrying each other as the Cathedral pushes homosexuality on everybody. Even better is the fools think they got away with something. That's what the government wants them to think.

Post: #10

(12-23-2017 06:00 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

(12-23-2017 05:32 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  Smart men.

True, but it's still pretty gay.

Only if they make eye contact.

Post: #11

A few years back, an older friend of mine told me that many of what you thought were elderly gay couples were actually what you could describe as prototype MGTOWs, pairing up to share the rent and so on.

Post: #12

@Syberpunk McSavage is a funny bastard, and that show was hilarious but the hoor has gone down the sjw line of late, he has definitely become more Establishment now, lately he was criticising and generally being a bollox to anyone who doesn't want mass unregulated economic migration into Ireland.

Post: #13

You watch. Gay marriage is gonna get exploited like crazy for immigration purposes. Love wins.

Aloha!

Post: #14

From the article:

Quote:Matt Murphy, 83, intends to leave his house to his carer Michael O’Sullivan, 58, but it would have left him with a €50,000 tax bill

That Michael O'Sullivan sounds like a gold digger.

Post: #15

(12-24-2017 12:57 PM)Brother Abdul Majeed Wrote:  From the article:

Quote:Matt Murphy, 83, intends to leave his house to his carer Michael O’Sullivan, 58, but it would have left him with a €50,000 tax bill

That Michael O'Sullivan sounds like a gold digger.

I wonder who gets the Paddy O'furniture?

Aloha!

Post: #16

Henry Fitzpatrick and Patrick Fitzhenry?

Post: #17

(12-24-2017 12:50 PM)Kona Wrote:  You watch. Gay marriage is gonna get exploited like crazy for immigration purposes. Love wins.

Aloha!

Nothing like a plethora of gay marriages to muslims to assist with the narrative

Post: #18

Why not? Don't hate the player , hate the game.
These guys are being smart and avoiding tax, no different to any other legal tax dodge.
Sure it's against the "spirit" of the system but it's not illegal.

Post: #19

2004 Aussie film with the same theme.

Post: #20

Who cares? I salute them for finding a way to beat the system by using the system.

More importantly this true story is a magnitudes funnier than the film "I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry" despite both being based on the same premise.

Post: #21

(12-24-2017 09:11 PM)Goldin Boy Wrote:  Who cares? I salute them for finding a way to beat the system by using the system.

More importantly this true story is a magnitudes funnier than the film "I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry" despite both being based on the same premise.

That's not saying much. When has Adam Sandler ever been funny?

Post: #22

“When has Adam Sandler ever been funny?”

Opera man on SNL was funny, so were a lot of his bits. Trying to stretch his crap into a 90 minute feature length film is asking for trouble

Post: #23

Marriage is legal business arrangement and always has been. The idea of romantic love is a smokescreen to prevent women from seeming like gold diggers when they marry ugly dudes for money. But I love him because he good to me! Ahahaha....

Common now. Think about it. As if 99% of women aren’t mostly basing their decision of LTRs and marriage mostly on money and control over a dude.

Why shouldn’t all men start doing this too?Yeah you can do it with a woman. But thing is: never trust a woman. You’ll need a lot of leverage like her needing ten years for citizenship. Then maybe you can control her a bit.

I’d guess formost guys it’s way smarter to arrange your business plan, ahem “marriage”, with a male friend who you can actually trust. If it’s set up correct then there’s no reason for either party to be self interested and screw the other financially. Plus dudes dont accidentally get pregnant. And I doubt some old guy is gonna knock up a gold digger.

Platonic tax/money marriage is nothing new. It’s redunant to even call it that. It’s just marrriage. I.e. a biz arrangement.

Sure the idea of romantic love has always been around. Lovers yeah. But coupled with marriage? That gained some popularity at various times like during the romantic movement in England etc. It falls flat when shit doesn’t work out because it’s a bad business arrangement.

Sexual revolution and women’s liberation 1960s. All of a sudden all these marriages happening for love because people can have sex,fall in love, live in sin before marriage. And of course half of them fail and we have a 50.% divorce rate.

Most industrialized country’s no one wants kids anyway. It’s a pointless and expensive hassle. No surprise our next step as society is let people form business arrangement, ahem marriage, based on friendship.

Thing is marriage does work really well for cutting the red tape on who gets what when you die or need a proxy to make all sorts of legal decisions. The mechanism for a spouse is built into every bank, benefit, country, tax code, etc.

Post: #24

(12-23-2017 11:43 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  

(12-23-2017 06:00 PM)RIslander Wrote:  

(12-23-2017 05:32 PM)Atlanta Man Wrote:  Smart men.

True, but it's still pretty gay.

Only if they make eye contact.

You're ball deep in a chick happily pumping away and she's like "Ughhh Ughhh Ohhh Ohhh JESUS!"

Don't make the mistake of letting your mind slip and think of Jesus. You will have an existential crisis feedback loop of faith and sexuality.