I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
"Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Author Message
sanbruno Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 47
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #51
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
I used to feel that way, but look at Israel. The whole Muslim world vows their destruction, yet a few million Jews on a sliver of desert, with zero natural resources holds its own against a bunch if fools too busy with their own tribalism and stone throwing to bother challenging their “mortal enemy”. Fuck, even relatively strong Iran can’t keep up with Mossad. Smarts and technology wins in the end.
09-07-2019 07:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like sanbruno's post:
Kid Twist, Jungle
John Dodds Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 221
Joined: Oct 2017
Reputation: 3
Post: #52
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-06-2019 09:13 AM)scorpion Wrote:  If we want to encourage family formation we need to encourage men's ability to generate economic surplus, which means shutting down immigration, de-funding the bloated, female-centric university system and removing all affirmative action and quotas for the hiring of women.

Disagree,
If we want to encourage family forming, we need to prevent female asset stripping of men.
Go back to the old laws (pre 1970s), where if the woman cheats or leaves, she gets nothing.

But, of course, the western governments are anti-family, so they have things perfect the way they are now.
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2019 07:36 PM by John Dodds.)
09-07-2019 07:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like John Dodds's post:
Jungle, questor70, beta_plus, billbudsocket
Zagor Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 64
Joined: Jan 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #53
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-07-2019 07:19 PM)sanbruno Wrote:  I used to feel that way, but look at Israel. The whole Muslim world vows their destruction, yet a few million Jews on a sliver of desert, with zero natural resources holds its own against a bunch if fools too busy with their own tribalism and stone throwing to bother challenging their “mortal enemy”. Fuck, even relatively strong Iran can’t keep up with Mossad. Smarts and technology wins in the end.

Having a buddy who can litteraly wipe out whole of the middle east in matter of seconds is also helpful.
09-07-2019 07:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Zagor's post:
Marmite, Jungle, Renzy, zigZag
Kid Twist Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,764
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 33
Post: #54
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-07-2019 07:38 PM)Zagor Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 07:19 PM)sanbruno Wrote:  I used to feel that way, but look at Israel. The whole Muslim world vows their destruction, yet a few million Jews on a sliver of desert, with zero natural resources holds its own against a bunch if fools too busy with their own tribalism and stone throwing to bother challenging their “mortal enemy”. Fuck, even relatively strong Iran can’t keep up with Mossad. Smarts and technology wins in the end.

Having a buddy who can litteraly wipe out whole of the middle east in matter of seconds is also helpful.

After I liked his comment, I was just about to write what you did there (I do think that may fall into "smarts" though). Cheers.

Get your passport ready!
(This post was last modified: 09-07-2019 10:28 PM by Kid Twist.)
09-07-2019 10:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
AvidArtisan Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 43
Joined: Jun 2015
Reputation: 1
Post: #55
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
I’m sure you guys have also realized this but the real reason the women want men who are “high earners “ is they play the corporate game in their mid 20s and then once they get to their 30s they want to settle down and go part time
Work or even quit and relay on the husbands salary then they can atleast claim they were a “working women “ for X amount of time. My brother works at a large fortune 100 company and he’s been there for 5 years most of his (coworkers were young hot blondes because of the industry can’t be more specific) and when he started all were 25-30. 5 years on for my bro and the other male coworkers they only continues to care about moving up on the company and he keeps getting promoted. In that time EVERY single one of these girls that were coworkers/managers have done either some side move so they are making the same pay but don’t work more/work less or they have outright quit because they were 32-38 and wanted a kid and got sick of corporate work. I laughed at the situation because every one of his coworkers who were dudes and I’ve hung out with have all been promoted and make more money/better titles. I work in a diff industry and I see the same thing happen in the place I work at (fortune 100). All the corporate staff that is female has done everything possible to make a tiny amount more money but mostly make moves where they work less. I do voluntary overtime everyday (which is accepted and paid happily in my industry) and I get paid an extra 1-2k a paycheck because of this . Literally my company could hire another person instead of me working overtime but they don’t because they realize it’s better to keep people who work hard then to hire people who put in the least effort and I feel like a lot of these career women forget that as they get older because they treat the job as a second family gathering.
09-08-2019 12:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes AvidArtisan's post:
Bienvenuto
N°6 Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,474
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 26
Post: #56
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-07-2019 11:48 AM)Swordfish1010 Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 02:59 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Some economists already predicted this because most corporate jobs favor women. Women in many cities already make more money than their under 30yo male counterparts. That spells disaster for the future.

Now they complain about it and blame men - of course they do, but the reality is that they are to be blamed for it on top of the giant sprawling diversity and immigration industry.

And women don't like to marry down, but always marry up. Pure math should tell you that they cannot marry up if they are on average better off than their male 30yo counterpart.

Corporations have quotas they must fill, which include women and minorities. The only people that have to compete solely on merit are white men.

In the UK, 85% of STEM students are men despite all the equality of opportunity programmes and blonde-haired models in safety clothes who adorn glossy posters holding A0 drawings whilst instructing blue collar workers that have existed for as long as I can remember.

Despite only 15% of STEM students being women, the engineering corporation I used to work for had a day of celebration because it had somehow managed to recruit graduates who were 40% women. This means - in theory - 85% of the graduate cohort were fighting for only 60% of the places. This artificial equality of income is producing a competition between men somewhere between a gladiator fight and the final stages of musical chairs when supply exceeds demand.


The irony is that the men who survive the interview stage are noticeably more intelligent and confident than their female colleagues who were awarded the diversity wildcards. But the main result is the hidden one, the men within the original 85% who couldn't get onto one of the 60% of chairs. They will be the invisible unemployed, underemployed and financially unstable men that the successful women used to marry. In other words they will join the growing ranks of economically unattractive men, and potentially the growing number of men in their 40s who have never married.


On the racial side of things, non-white men are probably going to be harmed by the glut of middle class entitled white girls getting diversity wildcards, who are destined to become the second income earners of materialist power marriages with the few white men who have somehow survived the guillotine of equality of outcome.

Don't spend all your energy on sex and all your money on women; they have destroyed kings. (Proverbs 31:3 GNB)
09-08-2019 03:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 12 users Like N°6's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, Sankt Michael, Kid Twist, njimko22, DJ-Matt, Kungfu, Isaac Jordan, Samseau, KnjazMihailo, Tactician, Bienvenuto, gework
[email protected] Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,269
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 20
Post: #57
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 03:18 AM)N°6 Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 11:48 AM)Swordfish1010 Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 02:59 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Some economists already predicted this because most corporate jobs favor women. Women in many cities already make more money than their under 30yo male counterparts. That spells disaster for the future.

Now they complain about it and blame men - of course they do, but the reality is that they are to be blamed for it on top of the giant sprawling diversity and immigration industry.

And women don't like to marry down, but always marry up. Pure math should tell you that they cannot marry up if they are on average better off than their male 30yo counterpart.

Corporations have quotas they must fill, which include women and minorities. The only people that have to compete solely on merit are white men.

In the UK, 85% of STEM students are men despite all the equality of opportunity programmes and blonde-haired models in safety clothes who adorn glossy posters holding A0 drawings whilst instructing blue collar workers that have existed for as long as I can remember.

Despite only 15% of STEM students being women, the engineering corporation I used to work for had a day of celebration because it had somehow managed to recruit graduates who were 40% women. This means - in theory - 85% of the graduate cohort were fighting for only 60% of the places. This artificial equality of income is producing a competition between men somewhere between a gladiator fight and the final stages of musical chairs when supply exceeds demand.


The irony is that the men who survive the interview stage are noticeably more intelligent and confident than their female colleagues who were awarded the diversity wildcards. But the main result is the hidden one, the men within the original 85% who couldn't get onto one of the 60% of chairs. They will be the invisible unemployed, underemployed and financially unstable men that the successful women used to marry. In other words they will join the growing ranks of economically unattractive men, and potentially the growing number of men in their 40s who have never married.


On the racial side of things, non-white men are probably going to be harmed by the glut of middle class entitled white girls getting diversity wildcards, who are destined to become the second income earners of materialist power marriages with the few white men who have somehow survived the guillotine of equality of outcome.

I tried to explain this to a friend who is a doctor for 15 years and he experienced visible cognitive dissonance. I asked him how is it possible that 80% of people going into sciences and medical related fields are men (80% of the people entering sciences admit to wanting to go to medical school) but the people that manage to enter enter the school are always split down 50/50 by gender? It would either mean that women are far better students than men despite their lower numbers OR affirmative action based female selection. He did something I rarely see him do, actually freeze up and become real quiet.

The men that had their seats taken by AA choices will also join the ranks of economically unattractive men and it also goes for AA hires for police, military, etc etc etc where undeserving females will get seats they don't deserve while a great number of men kill each other to get very limited seats in a game of musical chairs.

I think the next generation of men will hopefully get wisdom passed down to them that higher ed is a meritless scam and to go into self learned tech or entrepreneurship and avoid schooling like the plague.
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2019 05:05 AM by [email protected].)
09-08-2019 04:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 14 users Like [email protected]'s post:
RawGod, Sankt Michael, Kid Twist, Leonard D Neubache, kosko, beta_plus, DJ-Matt, Samseau, KnjazMihailo, Tactician, billbudsocket, Speculation, BBinger, Dismal Operator
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 17,843
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 216
Post: #58
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
The gist of the matter is that the globalists will support anything that will destroy the family, the male-female bonding - this includes also following down the path to radical faminism and idiotic equal-outcome-dogma. They know at the top that it's inefficient and stupid, but they like it that way if only a few more women will be more dysfunctional, more divorce-prone and less willing to marry young and have kids. If less happy healthy families are created then it's a worthy cause for them and they will support it fully.

But woe someone starts a campaign for women to become housewives and marry young while leaving the men the better-paid jobs - all hell breaks lose.
09-08-2019 05:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
KnjazMihailo, Tactician, gework
AntoniusofEfa Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 147
Joined: May 2018
Reputation: 1
Post: #59
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
^In engineering fields in Europe the companies are fulfilling the productivity gaps by hiring expensive self employed contractors.

A friend of mine gets 90 euros an hour doing RF test automation in Germany. He also gets to do home office when he likes, one month at a time. Going freelance means that one can walk away any time, and the corporate BS is minimal.
09-08-2019 05:11 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like AntoniusofEfa's post:
Leonard D Neubache, Samseau, KnjazMihailo, Tactician, BBinger
Takeachance Offline
Male Feminist

Posts: 7
Joined: Aug 2019
Reputation: 0
Post: #60
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
There was a study about how many women doctors go to part time later in their careers. When the women were applying they probably got some favoritism. Which denied a man who would work the entirety of his career full time.

So our society then has an insufficient number of doctor hours because women go part time.
09-08-2019 05:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Takeachance's post:
Days of Broken Arrows, Buck Wild, Samseau, Tactician, Dismal Operator
mr-ed209 Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 81
Joined: Aug 2018
Reputation: 2
Post: #61
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-07-2019 02:59 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Some economists already predicted this because most corporate jobs favor women. Women in many cities already make more money than their under 30yo male counterparts. That spells disaster for the future.

Yep, I've felt this whenever I've spent time in a lot of tier 1 cities. You can see it playing out geographically, girls from all over the country move to big cities for university and manage to stay, being offered some office pen pusher position. Men however, don't seem to be able to survive in cities in any way the same numbers.

In this day and age in the west, you don't need a massive income to afford a nicely furnished flat and a big TV and i feel a lot of women in cities pay for exactly that, and can afford little more. They live pay-pay check but justify it through the status boost that comes with living in 'the city'.

I feel many guys in their 20s resort to moving further afield if they have any desire to earn a decent pay check and put some savings together - e.g going to remote oil/gas plants, power stations, heavy industry, offshore platforms and such.

A huge number of guys who would make for the most 'economically attractive' prospects simply can't afford to coexist in the same locales as women nowadays. The few men who can, have their pick of the field.
09-08-2019 06:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like mr-ed209's post:
Samseau, JiggyLordJr
Eazy_E Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 68
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #62
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Honestly, I think the girls are getting unfairly shafted and thrown into a meat grinder, Metropolis style. They get told, you can be a boss bitch so much they believe it, they go to college, get a degree, get 120k of student loan debt, decide they have to live in New York or London or whatever for their career and to shit post on Instagram (look how interesting I am), but in reality it's a miserable, expensive, hand to mouth existence where your life is working and anything social heavily involves alcohol. $4k a month rent, student loans, clothes, Starbucks, going out, restaurants....

Men can't, or won't, pay the prices that New York or London command, and they're getting wise to the student loan scam, so what do you do? Find another market to toss in the wood chipper, and it just so happens to be the market that was previously underrepresented in being tossed in. I don't wanna say conspiracy, but it's a hell of a coincidence.
09-08-2019 08:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
AntoniusofEfa Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 147
Joined: May 2018
Reputation: 1
Post: #63
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
^ how exactly are women being shafted? The last 50 years have had laws being changed to cater just to women.

They created the current state of affairs, and it has gotten really bad for the majority of men. So bad, in fact, that most aware men have turned off their protector instinct. Western women can go and fuck themselves.

Instead of admitting their mistakes, the fem centric academia finds ways to blame their spinstership on men. I have actually seen a similar article in German a few weeks ago, so this kind of behavior is not exclusive to the US.
09-08-2019 08:35 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like AntoniusofEfa's post:
Renzy, questor70, beta_plus, JiggyLordJr
Eazy_E Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 68
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #64
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
I mean it's all propaganda designed to keep you on the carousel for life. Keep you in debt and with just enough to live, but not thrive. Girls are told from day one, you have to go to college, and you have to be interesting and live in DC or New York or London, and don't worry about having a family or any of that other lame shit, just consume, consume, consume.

If a man thinks it'll buy him into a higher class of woman, he'll go along with it, but if not, he's probably gonna start looking around and asking questions. Women, unfortunately, don't have that kind of rational brain so like lemmings, they just line up to jump off the cliff. Now you've got 120k in student debt, a 4k a month apartment you're never in and you basically just exist to pay interest to the banking cartel and that kinda sucks when you realize it would have been a lot easier and way less stressful to just marry the decent guy you met in high school.
09-08-2019 08:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Eazy_E's post:
Kid Twist, JiggyLordJr, Samseau, DamienCasanova, Dismal Operator
Kid Twist Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,764
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 33
Post: #65
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 05:55 AM)Takeachance Wrote:  There was a study about how many women doctors go to part time later in their careers. When the women were applying they probably got some favoritism. Which denied a man who would work the entirety of his career full time.

So our society then has an insufficient number of doctor hours because women go part time.

I have quoted it, it was 0.7 productive.

Ugly women (somewhat selected for in careers that take that long to accomplish, as it should be) are the only reason it's not closer to 0.5.
09-08-2019 08:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,375
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 204
Post: #66
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 08:35 AM)AntoniusofEfa Wrote:  ^ how exactly are women being shafted? The last 50 years have had laws being changed to cater just to women.
...

This demonstrates how effective the globohomo programming has been. The rules have not been changed to "cater to women" because women are suffering too. They have been changed to cater to the ZOG and the Corporatocracy.

1) Women should not be responsible for themselves.
2) The reason women are currently responsible for themselves is because we (men) allowed ourselves to become weak and complacent
3) Women are not societal competitors. If you have been placed in competition with them then your real enemy is the person that manipulated that situation into existence.
4) Women are mostly incapable of bringing about social change. Feminism is the shroud that covers for elite social engineering. Feminists achieve nothing that the elites do not set out for them to achieve.
5) The elites have opened the doors to this by tricking men into accepting equality under a supposed meritocracy. "Freedom" demanded that men comply. By this fact we can understand that "freedom" is a weapon used against those who claim to be free. The feminist is free to agitate against meritocracy. The corporation is free to eliminate it on the false pretense that they are bowing to social pressure.
6) Ultimately we are led back to the will to power. You will keep nothing but that which you take and guard by force. Over the last 100 years this demonstrably includes the women of your society who now effectively in great numbers belong to your local ZOG and the Corporatocracy.

Complaining about women as if they should know better is akin to complaining about the poor behavior of the dog you never bothered to leash and train.

Women will go back to their place when us men put them there, or at best only after a serious global catastrophe.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2019 09:14 AM by Leonard D Neubache.)
09-08-2019 09:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 11 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
JiggyLordJr, DJ-Matt, Buck Wild, Samseau, KnjazMihailo, Sankt Michael, DamienCasanova, billbudsocket, gework, BBinger, Dismal Operator
Eazy_E Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 68
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #67
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Why do you think girls do better in school? Because teachers are women and they know how girls are. Girls generally have a better disposition towards being told to sit down and shut up and stay there. Boys get rambunctious in the same situation. Physically, girls are a lot lazier then boys so sitting all day doesn't bother them.

I spent a lot of time with my grandparents before I started school. Grandpa had an old stump in the yard, couple feet high. He used to give me a coffee can full of old rusty nails and a hammer and let me go to town on that damn thing. Or take a bow saw to it. Just a five year old kid pounding nails in a stump and I was happy as shit to do it. My sister, no nails were hammered.

Girls like to sit inside, boys like to hammer nails in a stump. Until we cater to that difference, men will never catch up, but not like anybody cares about that anyway.
09-08-2019 09:36 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Eazy_E's post:
Days of Broken Arrows, Samseau, spokepoker, DamienCasanova
Barron Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,760
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 46
Post: #68
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Funny cause if you reverse the SMV proposition and gender of the article's title, you get the truth:

Why Are Marriage Rates Down? Study Blames Lack Of 'Physically-Attractive’ Women

Inversion 101

two scoops
two genders
two terms
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2019 09:44 AM by Barron.)
09-08-2019 09:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 7 users Like Barron's post:
questor70, Simeon_Strangelight, Kungfu, Samseau, Zenta, balla_23, BBinger
bbgun Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 374
Joined: Mar 2017
Reputation: 2
Post: #69
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
There are plenty of guys who graduate from college but don't make a lot of money because of their choice of major, so that's problem #2.
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2019 10:15 AM by bbgun.)
09-08-2019 10:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
questor70 Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,152
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 19
Post: #70
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 08:54 AM)Kid Twist Wrote:  Ugly women (somewhat selected for in careers that take that long to accomplish, as it should be) are the only reason it's not closer to 0.5.

Humans follow put their time and energy into what nets them the best bang for the buck. And for women, the amount of time they put into school and career is typically a function of their appearance. The better they look, the greater the temptation to lean on that rather than their intellectual capacity, because it's the path of least resistance. Thanks to male thirst and erosion of social mores, that temptation is greater than ever (think of insta-THOTs like Belle Delphine).

Historically speaking ugly or awkward women would become librarians or nuns. These days they enter academia. It only takes a few minutes of watching some educational TV on cable to see this this validated. I have my doubts there are any female PhDs alive today that are over HB6. If they are, then they got a diversity pass and they didn't deserve it. Not that male academics are models either, of course, but you get a broader demographic spectrum because academic achievement is a form of high status and there's really no mating advantage for women to be high status.

If women feel they don't have a lot of leverage in the sexual marketplace they have nothing to lose by pursuing education/career. It's women who have higher SMV who are squandering their leverage by taking advantage of diversity quotas.
09-08-2019 10:29 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like questor70's post:
JiggyLordJr, Buck Wild
questor70 Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,152
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 19
Post: #71
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 09:42 AM)Barron Wrote:  Funny cause if you reverse the SMV proposition and gender of the article's title, you get the truth:
Why Are Marriage Rates Down? Study Blames Lack Of 'Physically-Attractive’ Women
Inversion 101

Let's be honest about how this gets spun these days:

Why are Marriage Rates Down? Study blames men's unrealistic beauty standards.
09-08-2019 10:31 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like questor70's post:
beta_plus, BBinger
kosko Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 6,783
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 146
Post: #72
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 04:53 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 03:18 AM)N°6 Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 11:48 AM)Swordfish1010 Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 02:59 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Some economists already predicted this because most corporate jobs favor women. Women in many cities already make more money than their under 30yo male counterparts. That spells disaster for the future.

Now they complain about it and blame men - of course they do, but the reality is that they are to be blamed for it on top of the giant sprawling diversity and immigration industry.

And women don't like to marry down, but always marry up. Pure math should tell you that they cannot marry up if they are on average better off than their male 30yo counterpart.

Corporations have quotas they must fill, which include women and minorities. The only people that have to compete solely on merit are white men.

In the UK, 85% of STEM students are men despite all the equality of opportunity programmes and blonde-haired models in safety clothes who adorn glossy posters holding A0 drawings whilst instructing blue collar workers that have existed for as long as I can remember.

Despite only 15% of STEM students being women, the engineering corporation I used to work for had a day of celebration because it had somehow managed to recruit graduates who were 40% women. This means - in theory - 85% of the graduate cohort were fighting for only 60% of the places. This artificial equality of income is producing a competition between men somewhere between a gladiator fight and the final stages of musical chairs when supply exceeds demand.


The irony is that the men who survive the interview stage are noticeably more intelligent and confident than their female colleagues who were awarded the diversity wildcards. But the main result is the hidden one, the men within the original 85% who couldn't get onto one of the 60% of chairs. They will be the invisible unemployed, underemployed and financially unstable men that the successful women used to marry. In other words they will join the growing ranks of economically unattractive men, and potentially the growing number of men in their 40s who have never married.


On the racial side of things, non-white men are probably going to be harmed by the glut of middle class entitled white girls getting diversity wildcards, who are destined to become the second income earners of materialist power marriages with the few white men who have somehow survived the guillotine of equality of outcome.

I tried to explain this to a friend who is a doctor for 15 years and he experienced visible cognitive dissonance. I asked him how is it possible that 80% of people going into sciences and medical related fields are men (80% of the people entering sciences admit to wanting to go to medical school) but the people that manage to enter enter the school are always split down 50/50 by gender? It would either mean that women are far better students than men despite their lower numbers OR affirmative action based female selection. He did something I rarely see him do, actually freeze up and become real quiet.

The men that had their seats taken by AA choices will also join the ranks of economically unattractive men and it also goes for AA hires for police, military, etc etc etc where undeserving females will get seats they don't deserve while a great number of men kill each other to get very limited seats in a game of musical chairs.

I think the next generation of men will hopefully get wisdom passed down to them that higher ed is a meritless scam and to go into self learned tech or entrepreneurship and avoid schooling like the plague.


You should also ask your friend why there is such a shortage of doctors even though there are higher student numbers coming out of medical schools. The same reasons you have mentioned because this 50/50 split isn't actually interested in practice for one side of the gender split and many women run off to part time weak practices or don't even practice at all.

Too many resources is dumped on women to get very little ROI in the economy and society as a whole. The value women bring is to birth and raise children.
09-08-2019 10:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like kosko's post:
beta_plus, Buck Wild, Samseau
beta_plus Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,195
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 15
Post: #73
AA Women Doctors Make My Blood Boil
(09-08-2019 10:34 AM)kosko Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 04:53 AM)[email protected] Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 03:18 AM)N°6 Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 11:48 AM)Swordfish1010 Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 02:59 AM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  Some economists already predicted this because most corporate jobs favor women. Women in many cities already make more money than their under 30yo male counterparts. That spells disaster for the future.

Now they complain about it and blame men - of course they do, but the reality is that they are to be blamed for it on top of the giant sprawling diversity and immigration industry.

And women don't like to marry down, but always marry up. Pure math should tell you that they cannot marry up if they are on average better off than their male 30yo counterpart.

Corporations have quotas they must fill, which include women and minorities. The only people that have to compete solely on merit are white men.

In the UK, 85% of STEM students are men despite all the equality of opportunity programmes and blonde-haired models in safety clothes who adorn glossy posters holding A0 drawings whilst instructing blue collar workers that have existed for as long as I can remember.

Despite only 15% of STEM students being women, the engineering corporation I used to work for had a day of celebration because it had somehow managed to recruit graduates who were 40% women. This means - in theory - 85% of the graduate cohort were fighting for only 60% of the places. This artificial equality of income is producing a competition between men somewhere between a gladiator fight and the final stages of musical chairs when supply exceeds demand.


The irony is that the men who survive the interview stage are noticeably more intelligent and confident than their female colleagues who were awarded the diversity wildcards. But the main result is the hidden one, the men within the original 85% who couldn't get onto one of the 60% of chairs. They will be the invisible unemployed, underemployed and financially unstable men that the successful women used to marry. In other words they will join the growing ranks of economically unattractive men, and potentially the growing number of men in their 40s who have never married.


On the racial side of things, non-white men are probably going to be harmed by the glut of middle class entitled white girls getting diversity wildcards, who are destined to become the second income earners of materialist power marriages with the few white men who have somehow survived the guillotine of equality of outcome.

I tried to explain this to a friend who is a doctor for 15 years and he experienced visible cognitive dissonance. I asked him how is it possible that 80% of people going into sciences and medical related fields are men (80% of the people entering sciences admit to wanting to go to medical school) but the people that manage to enter enter the school are always split down 50/50 by gender? It would either mean that women are far better students than men despite their lower numbers OR affirmative action based female selection. He did something I rarely see him do, actually freeze up and become real quiet.

The men that had their seats taken by AA choices will also join the ranks of economically unattractive men and it also goes for AA hires for police, military, etc etc etc where undeserving females will get seats they don't deserve while a great number of men kill each other to get very limited seats in a game of musical chairs.

I think the next generation of men will hopefully get wisdom passed down to them that higher ed is a meritless scam and to go into self learned tech or entrepreneurship and avoid schooling like the plague.


You should also ask your friend why there is such a shortage of doctors even though there are higher student numbers coming out of medical schools. The same reasons you have mentioned because this 50/50 split isn't actually interested in practice for one side of the gender split and many women run off to part time weak practices or don't even practice at all.

Too many resources is dumped on women to get very little ROI in the economy and society as a whole. The value women bring is to birth and raise children.

AA for women doctors is extremely angering because, unlike say Mechanical Engineering, you cannot just spend more money on resources to train replacements. Doctors must learn by practicing on sick and injured people, whose supply is inherently limited.
09-08-2019 11:09 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes beta_plus's post:
BBinger
Swordfish1010 Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 345
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation: 4
Post: #74
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 09:36 AM)Eazy_E Wrote:  Why do you think girls do better in school? Because teachers are women and they know how girls are. Girls generally have a better disposition towards being told to sit down and shut up and stay there. Boys get rambunctious in the same situation. Physically, girls are a lot lazier then boys so sitting all day doesn't bother them.

I spent a lot of time with my grandparents before I started school. Grandpa had an old stump in the yard, couple feet high. He used to give me a coffee can full of old rusty nails and a hammer and let me go to town on that damn thing. Or take a bow saw to it. Just a five year old kid pounding nails in a stump and I was happy as shit to do it. My sister, no nails were hammered.

Girls like to sit inside, boys like to hammer nails in a stump. Until we cater to that difference, men will never catch up, but not like anybody cares about that anyway.
Girls go in for office hours for “special” treatment. Whether that is actual sex or just playing the sympathy card and begging for a redo on a test is between them. It was crazy how many dumb looking hot girls in college had a better gpa than me. They have that shit down to a science. They take online quizzes in groups (cheat), and do anything they can get away with. Then once they get in the corporate world they do the same thing. This girl from college literally cheated on her husband with this big wig at her job for a promotion. I never realized how prevalent this immoral behavior was.
09-08-2019 11:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Swordfish1010's post:
beta_plus, Samseau
DogLover Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 70
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 0
Post: #75
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Heartiste referred to them as "Litterbox Ladies" the other day. LOL.
09-08-2019 11:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  US birth rate falls to record low Parlay44 17 8,000 06-10-2019 10:02 PM
Last Post: beta_plus
  Explaining Sex Rate Changes lookslikeit 1 853 04-08-2019 03:04 AM
Last Post: kinjutsu
  Millennials Are Causing the U.S. Divorce Rate to Plummet Kamikaze 39 4,335 11-30-2018 09:54 PM
Last Post: Waqqle

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication