The Paperback Of Game Is Now Available! Several retailers have begun selling the physical copy of Game with free shipping. Click Here For Full Details.

Post Reply 
Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
Author Message
spydersuit Offline
Recovering Beta
*
Gold Member

Posts: 239
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 3
Post: #251
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
(Yesterday 09:28 PM)The_e_man Wrote:  
(12-09-2018 08:23 AM)BadBoyGamer Wrote:  Attractiveness is not only determined by looks. I would say that when it comes down to looks (psysical appearance as in muscle, fat, face, hair, grooming, clothes) only a certain "treshold" needs to be obtained. Once this point has been reached other qualities get priority. And I do not see any evidence for this "threshold" to be particulary high.

Or to put it into other words: As long as you are "not bad looking".

Other attractive qualities that are important are: dominance, strength, pre selection, initiative taking, self confidence, risk taking, fearlesssness, social freedom, emotional control, etc.

In a real life face to face interaction these qualities become a whole lot more important than looks. And when it comes to sex these qualities become even more important.

To put it into other words: A "hot" submissive guy is unattractive.

I would even say that these qualities can entirely negate "uglyness". Or in the negative completly negate "hotness".

On other hand money and social status have little to do with attractiveness. These are simply practical considerations which belong in the "Beta Bux" category. If money or status where attractive, I expect girls to masturbate to pictures of Mark Zuckerberg.

But I do agree that Tinder gives you a good idea about where you stand looks wise. However as I said, this be a biased dataset. Biased towards looks primarily and biased for girls that primarily select based on looks.

Oh boy. I like your posts and I like your logical approach to the game, I really do.
In fact I even recently gave you a rep point a few days ago.

So please take this sincerely when I tell you that you have it completely wrong. The first part of your post was ok, but then you started losing me. I have a feeling you're wrong because you are basing too many things in the theoretical world in your mind, and you still don't have enough real world experience of the game (high notch count, experience with harems / LTRs with hot girls, etc).

Social status, to some girls, can be KING when it comes to attraction. Especially the young hot party girls that are being picky on tinder. And status is certainly not a "beta bux" trait. Keep in mind, when I say status I am talking about the status that girls care about: popular, cool guy, at the top of the social food chain, with lots of fun connections. Not the department chair at the astrophysics society. And even then, the department chair of astrophysics has enough relative status in his little niche that he can actually be killing it as well - just not with the young party girls but obviously a much more different demographic of women.

Also keep in mind that some of the best looking guys are usually the high status guys in their social circles. Yes, yes exceptions exist. There's stories of ugly guys killing it and good looking guys shooting themselves in the foot and never getting pussy. But let's get the extreme anecdotes out of the way and look at general trends.
Physical attractiveness and status are tightly related and intertwined, and it's no surprise girls very much care about those two things when it comes to pure attraction.

Somebody should create 2 accounts with the same photos!!! Then use the text to portray a fun, risk taking, social, party animal in Profile 1. In profile 2. a stable provider - Energy company engineer. (c'mon we all know which profile will win today in most large cities of the US). I have actually done this with varied results. I find there to be a strong urban rural and socioeconomic status divide between which profile does better (internationally and domestically). Wealthy cities party animal Chad does well. In poor rural areas not too risky stable Fred does well.

Of course this is all complex, and the location and the other options (men) available in the marketplace to the women are a factor.

-----
But OP - marketplace economics to answer your question as others have said.
Yesterday 09:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes spydersuit's post:
Built to Fade
The_e_man Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 512
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 27
Post: #252
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
^ interesting point.

If I were to take an educated guess as to why that be the case, I would say it's because women that live in a big cosmopolitan city care more about looks and status and fun (Pure attraction) whereas women that live in rural areas care more about a stable provider (transactional attraction).

Grant me serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
The courage to change the things I can,
And the wisdom to know the difference
Yesterday 09:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes The_e_man's post:
Built to Fade
corsega Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 875
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 26
Post: #253
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
(Yesterday 08:21 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  I am actually one such example, but I can't give you evidence over the Internet as that's just stupid. I can and have shown men who've met me in person the examples.

You're telling me you are a regular guy, a "5", and have banged and retained 9s, in the hardest Western country for Game (Australia)?

Yeah nah.

Either they weren't 9s, or you aren't regular (more likely).

(Yesterday 08:21 PM)StrikeBack Wrote:  In saying that, why would you downplay status, money and social circle?

Because you mentioned a regular guy. A regular guy has average status, average money, and an average social circle filled with average girls.

Sounds like you're redefining the term "regular".

(Yesterday 08:47 PM)Shemp Wrote:  I've known at least two short, bald morbidly obese guys with beautiful wives (also short). Facially the guys were fine, 8 or above. But short, fat and bald should knock their score down right?

People are really obsessed with the anomalies, I gotta say. This video explains my thoughts on the matter (start at 2:20 for literally the exact example you just gave, haha):




Also, morbidly obese with an 8 face? That's impossible. Obesity ruins your facial aesthetics.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
(This post was last modified: Today 02:35 AM by corsega.)
Today 02:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes corsega's post:
Built to Fade
StrikeBack Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,957
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 86
Post: #254
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
I said regular, as in terms of looks. I have never said that I'm a "regular" guy in a complete sense. I am anything but average when it comes to other qualities. Women I've dated all think I'm handsome, but I'm also only 5'7" (5'6" after squatting at the gym!), hairy, built like a small bulldog, no six packs and Asian. Pretty sure I tried hotornot once when I was younger and got rated a 3. You tell me what women would rate me at, looks-wise. Yet I've dated plenty of European girls who look way out of my league and are almost always taller than me, including my wife. One key thing every one of them has told me is that I am the most interesting man they have ever talked to, that's always been my hook.

I'm not a casual sex guy, I nearly always get into relationships. But that's also because I'm normal man, when I get a pretty girl, I want to at least bang her regularly for a while, and I'm not out there trying to rack up big numbers to impress Internet people.

I only brought this up because you lot keep yapping on and on about looks being everything, when my experience shows that it's clearly not. If looks mattered that much, I'd probably be one of those incel MGTOWs whining on the Internet after trying looksmaxing for a month. As men, we have so many other venues to improve our attractiveness, and this should give all of us hope. Stop this obsession with looks.

StrikeBack's Wife School
Today 04:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like StrikeBack's post:
Ouroboros, Tactician, Built to Fade, Saweeep, Zoso, DJ-Matt
BadBoyGamer Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 261
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation: 5
Post: #255
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
corsega Wrote:In the 20-24 age range, over 60 percent of women (e.g. most women) have had between 1 and 4 partners: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795598/

There is no way of knowing how many sexual partners people have had. People are known to lie about these things. The idea that most woman only have had between 1-4 sexual partners is ridiculous. Unless you count old people.


"normal looking men getting beautiful women"

It all depends on how you define "beautiful woman" and how you define "normal looking men".

The_e_man Wrote:
BadBoyGamer Wrote:On other hand money and social status have little to do with attractiveness.

Social status, to some girls, can be KING when it comes to attraction. Especially the young hot party girls that are being picky on tinder. And status is certainly not a "beta bux" trait. Keep in mind, when I say status I am talking about the status that girls care about: popular, cool guy, at the top of the social food chain, with lots of fun connections. Not the department chair at the astrophysics society. And even then, the department chair of astrophysics has enough relative status in his little niche that he can actually be killing it as well - just not with the young party girls but obviously a much more different demographic of women.

I agree with you. I wass refering to something else. Might be using the wrong words by calling it "social status". I was referring to other kinds of "social status". Like indeed the head of the astrophysics club, manager of a company, doctor in hospital or the lawyer.

A soccer coach might have lots of social status at the local soccer club, but girls do not give one bit of a fuck about this form of status. Same for the CEO of a company. The guy might be having huge status inside the company, but once he enters a bar the bartender can be having more (from female perspective).

Usually the popular and cool guy on top of the social food chain, with lots of fun connections, is on the top because he displays the qualities I mentioned earlier.

The_e_man Wrote:Physical attractiveness and status are tightly related and intertwined, and it's no surprise girls very much care about those two things when it comes to pure attraction.

I attribute all of this to earlier mentioned qualities. I highly doubt a guy can be physical attractive without having at least a subset of these qualities.

Only three ways to do something: "The right way. The wrong way. Or my way. Obviously my way is best."
(This post was last modified: Today 05:29 AM by BadBoyGamer.)
Today 05:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes BadBoyGamer's post:
Built to Fade
spydersuit Offline
Recovering Beta
*
Gold Member

Posts: 239
Joined: Oct 2016
Reputation: 3
Post: #256
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
(Today 04:18 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  I said regular, as in terms of looks. I have never said that I'm a "regular" guy in a complete sense. I am anything but average when it comes to other qualities. Women I've dated all think I'm handsome, but I'm also only 5'7" (5'6" after squatting at the gym!), hairy, built like a small bulldog, no six packs and Asian. Pretty sure I tried hotornot once when I was younger and got rated a 3. You tell me what women would rate me at, looks-wise. Yet I've dated plenty of European girls who look way out of my league and are almost always taller than me, including my wife. One key thing every one of them has told me is that I am the most interesting man they have ever talked to, that's always been my hook.

I'm not a casual sex guy, I nearly always get into relationships. But that's also because I'm normal man, when I get a pretty girl, I want to at least bang her regularly for a while, and I'm not out there trying to rack up big numbers to impress Internet people.

I only brought this up because you lot keep yapping on and on about looks being everything, when my experience shows that it's clearly not. If looks mattered that much, I'd probably be one of those incel MGTOWs whining on the Internet after trying looksmaxing for a month. As men, we have so many other venues to improve our attractiveness, and this should give all of us hope. Stop this obsession with looks.

You are missing the point of what a few of us had said brosef. The point is, if you took the same "inner you" and placed it 2 different bodies; 1 hot body, and 1 ugly body. The hot body would outperform the ugly body. Do you understand? If you don't think looks matter you are high. It is what opens the door the fastest to most women. After that point, yes game matters. Up until that point some women won't give you the time of day. Hot guys need to put in much less effort than ugly ones.
Today 09:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like spydersuit's post:
Built to Fade, zatara, The_e_man
AneroidOcean Offline
International Playboy
******
Gold Member

Posts: 3,098
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 78
Post: #257
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
(Today 09:39 AM)spydersuit Wrote:  
(Today 04:18 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  I said regular, as in terms of looks. I have never said that I'm a "regular" guy in a complete sense. I am anything but average when it comes to other qualities. Women I've dated all think I'm handsome, but I'm also only 5'7" (5'6" after squatting at the gym!), hairy, built like a small bulldog, no six packs and Asian. Pretty sure I tried hotornot once when I was younger and got rated a 3. You tell me what women would rate me at, looks-wise. Yet I've dated plenty of European girls who look way out of my league and are almost always taller than me, including my wife. One key thing every one of them has told me is that I am the most interesting man they have ever talked to, that's always been my hook.

I'm not a casual sex guy, I nearly always get into relationships. But that's also because I'm normal man, when I get a pretty girl, I want to at least bang her regularly for a while, and I'm not out there trying to rack up big numbers to impress Internet people.

I only brought this up because you lot keep yapping on and on about looks being everything, when my experience shows that it's clearly not. If looks mattered that much, I'd probably be one of those incel MGTOWs whining on the Internet after trying looksmaxing for a month. As men, we have so many other venues to improve our attractiveness, and this should give all of us hope. Stop this obsession with looks.

You are missing the point of what a few of us had said brosef. The point is, if you took the same "inner you" and placed it 2 different bodies; 1 hot body, and 1 ugly body. The hot body would outperform the ugly body. Do you understand? If you don't think looks matter you are high. It is what opens the door the fastest to most women. After that point, yes game matters. Up until that point some women won't give you the time of day. Hot guys need to put in much less effort than ugly ones.

Jesus guys. He's saying this emphasis on looks matter above all else is silly. Looks are always a factor, but he's saying they are not the end all and be all for men, far from it. It's a WAY less important factor vs what it is for women. Seriously.

He's not saying looks don't matter at all. You guys are making a strawman argument.

Read My Old Blog - Subscribe To My Old Blog
Top Posts - Fake Rape? - Sex With A Tranny? - Rich MILF - What is a 9?

"Failure is just practice for success"
Today 04:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like AneroidOcean's post:
corsega, jselysianeagle, Built to Fade
corsega Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 875
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 26
Post: #258
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
(Today 05:24 AM)BadBoyGamer Wrote:  
corsega Wrote:In the 20-24 age range, over 60 percent of women (e.g. most women) have had between 1 and 4 partners: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5795598/

There is no way of knowing how many sexual partners people have had. People are known to lie about these things. The idea that most woman only have had between 1-4 sexual partners is ridiculous. Unless you count old people.

So we should just discard all this data entirely and believe... what, exactly?

All women are sluts, despite zero evidence for that side of things and a lot of evidence for what I posted?

I highly doubt many women are going to lie about their n-count on a private survey.

(Today 04:18 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  I said regular, as in terms of looks. I have never said that I'm a "regular" guy in a complete sense. I am anything but average when it comes to other qualities. Women I've dated all think I'm handsome, but I'm also only 5'7" (5'6" after squatting at the gym!), hairy, built like a small bulldog, no six packs and Asian. Pretty sure I tried hotornot once when I was younger and got rated a 3. You tell me what women would rate me at, looks-wise. Yet I've dated plenty of European girls who look way out of my league and are almost always taller than me, including my wife. One key thing every one of them has told me is that I am the most interesting man they have ever talked to, that's always been my hook.

Sounds like you are far above average. So, unfortunately, not really a good example for the original claim of "regular" guys getting with "beautiful" girls.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
(This post was last modified: Today 04:45 PM by corsega.)
Today 04:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes corsega's post:
Built to Fade
BadBoyGamer Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 261
Joined: Sep 2018
Reputation: 5
Post: #259
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
Yes, they are going to lie just like the males. No matter how you ask the questions. And I am not saying "all woman are sluts". Simply that I think the number might be a little bit higher. Or the number of woman a little bit lower. Or more likely a combination of the two.

Only three ways to do something: "The right way. The wrong way. Or my way. Obviously my way is best."
Today 05:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes BadBoyGamer's post:
Built to Fade
Jetset Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,026
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 40
Post: #260
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
(Today 04:41 PM)corsega Wrote:  So we should just discard all this data entirely and believe... what, exactly?

All women are sluts, despite zero evidence for that side of things and a lot of evidence for what I posted?

I highly doubt many women are going to lie about their n-count on a private survey.

It took me a long time to realize that women lie very differently than men do.

A man will usually lie strategically, making a calculated choice to deviate from his own memories in order to achieve a goal.

When a woman lies, she has altered her own personal space-time continuum. In much the same way that consensual sex can be revised into rape, if she doesn't want to have fucked him, SHE DID NOT FUCK HIM. NOTHING HAPPENED.

This will not even be experienced as "lying", because it's just a natural part of promoting the version of themselves that they wish were true, that must be true, and is part of the reason they choke up like Windows Vista when they are confronted with the hard evidence. They are not fully prepared, psychologically, for the possibility that their own lie is not true, where a man would typically be planning for that because he knows reality still exists.

I guarantee, no woman tells the truth about vacation dick or that fat guy she blew for weed and concert tickets on an anonymous internet survey, because that shit DID NOT HAPPEN. Clicking it would be to acknowledge it.

"He always wanted to drift forever, but through the American Southwest."
(This post was last modified: Today 05:38 PM by Jetset.)
Today 05:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Jetset's post:
Built to Fade, Saweeep
Ouroboros Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 124
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 4
Post: #261
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
(Today 04:18 AM)StrikeBack Wrote:  I'm not a casual sex guy, I nearly always get into relationships. But that's also because I'm normal man, when I get a pretty girl, I want to at least bang her regularly for a while, and I'm not out there trying to rack up big numbers to impress Internet people.

I only brought this up because you lot keep yapping on and on about looks being everything, when my experience shows that it's clearly not. If looks mattered that much, I'd probably be one of those incel MGTOWs whining on the Internet after trying looksmaxing for a month. As men, we have so many other venues to improve our attractiveness, and this should give all of us hope. Stop this obsession with looks.

This may be where some of the disagreement is coming from. You're arguing (I suspect) with people who are mainly aiming for casual sex/notches through online game and cold approach. Women obviously date up much more (in terms of looks) for such encounters than they do for social circle-derived LTRs.
Today 05:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Ouroboros's post:
Built to Fade, corsega
corsega Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 875
Joined: Aug 2016
Reputation: 26
Post: #262
RE: Please explain to me where this 80/20, Chad theory comes from
(Today 05:22 PM)BadBoyGamer Wrote:  Yes, they are going to lie just like the males. No matter how you ask the questions. And I am not saying "all woman are sluts". Simply that I think the number might be a little bit higher. Or the number of woman a little bit lower. Or more likely a combination of the two.

Cool. Let's say it's 33% higher to deal with lying and bad data. So we have 60% of women having <6 partners by age 24.

Not exactly ALL WIMMINZ DO STUFF U WONT BELIEVE BRAH like our dude was mentioning earlier.

My blog - skeptical, data-driven takes on daygame, online game, and more
(This post was last modified: Today 06:12 PM by corsega.)
Today 06:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  What you guys think of r/K-selection theory with application to girls? sch 5 1,731 07-30-2018 10:54 AM
Last Post: General Stalin
Question What is the equivalent of the Chad prototype in a woman? antivi 16 4,154 04-30-2018 08:32 PM
Last Post: questor70
  Game Theory: Handling 9s slubu 168 65,639 03-09-2018 01:29 PM
Last Post: Spartacus

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: Batman_, firat113, 2 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication