Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
Author Message
Going strong Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 4,141
Joined: Sep 2014
Reputation: 85
Post: #1
An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
Inspired by Hunter Biden's lurid shenanigans ( https://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-74151.html ) Dodgy, I researched the matter - at first reluctantly but then with interest - and discovered that, in History, there actually are examples of civilizations allowing (or requiring under some circumstances) a surviving brother to marry the widow of his recently deceased brother.

https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/ent...e_Marriage

"Levirate marriage is a type of marriage in which a woman marries one of her husband's brothers after her husband's death. The term is a derivative of the Latin word levir, meaning "husband's brother."

Levirate marriage has been practiced by societies with a strong clan structure in which exogamous marriage—martial unions outside of the clan—was forbidden. It is best known from stories in the Hebrew Bible, where it was practiced among the early Israelites. In Jewish tradition, the most famous levirate marriages took place in the family of Judah, whose daughter-in-law Tamar ultimately married Judah himself after two previous marriages resulted in the deaths of her husbands. The story of Ruth and Boaz describes a derivative form of levirate marriage, involving relatives more distant than brothers. Later and current Jewish tradition allows for the parties to opt out of levirate marriage through a process known as halizah.

Levirate marriage is or was also known in many other societies, including the Punjabis, Jats, Huns, Apache, Mongols, and Tibetans. Some, but by no means all, cultures that practice levirate marriage also practice the related custom of soroate marriage, in which a deceased wife’s sister marries the dead woman's husband.
"

So, those were called Levirate marriages. Well, what do you think of them and the old cultures and often lost civilizations that enabled these marriages? Can we learn something from their ancient wisdom, or should we just dismiss their peculiarities?

[Image: judah_tamar.jpg]
^Judah and Tamar
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tamar_(Genesis)
(This post was last modified: 09-27-2019 04:02 PM by Going strong.)
09-27-2019 03:54 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Going strong's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, BlueMark, RoastBeefCurtains4Me
BlueMark Offline
Woodpecker
**
Gold Member

Posts: 458
Joined: Jul 2017
Reputation: 15
Post: #2
RE: An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
This only seems like an oddity to our "enlightened" modern sensibilities because we have lost sight of the original purpose of marriage: to ensure paternity-based inheritance. In other words, to make sure that when a man dies, his property will be passed down to those who have his genes.

In light of that original goal, it makes perfect sense: practices like Levirate marriage is a further insurance policy in case a man gets married but dies before having any children, or maybe before having a son.

Today we have replaced all that with the modern state to take care of children and the elderly, while we are taught to think of marriage as for love and companionship.

What a man can be, he must be. --Abraham Maslow
09-27-2019 06:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like BlueMark's post:
Going strong, Leonard D Neubache, billbudsocket, Benoit, Buck Wild, Hypno
RoastBeefCurtains4Me Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,534
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 28
Post: #3
RE: An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
My brother has a fine wife, but I'm not interested in having her if he dies.

I'm the tower of power, too sweet to be sour. I'm funky like a monkey. Sky's the limit and space is the place!
-Randy Savage
09-27-2019 08:22 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like RoastBeefCurtains4Me's post:
Bienvenuto, Going strong, Leonard D Neubache, Buck Wild
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 18,938
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 218
Post: #4
RE: An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
That's not so strange. Men died early in previous times - not only as warriors, but due to sickness, dangerous travel etc.

Women without a husband faced poverty and hardship. So marrying your brother's wife was the legal precdent of securing her future.
09-28-2019 06:18 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
Leonard D Neubache, Buck Wild, Going strong
Bienvenuto Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,115
Joined: Mar 2017
Reputation: 25
Post: #5
RE: An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
From a Christian theological point of view this is interesting..

From History

Catherine of Aragon was the first wife of King Henry VIII; she was previously Princess of Wales as the wife of Henry's elder brother, Arthur.

Catherine was three years old when she was betrothed to Arthur, Prince of Wales, heir apparent to the English throne. They married in 1501, but Arthur died five months later.

To settle the matter, it was agreed that Catherine would marry Henry VII's second son, Arthur's brother, - Henry, Duke of York, who was five years younger than she was.

Marriage to Arthur's brother depended on the Pope granting a dispensation because canon law forbade a man to marry his brother's widow (Lev. 18:16[a]).

Catherine testified that her marriage to Arthur was never consummated as, also according to canon law, a marriage was not valid until consummated.


5 months of marriage and No Sex? Hmmm..

Leviticus 18:16 King James Version (KJV). 16 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of thy brother's wife: it is thy brother's nakedness.

Leviticus 18:16-18 New International Version (NIV). 16 “'Do not have sexual relations with your brother's wife; that would dishonor your brother."
09-28-2019 11:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Bienvenuto's post:
Going strong
NoMoreTO Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 878
Joined: Jan 2018
Reputation: 15
Post: #6
RE: An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
If you're gonna be a White Knight and raise someone elses' kids, they might as well be your brothers.

In Ancient times Jewish men could have multiple wives also, so it wouldn't limit you having your own wife.

On the other side of the coin, these women may have had no one who would take them in the old days, especially with children, from a 'Darwinian' perspective the kids would be seen as liabilities.

“Where the danger is, so grows the saving element.” ~ German poet Hoelderlin
09-28-2019 01:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes NoMoreTO's post:
Going strong
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 18,938
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 218
Post: #7
RE: An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
We also have to remember that up until the early 20th century there was generally a shortage of marriageable men. So even in socities which stressed monogamy a few exceptions were made.

Gender-ratio has multiple effects in society that are missed. When you have female shortage, then even feminism likely would be 80% less effective in the West. Consider that female behavior changes instantly when entering a sausage-fest nightclub - and that is just the instant reaction. Male shortages are generally good for society on all accounts and strengthen the patriarchy as well as good behavior - obviously on top of a good monogamous framework. Even an extra wife married is forgivable in this general circumstance.
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2019 02:10 PM by Simeon_Strangelight.)
09-28-2019 02:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Simeon_Strangelight's post:
NoMoreTO, Going strong
Mage Offline
Banned

Posts: 2,859
Joined: Jul 2011
Post: #8
RE: An oddity of History and religion: Levirate marriages.
I have always been a proponent of this system. It is like middle ground between strict monogamy and polygamy, which both have pros and cons.

Today the society with all the single moms hanging around practices serial monogamy, which is even worse then open polygamy. Clearly strict monogamy is not working without strictly enforced religious code. Completely unrestricted polygamy on the other hand would lead to unstable society with too much angry unmarried men.


I theorize that solution would be a system with monogamy on basis, but with the charitable option for each monogamous couple to take in another 2nd wife with her kids from a deceased or absent husband. Blood relation is not that important. This charitable couple would have to prove to be financially and psychologically ready to do that.

Everyone would gain something, but also would have to give something back:

- The husband would get some sexual variety but would have to be ready to feed 2x women and children.
- The first wife would get a domestic helper and a female friend, but would have to sacrifice some pride. Actually she could get more exclusive romantic time with husband if the 2nd wife takes time to watch children of both women.
- 2nd wife would not be lonely and would get a man, both for sex and financial support, but would have to recognize her subordination to the 1st wife.
- children of 2nd wife would have father figure, would not have to tolerate the endless pumpers and dumpers of their mother, they gain the most.
- children of 1st wife would lose some temporal resources that would otherwise be spent only on them, but could gain new brothers and sisters for life. They probably gain the least, therefore this option would have to be open only for wealthy families.
- society (provided it is not suicidal like modern west) would make sure no womb stays empty and birthrates go up.

It would be a good system, there are some ill chance it would be misused but so does the standard monogamous marriage anyway.

Of course for this system to work marriage laws would have to change drastically, generally they would have to favor men more and either completely abolish divorce and alimony or make them much more just.
(This post was last modified: 09-28-2019 02:43 PM by Mage.)
09-28-2019 02:34 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Mage's post:
Going strong
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  "Arab world turns its back on religion" Blake2 28 4,322 08-03-2019 12:15 AM
Last Post: for.petes.sake
  Alternative to marriages. Are they worth it? AOC's Missing Boyfriend 28 2,893 05-05-2019 11:08 PM
Last Post: Stealth
  The Worst PUA In All History (is from RSD) Dolo 20 16,626 03-25-2019 07:53 PM
Last Post: Alpone

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication