I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
The Gay Pride Month Thread
Author Message
Vladimir Poontang Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,389
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 26
Post: #101
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
They don't like cultural appropriation but they love saying y'all.

That's not how we do things in Russia, comrade.

http://inspiredentrepreneur.weebly.com/
06-20-2019 03:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,377
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 41
Post: #102
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-20-2019 02:10 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  Tolerance is no longer sufficient.

You MUST actively participate and cheerlead, else you are a bigot.

[Image: K9MPcqt.png]

Recently, in Houston, two Story Time "Drag Queens" were revealed to be convicted child sex offenders.

Warning: Viewing any further will require eye bleach!

Meanwhile, here is one of the perverts that library officials and LGBT activists invited to read to young children at a Drag Queen Story Time in Leander, TX:

   

https://www.massresistance.org/docs/gen3...index.html


And you know that these same freaks would go ballistic if grandpa taught Story Time at a public library while wearing an NRA or MAGA hat.
(This post was last modified: 06-20-2019 03:31 PM by Tail Gunner.)
06-20-2019 03:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Tail Gunner's post:
gework, Handsome Creepy Eel, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, DJ-Matt
WalterBlack Online
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,398
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 23
Post: #103
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
I wonder if this is peak gay? Maybe next year this won't be as big because gays can see they're patronised so they won't buy things, and the average straight person would never buy that shit anyway.
06-20-2019 04:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,377
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 41
Post: #104
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-20-2019 04:38 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  I wonder if this is peak gay? Maybe next year this won't be as big because gays can see they're patronised so they won't buy things, and the average straight person would never buy that shit anyway.

You will not see peak gay until you see drag queens cavorting in the Oval Office.

Just thirty years ago, did anyone envision gay flags hanging on U.S. embassies all over the world (during a Republican Administration, no less)?

Sustained and serious damage to our culture will occur before this train turns around. You need an exit plan.
(This post was last modified: 06-20-2019 04:52 PM by Tail Gunner.)
06-20-2019 04:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Tail Gunner's post:
fokm, Leonard D Neubache, azulsombra, Handsome Creepy Eel, DJ-Matt
911 Offline
International Playboy
******

Posts: 4,571
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 55
Post: #105
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-20-2019 04:50 PM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  
(06-20-2019 04:38 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  I wonder if this is peak gay? Maybe next year this won't be as big because gays can see they're patronised so they won't buy things, and the average straight person would never buy that shit anyway.

You will not see peak gay until you see drag queens cavorting in the Oval Office.

Just thirty years ago, did anyone envision gay flags hanging on U.S. embassies all over the world (during a Republican Administration, no less)?

Sustained and serious damage to our culture will occur before this train turns around. You need an exit plan.

I guess peak gay must have been 4 years ago then.

[Image: 170801_obama-gay.jpg]

λ ό γ ο ς
06-20-2019 06:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 7 users Like 911's post:
Matsufubu, MikeInRealLife, Laner, Handsome Creepy Eel, dicknixon72, Cumlluminates, DJ-Matt
WalterBlack Online
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,398
Joined: Oct 2013
Reputation: 23
Post: #106
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
Are Pride Parades Kid-Friendly? Parents Say Children Can Handle The Kink

[Image: 5d0243b72500004e12e4698f.jpeg?cache=GfNc..._noupscale]

Quote:Each year, in the blazing sun of the Pride parade in Nelson, B.C., Pega Ren and her two young grandkids seek shade under their spinning rainbow parasols.

Ren, a semi-retired sex therapist, told HuffPost Canada the parasols were a magical find, and have come to symbolize the importance of this event for her family. Ren spoke joyfully of going to the dollar store, picking up all the rainbow ribbons and flags, decorating the roller skates and the stroller, and getting the costumes ready.

“I can’t imagine a safer place for families to bring children,” she said of Pride.

A resounding chorus of voices — from within the queer community and not — would agree with this general sentiment about Pride parades and kids. But in late May, one tweet turned it into a bigger conversation.


The post asked parade participants not to “sexualize” Pride and to leave their fetish and kink at home, for the sake of minors.

Anyone who has been to a parade has likely seen the procession of leather animal costumes, kinky costumes in every hue, and more skin than is normally exposed in public.


Although the post and account have since been deleted, the tweet got many people talking: How child-appropriate are Pride festivities? And why does this discussion hit a nerve for the LGBTQ+ community?

“At some level this has always been part of a much larger debate of what Pride is,” David Rayside, a retired politics and sexual diversity professor at the University of Toronto, told HuffPost Canada.

“Pride has always had a kind of outrageous edge to it. And should we alter that? It is not the Santa Claus parade, and it never was. It shouldn’t be. It can’t be.”

[Image: 5d013dbf2500004e12dd736d.png?ops=scalefit_630_noupscale]

That said, Rayside added, not only is it important for parents to bring their kids, but “I’ve seen thousands of kids at Pride, and I’ve never seen anyone fuss about what they see there.”

In fact, many parents would fuss at the thought of not bringing kids to these events.

Pride is fun for kids, and an important cultural festival

“There is absolutely no reason not to take our kids to Pride — it’s a fun day, there are a lot of bubbles, rainbow streamers and enjoyable performances,” writer, educator, and publisher S. Bear Bergman told HuffPost Canada.

Plus, as queer parents, it’s one of their cultural festivals, added Bergman, who who attends Toronto Pride every year with his kids.

“It’s their right as queer spawn. And as a parent, I might want to take my kids to Pride, because they might be lesbian, gay, bi, trans, queer or two-spirit.”


Pride events are dynamic — with so many notes being played at once, a degree of dissonance can also be expected. No one knows this better than Parker Chapple, Executive Director of Calgary Pride.

As Canada’s fourth-largest and fastest growing Pride celebration, Calgary Pride works hard to be family-friendly, including events like Reading with Royalty and puppet-making. When asked how they go about balancing the needs of various segments of the community, Chapple (who uses they/ them pronouns) laughed.

“It’s hands-down one of the most challenging roles that any Pride director has,” they said.

Tensions are heightened this year

The tensions around who and what “belongs” at Pride are heightened this year, as the 50th anniversary of the Stonewall riots stands in contrast to the consumer culture that has become synonymous with the season.
After the June 1969 raid of New York gay bar the Stonewall Inn, a series of uprisings began, and sparked the gay liberation movement. The first Pride march took place one year after those raids.

“As an activist, I’ve always been acutely aware of what the parade and the festival is rooted in,” Chapple said.

“And I’ve always passed that opportunity on to my children as a learning opportunity, so they can appreciate the work, the heartache, the celebration that our community put into gaining protection.”

Politics have a prominent place in Pride, Rayside said, but “it is also about outrage,” a time when some in the community express this “in ways that confront normal sensibilities.”

The freedom to do so is embedded within LGBTQ+ culture and history. These expressions are the most colourful during the parade.

Bergman defended these elements and their right to exist at a kid-friendly event.


“First of all, nobody likes nakedness more than children,” Bergman said.

“On the list of things that I don’t want my children ever to be exposed to are: Compulsory heterosexuality, demonstrations of sexism, demonstrations of racism, demonstrations of ablism, violence. These are all way higher on the list than some homosexual’s tuchus.”


Pride is also a good learning opportunity

Putting on her sex therapist hat, Ren emphasized that Pride, from kink to nakedness, is an excellent opportunity for parents to do unbiased sex education. Bergman also pointed out that many children don’t even interpret most of what they’re seeing in a Pride parade as sexual, but rather as dress-up or fun.

“Children benefit from seeing people loving one another, from seeing diversity and inclusion. Children suffer from seeing violence and fear, hatred and divisiveness,” Ren said.


“We found and built our tribe at these gatherings.”
06-20-2019 07:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes WalterBlack's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Wutang Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,505
Joined: Mar 2012
Reputation: 43
Post: #107
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
A question I've asked in the past is why it seems like there's so much more vitriol directed towards homosexuality as a sin rather than something like plain 'ol heterosexual fornication and adultery. An answer that's been forming in my mind is that there's something about homosexuality that seems to consume a person.

Sexual sins seem to have a particularly vicious way of taking over a person that aren't as potent as other sins. We can see this with heterosexuals, just look at the obsession with notch counts in this forum's past. But with homosexuality, it appears to be all-consuming. Look at how how so many LGBT people, their LGBT identity becomes there primary one. The first thing they want you to know about them isn't what they've accomplished in life, their ethnic culture, no rather it's how gay they are and their pronouns. Everything else becomes subsumed underneath their LGBT identity.

I don't think there's anything wrong with having a primary identity. If you follow Jesus, then that takes precedence over everything else. But think about how silly it is to base your identity on taking it up the ass. Identifying as say an Ethiopian means being part of a tribe, a nation, having a shared language, traditions and perhaps religious identity. What exactly is being part of the gay tribe all about? They have their own quirks and particularities such as enjoying campy material, but that hardly can compare to an ethnic or spiritual identity. Boil it down and there's nothing really about being gay beyond what you do in the bedroom (or out in the public now), hardly something to build a cohesive identity around.
06-20-2019 08:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 12 users Like Wutang's post:
Tail Gunner, Sooth, Dr. Howard, infinitejest, HermeticAlly, Handsome Creepy Eel, Horus, mr-ed209, dicknixon72, FilipSRB, bacani, Sankt Michael
Dr. Howard Online
International Playboy
******
Gold Member

Posts: 5,993
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 75
Post: #108
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-20-2019 10:35 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  
(06-20-2019 10:09 AM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  [quote='Dr. Howard' pid='1993306' dateline='1561033619']
[quote='Tail Gunner' pid='1993197' dateline='1561001584']
[quote='Dr. Howard' pid='1993167' dateline='1560992342']God doesn't hate his children, he hates their actions. Its more of a "Son I am disappoint"

....

John Gills Exposition of the Bible explains how Romans 5:8 applies only to God's elect and God's people:

Quote:God's elect were sinners in Adam, in whom they were naturally and federally, as all mankind were; hence polluted and guilty; and so they are in their own persons whilst unregenerate: they are dead in sin, and live in it, commit it, are slaves unto it, and are under the power and dominion of it; and many of them are the chief and vilest of sinners; and such they were considered when Christ died for them: but are not God's people sinners after conversion? yes; but sin has not the dominion over them; their life is not a course of sinning, as before; and besides, they are openly justified and pardoned, as well as renewed, and sanctified, and live in newness of life; so that their characters now are taken, not from their worse, but better part. And that before conversion is particularly mentioned here, to illustrate the love of God to them, notwithstanding this their character and condition; and to show that the love of God to them was very early; it anteceded their conversion; it was before the death of Christ for them; yea, it was from everlasting: and also to express the freeness of it, and to make it appear, that it did not arise from any loveliness in them; or from any love in them to him; nor from any works of righteousness done by them, but from his own sovereign will and pleasure.

https://www.biblestudytools.com/commenta...s-5-8.html

I appreciate the counter point. I'll have to do some studying and praying on it this week.

My focus isn't going to be on what happens after salvation, that is very clear to me, its more about the time God gives us between rebellion and repentance. Why give anyone a chance to come to Jesus as opposed to invoking wrath on them immediately. In short, why are we even given the opportunity to repent?

My thesis, with no biblical context, is that God has some kind of compassion for his human creations, saved or not, and executes judgement and punishment on them because he is bound by his own authority.

The starting assumptions being, that we are all born of sin and the 'elect' are not predestined, but are the ones that come to Christ of their own choice.

EDIT: I'll also add in the question from Spectrum Walker's answer...namely the idea that all sinners can come to Christ, except for Homosexuals, because they are reprobates.

Following up on my previous post, and Tailgunner's advice to use specific biblical references.

First, from Spectrum Walker, the idea that homosexuals are reprobates and reprobates cannot come to Jesus. That comes from Romans 1:28

"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient"

The context before is that God revealed himself to these people, they knew who he was and turned away. They substituted idols, and started being gay. God then gave them over to a reprobate mind. They then loved to do evil.

So, it does seem that homosexuals could be classified as reprobates, especially if they have profound knowledge of God. However, what I didn't read is anywhere where reprobates are forbidden from repentance or redemption.

My conclusion is that Homosexuals are reprobates, but reprobates aren't forbidden from redemption.

Second, the idea that God has compassion for both sinners and the elect. Also known as, why does God give us room to find Jesus instead of immediate judgement upon sin. If God only hated the lost, why isn't there immediate judgement?

First, lets go to the most familiar Bible verse, John 3:16

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

God loved the world, that seems like a love for everyone. A clear example

Next, God doesn't delight in executing judgement, even on the wicked. Ezekiel 33:11

"Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?"

This was a solid reference for me. God wants the wicked to repent, he does not want to execute judgement. This would also make sense as to why he gives us the grace of time to repent when we do sin. It also seems to parallel well with a paternal/child relationship.

Further to this, Jesus takes the time to give us the parable of the lost sheep and the prodigal son. Both of these are examples of God's love being offered to those that have been apart from him.

Conclusion, God loves all of his creations in a parental way. He does not want to see us fail and will extend patience to us because he wants our salvation, not our execution. Though, that patience does not last forever. That may be why we are spared from immediate judgement when we sin.

Even the most vile sinner can still have a chance at repentance, homosexuals included. As long as they are still breathing God is witholding his judgement and extending his paternal love to them.

Jesus even tells us this by mentioning the one unpardonable sin. Matthew 12:32

"And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come."

Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
06-20-2019 09:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Easy_C Offline
International Playboy
******

Posts: 3,848
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 28
Post: #109
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
It’s also because heterosexual degenerates generally do not conduct themselves according to a mantra of Participate in celebrating our lifestyle or we will DESTROY you!
06-20-2019 09:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
BlastbeatCasanova Online
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 474
Joined: Dec 2017
Reputation: 3
Post: #110
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
Quote:“It’s their right as queer spawn. And as a parent, I might want to take my kids to Pride, because they might be lesbian, gay, bi, trans, queer or two-spirit.”

This line sounds like something out of a bad fantasy novel. "Queer spawn?" Are you kidding me?

Also the whole "they/them" pronouns thing is the stupidest shit of all time. When did straight people start bending over and accepting all this absurdity?
(This post was last modified: 06-20-2019 09:50 PM by BlastbeatCasanova.)
06-20-2019 09:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes BlastbeatCasanova's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Yatagan Offline
Alpha Male
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,430
Joined: Apr 2013
Reputation: 10
Post: #111
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
"Queer Spawn" actually sounds like it'd be an anti-gay slur.
06-20-2019 10:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Yatagan's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Cumlluminates
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,377
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 41
Post: #112
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-20-2019 09:39 PM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  
(06-20-2019 10:35 AM)Dr. Howard Wrote:  
(06-20-2019 10:09 AM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  [quote='Dr. Howard' pid='1993306' dateline='1561033619']
[quote='Tail Gunner' pid='1993197' dateline='1561001584']
[quote='Dr. Howard' pid='1993167' dateline='1560992342']God doesn't hate his children, he hates their actions. Its more of a "Son I am disappoint"

....

John Gills Exposition of the Bible explains how Romans 5:8 applies only to God's elect and God's people:

Quote:God's elect were sinners in Adam, in whom they were naturally and federally, as all mankind were; hence polluted and guilty; and so they are in their own persons whilst unregenerate: they are dead in sin, and live in it, commit it, are slaves unto it, and are under the power and dominion of it; and many of them are the chief and vilest of sinners; and such they were considered when Christ died for them: but are not God's people sinners after conversion? yes; but sin has not the dominion over them; their life is not a course of sinning, as before; and besides, they are openly justified and pardoned, as well as renewed, and sanctified, and live in newness of life; so that their characters now are taken, not from their worse, but better part. And that before conversion is particularly mentioned here, to illustrate the love of God to them, notwithstanding this their character and condition; and to show that the love of God to them was very early; it anteceded their conversion; it was before the death of Christ for them; yea, it was from everlasting: and also to express the freeness of it, and to make it appear, that it did not arise from any loveliness in them; or from any love in them to him; nor from any works of righteousness done by them, but from his own sovereign will and pleasure.

https://www.biblestudytools.com/commenta...s-5-8.html

I appreciate the counter point. I'll have to do some studying and praying on it this week.

My focus isn't going to be on what happens after salvation, that is very clear to me, its more about the time God gives us between rebellion and repentance. Why give anyone a chance to come to Jesus as opposed to invoking wrath on them immediately. In short, why are we even given the opportunity to repent?

My thesis, with no biblical context, is that God has some kind of compassion for his human creations, saved or not, and executes judgement and punishment on them because he is bound by his own authority.

The starting assumptions being, that we are all born of sin and the 'elect' are not predestined, but are the ones that come to Christ of their own choice.

EDIT: I'll also add in the question from Spectrum Walker's answer...namely the idea that all sinners can come to Christ, except for Homosexuals, because they are reprobates.

Following up on my previous post, and Tailgunner's advice to use specific biblical references.

First, from Spectrum Walker, the idea that homosexuals are reprobates and reprobates cannot come to Jesus. That comes from Romans 1:28

"And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient"

The context before is that God revealed himself to these people, they knew who he was and turned away. They substituted idols, and started being gay. God then gave them over to a reprobate mind. They then loved to do evil.

So, it does seem that homosexuals could be classified as reprobates, especially if they have profound knowledge of God. However, what I didn't read is anywhere where reprobates are forbidden from repentance or redemption.

My conclusion is that Homosexuals are reprobates, but reprobates aren't forbidden from redemption.

Second, the idea that God has compassion for both sinners and the elect. Also known as, why does God give us room to find Jesus instead of immediate judgement upon sin. If God only hated the lost, why isn't there immediate judgement?

First, lets go to the most familiar Bible verse, John 3:16

"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

God loved the world, that seems like a love for everyone. A clear example

Next, God doesn't delight in executing judgement, even on the wicked. Ezekiel 33:11

"Say unto them, As I live, saith the Lord GOD, I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked; but that the wicked turn from his way and live: turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel?"

This was a solid reference for me. God wants the wicked to repent, he does not want to execute judgement. This would also make sense as to why he gives us the grace of time to repent when we do sin. It also seems to parallel well with a paternal/child relationship.

Further to this, Jesus takes the time to give us the parable of the lost sheep and the prodigal son. Both of these are examples of God's love being offered to those that have been apart from him.

Conclusion, God loves all of his creations in a parental way. He does not want to see us fail and will extend patience to us because he wants our salvation, not our execution. Though, that patience does not last forever. That may be why we are spared from immediate judgement when we sin.

Even the most vile sinner can still have a chance at repentance, homosexuals included. As long as they are still breathing God is witholding his judgement and extending his paternal love to them.

Jesus even tells us this by mentioning the one unpardonable sin. Matthew 12:32

"And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of man, it shall be forgiven him: but whosoever speaketh against the Holy Ghost, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this world, neither in the world to come."

I agree with most of your analysis. But I still stand by my original point that God only loves His church (the Body of Christ) and that He hates unrepentant sinners. You cite John 3:16: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life."

In my earlier post, I stated (in bold lettering): It is very important to read scripture in its proper context. So, in Chapter 3 of the Gospel of John, Jesus spoke to Nicodemus, a man who believed that God’s mercies were confined only to God's people -- and, in particular, the nation of Israel. (John 3:1) So, when Jesus said to Nicodemus that "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life," Nicodemus would clearly have understood Jesus to mean only God's people. Arthur Pink explains it well here:

Quote:Now the first thing to note in connection with John 3:16 is that our Lord was there speaking to Nicodemus, a man who believed that God’s mercies were confined to his own nation. Christ there announced that God’s love in giving His Son had a larger object in view, that it flowed beyond the boundary of Palestine, reaching out to "regions beyond." In other words, this was Christ’s announcement that God had a purpose of grace toward Gentiles as well as Jews. "God so loved the world," then, signifies, God’s love is international in its scope. But does this mean that God loves every individual among the Gentiles? Not necessarily, for as we have seen the term "world" is general rather than specific, relative rather than absolute. . . the "world" in John 3:16 must, in the final analysis refer to the world of God’s people. Must we say, for there is no other alternative solution. It cannot mean the whole human race, for one half of the race was already in hell when Christ came to earth. It is unfair to insist that it means every human being now living, for every other passage in the New Testament where God’s love is mentioned limits it to His own people — search and see! The objects of God’s love in John 3:16 are precisely the same as the objects of Christ’s love in John 13:1: "Now before the Feast of the Passover, when Jesus knew that His time was come, that he should depart out of this world unto the Father, having loved His own which were in the world, He loved them unto the end." We may admit that our interpretation of John 3:16 is no novel one invented by us, but one almost uniformly given by the Reformers and Puritans, and many others since them.

Arthur Pink, The Sovereignty of God

Context is everything when interpreting scripture. The audience is among one of the most important of those contexts. Moreover, your interpretation would make John 3:16 conflict with the verses that I cited earlier. Arthur Pink also makes that same point. When properly interpreted, scripture never conflicts. It is a perfect unified body of work. Good discussion!

BTW: I highly recommend Arthur Pink's "The Sovereignty of God." I printed a PDF copy off the internet many years ago (I believe that it is in the public domain), read it, and highlighted it.
(This post was last modified: 06-20-2019 11:39 PM by Tail Gunner.)
06-20-2019 11:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Tail Gunner's post:
Dr. Howard
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,377
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 41
Post: #113
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
Duplicate. CAPTCHA issue.
(This post was last modified: 06-20-2019 11:40 PM by Tail Gunner.)
06-20-2019 11:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
UnW Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 652
Joined: Apr 2012
Reputation: 12
Post: #114
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
LinkedIn is just literally overflowing with rainbows this month. Quite an eye sore.

[Image: LzWXqHP.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2019 08:27 AM by UnW.)
06-21-2019 08:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes UnW's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Dusty Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,657
Joined: Jul 2013
Reputation: 79
Post: #115
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
The NY Fed using its official account for this.


Getting torn up in the replies.

Take care of those titties for me.
06-21-2019 10:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Dusty's post:
Renzy, Handsome Creepy Eel, gework, Laner, DJ-Matt
fokm Offline
Male Feminist

Posts: 24
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 0
Post: #116
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-21-2019 10:56 AM)Dusty Wrote:  Getting torn up in the replies.

My favorite was the guy wondering how HE could be a lesbian to begin with. Laugh
06-21-2019 04:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes fokm's post:
DJ-Matt
gework Offline
Alpha Male
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,175
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 65
Post: #117
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
[Image: qakl8cnivb331.png?width=640&crop...76a1520c04]
06-21-2019 05:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like gework's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Renzy, DJ-Matt
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,377
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 41
Post: #118
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-21-2019 05:58 PM)gework Wrote:  [Image: qakl8cnivb331.png?width=640&crop...76a1520c04]

That is old news for people who deeply delve into history. This is the book to read:

   


This book is a truly fascinating read. Scott Lively personally traveled to Germany to consult original source material. He proved that homosexuality was rife in the Nazi party -- as was pederasty. In fact, Ernst Rohm, Hitler's only serious rival, was a sodomite.

The modern homosexual lobby likes to emphasize how the Nazis placed sodomites in concentration camps. But that is only half the story. The homosexuals in the Nazi Party were "manly" butches, who utterly despised the fems, who the butches believed made homosexuals laughingstocks because of their feminine traits. Moreover, politically most fems were communists, while the butches were Nazis. So, most of the hatred for the fems and their placement in concentration camps stemmed directly from other homosexuals in the Nazi Party! So homosexuals in Germany were victimized by their own kind.

All of this history is hidden from us by the media.

Quote:In a fascinating read of 204 well documented pages, the authors of The Pink Swastika track down the facts behind the homosexual movement’s current claims for Nazi-victim status. Divided into seven parts, the story opens as the new Nazi party is founded in the smoky din of the Bratwurstglockl, “a tavern frequented by homosexual roughnecks and bully-boys....a gay bar,” favored by Hitler’s closest comrade, Captain Ernst Rohm.

Almost every biography of Hitler reports that Rohm was a flagrant homosexual and the only man Hitler called by the familiar “du.” Hitler’s beloved Storm Trooper Chief and founder of the Brown Shirts, the authors note, had a “taste for young boys." Almost as close to Hitler as Rohm was Rudolph Hess, known for his dress-up attire as “‘Black Bertha’” in the gay bars of prewar Berlin.

In fact, Mein Kampf was dedicated to Hess while Hitler was in prison. The Pink Swastika reports that Hitler was given power by a homosexual gang, a gang says Dr. Carroll Quigley, President Bill Clinton’s college teacher and mentor, that subverted Germany’s free elections by underhanded and brutal strategies.

Also it was under Rohm and his Storm Troopers that the records and books of “the Sex Research Institute,” were burned. The authors reveal that Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld, the homosexual director of the Institute, maintained detailed records of his many court-referred sex offenders, including important Nazi rapists, and homosexual child offenders, pederasts.

The Pink Swastika as Holocaust Revisionist History, by Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D., The Institute for Media Education


You can read chapter one of The Pink Swastika here (click on the link for the PDF file):

https://www.scottlively.net/2012/07/24/t...h-edition/
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2019 06:33 PM by Tail Gunner.)
06-21-2019 06:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Tail Gunner's post:
911, Handsome Creepy Eel, fokm
Enhanced Eddie Online
Chubby Chaser
**
Gold Member

Posts: 310
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 19
Post: #119
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
Democrats are the Real Racists, and Nazis are the Real Faggots? Hmmm I have my doubts.

Rohm didn't last very long, I'll just say that much... 1934 he was a goner during the night of the long knives.

This smacks of more "Hitler had only one testicle and was secretly gay" type propaganda.
06-21-2019 07:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Tail Gunner Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,377
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 41
Post: #120
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-21-2019 07:09 PM)Enhanced Eddie Wrote:  Democrats are the Real Racists, and Nazis are the Real Faggots?

Democrats are the real racists -- and always have been. In the present day, they just traded their white racists for black racists.

Quote:The most commonly cited of the Civil Rights Acts is the one passed in 1964. Originally proposed in 1963 by former President John F. Kennedy, a Democrat, the bill ended segregation in public places and made employment discrimination illegal.

The House passed the bill after 70 days of public hearings and testimony in a 290-130 vote. The bill received 152 “yea” votes from Democrats, or 60 percent of their party, and 138 votes from Republicans, or 78 percent of their party.

These percentages include four vote categories—“yea,” “nay,” “present,” and “not voting.”

In the Senate, the bill faced strong and organized opposition from Southern Democrats. Influential senators like Richard Russell, Strom Thurmond (who would soon switch to the Republican Party), Robert Byrd, William Fulbright, and Sam Ervin joined together to launch a filibuster that lasted for 57 days.

Russell, a Democrat from Georgia, at one point argued that the bill would lead to the destruction of the South’s “two different social orders” and result in the “amalgamation and mongrelization of our people.”

After some changes were made to the bill and the filibuster ended, it passed the Senate with a 73-27 vote. About 82 percent of Republicans in the Senate voted for the bill, as did 69 percent of Democrats. The amended Senate bill was then sent back to the House where it passed with 76 percent support from Republicans and 60 percent support from Democrats.

https://www.countable.us/articles/17557-...ocrats-did
(This post was last modified: 06-21-2019 07:17 PM by Tail Gunner.)
06-21-2019 07:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Tail Gunner's post:
fokm
Enhanced Eddie Online
Chubby Chaser
**
Gold Member

Posts: 310
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 19
Post: #121
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
I know, I just think it's a mistake to constantly disavow identity politics.

We mock communists because "yeah it's nice idealism, but it just doesn't work, human nature is incentive based".

We should mock multi-culturalism the same way... "nice idealism, but doesn't work because human nature is tribal."

That's the real problem with DR3
06-21-2019 07:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Enhanced Eddie's post:
Yatagan
JakeHighwell Offline
Male Feminist

Posts: 14
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #122
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
Every society that has fallen (Greek, Roman) has been chock full of Godlessness, homosexuality, pedophilia, and debauchery.

That's where we are!
06-21-2019 08:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like JakeHighwell's post:
911, Teedub
la bodhisattva Offline
Chubby Chaser
Silver Member

Posts: 468
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 8
Post: #123
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
Despite all previous attempts of the LGBT community to portray themselves as simply being attracted to the same or both sexes, there is only abomination and perversion. That their sexual orientation must be celebrated is enough to warrant suspicion from all natural heterosexuals. That every gathering of gay pride is invariably accompanied by displays of kinks, fetishes, and lascivious behavior is a warning sign in neon lights that the community is a threat to society at large and undermines the "wholesome" message of one/same love they so duplicitously broadcast to the masses.
06-21-2019 11:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 12 users Like la bodhisattva's post:
Tail Gunner, 911, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Cumlluminates, MusicForThePiano, Handsome Creepy Eel, Teedub, lonewolf1992, debeguiled, fokm, DJ-Matt, Soothesayer
Kingsley Davis Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,218
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 24
Post: #124
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
Also Weimar Germany.

"I have refused to wear a condom all of my life, for a simple reason – if I’m going to masturbate into a balloon why would I need a woman?"
06-22-2019 12:03 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RoastBeefCurtains4Me Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,356
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 27
Post: #125
RE: The Gay Pride Month Thread
(06-20-2019 04:38 PM)WalterBlack Wrote:  I wonder if this is peak gay? Maybe next year this won't be as big because gays can see they're patronised so they won't buy things, and the average straight person would never buy that shit anyway.

I can imagine someone asking this question of themselves 5, 10, 15, 20 years ago. Most people back then would have thought they were near max public gay expression.

I'm the tower of power, too sweet to be sour. I'm funky like a monkey. Sky's the limit and space is the place!
-Randy Savage
06-22-2019 01:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes RoastBeefCurtains4Me's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Orthodox priest cleanses streets with holy water after gay pride parade Roosh 14 3,146 04-29-2019 07:15 AM
Last Post: VNvet
  Peruvian "March for Heterosexual Pride" met with predictable sneering responses kmhour 0 1,918 01-17-2017 11:34 PM
Last Post: kmhour
  Drag queens banned from Pride event 'because they may offend transgender people' vinman 6 3,201 07-22-2015 11:33 AM
Last Post: Jura

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication