Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
"He’s a 10-year-old drag performer, and he’s cooler than you"
Author Message
911 Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 5,153
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 58
Post: #76
RE: "He’s a 10-year-old drag performer, and he’s cooler than you"
When you have the majority of Americans living paycheck to paycheck, and the middle class still shrinking, the average cop is not going to do anything that could threaten his livelihood. A relatively affluent middle class would have been a lot more difficult to control, that's one of the main reasons the oligarchs in N. America and Western Europe gutted their industrial base.

λ ό γ ο ς
06-23-2019 12:50 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like 911's post:
Leonard D Neubache, Handsome Creepy Eel
911 Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 5,153
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 58
Post: #77
RE: "He’s a 10-year-old drag performer, and he’s cooler than you"
(06-22-2019 05:51 PM)scorpion Wrote:  It's very obvious now how they're using the transgender issue to push directly into pedophilia. Seriously, how can anyone endorse this child drag queen thing? It's not like it's even a slippery slope argument. There's not much of a line between a 10 year old boy dancing around in a gay club as a drag queen because "that's who he is" and a 10 year old boy "choosing" to "have sex" (aka be raped after being groomed and drugged) with older gay men because "that's who he is". And people are literally cheering for this. The West needs to be cleansed with divine fire.

The issue will be packaged as a "sexual rights" for children. Those who object to pedophilia are standing against the sexual rights of children!

Princeton prof specializing in moral philosophy and ethics says pedophilia is OK, and so is bestiality:

https://www.eutimes.net/2019/06/jewish-p...edophilia/

Quote:Jewish professor says women should have sex with dogs for pleasure, also refuses to condemn pedophilia

Posted by EU Times on Jun 17th, 2019

He also refuses to call sex with children wrong: ‘the issue is whether it harms the ten year old.’

Video has resurfaced, thanks to Mark Powell at The Spectator, of Professor Peter Singer, a Jewish moral philosopher and ethicist from Princeton University, suggesting sex between humans and dogs is harmless provided the animal essentially consents.

In 2010 Singer appeared on the ABC’s Q&A where he explained, “A woman has oral sex performed by her dog. I know women who have said this is something that pleases them. The dog is free to do it or walk away. There is no dominance over the dog. That seems to me harmless.”

When asked in another interview if he had similar thoughts regarding sex with children, Singer refused to call the act itself wrong saying, “The issue here is whether this harms the ten year olds and will harm them in their sexuality later on… My view is not that anything is just wrong full stop.”

Mark Powell rightly said, “The fact that anyone in the community—let alone a ‘moral philosopher’ from Princeton University—is arguing for something like this should be a cause for public outrage.”

Strangely, the public have been rather quiet on this one. The video of Singer’s appearance on Q&A has only received just over 3,000 views in more than eight years.


Singer served as chair of the philosophy department at Monash University, where he founded its Centre for Human Bioethics. In 1996 he stood unsuccessfully as a Greens candidate for the Australian Senate. In 2004 Singer was recognised as the Australian Humanist of the Year by the Council of Australian Humanist Societies. In 2005, the Sydney Morning Herald placed him among Australia's ten most influential public intellectuals.


Those are the high priests of morality that we're supposed to look up to and obey going forward.

λ ό γ ο ς
(This post was last modified: 06-23-2019 01:31 AM by 911.)
06-23-2019 01:28 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like 911's post:
Leonard D Neubache, Gremlin, Handsome Creepy Eel, ilostabet
WalterBlack Online
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,563
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 24
Post: #78
RE: "He’s a 10-year-old drag performer, and he’s cooler than you"
(03-14-2019 08:42 PM)Geomann180 Wrote:  Bachi Bazi finally made it to the US I see.

G



06-23-2019 02:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes WalterBlack's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
ilostabet Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 673
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 22
Post: #79
RE: "He’s a 10-year-old drag performer, and he’s cooler than you"
(06-23-2019 01:28 AM)911 Wrote:  
(06-22-2019 05:51 PM)scorpion Wrote:  It's very obvious now how they're using the transgender issue to push directly into pedophilia. Seriously, how can anyone endorse this child drag queen thing? It's not like it's even a slippery slope argument. There's not much of a line between a 10 year old boy dancing around in a gay club as a drag queen because "that's who he is" and a 10 year old boy "choosing" to "have sex" (aka be raped after being groomed and drugged) with older gay men because "that's who he is". And people are literally cheering for this. The West needs to be cleansed with divine fire.

The issue will be packaged as a "sexual rights" for children. Those who object to pedophilia are standing against the sexual rights of children!

Princeton prof specializing in moral philosophy and ethics says pedophilia is OK, and so is bestiality:

https://www.eutimes.net/2019/06/jewish-p...edophilia/

Quote:Jewish professor says women should have sex with dogs for pleasure, also refuses to condemn pedophilia

Posted by EU Times on Jun 17th, 2019

He also refuses to call sex with children wrong: ‘the issue is whether it harms the ten year old.’

Video has resurfaced, thanks to Mark Powell at The Spectator, of Professor Peter Singer, a Jewish moral philosopher and ethicist from Princeton University, suggesting sex between humans and dogs is harmless provided the animal essentially consents.

In 2010 Singer appeared on the ABC’s Q&A where he explained, “A woman has oral sex performed by her dog. I know women who have said this is something that pleases them. The dog is free to do it or walk away. There is no dominance over the dog. That seems to me harmless.”

When asked in another interview if he had similar thoughts regarding sex with children, Singer refused to call the act itself wrong saying, “The issue here is whether this harms the ten year olds and will harm them in their sexuality later on… My view is not that anything is just wrong full stop.”

Mark Powell rightly said, “The fact that anyone in the community—let alone a ‘moral philosopher’ from Princeton University—is arguing for something like this should be a cause for public outrage.”

Strangely, the public have been rather quiet on this one. The video of Singer’s appearance on Q&A has only received just over 3,000 views in more than eight years.


Singer served as chair of the philosophy department at Monash University, where he founded its Centre for Human Bioethics. In 1996 he stood unsuccessfully as a Greens candidate for the Australian Senate. In 2004 Singer was recognised as the Australian Humanist of the Year by the Council of Australian Humanist Societies. In 2005, the Sydney Morning Herald placed him among Australia's ten most influential public intellectuals.


Those are the high priests of morality that we're supposed to look up to and obey going forward.

We might find this fellow white person's take on bestiality and pedophilia abhorrent (as you should if you are sane), but it is completely in line with the basic premise of classical liberalism that replaced the old order, and to which many people here still adhere to but aren't satisfied with its more disgusting fruits: the replacement of natural law based morality for harm/consent based morality - ditching objective and absolute norms given by God (and that obviously can not be changed) for subjectively and personally perceived norms such as consent or harm.

Once you ditch objective natural law, the subjective harm or consent can be twisted (and will be twisted, and has been twisted) to mean whatever the individual wants. The moment we start arguing about who can consent or what constitutes harm, we already lost the battle because we are discussing subjectively derived norms that require interpretation. It's important to realize that our societies are not imoral, but amoral.

A lot of other things allowed in our societies that most people here would not object to because they 'do not harm anyone' or because 'it's consented' will have to be rethought if we are to oppose these more obvious abominations successfully as a society - including, for example, casual sex. Our modern society is completely unoriginal in this regard as we can observe these same patterns in many others across history. If we do not reject the subjective moral law in its entirety and go back to objective morality, these diabolic results are always just around the corner.

We made too many wrong mistakes. Yogi Berra
06-23-2019 12:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes ilostabet's post:
VNvet
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
Brick Drag queen story time JayMillz 28 13,007 10-27-2019 04:44 PM
Last Post: Handsome Creepy Eel
  Public school allows drag queen to speak on "career day" without notifying parents Roosh 29 6,653 08-06-2019 06:59 PM
Last Post: Lazuli Waves
  VICE Canada - "the next generation of drag queens" crystalcastle 4 1,418 06-09-2019 06:01 AM
Last Post: Teedub

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication