Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
Author Message
Laner Offline
Hummingbird
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 3,437
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 96
Post: #26
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
^ True. As I was writing my post above, I thought to myself that future wars will have a large portion fought from behind a computer. I think of Enders Game, but for women, that will take out all the emotion from the killing.

They are not built for it, and 40 years of feminism will not be able to completely destroy a million years of evolution. If a woman was sitting in an A/C cooled trailer in the middle of the desert shooting sprog avatars on a screen, took a nice chill 30min lunch break and had some free time to hit the gym and have a soak, then yes women will very much be part of the next draft.
02-26-2019 12:36 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Laner's post:
Donfitz007
RIslander Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,766
Joined: Dec 2013
Post: #27
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
Women in combat roles is a bullshit idea. It isn't going to happen because it doesn't win wars. Girls can go to Ranger School and pass because of SJW policy of reduced minimum requirements... but they're not actually Rangers. They're going to go back to the supply room in North Carolina taking selfies and facebooking the fancy new Ranger tag on their sleeve not fighting wars.

This is a famous image from the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Is there anyone on this planet that doesn't realize this is total bullshit?

[Image: 220px-Haganah_Woman.jpg]

Yep. Most men think Israeli female soldiers are hot (which they are) and badass (which is ridiculous). They pose with weapons they unlikely know how to use then go back to busting balls in a HR office.
(This post was last modified: 02-26-2019 03:07 PM by RIslander.)
02-26-2019 03:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like RIslander's post:
CynicalContrarian, Solitaire, MikeInRealLife
SlickyBoy Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,244
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 22
Post: #28
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
Drafting females is a terrible idea that's long overdue.
I wholeheartedly do not support it from a practical and sober standpoint, yet in these upside down times, a change in the law can't come soon enough.

Sure, we know it will never be implemented, but make them eat their words - I just want to see them squirm out of this the way they rationalized every other fucked up change that they've advocated in the past 10-15 years.

At this point, we can't save the house. Might as well get the marshmallows.

Twitter: @_slickyboy
Occasional contributor at Return of Kings (while it lasted)
02-26-2019 03:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like SlickyBoy's post:
Buck Wild, Renzy, Geomann180, kruger41, Solitaire
Heuristics Offline
Banned

Posts: 628
Joined: Jul 2018
Post: #29
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
(02-26-2019 03:26 PM)SlickyBoy Wrote:  Drafting females is a terrible idea that's long overdue.
I wholeheartedly do not support it from a practical and sober standpoint, yet in these upside down times, a change in the law can't come soon enough.

Sure, we know it will never be implemented, but make them eat their words - I just want to see them squirm out of this the way they rationalized every other fucked up change that they've advocated in the past 10-15 years.

At this point, we can't save the house. Might as well get the marshmallows.

Well I'm drunk so I say they deserve it. Although looking at it from the most pragmatic standpoint, maybe they don't.

We're faced with a fundamental question: what is the role of women? I don't have a good answer. In a post-feminist world, I would say they've given all the rights and responsibilities we're given. So, draft is good. But, but, if we're trying to be reactionary, they don't deserve to be drafted. So, my question is: what are we advocating for.

Take a step back: women have no place, I repeat: no place in combat. The studies are clear. In our ideal western-patriarchal-oriented civilization, what do we do? We don't put women in combat. They're mothers and ill-equipped to handle combat.
02-26-2019 03:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
nomadbrah Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 5,421
Joined: Sep 2015
Reputation: 66
Post: #30
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
White knight cuckservatives are not only spineless, but also very uncreative.

Who says the draft should be in fighting capacity? Why not allow for a healthcare capacity.

Make the choice available for everyone.

It won't matter for the US professional warmachine, but in Europe it would mean a lot of young women forced to do real work at a young age. Would "make a woman" out of girls, like how the military supposedly makes men out of boys.
02-26-2019 04:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
CynicalContrarian Offline
Peacock
******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,800
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 22
Post: #31
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
(02-26-2019 03:05 PM)RIslander Wrote:  Women in combat roles is a bullshit idea. It isn't going to happen because it doesn't win wars. Girls can go to Ranger School and pass because of SJW policy of reduced minimum requirements... but they're not actually Rangers. They're going to go back to the supply room in North Carolina taking selfies and facebooking the fancy new Ranger tag on their sleeve not fighting wars.

This is a famous image from the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. Is there anyone on this planet that doesn't realize this is total bullshit?

[Image: 220px-Haganah_Woman.jpg]

Yep. Most men think Israeli female soldiers are hot (which they are) and badass (which is ridiculous). They pose with weapons they unlikely know how to use then go back to busting balls in a HR office.

What's that? A 9mm NATO Sten derivative or some such?
In being 9mm NATO & at that angle. Is she attempting to engage targets 300+ yards away?
Bless her heart...
02-26-2019 04:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like CynicalContrarian's post:
Laner, RIslander, kruger41, Leonard D Neubache
RatInTheWoods Offline
Hummingbird
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 3,344
Joined: Jul 2015
Reputation: 33
Post: #32
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
WOULD HAZE FRESH DRAFT LIZARD
02-26-2019 06:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 12,208
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 210
Post: #33
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
Ugh. I forgot to apply my new #1 rule for predicting globalist policy.

Western interventions exist to kill/mutilate combat capable white people.

So yeah, they absolutely will turf the most (relatively speaking) combat capable females into combat because they're also most likely to give birth to future combat capable males if left in the civillian world.

Hostile foreign tribes running your eugenics program is a real bitch.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
02-27-2019 09:21 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
MikeInRealLife, Aurini
General Mayhem Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 961
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 25
Post: #34
RE: Male-only draft is unconstitutional: federal judge
(02-27-2019 09:21 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  Ugh. I forgot to apply my new #1 rule for predicting globalist policy.

Western interventions exist to kill/mutilate combat capable white people.

So yeah, they absolutely will turf the most (relatively speaking) combat capable females into combat because they're also most likely to give birth to future combat capable males if left in the civillian world.

Hostile foreign tribes running your eugenics program is a real bitch.

Drafting women won't stop them from reproducing. Neither will sending them off to fight wars (sit on FOBs). Ever heard of deployment babies?
02-27-2019 01:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Two female pimps spared prison time by Ottawa judge Thot Leader 13 1,895 11-08-2019 03:27 AM
Last Post: Leonard D Neubache
  Department of Homeland Security: The new federal police? Cattle Rustler 8 5,776 03-15-2019 12:48 PM
Last Post: Foolsgo1d
  Beta Male Husband Awarded 8.8mil from Alpha Male Banging His Wife RIslander 16 3,881 12-19-2018 07:03 PM
Last Post: moneyshot

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication