I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
"Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Author Message
beta_plus Offline
Alpha Male
****

Posts: 1,195
Joined: May 2011
Reputation: 15
Post: #76
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 11:39 AM)Swordfish1010 Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 09:36 AM)Eazy_E Wrote:  Why do you think girls do better in school? Because teachers are women and they know how girls are. Girls generally have a better disposition towards being told to sit down and shut up and stay there. Boys get rambunctious in the same situation. Physically, girls are a lot lazier then boys so sitting all day doesn't bother them.

I spent a lot of time with my grandparents before I started school. Grandpa had an old stump in the yard, couple feet high. He used to give me a coffee can full of old rusty nails and a hammer and let me go to town on that damn thing. Or take a bow saw to it. Just a five year old kid pounding nails in a stump and I was happy as shit to do it. My sister, no nails were hammered.

Girls like to sit inside, boys like to hammer nails in a stump. Until we cater to that difference, men will never catch up, but not like anybody cares about that anyway.
Girls go in for office hours for “special” treatment. Whether that is actual sex or just playing the sympathy card and begging for a redo on a test is between them. It was crazy how many dumb looking hot girls in college had a better gpa than me. They have that shit down to a science. They take online quizzes in groups (cheat), and do anything they can get away with. Then once they get in the corporate world they do the same thing. This girl from college literally cheated on her husband with this big wig at her job for a promotion. I never realized how prevalent this immoral behavior was.

One of the shocks of #GamerGate for me was that mediocre and ugly girls do the same thing. A good example after GG was the Senate Intelligence Committee leak down by a 4 journalist in exchange for sex.
09-08-2019 12:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Swordfish1010 Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 345
Joined: Oct 2018
Reputation: 4
Post: #77
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 12:26 PM)beta_plus Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 11:39 AM)Swordfish1010 Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 09:36 AM)Eazy_E Wrote:  Why do you think girls do better in school? Because teachers are women and they know how girls are. Girls generally have a better disposition towards being told to sit down and shut up and stay there. Boys get rambunctious in the same situation. Physically, girls are a lot lazier then boys so sitting all day doesn't bother them.

I spent a lot of time with my grandparents before I started school. Grandpa had an old stump in the yard, couple feet high. He used to give me a coffee can full of old rusty nails and a hammer and let me go to town on that damn thing. Or take a bow saw to it. Just a five year old kid pounding nails in a stump and I was happy as shit to do it. My sister, no nails were hammered.

Girls like to sit inside, boys like to hammer nails in a stump. Until we cater to that difference, men will never catch up, but not like anybody cares about that anyway.
Girls go in for office hours for “special” treatment. Whether that is actual sex or just playing the sympathy card and begging for a redo on a test is between them. It was crazy how many dumb looking hot girls in college had a better gpa than me. They have that shit down to a science. They take online quizzes in groups (cheat), and do anything they can get away with. Then once they get in the corporate world they do the same thing. This girl from college literally cheated on her husband with this big wig at her job for a promotion. I never realized how prevalent this immoral behavior was.

One of the shocks of #GamerGate for me was that mediocre and ugly girls do the same thing. A good example after GG was the Senate Intelligence Committee leak down by a 4 journalist in exchange for sex.

I never looked into that but it doesn't surprise me at all. The elite have essentially commodified pussy beyond just straight up hookers.
09-08-2019 12:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Swordfish1010's post:
beta_plus
Barron Offline
True Player
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,760
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 46
Post: #78
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 11:48 AM)DogLover Wrote:  Heartiste referred to them as "Litterbox Ladies" the other day. LOL.

Where?

two scoops
two genders
two terms
09-08-2019 01:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Barron's post:
Goldin Boy, Monty_Brogan
DogLover Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 70
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 0
Post: #79
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 01:57 PM)Barron Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 11:48 AM)DogLover Wrote:  Heartiste referred to them as "Litterbox Ladies" the other day. LOL.

Where?

Gab.

https://gab.com/Heartiste/posts/102725113361468854

Heartiste
@Heartiste

The "grab them by the pussy" moment is the polestar of the pussyhatter and litter box ladies' rage against Trump. Everything they imagined was represented by that tape was their rallying cry to "resist" Trump and his voters, and it's a motivating indignation that continues to resonate three years after Trump's Inauguration. Read Lana Del Ray's recent interview in which she bitched about that taped comment for proof of its lingering hold on skankhos' hindbrains.

Of course, what these battlecunts imagined -- that Trump is a serial sexual harasser -- was the opposite of the truth. Trump said, loosely paraphrasing, "if you're rich and famous, women will let you grab their pussies".

Which is true.

And revealing.

Because what Pussyhat Inc is really indignant about is that a presidential candidate with a penchant for plain speaking let the public see what's behind the cuntflaps. Trump brashly spoke what no man should dare speak: women will sidle up and let billionaire playboys grab their wet pussies, while every beta male who's had a visit from HR for "inappropriate behavior" such as accidentally brushing the sleeve of a cat lady in the elevator continues to get the spiteful neo-Puritan MeToo treatment.

The pussyhatters and bluehairs are pissed as hell that Trump exposed female nature to a national audience, and they will never

let

it

go.
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2019 02:13 PM by DogLover.)
09-08-2019 02:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 10 users Like DogLover's post:
beta_plus, Barron, Bienvenuto, jeffreyjerpp, estraudi, Enoch, Tactician, John Dodds, PrimeTime32, Dismal Operator
Arado Offline
Wingman
***
Gold Member

Posts: 941
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 21
Post: #80
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Any predictions on how the coming recession will affect this dynamic?
09-08-2019 03:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Eazy_E Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 68
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #81
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
BOHICA?
09-08-2019 03:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Kungfu Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 59
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #82
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 03:32 PM)Arado Wrote:  Any predictions on how the coming recession will affect this dynamic?

skip to 5:45



09-08-2019 07:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Kungfu's post:
John Dodds
Kid Twist Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,764
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 33
Post: #83
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
What bothers me about Peterson is that he goes to the precipice, then won't admit the obvious. For example, 8:30.

You don't know??? You just told them exactly what's going on --- women want kids at 30 career is a false promise, and the current system is not working --- And has an even worse future! He says all of this.

But when the kid asks if women should have kids earlier, he says, "I don't know"???

Facepalm
(This post was last modified: 09-08-2019 09:10 PM by Kid Twist.)
09-08-2019 09:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 12 users Like Kid Twist's post:
Kungfu, Barron, infowarrior1, jeffreyjerpp, Sankt Michael, captndonk, John Dodds, billbudsocket, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, PrimeTime32, gework, Dismal Operator
Kid Twist Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 2,764
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 33
Post: #84
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 03:32 PM)Arado Wrote:  Any predictions on how the coming recession will affect this dynamic?

Arado, it's one of my favorite topics.

My feeling is that the realist perspective (and these are all probabilities) is like that of Trump: 8 year breather, but then back to decline, and major. I hope I'm wrong, but I've always said it. Similar, I hope that a recession would make people humble enough to live with a newfound reality and appreciation about how hard life is and how hard survival is, which usually reverts back to traditional living.

My suspicion, sadly, is that most will opt for subsistence living, just enough bread and circuses by the gov't, checking out of life via week or booze, etc. Instead of a change in culture, sugar dating type things will continue to get even stronger; what's bad right now with apps, IG, and everything else will just get worse. I think the main reason why that is more likely is that you just don't have a strong culture to identify with here anymore. To be frank, you haven't had it for decades.

I'm very sad to guess this, but I'm being honest.

Get your passport ready!
09-08-2019 09:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Kid Twist's post:
JiggyLordJr, Monty_Brogan, John Dodds, gework
Bienvenuto Offline
Wingman
***
Gold Member

Posts: 963
Joined: Mar 2017
Reputation: 21
Post: #85
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 11:39 AM)Swordfish1010 Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 09:36 AM)Eazy_E Wrote:  Why do you think girls do better in school? Because teachers are women and they know how girls are. Girls generally have a better disposition towards being told to sit down and shut up and stay there. Boys get rambunctious in the same situation. Physically, girls are a lot lazier then boys so sitting all day doesn't bother them.

I spent a lot of time with my grandparents before I started school. Grandpa had an old stump in the yard, couple feet high. He used to give me a coffee can full of old rusty nails and a hammer and let me go to town on that damn thing. Or take a bow saw to it. Just a five year old kid pounding nails in a stump and I was happy as shit to do it. My sister, no nails were hammered.

Girls like to sit inside, boys like to hammer nails in a stump. Until we cater to that difference, men will never catch up, but not like anybody cares about that anyway.
Girls go in for office hours for “special” treatment. Whether that is actual sex or just playing the sympathy card and begging for a redo on a test is between them. It was crazy how many dumb looking hot girls in college had a better gpa than me. They have that shit down to a science. They take online quizzes in groups (cheat), and do anything they can get away with. Then once they get in the corporate world they do the same thing. This girl from college literally cheated on her husband with this big wig at her job for a promotion. I never realized how prevalent this immoral behavior was.

Chicks getting away with missing deadlines in College, all they had to do was sit there and pout. Extension, extension, extension. Us guys on the other hand would be in deep shit.

I was in a teaching job with a literally crazy kid punching his classmates all the time. Too crazy to learn anything, but so crazy that whole sections of class were sidelined by his fits.

This was in Vietnam.. Western boss. Told me the kid had to stay, NOTHING we could do. I didn't understand. Well, parents so rich. Fucking.. whatever. I found a way of neutralising the kid and just joked about this demon spawn with the boss after that.

Fat screeching Ham Planet of an American feminist has one 10th of the issues with one unruly boy in her class on one day. Came marching in to the office, straight up to the manager.. tears, she's yelling herself (like always).

Fuck me .. the business couldn't find enough resources to help her. We were all 'deputised' to play a role, be it brainstorming with her, taking on her workload, planning an emergency response..
We, as a business, were going after this little fucker - who dared to act up in a female teachers class - that little fucker was going down.
At one stage I was expecting the Vietnamese Army to get called in.

(09-08-2019 06:49 PM)Scorpio Rising Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 06:12 PM)VNvet Wrote:  
(09-07-2019 12:34 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  < Women have a lower reaction time, they panic much more readily especially when lethal force is rarely applied. So even if a woman is allowed to use lethal force, she does it on average far worse than a man. There were a few female cops who died because they reacted too late to a perp - got out of her car and allowed themselves to be driven over etc.

I've seen female cops on Live PD before. One word:

Yikes.

My favorite female cop clip:



This has happened to male officers before too. Take the case of Pittsburgh PO John Wilbur in June of 1996. https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1996/j...g-dragged/
Do you think some Susie Cop could have responded so heroically? Do you know what reward Officer Wilbur received? A coroner's jury voted 4-2 that he be charged with some degree of murder.

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/1996/s...ssailants/
Clown world is older than you think.

But.. "he just hit us both with his car" Bishes exaggerate. resources deploy.

Kid gets tossed from class/ Perp probably gets killed on the back of it.
I was thinking.. "well why not just hand it back to her as a catch-22/nothing-we-can-do cognitive challenge?" (which has been my experience of management's approach in most of the shitty jobs I've done.)

Oh No.. Fuck That. The whole world stands still for a loud angry feminist bitch.
Anyone think that riding straight to her rescue made her a better teacher?
Anyone think that inverting all previous approaches to make her happy made her a better problem solver?

She remains angry and unfuckable, falling in love with each new passing western teacher (who drinks gallons of soy and who insists after several weeks of not getting her overtures that.. she's just a Great Friend).
her tragic wall-hitting experience and her increasing use of scarves, capes, rugs, (in a sweltering tropical country) in order to hide her ballooning body-shape... is... a source of some schadenfreude for me.
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2019 03:20 AM by Bienvenuto.)
09-09-2019 02:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Bienvenuto's post:
John Dodds
sanbruno Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 47
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #86
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 09:09 PM)Kid Twist Wrote:  What bothers me about Peterson is that he goes to the precipice, then won't admit the obvious. For example, 8:30.

You don't know??? You just told them exactly what's going on --- women want kids at 30 career is a false promise, and the current system is not working --- And has an even worse future! He says all of this.

But when the kid asks if women should have kids earlier, he says, "I don't know"???

Facepalm

I think he knows if he comes out and says it, it will just be used as a hot take against him to "prove" he is "alt-right, "conservative", "literally Hitler", or whatever label they want to pin on him. I think he is doing his best to avoid falling into any traps, he knows everything he says will be analyzed for "bigotry". Maybe it doesn't rally the red pilled crowd, but it's a better strategy IMO, because leftists and blue pillers don't have the "evidence" to properly write him off as a "bigot", thus more moderate and curious blue pilled men will be open to at least seeing what he has to say. The type of people that read this forum or regularly follow the musings of Peterson can certainly read between the lines. It's the soy boy Starbucks barista that's maybe a bit frustrated with his life, but is surrounded by females that tell him Peterson is a bigot, and thus he tunes out, lest he disappoint those same females with red pilled/masculine thoughts he's been convinced they aren't attracted to.
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2019 03:27 AM by sanbruno.)
09-09-2019 03:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 12 users Like sanbruno's post:
Bienvenuto, wwtl, Renzy, JiggyLordJr, jeffreyjerpp, Sankt Michael, Swordfish1010, Isaac Jordan, Tactician, John Dodds, Kungfu, PrimeTime32
LEMONed IScream Offline
True Player
*****

Posts: 1,956
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 16
Post: #87
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
The Left does not need evidence to tar Peterson, or anyone else. They do not deal with reason.

"Christian love bears evil, but it does not tolerate it. It does penance for the sins of others, but it is not broadminded about sin. Real love involves real hatred: whoever has lost the power of moral indignation and the urge to drive the sellers from temples has also lost a living, fervent love of Truth."

- Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen
09-09-2019 05:05 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes LEMONed IScream's post:
questor70
wwtl Offline
Recovering Beta
*

Posts: 232
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 1
Post: #88
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-09-2019 05:05 AM)LEMONed IScream Wrote:  The Left does not need evidence to tar Peterson, or anyone else. They do not deal with reason.

Crazy extremists don't need anything, but his audience still likes tangible evidence.

There are people who like to preach to the converted (which is a waste of time).
There are people who like to preach to the enemy (which is mostly futile).

And then there are people who go after the undecided on the fence. If you do that right you make a difference. That's why you have the enemy pretending to be converts trying to steer anyone away from that.
09-09-2019 05:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes wwtl's post:
Bienvenuto
Chad's Day Off Offline
Banned

Posts: 51
Joined: Jul 2019
Post: #89
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Peterson has run the gauntlet at this point, and emerged largely unscathed judging by the horrible quality of their hitpieces/ thinkpieces. Saying that he has a "alt-right" followers, is misogynistic only goes so far. And on the subject of misogyny, they're unable to point to anything he's said that would be unfounded about female nature given the current scientific, that is, mainstream, literature on the subject (discounting obvious gender studies BS, which isn't scientific in the slightest).

And, on the subject of men being economically unattractive: yes, if unemployed or living with parents yes, it is their fault at some point, especially if the guy is older. But given the solid middle class nature of the US and being less classicist than other western countries, like the UK for example (where you only hang out with people in the same wealth class as you, which is almost always what I've observed), i think they're overstating their case. Women are just turned off by boring men, many of whom are video gamers or never leave the house. Heck, men in Italy manage to get laid even though they live with parents until 30...

So, some of it is economic, for sure. But so long as a man has stable employment, has his own spot, and works to get out of the house, it's something deeper on a sociological level. For one, porn. Which means all men are getting less contact time with women as a result. Two, cohabitation which kills attractiveness of men and hurts having kids and marriage rate. Three, the obvious one, feminism, which reprograms women into workers for modern neoliberalism and makes them barren and hyper-hypergamous because they're now in the workforce, and wanting a man that out-earns them.

On face value this all may sound discouraging, which it is, and which they want. But really, men just need to apply themselves and get out of the freaking house!

Chad out.
09-09-2019 06:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Chad's Day Off's post:
KnjazMihailo, John Dodds
Easy_C Offline
International Playboy
******

Posts: 3,999
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 28
Post: #90
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 12:26 PM)beta_plus Wrote:  One of the shocks of #GamerGate for me was that mediocre and ugly girls do the same thing. A good example after GG was the Senate Intelligence Committee leak down by a 4 journalist in exchange for sex.

It's more common with mediocre looking girls. The hot ones very frequently don't need to offer sex for favors, and have access to higher quality mates without needing to try to lure them in by sleeping with them as quickly as possible.

Basically they have a shorter deck so they need to play all their cards sooner.
09-09-2019 06:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
AntoniusofEfa Offline
Beta Orbiter
*

Posts: 147
Joined: May 2018
Reputation: 1
Post: #91
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-09-2019 06:51 AM)Chads Day Off Wrote:  Peterson has run the gauntlet at this point, and emerged largely unscathed judging by the horrible quality of their hitpieces/ thinkpieces. Saying that he has a "alt-right" followers, is misogynistic only goes so far. And on the subject of misogyny, they're unable to point to anything he's said that would be unfounded about female nature given the current scientific, that is, mainstream, literature on the subject (discounting obvious gender studies BS, which isn't scientific in the slightest).

And, on the subject of men being economically unattractive: yes, if unemployed or living with parents yes, it is their fault at some point, especially if the guy is older. But given the solid middle class nature of the US and being less classicist than other western countries, like the UK for example (where you only hang out with people in the same wealth class as you, which is almost always what I've observed), i think they're overstating their case. Women are just turned off by boring men, many of whom are video gamers or never leave the house. Heck, men in Italy manage to get laid even though they live with parents until 30...

So, some of it is economic, for sure. But so long as a man has stable employment, has his own spot, and works to get out of the house, it's something deeper on a sociological level. For one, porn. Which means all men are getting less contact time with women as a result. Two, cohabitation which kills attractiveness of men and hurts having kids and marriage rate. Three, the obvious one, feminism, which reprograms women into workers for modern neoliberalism and makes them barren and hyper-hypergamous because they're now in the workforce, and wanting a man that out-earns them.

On face value this all may sound discouraging, which it is, and which they want. But really, men just need to apply themselves and get out of the freaking house!

Chad out.

I believe that JP is on (((their))) side, and therefore he was not taken down.

Knowing some guys who live with parents and yet slay, I think that having no game has nothing to do with living away from parents in Europe. Italy is also not a good example for a functioning economy. A senior chip designer in Italy can earn 45 K Euro before tax. You cannot buy any decent property with that money in an attractive location in Italy for that
09-09-2019 08:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes AntoniusofEfa's post:
Simeon_Strangelight
Chad's Day Off Offline
Banned

Posts: 51
Joined: Jul 2019
Post: #92
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-09-2019 08:18 AM)AntoniusofEfa Wrote:  
(09-09-2019 06:51 AM)Chads Day Off Wrote:  Peterson has run the gauntlet at this point, and emerged largely unscathed judging by the horrible quality of their hitpieces/ thinkpieces. Saying that he has a "alt-right" followers, is misogynistic only goes so far. And on the subject of misogyny, they're unable to point to anything he's said that would be unfounded about female nature given the current scientific, that is, mainstream, literature on the subject (discounting obvious gender studies BS, which isn't scientific in the slightest).

And, on the subject of men being economically unattractive: yes, if unemployed or living with parents yes, it is their fault at some point, especially if the guy is older. But given the solid middle class nature of the US and being less classicist than other western countries, like the UK for example (where you only hang out with people in the same wealth class as you, which is almost always what I've observed), i think they're overstating their case. Women are just turned off by boring men, many of whom are video gamers or never leave the house. Heck, men in Italy manage to get laid even though they live with parents until 30...

So, some of it is economic, for sure. But so long as a man has stable employment, has his own spot, and works to get out of the house, it's something deeper on a sociological level. For one, porn. Which means all men are getting less contact time with women as a result. Two, cohabitation which kills attractiveness of men and hurts having kids and marriage rate. Three, the obvious one, feminism, which reprograms women into workers for modern neoliberalism and makes them barren and hyper-hypergamous because they're now in the workforce, and wanting a man that out-earns them.

On face value this all may sound discouraging, which it is, and which they want. But really, men just need to apply themselves and get out of the freaking house!

Chad out.

I believe that JP is on (((their))) side, and therefore he was not taken down.

Knowing some guys who live with parents and yet slay, I think that having no game has nothing to do with living away from parents in Europe. Italy is also not a good example for a functioning economy. A senior chip designer in Italy can earn 45 K Euro before tax. You cannot buy any decent property with that money in an attractive location in Italy for that

Let me disagree: JBP has made me like men's sites like this one more, and men's sites have made me like JBP more. Why is that, they have a symbiotic relationship. JBP gives me the psychological, political, cultural and social information that then leads me to RVF to get advise that improves my life in the realm of women, politics, and self-improvement. And RVF gives me such advise, but I turn to JBP to see the scientific and psychological backing of such advise.

If his sin is not covering third rails, he got me in the door and then I turn to RVF and others to fill in gaps, keep in mind saying certain things as a public figure will get you depersoned, examples: James Watson women in science comments, Mel Gibson on Jews, John Galliano a gay fashion designer who said something about Hitler, Charles Murray on intelligence, Chomsky on foreign policy and media, among others. They are all pushed to the margins, lose jobs, research appointments, public reputation, etc.

So you're faced with a dilemma, if you achieve the power and reach of JBP, do you go for a third rail and knowingly deperson yourself. Keep in mind you lose all your audience and influence at that point. You can't at that point do anything to help them, or red pill them. You're silenced.

As to men at home and wages. It's happening everywhere in the West, it's just worse in europe. Happens in Japan as well. It's something about the organization or mechanics of modern society or the economy, or technology that's doing this. You still can get laid without a spot. Thus this shouldn't be an excuse for disadvantaged men. As to wages, wages are starting to suck in every developed place for men, there's no growth in real male incomes, while females are breaking the glass ceiling.

If you noticed the time he avoided talking about Jews, via a question about Solzhenitsyn and his book about the Jews, JBP just basically said he can't talk about it. If you read the subtext, it's just that he knows it's true, can't say it publicly or lose everything. I would contend you can use his logic or the way he thinks to get to the truth for yourself, once you start to understand his approach to things.
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2019 08:44 AM by Chad's Day Off.)
09-09-2019 08:42 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Chad's Day Off's post:
Buck Wild, Isaac Jordan, Samseau
CynicalContrarian Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 7,428
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 22
Post: #93
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Got to love those maxims that transcend so much :

"Careful what you wish for, you just may get it."
09-09-2019 08:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
jeffreyjerpp Online
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 441
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation: 11
Post: #94
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-09-2019 08:18 AM)AntoniusofEfa Wrote:  I believe that JP is on (((their))) side, and therefore he was not taken down.

Nah, no way. He has been loudly speaking the truth about gender relations, and many other things, for a long time, and hasn't stopped.

A single bad soundbite would give leftists an excuse to permanently "cancel" him, as they say. So he is 95% red pill, then says "well gee, I just dunno!" about the final 5%, knowing that anyone in the audience with two brain cells to rub together is going to figure the rest out on their own.

In the meantime, Peterson gets massive mainstream coverage, is represented by CAA, and only has to dance to (((their))) tune occasionally. Certain comments of his are annoying and objectionable, but whatever.

It's worth it to have openly red pilled male celebrities in the mainstream. Peterson is in a similar position to Dave Chappelle in that sense.
09-09-2019 08:59 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 8 users Like jeffreyjerpp's post:
spokepoker, Buck Wild, Isaac Jordan, Samseau, Kid Twist, Swordfish1010, JiggyLordJr, Dismal Operator
david.garrett84 Offline
Wingman
***

Posts: 972
Joined: Feb 2015
Reputation: 33
Post: #95
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-09-2019 08:18 AM)AntoniusofEfa Wrote:  I believe that JP is on (((their))) side, and therefore he was not taken down.

If it’s so damn easy and Peterson is either a sellout or “Zionist asset”, in your view, how come you are not a public figure who publicly trumpets how he is a member of this forum to his employer and clients? To neighbors? To society at large?

Peterson is a shill, you say, out there with his name and reputation directly on the line, so what does that make everyone else on this forum aside from a few like Roosh?

You have ideological purity, Antonious, precisely because you can write here using a Latin pseudonym without major repercussions. I perfectly understand why you would do this, by the way. But for the love of God pause next time before you cast ridiculous aspersions, the substance of which you will never apply even 1% to yourself.

As a UoT professor and infinitely published academic, Peterson does have a safer reputation than 99.9% of people challenging the status quo, that’s true. It does not, however, shift the reality that only people like Orban Viktor in Hungary and Nigel Farage in Britain are doing more than him to shape public discourse and social and political outcomes along ways we can agree more readily with.

I just lament this pathetic attempt to cast any individual who doesn’t go as far as someone wants them to as a shill for xyz.

Born Down Under, but I enjoy Slovakian Thunder: http://slovakia.travel/en/nove-zamky
09-09-2019 09:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 18 users Like david.garrett84's post:
Chad's Day Off, spokepoker, questor70, Buck Wild, debeguiled, Sankt Michael, jeffreyjerpp, Robert High Hawk, Isaac Jordan, Transsimian, Samseau, Dream Medicine, LeBeau, Kungfu, Swordfish1010, JiggyLordJr, Speculation, Dismal Operator
estraudi Offline
Chubby Chaser
**
Gold Member

Posts: 446
Joined: Aug 2013
Reputation: 3
Post: #96
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-08-2019 02:11 PM)DogLover Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 01:57 PM)Barron Wrote:  
(09-08-2019 11:48 AM)DogLover Wrote:  Heartiste referred to them as "Litterbox Ladies" the other day. LOL.

Where?

Gab.

https://gab.com/Heartiste/posts/102725113361468854

Heartiste
@Heartiste

The "grab them by the pussy" moment is the polestar of the pussyhatter and litter box ladies' rage against Trump. Everything they imagined was represented by that tape was their rallying cry to "resist" Trump and his voters, and it's a motivating indignation that continues to resonate three years after Trump's Inauguration. Read Lana Del Ray's recent interview in which she bitched about that taped comment for proof of its lingering hold on skankhos' hindbrains.

Of course, what these battlecunts imagined -- that Trump is a serial sexual harasser -- was the opposite of the truth. Trump said, loosely paraphrasing, "if you're rich and famous, women will let you grab their pussies".

Which is true.

And revealing.

Because what Pussyhat Inc is really indignant about is that a presidential candidate with a penchant for plain speaking let the public see what's behind the cuntflaps. Trump brashly spoke what no man should dare speak: women will sidle up and let billionaire playboys grab their wet pussies, while every beta male who's had a visit from HR for "inappropriate behavior" such as accidentally brushing the sleeve of a cat lady in the elevator continues to get the spiteful neo-Puritan MeToo treatment.

The pussyhatters and bluehairs are pissed as hell that Trump exposed female nature to a national audience, and they will never

let

it

go.

Excellent post.
Which reminds of this....
   

The women who despise trump ran through the gamut of female tactics( lying, denial, blame-shifting, crying) and he now has these stalkers trapped in a trance of hate. They can't shake it. They must conquer!
Hilarious to see.

I doubt it. Remember that your lower level, millenial leftist isn't good at critical thinking. They're largely like trained dogs who emote in response to programmed cues like the word "racism" and "socialism". Easy_C

"The savage lives within himself while social man lives outside himself and can only live in the opinion of others, so that he seems to receive the feeling of his own existence only from the judgement of others concerning him."--Jean Jacques Rousseau
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2019 01:38 PM by estraudi.)
09-09-2019 01:36 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 17 users Like estraudi's post:
jeffreyjerpp, Swordfish1010, Isaac Jordan, spokepoker, Tactician, DamienCasanova, Chad's Day Off, Renzy, Samseau, Leonard D Neubache, LeBeau, JiggyLordJr, Bienvenuto, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, PrimeTime32, Sankt Michael, Dismal Operator
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Innovative Casanova
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 17,843
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 216
Post: #97
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-09-2019 09:43 AM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  
(09-09-2019 08:18 AM)AntoniusofEfa Wrote:  I believe that JP is on (((their))) side, and therefore he was not taken down.

If it’s so damn easy and Peterson is either a sellout or “Zionist asset”, in your view, how come you are not a public figure who publicly trumpets how he is a member of this forum to his employer and clients? To neighbors? To society at large?

Peterson is a shill, you say, out there with his name and reputation directly on the line, so what does that make everyone else on this forum aside from a few like Roosh?

You have ideological purity, Antonious, precisely because you can write here using a Latin pseudonym without major repercussions. I perfectly understand why you would do this, by the way. But for the love of God pause next time before you cast ridiculous aspersions, the substance of which you will never apply even 1% to yourself.

As a UoT professor and infinitely published academic, Peterson does have a safer reputation than 99.9% of people challenging the status quo, that’s true. It does not, however, shift the reality that only people like Orban Viktor in Hungary and Nigel Farage in Britain are doing more than him to shape public discourse and social and political outcomes along ways we can agree more readily with.

I just lament this pathetic attempt to cast any individual who doesn’t go as far as someone wants them to as a shill for xyz.

There is a J Peterson thread https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-61725...pid1991951

We compiled 126 pages of comments and plenty of links proving that Peterson is the equivelent of Ben Shapiro kind of "opposition". He is allowed to talk reason as the outermost element to the right thus working as a form of a gatekeeper especially when his political advice is conerned.

His personal life advice, feminism comments as well as other topics are more or less fine. Also there are other incosistencies within his life proving that he wasn't some kind of scientific class member of the elite, but more a useful intellectual who helps a few and stops more men from turntng to the real right which might stop the destruction of the West. Because he won't be doing any of that. In certain topics he is clearly intellectually dishonest, because he is still a leftie liberal, just someone who is more sane. After a time you know exactly what those topics are and they are not dissimilar to the ones pushed by Ben Shapiro.
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2019 02:19 PM by Simeon_Strangelight.)
09-09-2019 02:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
Kid Twist, Leonard D Neubache, Yatagan, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Sankt Michael, Dismal Operator
catoblepa Offline
Chubby Chaser
**

Posts: 279
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 2
Post: #98
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Men are experiencing financial insecurity, women the hardest hit

[Image: EEBQ5ifXsAEi_QB?format=png&amp;name=small]
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2019 02:37 PM by catoblepa.)
09-09-2019 02:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 15 users Like catoblepa's post:
Tactician, jeffreyjerpp, Enoch, Renzy, beta_plus, CynicalContrarian, Leonard D Neubache, spokepoker, Simeon_Strangelight, billbudsocket, Buck Wild, Isaac Jordan, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, gework, Sankt Michael
Eazy_E Offline
Game Denialist

Posts: 68
Joined: Jul 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #99
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
Women don't want to marry broke men. Men don't want to marry fat women. Divorce rape is real. All are growing exponentially.

Meanwhile, the state pays Somalis, Syrians, and Mexicans handsomely to have large families.

Maybe it's not a conspiracy, but a lot of this meshes together really well.
09-09-2019 03:00 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 9 users Like Eazy_E's post:
Enoch, wwtl, Transsimian, beta_plus, Avon Barksdale, Aurini, JiggyLordJr, Buck Wild, PrimeTime32
Chad's Day Off Offline
Banned

Posts: 51
Joined: Jul 2019
Post: #100
RE: "Economically Unattractive" Men to Blame For Low Marriage Rate
(09-09-2019 02:18 PM)Simeon_Strangelight Wrote:  
(09-09-2019 09:43 AM)david.garrett84 Wrote:  
(09-09-2019 08:18 AM)AntoniusofEfa Wrote:  I believe that JP is on (((their))) side, and therefore he was not taken down.

If it’s so damn easy and Peterson is either a sellout or “Zionist asset”, in your view, how come you are not a public figure who publicly trumpets how he is a member of this forum to his employer and clients? To neighbors? To society at large?

Peterson is a shill, you say, out there with his name and reputation directly on the line, so what does that make everyone else on this forum aside from a few like Roosh?

You have ideological purity, Antonious, precisely because you can write here using a Latin pseudonym without major repercussions. I perfectly understand why you would do this, by the way. But for the love of God pause next time before you cast ridiculous aspersions, the substance of which you will never apply even 1% to yourself.

As a UoT professor and infinitely published academic, Peterson does have a safer reputation than 99.9% of people challenging the status quo, that’s true. It does not, however, shift the reality that only people like Orban Viktor in Hungary and Nigel Farage in Britain are doing more than him to shape public discourse and social and political outcomes along ways we can agree more readily with.

I just lament this pathetic attempt to cast any individual who doesn’t go as far as someone wants them to as a shill for xyz.

There is a J Peterson thread https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-61725...pid1991951

We compiled 126 pages of comments and plenty of links proving that Peterson is the equivelent of Ben Shapiro kind of "opposition". He is allowed to talk reason as the outermost element to the right thus working as a form of a gatekeeper especially when his political advice is conerned.

His personal life advice, feminism comments as well as other topics are more or less fine. Also there are other incosistencies within his life proving that he wasn't some kind of scientific class member of the elite, but more a useful intellectual who helps a few and stops more men from turntng to the real right which might stop the destruction of the West. Because he won't be doing any of that. In certain topics he is clearly intellectually dishonest, because he is still a leftie liberal, just someone who is more sane. After a time you know exactly what those topics are and they are not dissimilar to the ones pushed by Ben Shapiro.

There is a JBP thread, just as there is a Trump thread. But both are characterized by groupthink. If you don’t want to admit that much, there’s not much point in having this discussion.

You wanna say he’s controlled opposition? His rise to prominence was the tranny issue. Remember that? He risked prison time to defy the state and the SJWs, that is 99.9% more than almost any guy on the forum has. Everyone here is posting under pseudonyms, and I’ve met very few militant red pill men in my life, and usually they’re not on forums… JBP is the Tommy Robinson of academia. Tommy has gone to jail but I’m having trouble thinking of many alt-right figures that have.

And this is where I think the animosity comes from: JBP preaches a message very different from the alt-right. The alt-right preaches victimhood and JBP does not. How does alt-right recruit? They prey on men’s insecurities just like porn producers do for women. Of course some guys that are alt-right don’t like him, because he’s their competition. JBP says the solution to the problem you have, lies within yourself. Many in the alt right say the solution is to repress some group, or say basking in their victimization is the answer.

I can’t have rational discussions with black pillars. They decided long ago they were going to throw themselves a pity party and intellectually masturbate about things they can’t control.

JBP isn’t a lefty liberal, he is a classical liberal. Big difference.

Ben Shapiro also never puts his money where his mouth is. To say they’re on the same level is a bit ridiculous.

And perhaps it would better to ask what about JBP's message is anti-masculine or how his message is not beneficial for men... Has JBP made any men's lives worse because they listened to him? Have you met a man that follows JBP whose life went to s*** once he started following his advice? I suspect JBP has saved a lot of men from suicide, drug abuse, darkness, and violent lashing out? Is that why you have a problem with him. Keep in mind men are our fellow brothers. Think, before you spout out your answer.

I'm also starting to think we need a copy-pasta for JBP haters, "JBP is a controlled opposition Jewish shill who refuses to talk about Jews."

I also find shill, controlled opposition arguments to be a bit vacuous. Everyone's a shill if they fail to 100 percent agree with you in this current day and age. What happened to nuance. Men behaving like women, deny, deflect, and blame others on spurious charges that have little basis or are just impulsive claims without any argumentative backing.
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2019 05:19 PM by Chad's Day Off.)
09-09-2019 04:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 9 users Like Chad's Day Off's post:
Transsimian, Jacob Rast, Days of Broken Arrows, jselysianeagle, Swordfish1010, Buck Wild, Isaac Jordan, Sankt Michael, Dismal Operator
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  US birth rate falls to record low Parlay44 17 8,000 06-10-2019 10:02 PM
Last Post: beta_plus
  Explaining Sex Rate Changes lookslikeit 1 853 04-08-2019 03:04 AM
Last Post: kinjutsu
  Millennials Are Causing the U.S. Divorce Rate to Plummet Kamikaze 39 4,335 11-30-2018 09:54 PM
Last Post: Waqqle

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication