I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
Author Message
Kona Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,535
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 144
Post: #126
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-23-2019 01:38 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  
(07-23-2019 10:33 AM)SilentOne Wrote:  Some of you guys here are just hopeless. A cuck will always back up his cheating girlfriend so I understand why you do it with NASA.

But hey NASA is now claiming to send the first woman to the moon in 2024. Exciting times ahead of us. Banana

Post Of The Day

Paracleus - my man you get a +1 from me for knowing your stuff.

Dude this is why I always wanted to be an astronaut.

You know they are doing moon sex experiments up there . They gotta see if the ladies can get pregnant in zero gravity or if herpes spread outside the atmosphere. Trust me, this is what they do.

They tried it once but the damn space shuttle blew up on the way. Need Another Seven Astronauts, remember that?

Aloha!
07-23-2019 03:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Kona's post:
pitbullowner, Samseau
PapayaTapper Away
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,085
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 151
Post: #127
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-23-2019 03:16 PM)Kona Wrote:  
(07-23-2019 01:38 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  
(07-23-2019 10:33 AM)SilentOne Wrote:  Some of you guys here are just hopeless. A cuck will always back up his cheating girlfriend so I understand why you do it with NASA.

But hey NASA is now claiming to send the first woman to the moon in 2024. Exciting times ahead of us. Banana

Post Of The Day

Paracleus - my man you get a +1 from me for knowing your stuff.

Dude this is why I always wanted to be an astronaut.

You know they are doing moon sex experiments up there . They gotta see if the ladies can get pregnant in zero gravity or if herpes spread outside the atmosphere. Trust me, this is what they do.

They tried it once but the damn space shuttle blew up on the way. Need Another Seven Astronauts, remember that?

Aloha!

[Image: H7UECWBYE5DQDPTQFIABZUHURM.jpg]

"You know what color Judy Resnicks eyes were? (She was one of the Challenger astronauts)

Blew...one blew this way and one blew that way"


[Image: Challenger_flight_51-l_crew.jpg]

Heard that joke like the next day. As a kid I wondered how they came up with that joke so fast

Now since RVF I know (((they))) had the jokes all ready because (((they))) planned the disaster

_______________________________________
- Does She Have The "Happy Gene" ?
-Inversion Therapy
-Let's lead by example


"Leap, and the net will appear". John Burroughs

"The big question is whether you are going to be able to say a hearty yes to your adventure."
Joseph Campbell
(This post was last modified: 07-23-2019 03:28 PM by PapayaTapper.)
07-23-2019 03:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like PapayaTapper's post:
Suits, Kona, Leonard D Neubache, Jones
Caduceus Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 714
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 10
Post: #128
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-23-2019 03:23 PM)PapayaTapper Wrote:  
(07-23-2019 03:16 PM)Kona Wrote:  
(07-23-2019 01:38 PM)rudebwoy Wrote:  
(07-23-2019 10:33 AM)SilentOne Wrote:  Some of you guys here are just hopeless. A cuck will always back up his cheating girlfriend so I understand why you do it with NASA.

But hey NASA is now claiming to send the first woman to the moon in 2024. Exciting times ahead of us. Banana

Post Of The Day

Paracleus - my man you get a +1 from me for knowing your stuff.

Dude this is why I always wanted to be an astronaut.

You know they are doing moon sex experiments up there . They gotta see if the ladies can get pregnant in zero gravity or if herpes spread outside the atmosphere. Trust me, this is what they do.

They tried it once but the damn space shuttle blew up on the way. Need Another Seven Astronauts, remember that?

Aloha!


"You know what color Judy Resnicks eyes were? (She was one of the Challenger astronauts)

Blew...one blew this way and one blew that way"



Heard that joke like the next day. As a kid I wondered how they came up with that joke so fast

Now since RVF I know (((they))) had the jokes all ready because (((they))) planned the disaster






There is another conspiracy theory that there was no one on the space shuttle challenger when it exploded in 1986 and that the astronauts are all still alive some of which are still using their same names:


I haven't looked into the evidence for this claim, so can't say how credibile it is, but here are some photos that have been making the rounds online over the last few years.

[Image: DyAp2Z2WsAEttAz.jpg]


[Image: challenger-uzay-mekigi_1435543.jpg]

[Image: onizuka.jpg]

[Image: mcauliffe.jpg]

[Image: scobee.jpg]

[Image: mcnair.jpg]

[Image: resnik.jpg]
(This post was last modified: 07-23-2019 04:41 PM by Caduceus.)
07-23-2019 04:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Caduceus's post:
rudebwoy, 911
Paracelsus Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,183
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 149
Post: #129
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-23-2019 10:34 AM)911 Wrote:  
(07-23-2019 06:26 AM)Paracelsus Wrote:  
(07-22-2019 05:51 PM)911 Wrote:  Here is another item that American Moon brought out, among 42 unanswered questions they have put forth, that is nearly impossible to debunk: the fact that in a near vacuum like the moon surface, dirt flying off the moon buggy wheels should have a perfectly parabolic path, not the earth-atmosphere like puffs of cloud that are the result of flying dirt interacting with the atmosphere/air resistance. We should have seen an arc of dirt whose tail is slightly expanding and scattering, but within the shape of a perfect parabola, as opposed to the typical earth-like dust plume we have in the moon landing footage:

You mean exactly like the parabolic vertical shapes trailing behind the rover at around 0:17 - 0:22 in the footage from Apollo 16, and then at 0:51 - 0:55?





And hey, take particular note of what happens to the dirt around the wheels as the rover draws to a stop, at 1:06 onward. Perfect downward parabolic arcs of dirt falling from the wheel to the Moon's surface, exactly as you predicted.


Not really, what you have instead is dust clouds suspending midair then coming down straight, most clearly visible from 2:05 on, as the rover comes closer to the camera. Some of the dusty patterns can be lessened by keeping the dirt slightly damp, but you still have those puffs of dust clearly visible, forming as a result of the interaction between the dirt kicked up by the wheels and air.

See what he did there, fellas?

First 911 said it was impossible for parabolic shapes to have occurred, then when he's shown parabolic paths in the actual footage he claims you can generate parabolic paths by special effects technology in the 60s.

This is why it's fun dealing with conspiracy kooks. There's always a God of the Gaps waiting in the wings to deal with any assertion that deals with their objection.


(07-23-2019 10:34 AM)911 Wrote:  You've spent a half a page with extra large pics and walls of prose going over a moot point, that you can't see stars if you have in the frame part of the much brighter lunar surface, earth surface from a satellite, or a narrow angle shot of the earth from the moon. I've never disputed that. What I do doubt is this:

Quote:Paracelsus wrote:

...the side of the Moon we see is perpetually in full daylight. The same light pollution that keeps you from taking pictures of stars during the day is the same light pollution that the surface of the Moon gives off when you’re trying to take pictures of the stars there.

(And no, the lack of an atmosphere doesn’t change that. If anything it makes it even harder. Conspiracy theorists scream that without the presence of an intervening atmosphere, millions of stars should have been visible and photographable from the surface of the Moon. Problem for that assertion is that because there was no atmosphere on the Moon, it also meant (a) none of the daylight from the Sun was reflected as it would have been from the Earth’s atmosphere, and therefore (b) there was that much more daylight for Apollo’s cameras to deal with.)

You're wrong here. The daylight on the moon is confined to the surface, because there is no atmosphere. There is no light whatsoever "trapped" above the lunar surface, because there is no atmosphere. If you were to look up on the moon away from the surface, it should be pitch black, because the light hitting the surface doesn't reflect or get filtered by the lunar sky.

By that logic - which is about as sound as Batman and Robin in the comics turning a TV to see the side of a guy's face in the picture - there should be a gradual gradient of visible stars at the top of the pictures taken with the surface in the shot, because there's less light interfering there. Or indeed anywhere at the edges of a picture taken in space that has a big light-reflecting source like the Earth or the Moon in a shot. Or are you saying the stars suddenly appear out of nowhere if you point the camera straight up?

Unfortunately for that theory, it doesn't happen that way in reality, as the pictures from the ISS and the Chinese lunar satellite show convincingly. Even with the Sun on the night side of Earth and only lights from the planet's cities below, there is still massive interference with the clarity of the shot by ambient light. As I've said before, on the astrophotography runs I've been on, there's often a lot of waiting around until 2 or 3 in the morning, not only because the Sun continues to pollute a shot long after it's gone over the horizon, but also to wait for the Moon to set.

Quote:The astronauts' press conference answers about whether they could see stars were very shaky, it's as if they couldn't get their stories right between them on a detail they should have described without any hesitation or divergence in their story.

And see what he did there, guys? He's getting worried he's on shaky ground with optics and physics, so he immediately jumps to witness testimony as if that proves his point - even with Armstrong recorded on the mission tapes on the way back as seeing a vast number of stars as they got away from the Moon's reflective influence.


Quote:In any case, you are stumped on the crater issue, no answer as to why a Mars probe with a mass of 350kg leaves a crater landing, while a 6,000kg LEM (I think that's a low estimate of its landing weight) with a lunar weight 7.5 times heavier than the Phoenix probe's weight on Mars doesn't leave a crater on a dustier lunar surface, where the dirt is 2.4 times lighter and easier to displace than on Mars.

Oh, I'll get to that, homeboy, and the remaining 14 minutes as I promised. I just like posting pretty pictures.

Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
07-23-2019 07:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Paracelsus's post:
questor70, Suits, rudebwoy, RDF, BlurredLines
Kona Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,535
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 144
Post: #130
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
And we can't go asking Neil Armstrong if he really walked on this "moon" anymore because (((they))) killed him.

The hospital paid one small settlement for killing such a big deal of a guy if you ask me . 6 million split ten ways, come on.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019...aim-report

He probably got brainwashed by who knows so he thought he really went to the moon. That's bad for the health.

Aloha!
07-24-2019 01:24 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Kona's post:
PapayaTapper
Caduceus Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 714
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 10
Post: #131
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
The Lunar Roving Vehicle was allegedly built and driven on the moon in 3 seperate landings - Apollo 15, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17.

There is NO WAY that huge lunar rover (moon buggy) could fit inside the lunar landing module (LEM)...even seperated in pieces. Do you have any idea how small the room is in there ?? The 4 tires alone would have taken away all the room the "astronauts" needed for their spacesuits and other essential gear.

Furthermore even if by some miracle it did fit inside the LEM or was attached to the outside (also no room for that) they were only on the moon 3 days each time. If you take away eating, sleeping and time spent doing other essential tasks there wasn't even enough time to even build that thing.

Just look at how ridiculous it is:




Apollo 15 LEM to moon buggy size comparison

[Image: Apollo.jpg]




Apollo 16 LEM to moon buggy size comparison

[Image: John-W-Young-commander-of-Apollo-16-luna...ehicle.jpg]



Apollo 17 LEM to moon buggy size comparison

[Image: as17-147-22527-800x533.jpg]





Another thing....the 2 "astronauts" were also allegedly sleeping, eating, going to the bathroom, and putting on and taking off their spacesuits for 3 whole days in the LEM on the moon. Another ridicilous claim...look at how little room they had to do anything:



[Image: a11LMPsleeping.jpg]

[Image: fob-sim2.jpg]




Here's an original video of Apollo 11 from 1969 inside the LEM...showing just how cramped it was in there.



(This post was last modified: 07-24-2019 03:19 AM by Caduceus.)
07-24-2019 03:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Glaucon Online
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,988
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 12
Post: #132
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-24-2019 03:06 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  The Lunar Roving Vehicle was allegedly built and driven on the moon in 3 seperate landings - Apollo 15, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17.

apparently it takes 2 min to deploy:




Deus vult!
07-24-2019 03:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Glaucon's post:
Paracelsus, Suits, PapayaTapper
Caduceus Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 714
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 10
Post: #133
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-24-2019 03:31 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:06 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  The Lunar Roving Vehicle was allegedly built and driven on the moon in 3 seperate landings - Apollo 15, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17.

apparently it takes 2 min to deploy:






They seem to require a whole team of people to pull that thing out and set it up.
Keep in mind there were maximum only 2 astronauts at any one time on the moon, and they were wearing heavy spacesuits with big gloves.


Is there any video of it being actually being pulled out and set up in that way on the moon ?




...
(This post was last modified: 07-24-2019 03:58 AM by Caduceus.)
07-24-2019 03:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Glaucon Online
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,988
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 12
Post: #134
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-24-2019 03:54 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:31 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:06 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  The Lunar Roving Vehicle was allegedly built and driven on the moon in 3 seperate landings - Apollo 15, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17.

apparently it takes 2 min to deploy:






They seem to require a whole team of people to pull that thing out and set it up.
Keep in mind there were maximum only 2 astronauts at any one time on the moon, and they were wearing heavy spacesuits with big gloves.


Is there any video of it being actually being pulled out and set up in that way on the moon ?




...

of course there is:




Deus vult!
07-24-2019 04:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Glaucon's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, Paracelsus, Suits, kruger41, BlurredLines
Paracelsus Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,183
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 149
Post: #135
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-24-2019 04:12 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:54 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:31 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:06 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  The Lunar Roving Vehicle was allegedly built and driven on the moon in 3 seperate landings - Apollo 15, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17.

apparently it takes 2 min to deploy:






They seem to require a whole team of people to pull that thing out and set it up.
Keep in mind there were maximum only 2 astronauts at any one time on the moon, and they were wearing heavy spacesuits with big gloves.


Is there any video of it being actually being pulled out and set up in that way on the moon ?




...

of course there is:




And let's not forget, since conspiracy theorists often do: "heavy" is not really a thing when gravity and therefore weight is one sixth that of your native planet.

Remissas, discite, vivet.
God save us from people who mean well. -storm
07-24-2019 04:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Paracelsus's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, kruger41, BlurredLines
Caduceus Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 714
Joined: Sep 2017
Reputation: 10
Post: #136
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-24-2019 04:12 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:54 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:31 AM)Glaucon Wrote:  
(07-24-2019 03:06 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  The Lunar Roving Vehicle was allegedly built and driven on the moon in 3 seperate landings - Apollo 15, Apollo 16 and Apollo 17.

apparently it takes 2 min to deploy:


They seem to require a whole team of people to pull that thing out and set it up.
Keep in mind there were maximum only 2 astronauts at any one time on the moon, and they were wearing heavy spacesuits with big gloves.

Is there any video of it being actually being pulled out and set up in that way on the moon ?


...

of course there is:


Great.
Thanks for that.
That's Apollo 15

Any video of the deployment of the rover on the moon for Apollo 16 and Apollo 17 as well ?
07-24-2019 04:32 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Richard Turpin Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 784
Joined: Nov 2017
Reputation: 7
Post: #137
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
All the conspiracy stuff is interesting and fun. Also a symptom of a wider problem; all governments lie to their people so naturally they end up not knowing what's true and what isn't.

That said, I'm not convinced by the hoax argument. The Moon Landings and whole Space Program is best understood under the right context; the very real and very unpredictable Cold War between the US and USSR. They didn't do it for 'science' or for the 'benefit of Mankind', it was a military endeavour, one they had to win.

That's why they haven't been back (in my view the single best argument the hoax-believers have in their arsenal). They won the cold war, so they no longer need to spend literally whatever it takes to keep winning.

‘After you’ve got two eye-witness accounts, following an automobile accident, you begin
To worry about history’ – Tim Allen
07-24-2019 07:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Richard Turpin's post:
HermeticAlly, Montrose, kruger41, Bienvenuto
questor70 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,300
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 20
Post: #138
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. Considering that Apollo was the result of the combined brainpower of the best and brightest of the US at its cultural peak, it should come as no surprise that your average under-educated keyboard warrior of today is not going to understand how various things were done. No single person even during Apollo's heyday could have understood every detail top to bottom. It was all carefully compartmentalized and farmed out and then put together like a huge Jenga puzzle. Different parties focused ONLY on their individual challenge, like getting the rover to fold, or designing the tires to work in moon-dust, or miniaturizing the onboard computers, all the way down the line. This way of working is how the few wonders of the world were built, like the cathedrals of Europe. The whole is far greater than any single person can comprehend, so they become monuments to the potential of teamwork. If you want, you can lose yourself in history books and old engineering reference to study all these things. The documentation IS there, but it's so huge that you could spend the rest of your life studying it and by the time you finish you'll have forgotten half of it.
(This post was last modified: 07-24-2019 09:40 AM by questor70.)
07-24-2019 09:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 11 users Like questor70's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, Montrose, Richard Turpin, kruger41, Paracelsus, Gallego2006, Glaucon, Professor Fox, Nevsky, Samseau, Syberpunk
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 18,669
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 217
Post: #139
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
Guys here have an odd way of picking and choosing the things they want to believe in.

The Moon landing has a ton of data out there backing it up, but you get the same guys who belive in the moon landing conspiracy, but then also believe with a big fervor in vaccines and that IQ is just a myth or has no meaningful impact whether the averages are 85 or 115 - it doesn't matter at all!

There are big conspiracies out there that are not backed by anything, that are attacked and refuted countless times with data and countless doctors coming out, but people will defend vaccines or that average IQ is irrelevant, because that is what they love to believe in. Disversity being our greatest strength and men and women being absolutely equal is another goodie. Then you can pick and choose your gender whenever you want and feel like it.

There were guys here who even believed in the Flat Earth - that we live on a pancake and are surrounded by eternal ice. For all your "research you do, you could go into one of those countless observatories and have them prove at least the existence of some remnants on the moon, but no the same guys likely claim that all rovers are fake, the entire space program is fake, all rockets are faked.

And don't take me wrong - there are meaningful cons out there - huge ones, but this is not one of them.
07-24-2019 10:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
Kona, kruger41, Paracelsus, Solitaire
Malone Away
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,091
Joined: Nov 2015
Reputation: 14
Post: #140
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
Confirmed Big Space shill. How much are they paying you to cover up the TRUTH, Simeon?
07-24-2019 10:25 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Malone's post:
rudebwoy, HermeticAlly, Kona, kruger41
MrLemon Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,048
Joined: Aug 2011
Post: #141
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
Speaking of which, you are all going to be mind controlled by 5g radiation within the next year.

Nowhere on earth, not even in tunnels you dig in hillsides in the Alaskan bush country, will be safe.

Tin foil will NOT block 5g!

Every one of you will be a slave in 1 YEAR!!!
07-24-2019 01:06 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like MrLemon's post:
rudebwoy, kruger41
SeaFM Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 718
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #142
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-19-2019 04:28 PM)Belgrano Wrote:  And the Soviet Union didn't say anything because....?

This. There is no way they wouldn’t have blown the lid off of this if it were fake.

Couldn’t ask for better anti American propaganda, especially at the height of the Cold War.
07-25-2019 08:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Glaucon Online
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,988
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 12
Post: #143
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-24-2019 04:32 AM)Caduceus Wrote:  Great.
Thanks for that.
That's Apollo 15

Any video of the deployment of the rover on the moon for Apollo 16 and Apollo 17 as well ?

Bruh.

I am not your youtube search bot. And I do not care if you belive it or not. I am just showing that you are so lazy you are not even willing to look up footage that takes 10 sec search on youtube....

Deus vult!
(This post was last modified: 07-26-2019 01:23 AM by Glaucon.)
07-26-2019 01:23 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Glaucon's post:
Paracelsus, Suits, questor70, Repo, BlurredLines
Cumlluminates Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 447
Joined: Aug 2017
Reputation: 1
Post: #144
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-24-2019 01:06 PM)MrLemon Wrote:  Speaking of which, you are all going to be mind controlled by 5g radiation within the next year.

Nowhere on earth, not even in tunnels you dig in hillsides in the Alaskan bush country, will be safe.

Tin foil will NOT block 5g!

Every one of you will be a slave in 1 YEAR!!!

Damn it! Just when I was going to insulate my hats/beanies with foil to prepare for the 5G apocalypse.

[Image: LittleSmugJellyfish-max-1mb.gif]

Tom Leykis / Leykis 101:

-Never do what you don't want to do. You make the money, you decide where you are going and what you are doing.
-Don't ask a woman what she wants to do.
-Never get involved with a co-worker unless you don't mind losing your job over it.
-Never spend more than $40 on a date. If possible, let her pay for everything or 50/50.
-If she doesn't bang you by the third date, Dump That Bitch (DTB).
-No spooning, cuddling, hugging, or staying over. Get in, get out!
-Never be in a committed relationship UNTIL you are 25+ or really ready to settle down.
-Men age like fine wine, women age like milk.
07-26-2019 02:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Cumlluminates's post:
MrLemon
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 18,669
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 217
Post: #145
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-24-2019 10:25 AM)Malone Wrote:  Confirmed Big Space shill. How much are they paying you to cover up the TRUTH, Simeon?

A lot.

No seriously - there is so much misinformation here - for example the Van Allen Belt. They previously thought that it was truly terrible, but it turns out that you would have to spend months or years in that belt in order to be impacted - not fly through quickly.

Though don't get me wrong - they likely are not telling us the full picture with regard to the moon or the space program. But the moon landing - it's not much more difficult than the setting up of a space station, satellite tech etc.

It's like saying: "Yes we can fly 500 miles with the plane, but no way in hell will I believe that you can fly 1000 miles with that plane."

Unless you are one of those guys who believe that there are no satellites, no space program, no space station etc. Let me put this clearly - once you are able to leave the atmosphere as a species, then flying to the next moon isn't that big of a step. Once you have a guy in a suit out in the open, then the moon or even Mars is just a matter of scale and price. We could reach Mars with our current technology, but it would be a very costly undertaking - and that is all the officially admitted technology - combustion engines and all. There are even guys who said in the documentaries I watched that "you could not take pictures on the moon back then". But taking pics in orbit worked fine both by Americans as well as Soviets?

Plus - there would be nothing stopping either the Russians or the Chinese now to telltale on the Americans. The Chinese have satellites in orbit taking pictures of the moon - I think that one orbited the moon. So why not shaming the US, it's not a big deal to them frankly?

Ultimately you have to assess personally based on the facts out there - listen to both sides of the story, then make an educated guess. I really understand it - the elites are lying to us on so many subjects, why not the moon landing as well? But remember - sometimes they are even behind cons like the Flat Earth idiocracy as well as other stuff in order to let you run circles in your mind and discredit yourself.

For example - veganism - it's supposed to be this super-healthy lifestyle that came from the "alternative researchers and doctors" who have to constantly fight "big meat and dairy". This turned out to be bullshit! The globohomos want you to eat their big agro-products and change your caloric intake of plants from 85% to 100%, so that you die off faster because the diet is shit long-term, makes you infertile even. We evolved on roughly 55-60% animal products and tribes who ate close to 100% animals products were the most healthy of them all, but NYC is giving you a vegan friday in schools!?

Some "alternative" topics are coming directly from them.
(This post was last modified: 07-26-2019 03:43 AM by Simeon_Strangelight.)
07-26-2019 03:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
Montrose, Johnnyvee
questor70 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,300
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 20
Post: #146
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
It's funny how someone can have a firm grasp of one element of reality and lose the plot in another. I really think attitudes about diet are about as close to a religion as you can be in the secular realm.
07-26-2019 09:56 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes questor70's post:
debeguiled
debeguiled Offline
Peacock
******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,699
Joined: Aug 2014
Reputation: 117
Post: #147
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-26-2019 09:56 AM)questor70 Wrote:  It's funny how someone can have a firm grasp of one element of reality and lose the plot in another. I really think attitudes about diet are about as close to a religion as you can be in the secular realm.

Stanley Kubrick faked the positive results of the keto diet.

“That sig BTW is a very asinine anti-family anti-parent quote. You live in a country where 40% of children grow up without a biological father, yet somehow “the greatest burden a child must bear is the unlived life of its parents”? Sorry but this is fruity Boomer nonsense.”

911
07-26-2019 11:20 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes debeguiled's post:
Jones
questor70 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,300
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 20
Post: #148
RE: 1969 - 1972: The only 3 years in which 12 humans walked on the moon in 6 landings
(07-26-2019 11:20 AM)debeguiled Wrote:  
(07-26-2019 09:56 AM)questor70 Wrote:  It's funny how someone can have a firm grasp of one element of reality and lose the plot in another. I really think attitudes about diet are about as close to a religion as you can be in the secular realm.

Stanley Kubrick faked the positive results of the keto diet.

[Image: giphy.gif]
07-26-2019 11:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like questor70's post:
debeguiled, kruger41
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  Man walked 351 miles to sleep with teenage girl Roosh 79 9,422 11-10-2019 03:13 PM
Last Post: RIslander
  Did we land on the moon? Roosh 142 12,143 11-02-2019 10:15 AM
Last Post: clutch
  The culture that put man on the moon is all the bad things RoastBeefCurtains4Me 10 1,507 07-16-2019 11:23 PM
Last Post: DogLover

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication