I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Author Message
Dr. Howard Away
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,191
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 77
Post: #151
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 07:11 PM)DariusQuintus Wrote:  Where else do you see a man of God who also sells pornographic memoirs?

Who finds God through psychedelics?

You either respect him or yourself.

I'm out of here.

[Image: giphy.gif]

rage quits on same day he joins the forum?

Why do the heathen rage and the people imagine a vain thing? Psalm 2:1 KJV
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2019 07:50 PM by Dr. Howard.)
11-01-2019 07:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 10 users Like Dr. Howard's post:
Tactician, rotekz, Leonard D Neubache, VNvet, wwtl, Latan, Jones, balybary, debeguiled, Kingsley Davis
VNvet Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 384
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 4
Post: #152
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 05:55 PM)DariusQuintus Wrote:  If you want to get laid but can't, you're an incel. No excuses!

Using incel as a shaming insult? Do you come from HuffPost? Do you wear a small hat?

C'mon man.
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2019 07:54 PM by VNvet.)
11-01-2019 07:51 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like VNvet's post:
rotekz, 911, Latan, Kingsley Davis
wwtl Offline
Banned

Posts: 525
Joined: May 2019
Post: #153
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 06:08 PM)Athanasius Wrote:  Yes, you should pursue debt-free, virgin, Christian women w/no tattoos who desire to submit. In fact, if a woman claims to be a Christian and mocks the ideal of this, then that alone is a red flag.

The ultimate red flag is if she actually chooses to marry someone with an account on any fornication forum.

That's the fallacy resulting from slut abundance: Assuming these exclusive goods are actually available to experienced fornicators and can be "pursued" by them.
11-01-2019 07:57 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes wwtl's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Vladimir Poontang Offline
Pelican
****

Posts: 1,687
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 30
Post: #154
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
All these bannings are breaking my heart. Someone make it stop!

That's not how we do things in Russia, comrade.

http://inspiredentrepreneur.weebly.com/
11-01-2019 08:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Vladimir Poontang's post:
RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Latan, Handsome Creepy Eel, jordypip23, Kingsley Davis
Kurgan Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 719
Joined: Nov 2016
Reputation: 3
Post: #155
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 12:27 PM)Buddydowrongright2 Wrote:  Christians versus atheists is a very strange and in my opinion tragic turn for this group to take. Like we have all become crabs in a bucket trying to crawl over each other to get out -
meanwhile the bucket is about to get dumped into boiling water and all of us destroyed in the bargain. While I will probably get banned or warned for this comment I feel it necessary to plead to you all - those who have given it all up to God as well as those who do not believe God exists - not to grow so short-sighted as to suddenly forget that the reason we are here is because leftists in our societies kickstarted a slow but almost certain decline and not a single one of us hasn’t felt the pinch in some way or another. I personally wish we could leave the scoldy Christian versus hella snarky atheist shit on* Facebook in 2010 where it belongs. But I am not disregarding anyone’s beliefs; that isn’t the point. You can believe or disbelieve in anything you want. But nuking one’s allies has never been a winning strategy. That is all.

Thank you, I think the decision is going to alienate good men who might or might believe in God. It seems to be a litmus test of what defines a man. Plus, with the restrictions on speech, it sounds like something the enemy would do.
11-01-2019 08:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Kurgan's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel
Sadstate Offline
Banned

Posts: 2
Joined: Nov 2019
Post: #156
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Roosh has every right to seek God and make his forum whatever he wants it to be, and I really think he's doing it in good faith, but I'd be lying if I wasn't resentful af about it.

Changing this forum into the Rod and Todd Flanders Foundation isn't going to do anything to this culture. You can act with 'morals' but women sure as shit ain't changing. They're still going to be the alpha fucking beta bucking sluts they've always been, whether you go to Church or not. So go ahead and castrate yourselves thinking it will bring peace. It won't.

We all want to live happily ever after with a traditional wife in a sane world, but that fantasy is dead and long gone.

Forums like these are the only male safe spaces we have left and some of us really struggle just to get out of bed. To come here and read that it's a Christian-only website with no more talk about finding intimacy with women, which is one of the last things some of us have ever had boils my blood. So fuck you and your 3 or 4 digit notch counts.

Before acting so morally righteous, how many women have you stolen out of the arms of other men? How many good men have been fucked out of a family because you decided to sleep with the wife? How many bored-out-of-their-minds Christian housewives have you guys fucked in the ass while their dutiful husbands went to work?

I guess what I'm really saying behind this wall of expletives is...take me with you on your road to peace...but I know the ideal life with an ideal wife in ideal times can never exist...not in this fucked up world.
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2019 09:08 PM by Sadstate.)
11-01-2019 09:05 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Sadstate's post:
Kurgan, roberto, Handsome Creepy Eel
Rocha Online
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,603
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 73
Post: #157
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 07:57 PM)wwtl Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 06:08 PM)Athanasius Wrote:  Yes, you should pursue debt-free, virgin, Christian women w/no tattoos who desire to submit. In fact, if a woman claims to be a Christian and mocks the ideal of this, then that alone is a red flag.

The ultimate red flag is if she actually chooses to marry someone with an account on any fornication forum.

That's the fallacy resulting from slut abundance: Assuming these exclusive goods are actually available to experienced fornicators and can be "pursued" by them.

Well, I have to say that you are the best troll ever on rfv.

Good job sir.

"Поехали!!" (Yuri Gagarin, 1961)

Twitter - Роча
11-01-2019 09:38 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 7 users Like Rocha's post:
TooFineAPoint, RWIsrael, Beyond Borders, Dream Medicine, zoom, wi30, Wutang
BlackFriar Away
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 761
Joined: Aug 2015
Reputation: 9
Post: #158
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
What?


Attached File(s) Image(s)
   
11-01-2019 09:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,890
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 210
Post: #159
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 10:39 AM)Scorpio Rising Wrote:  ...
It is sad to see what is happening here. So much bad advice given by people who are either trolls or in no position to be giving anyone advice.
...

Who are you, anyway?

Seems like if you had any decent advice to give you had four years to give it and didn't bother.

Thanks for turning up when all you could contribute was bitching about the forum moving forward.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
11-01-2019 10:04 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
Sword and Board, wwtl, 911, RWIsrael, rotekz
Sword and Board Offline
Robin
*

Posts: 190
Joined: May 2019
Reputation: 4
Post: #160
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 09:41 PM)Supreme Gentleman Wrote:  How do I embed this picture of a filthy Jewish cunt?
https://pasteboard.co/IEKU8pi.png

They are the Synagogue of Satan!

Troll

The trolls have gone to defcon 1

"No Roosh stop leading the goyim to Christianity, politics and exposing Zionism. Go back to being about banging sluts and leading men to debauchery"

(09-19-2019 04:19 AM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  You cannot win playing in the enemy's house by the enemy's rules with the enemy acting as referee.
11-01-2019 10:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Sword and Board's post:
911, rotekz, Dr. Howard, Kingsley Davis
Sadstate Offline
Banned

Posts: 2
Joined: Nov 2019
Post: #161
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Go ahead and get married you pussies, cause this is what's in store for you.

See the cluster of traits on the left hand side? You know, the ones that 'God' always preaches? Goodness, good father, good husband, loyalty, intellience? Women despise that, so enjoy literally being cucked for the narcissistic clowns on the right.

It's not degenerate society, it's not social media, it's not the left, women have always been like this. With hypergamy greater than ever, it's the worst time to abandon game.

[Image: 8-Figure1-1.png]


If you decide to get married in an age where whoredom is at an all time high, I wish you the best, but to me it's a mistake.
11-01-2019 10:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Aceto Balsamico Offline
Banned

Posts: 27
Joined: Dec 2018
Post: #162
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Your religion is like your dick. It's good to have one but you're not supposed to take it out of your pants and swing it to anybody's face like that.
11-01-2019 10:20 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Aceto Balsamico's post:
Latan, Handsome Creepy Eel
Enhanced Eddie Offline
Woodpecker
**
Gold Member

Posts: 344
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 21
Post: #163
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Quote:Goodness, good father, good husband, loyalty, intellience? Women despise that, so enjoy literally being cucked for the narcissistic clowns on the right.

Has already been answered by Going Strong on page 3:

Quote:The future is in God and tribe. And, considering, guns and gold. And a good untattoed girl by your side.

You need to find a girl who has those same values. And then keep her in check.
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2019 10:24 PM by Enhanced Eddie.)
11-01-2019 10:23 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Enhanced Eddie's post:
911
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,890
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 210
Post: #164
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 12:27 PM)Buddydowrongright2 Wrote:  Christians versus atheists is a very strange and in my opinion tragic turn for this group to take. Like we have all become crabs in a bucket trying to crawl over each other to get out -
meanwhile the bucket is about to get dumped into boiling water and all of us destroyed in the bargain. While I will probably get banned or warned for this comment I feel it necessary to plead to you all - those who have given it all up to God as well as those who do not believe God exists - not to grow so short-sighted as to suddenly forget that the reason we are here is because leftists in our societies kickstarted a slow but almost certain decline and not a single one of us hasn’t felt the pinch in some way or another. I personally wish we could leave the scoldy Christian versus hella snarky atheist shit on* Facebook in 2010 where it belongs. But I am not disregarding anyone’s beliefs; that isn’t the point. You can believe or disbelieve in anything you want. But nuking one’s allies has never been a winning strategy. That is all.

We were never here because of Left wing tyranny. We just happened to become the target of it, and not because we were Right wing. The forum was decidedly Left of center, just not far enough for the tastes of the extremists, and if you have any doubt about that then I want you to put yourself in the position of a man in the 1950's watching a group of men discussing strategies to fuck his daughter same day after approaching her on the street, and then tell me again what a magnificent bastion of rebellion against "the Left" we were.

As for winning strategies, bitching about the Left on an internet forum is not a winning strategy whether 10 people are doing it or 10,000. What you were experiencing was a delusion of grandeur and relevance. No offence by that. It's what we all felt.

Time to wake up.

Your "allies" are people that will take you in when you have a communist death-squad tracking your ass. Everything else is just smoke of varying density. If you think that a bunch of guys complaining on the internet scares the Left then you have utterly zero idea of what's coming down the line.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2019 10:26 PM by Leonard D Neubache.)
11-01-2019 10:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
VNvet, wwtl, 911, rotekz, Handsome Creepy Eel, Kingsley Davis
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,890
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 210
Post: #165
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 10:12 PM)Sadstate Wrote:  Go ahead and get married you pussies, cause this is what's in store for you.

See the cluster of traits on the left hand side? You know, the ones that 'God' always preaches? Goodness, good father, good husband, loyalty, intellience? Women despise that, so enjoy literally being cucked for the narcissistic clowns on the right.

It's not degenerate society, it's not social media, it's not the left, women have always been like this. With hypergamy greater than ever, it's the worst time to abandon game.

[Image: 8-Figure1-1.png]


If you decide to get married in an age where whoredom is at an all time high, I wish you the best, but to me it's a mistake.

Congratulations, slow kid. With this one chart you can extrapolate how to get a woman and then keep her. Unfortunately retards will have trouble figuring it out.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
11-01-2019 10:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
Enhanced Eddie, VNvet, wwtl, Tactician
mr_ks Offline
Sparrow

Posts: 118
Joined: Jun 2019
Reputation: 0
Post: #166
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
That graph has problems.

Arrogance and Physical Attractiveness should both correlate with intelligence. Good looking people are intelligent.

Few people can be arrogant and confrontative over a period of time unless they have some real intelligence/skills/abilities with which to back it up.
11-01-2019 10:39 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like mr_ks's post:
roberto, wwtl
TooFineAPoint Offline
Pelican
****

Posts: 1,508
Joined: Nov 2014
Reputation: 17
Post: #167
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 09:38 PM)Rocha Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 07:57 PM)wwtl Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 06:08 PM)Athanasius Wrote:  Yes, you should pursue debt-free, virgin, Christian women w/no tattoos who desire to submit. In fact, if a woman claims to be a Christian and mocks the ideal of this, then that alone is a red flag.

The ultimate red flag is if she actually chooses to marry someone with an account on any fornication forum.

That's the fallacy resulting from slut abundance: Assuming these exclusive goods are actually available to experienced fornicators and can be "pursued" by them.

Well, I have to say that you are the best troll ever on rfv.

Good job sir.

Truth. I begrudgingly tip my hat.

He/she's almost given up the game in this thread though, with nearly a post to match every other contributor.
11-02-2019 12:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes TooFineAPoint's post:
Rocha
Delta Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 940
Joined: Jan 2016
Reputation: 23
Post: #168
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
What I used to love about this place was the atmosphere of free thinking. In the midst of a politically correct outrage culture, this was a sanctuary where we could feel safe speaking uncomfortable truths and exploring original ideas. This place was tremendously helpful in my journey of learning to navigate this world, and particularly the dating scene.

But at this point, it's safe to say the freethinking atmosphere is thoroughly demolished. If I'm not welcome here unless I can convince myself that the mythology of ancient Israel was actually revelation from the creator of the universe, then so be it.

The lessons I learned here will stay with me for life, and for that I am ever grateful. Good luck to you all.
11-02-2019 12:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Delta's post:
TooFineAPoint, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Latan, Handsome Creepy Eel
wwtl Offline
Banned

Posts: 525
Joined: May 2019
Post: #169
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 10:12 PM)Sadstate Wrote:  Go ahead and get married you pussies, cause this is what's in store for you.

See the cluster of traits on the left hand side? You know, the ones that 'God' always preaches? Goodness, good father, good husband, loyalty, intellience? Women despise that, so enjoy literally being cucked for the narcissistic clowns on the right.

These are not polar opposites. My outer appearance represents the right cluster, while my inner value system represents the left cluster. Just let me add "radiating sexual energy" on the right and "abstinent with zero thirst" on the left of the chart to complete it.

From my experience I can tell, that girls actually appreciate all these traits. And if they happen to appear both in the same man, it drives them completely insane.

Quote:It's not degenerate society, it's not social media, it's not the left, women have always been like this. With hypergamy greater than ever, it's the worst time to abandon game.

[Image: 8-Figure1-1.png]

If you decide to get married in an age where whoredom is at an all time high, I wish you the best, but to me it's a mistake.

Getting married and creating a family seems to be the hardest challenge ever for a white man in the 21st century clown world. That's why I intend to tackle it. Without being a millionaire and a legal team to back me up, only with the help of God.
11-02-2019 02:58 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
wwtl Offline
Banned

Posts: 525
Joined: May 2019
Post: #170
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 12:39 AM)TooFineAPoint Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 09:38 PM)Rocha Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 07:57 PM)wwtl Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 06:08 PM)Athanasius Wrote:  Yes, you should pursue debt-free, virgin, Christian women w/no tattoos who desire to submit. In fact, if a woman claims to be a Christian and mocks the ideal of this, then that alone is a red flag.

The ultimate red flag is if she actually chooses to marry someone with an account on any fornication forum.

That's the fallacy resulting from slut abundance: Assuming these exclusive goods are actually available to experienced fornicators and can be "pursued" by them.

Well, I have to say that you are the best troll ever on rfv.

Good job sir.

Truth. I begrudgingly tip my hat.

He/she's almost given up the game in this thread though, with nearly a post to match every other contributor.

Let me ask one question: How many traditional, religious, loyal to their tribe, virgin women do you believe engage with a foreigner traveling a multitude of countries looking for the "tradwife" experience after accumulating three digits of notches?
11-02-2019 03:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Vladimir Poontang Offline
Pelican
****

Posts: 1,687
Joined: Feb 2017
Reputation: 30
Post: #171
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Unfortunately a lot of people are going to feel like they can't say what they really think, express themselves how they want, have frank conversations and be real. Some will decide that saying nothing is more dignified than sanitizing their views, while many will pretend to be ok with the changes and embrace the groupthink. A lot of posters who have been around a long time and contributed a lot are going to get banned, which won't go unnoticed.

There's a fine line between avoiding chaos and everyone censoring themselves. I don't think it's good to feel like you have to watch every word you say, even if it means avoiding conflicts. Being offended is part of life, and I see no reason why anyone would think that men can't work things out with minimum drama and tantrums.

That's not how we do things in Russia, comrade.

http://inspiredentrepreneur.weebly.com/
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2019 06:42 AM by Vladimir Poontang.)
11-02-2019 06:34 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Vladimir Poontang's post:
N°6, Latan, Handsome Creepy Eel
Days of Broken Arrows Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,023
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 210
Post: #172
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Every space on the Web has an anti-blasphemy rule, enforced by either Big Tech or current day public opinion. They just don't call it that.

Get on Facebook and talk honestly about American women -- about how you dislike obesity and tattoos. Then get on Twitter and cite honest crime statistic as they pertain to racial minorities.

Then go on either of these platforms and mention how AIDS remains a gay disease and it never exploded into the hetero population like the media said it would. Say that gay sex = a death sentence because the average gay man has countless sex partners over a lifetime.

What happens then? You get struck down for "blasphemy" under its new name "political correctness" or its other idiotic new name "wokeness." Then you cast out of polite society.

Our culture no longer recognizes blasphemy as it pertains to God. Instead we've designed a system where some humans (and only some) can commit blasphemy against some select groups.

This is not the American in which I grew up. And -- as I said at the beginning of this thread -- the forum's new blasphemy rule takes us back to the old America of the pre-1990s. Unless I'm missing something (and correct me here if I am), this rule brings us back to the way you behaved in school and the workplace in the old days.

This is the America where you didn't take the Lord's name in vain in front of your grandparents or World War II veteran boss. Where you didn't insult people for being religious or having beliefs. Where you didn't "celebrate" things you know you old aunts would have deemed "sinful."

If given a choice, I'd go with this America. Sure, it had its flaws. Maybe it was close-minded to a degree. But compared to what we have now? Ha! It was a bastion of free thought and expression. If the media did away with politically correct blasphemy and put the new forum rule into place, we'd have an honest media.
11-02-2019 06:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 16 users Like Days of Broken Arrows's post:
wwtl, RIslander, Latan, Roosh, roberto, arafat scarf, Leonard D Neubache, Gimlet, 911, balybary, Handsome Creepy Eel, Tactician, Kingsley Davis, Polniy_Sostav, infinitejest, Samseau
rockoman Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 330
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 7
Post: #173
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 03:46 AM)wwtl Wrote:  
(11-02-2019 12:39 AM)TooFineAPoint Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 09:38 PM)Rocha Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 07:57 PM)wwtl Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 06:08 PM)Athanasius Wrote:  Yes, you should pursue debt-free, virgin, Christian women w/no tattoos who desire to submit. In fact, if a woman claims to be a Christian and mocks the ideal of this, then that alone is a red flag.

The ultimate red flag is if she actually chooses to marry someone with an account on any fornication forum.

That's the fallacy resulting from slut abundance: Assuming these exclusive goods are actually available to experienced fornicators and can be "pursued" by them.

Well, I have to say that you are the best troll ever on rfv.

Good job sir.

Truth. I begrudgingly tip my hat.

He/she's almost given up the game in this thread though, with nearly a post to match every other contributor.

Let me ask one question: How many traditional, religious, loyal to their tribe, virgin women do you believe engage with a foreigner traveling a multitude of countries looking for the "tradwife" experience after accumulating three digits of notches?

If there were official surveys on the subject, then I'm sure that no women would admit to being ready to engage with such a man.

Anecdotal evidence and the record of history tells us that plenty of women are ready to do just that.

It depends on the particular circumstances of the case and what that foreign man can bring to the table.

I do understand where you are coming from, but successful action demands dealing with the world as it is.

The most successful societies do not deny the reality of female hypergamy or of male promiscuity but they certainly don't give it free rein either - as we have done. Rather, they set boundaries and canalize male nature and female nature in productive directions, balancing rights and responsibilities, balancing the individual and society.

The social wreckage that we all see around us is a consequence of the breakneck speed of technological and economic forces over the past 150 years or so. These have torn asunder the pre-existing social fabric and turned loose hypergamy and promiscuity.

The, as yet, unanswered questions are:

Will a new sustainable social equilibrium be found?

- and if so, where?

“The world is what it is; men who are nothing, who allow themselves to become nothing, have no place in it.”

- V.S Naipaul 'A Bend in the river'
11-02-2019 07:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
d'Aversa Offline
Sparrow

Posts: 112
Joined: Oct 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #174
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 07:51 PM)VNvet Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 05:55 PM)DariusQuintus Wrote:  If you want to get laid but can't, you're an incel. No excuses!
Using incel as a shaming insult?

Using this word should be met with an immediate bitchslap.
11-02-2019 07:30 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like d'Aversa's post:
Days of Broken Arrows, Kingsley Davis
rockoman Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 330
Joined: Dec 2016
Reputation: 7
Post: #175
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 06:57 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  Every space on the Web has an anti-blasphemy rule, enforced by either Big Tech or current day public opinion. They just don't call it that.

Get on Facebook and talk honestly about American women -- about how you dislike obesity and tattoos. Then get on Twitter and cite honest crime statistic as they pertain to racial minorities.

Then go on either of these platforms and mention how AIDS remains a gay disease and it never exploded into the hetero population like the media said it would. Say that gay sex = a death sentence because the average gay man has countless sex partners over a lifetime.

What happens then? You get struck down for "blasphemy" under its new name "political correctness" or its other idiotic new name "wokeness." Then you cast out of polite society.

Our culture no longer recognizes blasphemy as it pertains to God. Instead we've designed a system where some humans (and only some) can commit blasphemy against some select groups.

This is not the American in which I grew up. And -- as I said at the beginning of this thread -- the forum's new blasphemy rule takes us back to the old America of the pre-1990s. Unless I'm missing something (and correct me here if I am), this rule brings us back to the way you behaved in school and the workplace in the old days.

This is the America where you didn't take the Lord's name in vain in front of your grandparents or World War II veteran boss. Where you didn't insult people for being religious or having beliefs. Where you didn't "celebrate" things you know you old aunts would have deemed "sinful."

If given a choice, I'd go with this America. Sure, it had its flaws. Maybe it was close-minded to a degree. But compared to what we have now? Ha! It was a bastion of free thought and expression. If the media did away with politically correct blasphemy and put the new forum rule into place, we'd have an honest media.

Absolutely - when you question PC ideology you are committing blasphemy.

Isn't it interesting that the 'woke' political correctness of today is strongest precisely in those countries: the Anglosphere, Germany, Netherlands and Scandinavia, where that godfearing Protestant attitude you describe was so common?

The PC ideology-complex - with its incessant virtue-signalling - perhaps.represents the secularisation of that attitude.

Political correctness was present 'in embryo' within those Protestant cultures. Its pedigree can be traced back along the line of Progressive thought to the 16th Century.

“The world is what it is; men who are nothing, who allow themselves to become nothing, have no place in it.”

- V.S Naipaul 'A Bend in the river'
11-02-2019 07:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like rockoman's post:
Days of Broken Arrows, wwtl, RoastBeefCurtains4Me
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  November 3 In Seattle Twigg 12 1,985 11-07-2019 11:49 AM
Last Post: Salinger
  Is Neanderthal DNA the reason why Europeans rule the world? Trumpian 320 30,730 07-04-2019 01:06 AM
Last Post: 911
  The John F. Kennedy (JFK) assassination thread - 22 November 1963 Mercenary 212 76,876 01-06-2019 05:41 PM
Last Post: Max RNR

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication