I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
The God pill
Author Message
infowarrior1 Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,609
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 10
Post: #1301
RE: The God pill
(09-10-2019 07:15 AM)PainPositive Wrote:  Does this mean personal insults that don't injure are to be forgiven and not retaliated against? and that when someone robs you you can't resist?

I haven't looked into this deeply enough but it seems like if someone robs you for your jacket and you pull out your concealed carry and double tap them you're in the wrong but if someone tries to kill you or hurt your family you're allowed to defend. I'm not really sure. When I ask myself "What would Jesus do if some junkie tried to steal his tunic?" I think he'd probably just let him have it without hurting him. If someone tried to beat his mother up he'd probably defend her.

What do you guys think?

Quote:Taken in their social context, such commands require neither action. "Resist not evil," which precedes the "cheek" admonition, is a well-known Jewish proverb (Ps. 37:1, 8; Prov. 24:19) and actually means, do not compete with evildoers by trying to outdo them in terms of getting back at them. Three examples for the teaching follow: Turn the other cheek; if someone sues you for your cloak, also give them your tunic; if you are forced to go one mile, go two.

All three of these things refer to what amount to inconvenient, but nevertheless perfectly legal, impositions on the person. The "slap on the cheek" is a type of personal insult, so that the command to turn the other cheek is essentially a command not to start trading insults, but take the higher ground and turn away from the exchange. It is not a license to allow yourself to get beat up.


http://www.tektonics.org/lp/madmad.php


Plus vengeance is kicked up to a third party The State. Who undertakes the Lex Talonis or Eye for an Eye.


This is to avoid ever escalating revenge cycles that were historically incredibly destructive.
09-10-2019 08:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,597
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 47
Post: #1302
RE: The God pill
(09-10-2019 07:15 AM)PainPositive Wrote:  
(09-10-2019 04:21 AM)MichaelWitcoff Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 02:33 PM)debeguiled Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 11:32 PM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 11:09 PM)NoMoreTO Wrote:  Guns aren't really part of religion, except in USA. That said, I wish we had 2nd amendment in Canada, but I think Americans overrate it, even though its a positive thing in defense of the family.

Weapons for self-defense are indisputably a part of the Christian religion. In fact, the more that a people are religious, the more guns they will have. The fact that Americans heed this fundamental Biblical truth, when almost all other nations have ignored it, simply proves my previous point that the U.S. is not "the sick man of the world," as opposed to almost all other nations. As a Christian, you have a duty to protect not only yourself and your family, but also the weak and the powerless:

-- What does the Bible say about self-defense?

“If a thief is caught in the act of breaking into a house and is struck and killed in the process, the person who killed the thief is not guilty of murder. But if it happens in daylight, the one who killed the thief is guilty of murder.” Exodus 22:2-3

“When a strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his property is safe.” Luke 11:21

“Then Jesus asked them, “When I sent you out to preach the Good News and you did not have money, a traveler’s bag, or an extra pair of sandals, did you need anything?” “No,” they replied. “But now,” he said, “take your money and a traveler’s bag. And if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. Luke 22:35-37


-- You must protect yourself, your family, and the defenseless:

“Rescue weak and needy people. Help them escape the power of wicked people.” Psalm 82:4

“Rescue captives condemned to death, and spare those staggering toward their slaughter.” Proverbs 24:11

“But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” 1 Timothy 5:8

I am skeptical of this.

Most of these come from the Old Testament.

Of the New Testament verses. . .

Luke 11:21 is a metaphor not a directive.

1 Timothy 5:8 talks about providing, not defending.

That leaves you with one verse talking about carrying a sword.

There are plenty of verses in the New Testament that speak of pacifism, of not resisting evil.

Matthew 26:52-54 ESV:
Quote:Then Jesus said to him, “Put your sword back into its place. For all who take the sword will perish by the sword. Do you think that I cannot appeal to my Father, and he will at once send me more than twelve legions of angels? But how then should the Scriptures be fulfilled, that it must be so?”

Plenty more here:

https://www.openbible.info/topics/pacifism

Not to mention the central metaphor of Christianity, a man willingly laying his life down for his enemies.

It seems the evidence for violence of any sort is pretty thin, and if anything, it is a concession to human weakness, and not a desire of God.

If a man holds a gun to your head and tells you to deny Christ or he pulls the trigger, you start praying out loud and put faith in where martyrdom gets you. If someone breaks into your house to hurt your family because they want to commit sexual crimes against your daughters, you have an obligation to protect them. Christianity does not preach pacifism in the face of aggression except in the case of sacrificing your own life in the name and defense of your faith. Of course if someone insults you, you are supposed to forgive them and not "return fire" but I assume you are talking about physical violence here.

St. Augustine had some very pointed things to say to the Roman governor Boniface in regards to his duties to protect the Christian communities during the sack of North Africa by the Vandals - at absolutely no point did he say "well let's just sit around and die because of pacifism." Just War includes defense of the innocent.

A lot of people like to quote these verses about shooting a thief who tries to rob you.

Quote:27 But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,

28 Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you.

29 And unto him that smiteth thee on the one cheek offer also the other; and him that taketh away thy cloak forbid not to take thy coat also.

30 Give to every man that asketh of thee; and of him that taketh away thy goods ask them not again.

31 And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.

32 For if ye love them which love you, what thank have ye? for sinners also love those that love them.

33 And if ye do good to them which do good to you, what thank have ye? for sinners also do even the same.

34 And if ye lend to them of whom ye hope to receive, what thank have ye? for sinners also lend to sinners, to receive as much again.

35 But love ye your enemies, and do good, and lend, hoping for nothing again; and your reward shall be great, and ye shall be the children of the Highest: for he is kind unto the unthankful and to the evil.

36 Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.

also:

Quote:39 But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

40 And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.

41 And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.

42 Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.

43 Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.

44 But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

45 That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

Does this mean personal insults that don't injure are to be forgiven and not retaliated against? and that when someone robs you you can't resist?

I haven't looked into this deeply enough but it seems like if someone robs you for your jacket and you pull out your concealed carry and double tap them you're in the wrong but if someone tries to kill you or hurt your family you're allowed to defend. I'm not really sure. When I ask myself "What would Jesus do if some junkie tried to steal his tunic?" I think he'd probably just let him have it without hurting him. If someone tried to beat his mother up he'd probably defend her.

What do you guys think?

Exactly.

https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-72750...pid1962184
09-10-2019 09:52 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
debeguiled Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,275
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 114
Post: #1303
RE: The God pill
(09-10-2019 04:21 AM)MichaelWitcoff Wrote:  If a man holds a gun to your head and tells you to deny Christ or he pulls the trigger, you start praying out loud and put faith in where martyrdom gets you. If someone breaks into your house to hurt your family because they want to commit sexual crimes against your daughters, you have an obligation to protect them. Christianity does not preach pacifism in the face of aggression except in the case of sacrificing your own life in the name and defense of your faith. Of course if someone insults you, you are supposed to forgive them and not "return fire" but I assume you are talking about physical violence here.

St. Augustine had some very pointed things to say to the Roman governor Boniface in regards to his duties to protect the Christian communities during the sack of North Africa by the Vandals - at absolutely no point did he say "well let's just sit around and die because of pacifism." Just War includes defense of the innocent.

Still seems like a concession to the faintness of human spiritual understanding, and not a Godly ideal.

“The greatest burden a child must bear is the unlived life of its parents.”

Carl Jung
09-10-2019 11:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like debeguiled's post:
ilostabet, worldwidetraveler
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,597
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 47
Post: #1304
RE: The God pill
(09-10-2019 11:51 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  
(09-10-2019 04:21 AM)MichaelWitcoff Wrote:  If a man holds a gun to your head and tells you to deny Christ or he pulls the trigger, you start praying out loud and put faith in where martyrdom gets you. If someone breaks into your house to hurt your family because they want to commit sexual crimes against your daughters, you have an obligation to protect them. Christianity does not preach pacifism in the face of aggression except in the case of sacrificing your own life in the name and defense of your faith. Of course if someone insults you, you are supposed to forgive them and not "return fire" but I assume you are talking about physical violence here.

St. Augustine had some very pointed things to say to the Roman governor Boniface in regards to his duties to protect the Christian communities during the sack of North Africa by the Vandals - at absolutely no point did he say "well let's just sit around and die because of pacifism." Just War includes defense of the innocent.

Still seems like a concession to the faintness of human spiritual understanding, and not a Godly ideal.

The Old Testament mainly focused on the rules pertaining to how men should live together in a society and, secondarily, man's relation to God. By contrast, the New Testament mainly focused on man's relation to God and, secondarily, man's relation to other men. So, by its very nature, the New Testament does not have many references to self-defense, but the Old Testament rules regarding the right to self-defense are quite clear. Moreover, Jesus made quite clear that those Old Testament rules still apply:

Quote:“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill [the law].

Matthew 5:17


Aside from the verses that I already cited, this verse leave no question about the right to self-defense:

Quote:16 And it came to pass from that time forth, that the half of my servants wrought in the work, and the other half of them held both the spears, the shields, and the bows, and the habergeons; and the rulers were behind all the house of Judah. 17 They which builded on the wall, and they that bare burdens, with those that laded, every one with one of his hands wrought in the work, and with the other hand held a weapon.

Nehemiah 4:16-17

When Nehemiah was rebuilding the walls of Jerusalem, there were threats to the workers' safety so Nehemiah wisely armed the builders so that if a sudden attack came, they could defend themselves. God was behind this rebuilding project, so we can safely assume from Nehemiah’s instructions to for the workers to carry weapons that God gave them permission to defend themselves and to keep the work going, no matter who might threaten them. In other words, there was no need to flee rather than standing your ground to defend yourself.

God wants manly family men, not cucks. The illusion of Jesus as a limp wristed woos is complete nonsense. Jesus was a carpenter by trade and, out of necessity, He was a very strong rough-hewn man. He also told His followers to pick up swords -- although they did not use them only because Jesus knew His fate and He willingly submitted to that fate as the Lamb of God, slaughtered for the transgressions of mankind.
(This post was last modified: 09-10-2019 01:57 PM by Tail Gunner.)
09-10-2019 01:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Tail Gunner's post:
ilostabet
ilostabet Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 598
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 19
Post: #1305
RE: The God pill
I've read that the reason why God allowed the scriptures to come from multiple sources, instead of having one source alone, is that it would be easy to subvert that one source, and if we have multiple then we can compare them and see if one have been subverted, because the others would be witnesses to the the truth.

I have been thinking if the same plan was not put in motion in the schism. I am becoming convinced that both Roman Catholicism and Orthodox retained parts of the truth, and that by having the schism it was possible to avert in the East the clear corruption that happened in the West (I don't mean necessarily in the Church, but in the societies - which is obviously related, but not the same thing). And obviously, Protestantism had some part to play as well, carrying part of the torch (in particular, the focus on scripture).

It's obvious that unity is the ideal, but given the fallen nature of our world, it may be that this separation was a workaround to a higher goal (a sort of not 'putting all eggs in one basket') and now, because God can turn evil into good, we see a return (albeit slow) to understanding and a true form of ecumenism and cooperation between Christians (for example, here in this forum). Now that Satan has revealed himself, Christians of all origins are coming together to fight the common enemy.

I don't know, I could be completely off the mark. Just something that occurred to me. Don't take it too seriously.

Don't call it a grave, it's the future you chose.
09-12-2019 05:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like ilostabet's post:
Leonard D Neubache, FilipSRB, Tail Gunner, Wutang, Dismal Operator, Sankt Michael
wwtl Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 232
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #1306
RE: The God pill
(09-12-2019 05:26 AM)ilostabet Wrote:  It's obvious that unity is the ideal, but given the fallen nature of our world, it may be that this separation was a workaround to a higher goal (a sort of not 'putting all eggs in one basket') and now, because God can turn evil into good, we see a return (albeit slow) to understanding and a true form of ecumenism and cooperation between Christians (for example, here in this forum). Now that Satan has revealed himself, Christians of all origins are coming together to fight the common enemy.

I don't know, I could be completely off the mark. Just something that occurred to me. Don't take it too seriously.

As someone who is with the Spirit I get drawn to Christian ecumenism as well. I started into faith with Scripture on my own. When the question of denomination came up for me, the Lord turned it into a question of parish choice - made it about meeting the right people (Christians), not about doctrine.

Now when I see brothers who are emphasizing on denomination disagreements instead, while being in love with non-Christian believers (especially "chosen ones"), my gut doesn't like it at all. I think that is no coincidence.
09-12-2019 06:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like wwtl's post:
debeguiled, ilostabet, Wutang
debeguiled Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,275
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 114
Post: #1307
RE: The God pill
(09-12-2019 06:08 AM)wwtl Wrote:  
(09-12-2019 05:26 AM)ilostabet Wrote:  It's obvious that unity is the ideal, but given the fallen nature of our world, it may be that this separation was a workaround to a higher goal (a sort of not 'putting all eggs in one basket') and now, because God can turn evil into good, we see a return (albeit slow) to understanding and a true form of ecumenism and cooperation between Christians (for example, here in this forum). Now that Satan has revealed himself, Christians of all origins are coming together to fight the common enemy.

I don't know, I could be completely off the mark. Just something that occurred to me. Don't take it too seriously.

As someone who is with the Spirit I get drawn to Christian ecumenism as well. I started into faith with Scripture on my own. When the question of denomination came up for me, the Lord turned it into a question of parish choice - made it about meeting the right people (Christians), not about doctrine.

Now when I see brothers who are emphasizing on denomination disagreements instead, while being in love with non-Christian believers (especially "chosen ones"), my gut doesn't like it at all. I think that is no coincidence.

You would like this joke:

https://www.theguardian.com/stage/2005/s...y.religion

Quote:Once I saw this guy on a bridge about to jump. I said, "Don't do it!" He said, "Nobody loves me." I said, "God loves you. Do you believe in God?"

He said, "Yes." I said, "Are you a Christian or a Jew?" He said, "A Christian." I said, "Me, too! Protestant or Catholic?" He said, "Protestant." I said, "Me, too! What franchise?" He said, "Baptist." I said, "Me, too! Northern Baptist or Southern Baptist?" He said, "Northern Baptist." I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist or Northern Liberal Baptist?"

He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist." I said, "Me, too! Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region, or Northern Conservative Baptist Eastern Region?" He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region." I said, "Me, too!"

Northern Conservative†Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879, or Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912?" He said, "Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912." I said, "Die, heretic!" And I pushed him over.

“The greatest burden a child must bear is the unlived life of its parents.”

Carl Jung
09-12-2019 11:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 9 users Like debeguiled's post:
ilostabet, Roosh, TooFineAPoint, Leonard D Neubache, Matsufubu, Dismal Operator, bacani, Sankt Michael, Jones
Spectrumwalker Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 691
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 49
Post: #1308
RE: The God pill
Unity is not the ideal. Be wary of ecumenalicasm. To bring religious groups together into this worldwide group through peace and love and koombayah is straight from Satan. Read Revelation 13. To dupe people into accepting world government and eventually worshipping the Antichrist. Ilostabet is right. "Christians" will come together to fight a common enemy. Jesus Christ himself at the time of his return.

Read Jesus's own words about what the Gospel cause.

Luke 12:51-53
Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

Don't sound very ecumenical.

Dreams are like horses; they run wild on the earth. Catch one and ride it. Throw a leg over and ride it for all its worth.
Psalm 25:7
https://youtu.be/vHVoMCH10Wk
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2019 02:27 PM by Spectrumwalker.)
09-12-2019 02:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Spectrumwalker's post:
ilostabet
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,597
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 47
Post: #1309
RE: The God pill
(09-12-2019 02:25 PM)Spectrumwalker Wrote:  Unity is not the ideal. Be wary of ecumenalicasm. To bring religious groups together into this worldwide group through peace and love and koombayah is straight from Satan. Read Revelation 13. To dupe people into accepting world government and eventually worshipping the Antichrist. Ilostabet is right. "Christians" will come together to fight a common enemy. Jesus Christ himself at the time of his return.

Read Jesus's own words about what the Gospel cause.

Luke 12:51-53
Suppose ye that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, Nay; but rather division: For from henceforth there shall be five in one house divided, three against two, and two against three. The father shall be divided against the son, and the son against the father; the mother against the daughter, and the daughter against the mother; the mother in law against her daughter in law, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.

Don't sound very ecumenical.

We need to be careful here. Ilostabet was correct: real bible-believing Christians of all denominations should stick together. Division among the bible-believing brethren will accelerate the evil in our culture.

Spectrumwalker is also correct: the ecumenical movement, in terms of a one-world religion is incredibly dangerous. Real bible-believing Christians should not join with other religions or with apostate Christian churches. It was not till the 20th century that progressive Protestant churches initiated the ecumenical movement. Conservative Protestants and Catholics held back, seeing ecumenism as giving in to relativism.

The views offered by both Ilostabet and Spectrumwalker are well-taken, but be keenly aware of the difference.
09-12-2019 03:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Tail Gunner's post:
debeguiled, ilostabet, Leonard D Neubache, Sankt Michael
Roosh Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******

Posts: 19,772
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 416
Post: #1310
RE: The God pill
God pill is not only for men..


Roosh
http://www.rooshv.com
09-13-2019 01:28 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 14 users Like Roosh's post:
Leonard D Neubache, wwtl, MichaelWitcoff, FilipSRB, NoMoreTO, Nemausus, worldwidetraveler, Tail Gunner, hlingzing, debeguiled, Dismal Operator, infowarrior1, Sankt Michael, Jones
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,375
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 204
Post: #1311
RE: The God pill
No point squabbling unless another denomination demands you backslide on modern progressive evil, at which point you're not obligated to do much more but decline their demands.

Open forums for interdenominational discussion are tricky. They can only exist with total respect for civilised discourse and acceptance that consensus is neither likely nor necessary.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
09-13-2019 02:22 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
wwtl Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 232
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #1312
RE: The God pill
(09-13-2019 01:28 AM)Roosh Wrote:  God pill is not only for men..


What a stunning transformation! We serve a truly awesome God.
09-13-2019 02:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like wwtl's post:
Leonard D Neubache, MichaelWitcoff, NoMoreTO, Tail Gunner, Vladimir Poontang, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, infowarrior1, Sankt Michael
wwtl Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 232
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #1313
RE: The God pill
BTW: The change in attractiveness from left to right is similar to how men look like to girls when they stop sinning and go on NoFap for at least a month.
09-13-2019 08:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Roosh Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******

Posts: 19,772
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 416
Post: #1314
RE: The God pill
Now imagine how her transformation would have looked if she had multiple visible tattoos. Then ask yourself how many women with tattoos had such a transformation. When a woman starts getting tattoos, the corruption is rather deep and may not be easily reversible.

Roosh
http://www.rooshv.com
09-13-2019 12:32 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
wwtl Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 232
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #1315
RE: The God pill
(09-13-2019 12:32 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Now imagine how her transformation would have looked if she had multiple visible tattoos. Then ask yourself how many women with tattoos had such a transformation. When a woman starts getting tattoos, the corruption is rather deep and may not be easily reversible.

The Lord already knew her fate of getting saved, so He spared her from the mark of the beast.
09-13-2019 01:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Wutang Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,516
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 43
Post: #1316
RE: The God pill
(09-13-2019 01:28 AM)Roosh Wrote:  God pill is not only for men..


It's like the reverse of that Brazilian before university vs after university Twitter thread
09-13-2019 02:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Wutang's post:
Vladimir Poontang, infowarrior1, Jones
yellowfever Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 36
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 13
Post: #1317
RE: The God pill
Good to see a positive transformation.

She does have small tattoos on each arm though: https://www.instagram.com/p/B0BY9dSAY3d/
09-13-2019 03:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Vladimir Poontang Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,543
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 27
Post: #1318
RE: The God pill
People are naturally disgusted when someone is arrogant. But why? When someone talks or acts as though they're wonderful and to be revered, why not just disagree or be indifferent? Why do people go as far as feeling disgusted?

People would say "Who does he think he is?" I think it's interesting that they ask that specific rhetorical question. I think what they're really asking is "Who does he think he is? Someone that is truly worthy of being revered?" This shows that everyone naturally understands the concept of something being wonderful and worthy of the highest praise. And it disgusts them that anyone should think of themselves as being that thing, whatever it might be. They also understand that it's bad to think of yourself as being so wonderful, unless you really are. The objection is only in thinking that you're something you're not, hence the question "WHO does he think he is?"

And that's one reason why I'd say everyone knows there's a god. God hates pride, and people hate it too. Like father, like sons.

That's not how we do things in Russia, comrade.

http://inspiredentrepreneur.weebly.com/
(This post was last modified: 09-13-2019 07:37 PM by Vladimir Poontang.)
09-13-2019 07:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Vladimir Poontang's post:
infowarrior1, Tex Cruise
SlickyBoy Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,123
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 20
Post: #1319
RE: The God pill
(09-13-2019 12:32 PM)Roosh Wrote:  Now imagine how her transformation would have looked if she had multiple visible tattoos. Then ask yourself how many women with tattoos had such a transformation. When a woman starts getting tattoos, the corruption is rather deep and may not be easily reversible.

Was in Portland Oregon recently. Seems like the women have more tattoos than the men - and sometimes deeper voices. I don't think hell is a popular concept there.

Twitter: @_slickyboy
Occasional contributor at Return of Kings (while it lasted)
09-13-2019 11:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
infowarrior1 Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,609
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 10
Post: #1320
RE: The God pill
An interesting analysis video on the Serpent in the Garden of Eden:





This enables explanation on why eve was truly deceived. And how the Serpent actually didn't appear to be much of a threat in the 1st place.

For this sin Satan was probably demoted in this position from the Divine Council or was cast out from his former position.

Only appearing occasionally in the Council during certain arranged times as it is shown in the 1st Chapter of the Book of Job.

The archaeology showing the seals depicting the Seraphim as shining burning fiery snakes with wings rather than humanoid make this quite different from what I first thought.

Satan being the same class of beings guarding the Throne of God as a class of beings known as Cherubim(Throne Guardian) and Seraphim being a certain kind of Cherubim that is Serpentine.
(This post was last modified: Yesterday 08:28 AM by infowarrior1.)
Yesterday 08:14 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
debeguiled Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,275
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 114
Post: #1321
RE: The God pill
(09-13-2019 07:22 PM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  People are naturally disgusted when someone is arrogant. But why? When someone talks or acts as though they're wonderful and to be revered, why not just disagree or be indifferent? Why do people go as far as feeling disgusted?

People would say "Who does he think he is?" I think it's interesting that they ask that specific rhetorical question. I think what they're really asking is "Who does he think he is? Someone that is truly worthy of being revered?" This shows that everyone naturally understands the concept of something being wonderful and worthy of the highest praise. And it disgusts them that anyone should think of themselves as being that thing, whatever it might be. They also understand that it's bad to think of yourself as being so wonderful, unless you really are. The objection is only in thinking that you're something you're not, hence the question "WHO does he think he is?"

And that's one reason why I'd say everyone knows there's a god. God hates pride, and people hate it too. Like father, like sons.

It's also because that person is only openly verbalizing impulses we all have.

How come he gets to?

“The greatest burden a child must bear is the unlived life of its parents.”

Carl Jung
Yesterday 11:45 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Vladimir Poontang Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,543
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 27
Post: #1322
RE: The God pill
(Yesterday 11:45 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  
(09-13-2019 07:22 PM)Vladimir Poontang Wrote:  People are naturally disgusted when someone is arrogant. But why? When someone talks or acts as though they're wonderful and to be revered, why not just disagree or be indifferent? Why do people go as far as feeling disgusted?

People would say "Who does he think he is?" I think it's interesting that they ask that specific rhetorical question. I think what they're really asking is "Who does he think he is? Someone that is truly worthy of being revered?" This shows that everyone naturally understands the concept of something being wonderful and worthy of the highest praise. And it disgusts them that anyone should think of themselves as being that thing, whatever it might be. They also understand that it's bad to think of yourself as being so wonderful, unless you really are. The objection is only in thinking that you're something you're not, hence the question "WHO does he think he is?"

And that's one reason why I'd say everyone knows there's a god. God hates pride, and people hate it too. Like father, like sons.

It's also because that person is only openly verbalizing impulses we all have.

How come he gets to?

It could be. Maybe they're disgusted at themselves and projecting.

That's not how we do things in Russia, comrade.

http://inspiredentrepreneur.weebly.com/
Yesterday 05:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Vladimir Poontang's post:
debeguiled
Rigsby Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,542
Joined: May 2014
Reputation: 74
Post: #1323
RE: The God pill
I was catching up on my music stuff the last day or two and the audio forums I go to.

Some guy I know who makes sound sets and I've bought hundreds of bucks of patches off is giving out a big 'oh life is so hard I don't think I can keep giving out this free stuff anymore' kind of post.

But I bite, because I'm a sucker. And he's a good guy. A bit weird. But we'll get to that in a bit.

I ask him how much he is down with server and hosting costs and tell him I may be able to help him out no strings attached. He mentions that his girlfriend is 'ill' which could mean anything, but again, I'm a sucker for a sob story.

He replies that it is not my problem and that he will deal with it, all valiant and reliant like. Well, fuck me, then why are you posting your sob story on the fucking internet then? I say 'all good', I get it, it's not my problem, I just thought you might be in real trouble and I would have been happy to help you out. Offer still stands.

I offer to maybe buy some soundsets I don't need to help him out, but he just keeps responding, edgey as fuck. Saying he 'doesn't need this shit now' and reiterating that his girlfriend is 'ill'. I back off and just say 'ok, no probs, let me know if you need anything, I'll say a small prayer for your girlfriend'.

And he comes back large, this dark edge lord that dresses in black and is into 'necromancy'.

PLEASE DO NOT SAY ANY PRAYERS FOR ME OR MY GIRLFRIEND THANK YOU!

I'm like, wtf dude.

I was just about to drop a couple of hundred bucks in his lap, gratis, no strings attached, after his little sob story and here we are at: FUCK YOU CHRISTIAN SON OF A BITCH.


[Image: giphy.gif]


I'd previously asked him to PM me or send me mail, but he just fucked me off on the forum. He could have said no thanks there but he wanted to make it public. About what a trooper he was. He was fucking baiting. The cunt.

I realised later that the DO NOT PRAY FOR ME, was more than a virtue signal, it was a direct request to not invoke God in any way on his part. I get it now.

This is someone that went on to a public forum (a pretty big one at that) and told the whole world about how pissed off he was and how he would need help to get through it all. Then, when someone who has backed him (financially) and (promotionally), offers to help him out, he just turns on them in a higher display of virtue signalling.

I asked him to give some more details about how the server problem happened but he didn't say. It didn't make any sense to me. I'm pretty tech savvy and he just shut up. Another red flag.

Did this guy just make up all this shit to promote his soundware? Couldn't be, nah? Surely not?

Was he just having a bad day, but not so bad he would accept money from non-satanists?



I kicked myself in the morning.

Getting drawn back in to that world with those people.

Those that live hand to mouth and a few sales here or there are the difference between survival or doing quite well. And there are those that are surviving that will game the system just to do a bit better.

Then there are the martyrs.

I felt as if this guy betrayed me. He did. It was just one massive FUCK YOU to virtue signal to the small crowd that congregate at this site. The cunt.

I offered him a couple of hundred bucks, no strings, to dig himself out of a hole. And this was in 'private' as well, or in theory 'in private'. But he wanted to make his FUCK YOU public.

I've watched him before, moaning about this and that. Virtue signalling. A real fucking LOL Cow. But my better nature always allows me to overlook this and see the good in people. What a mug I am!

Snidey little cunt.

"Do NOT pray for me!".

I got to admit, that one did catch me out of left field. It's those we trust and those we consider 'friends' that can hurt us the most.

It reminded me of something that Teedub once said on this very forum to another member: Please don't talk to me in a way that you wouldn't do to my face! Poignant words.

The virtue posturing over the internet sickened me and I wanted to rip his fucking eyeballs out of his head. And his 'sick' girlfriend too. Metaphorically speaking of course. The little goth cunt.

I'm at such a low point in my life. I hold my hand out to help. And I get kicked in the fucking balls.

These are all lessons for learning. And I take mine well.

I held the atheist crowd in quite low regard, but they have just sunk to a very dangerous level in my book, right now.

But it was a wake up call again, with regard to dealing with that whole crowd. The virtue signalling there has been unbearable. They called people who support Tommy Robinson and Trump, 'CUNTS' openly. Not that I am a supporter as such, but you know.

Pushing and accepting the whole trans thing. Perpetrating it.

Fuck I hate musicians and songwriters and producers and engineers.

But yeah, it was a good wake up call. Much needed.

I now have a deeper well of hatred and anger in my heart towards certain types of human beings. I mean, real 'hatred'. The bad stuff. I'm nurturing it, giving it a place for it to grow, hopefully so it can spread its seed. Towards those I hate. My world is so toxic anyway, I should be dead, but somehow I have adapted to live like this.

But it's not all bad, I also feel very calm. Unable to truly understand the teachings of Christ, unable to understand the Bible, I feel myself being steered by men... guided toward a greater light. On the opposite side.

Whatever this force is, it is not a weak one. It is mighty and holy.

I am ready to smite these fuckers down.

This prick was just a 'trigger' for me, I suppose. I've met so many twats like that and I always look the other way.

But in this instance, I feel as if I innocently held out my hand with food to a starving child, only to be told : Fuck off cunt!

Do NOT pray for me!


But whatevs. Maybe that 'necromancy' will come in handy to talk to his girlfriend if she really is that 'ill'.

I have a very very long fuse with people.

Until I don't.
Yesterday 08:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Rigsby's post:
Tex Cruise, infowarrior1, debeguiled
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,375
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 204
Post: #1324
RE: The God pill
Pray for me instead, Rigs. I'll be needing a bigger TV and a good deal on my third car.

Cheers!

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
Yesterday 10:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
wwtl, infowarrior1, debeguiled
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Blue pill, red pill, purple pill, black pill &... woke pill ? CynicalContrarian 14 2,539 02-14-2019 11:56 AM
Last Post: Atlanta Man
  Red pill, Blue pill, Yellow pill? ("Asian Aryanism") Svara 6 4,778 09-12-2017 04:22 AM
Last Post: RatInTheWoods
  Is religion considered blue-pill or red-pill III 3 3,306 05-14-2015 02:43 PM
Last Post: TheWastelander

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication