I'm Touring The United States! Starting in June, I'm conducting private events in 23 American cities. Click here for full details.

Post Reply 
New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Author Message
Teedub Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,204
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 82
Post: #201
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Never thought I'd ever be writing this but I just came back from a family friendly LDS/Mormon church event after being approached by two missionaries about a month ago. It was great! Everyone was so genuinely nice. It was incredibly pleasant to have a fun, enjoyably evening without alcohol present.

One of the perks according to one 50 year old former gun runner (legit) was that as a man in my early 30s at their singles events I would have my pick of that age right down to early 20s so perhaps I'd be joining (a long way off) for the wrong reasons, but it's a legitimate perk in a country where nice, wholesome girls are so hard to find.

I've craved being a part of something for some time and doing the rounds in the Tommy R > Alt Right scene didn't fill me with anything but more anger. I don't know the route I'll go, but I think a turn to faith rather than fringe politics is better for my soul and mental wellbeing. Perhaps there's somewhat of a Christian revival movement in the West of which Kanye is a small part of, or perhaps those missionaries was Devine intervention.

The things you own end up owning you.
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2019 04:27 PM by Teedub.)
11-02-2019 04:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 13 users Like Teedub's post:
redbeard, VNvet, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Leonard D Neubache, infowarrior1, 911, Handsome Creepy Eel, Tactician, Syberpunk, debeguiled, Polniy_Sostav, Dismal Operator, Samseau
Rush87 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,398
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 26
Post: #202
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Same selection rules still apply to girls of faith. Knowing countless women from church, they aren't as wholesome as the impression they give out. It's akin to guys going abroad to find a girl. On the surface, the pleasant demeanor is refreshing, but once you peel back the layers, alot of similar issues arise.
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2019 04:48 PM by Rush87.)
11-02-2019 04:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like Rush87's post:
GT777733, infowarrior1, Handsome Creepy Eel, Tactician, billbudsocket
Teedub Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 5,204
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation: 82
Post: #203
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Of course. But the chances of them being tattooed slags is far lower. At least from the 6 young ones I've met this past month or so. In fact, there was one...I'll call her 'Jane'. There's no way she's even kissed a man before. Well, I'd be highly surprised. But as their church encourages sex not just for procreation but also to solidify bonds, I'd be intrigued to know! Again, wrong reasons I know.

I also liked that I could go all out on LGBT propaganda and everyone was in agreement even if some were hesitant because I may have come across as a bit too passionate in my hatred of it.

The things you own end up owning you.
11-02-2019 04:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 7 users Like Teedub's post:
Rush87, Leonard D Neubache, infowarrior1, Handsome Creepy Eel, Tactician, Geomann180, Dismal Operator
Rush87 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,398
Joined: Jun 2014
Reputation: 26
Post: #204
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 04:59 PM)Teedub Wrote:  Of course. But the chances of them being tattooed slags is far lower. At least from the 6 young ones I've met this past month or so. In fact, there was one...I'll call her 'Jane'. There's no way she's even kissed a man before. Well, I'd be highly surprised. But as their church encourages sex not just for procreation but also to solidify bonds, I'd be intrigued to know! Again, wrong reasons I know.

I also liked that I could go all out on LGBT propaganda and everyone was in agreement even if some were hesitant because I may have come across as a bit too passionate in my hatred of it.
Finding a faithful wife is at the core of almost every man. I don't think it's an inherantly 'wrong' reason to join a church. If I were to hazard a guess, I would say that almost every single person who joined this forum pre-2016, joined as a means to become more successful with women, but to ultimately find 'A' good woman.

Ephesians 5:22-33 - Wives, submit yourselves to your own husbands as you do to the lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body of which is the saviour.

From my experience - a church, much like any organisation can be compromised. The reason I mentioned "same rules applying" with the women, is that if someone just so happens to be part of a parish which has 'cucked', chances are, their women will be no different to your nightclub thots.

There definitely are still churches that have 'kept their house in order', and if you've found one, I wouldn't doubt that the women are as wholesome as you say.

If it weren't for the fact that it could comprise our location (and the potential parishes), it would be ideal for members to be able to recommend for/against various churches they attend. Those that honestly preach the word of the Lord and those that have fallen to the globohomo agenda.
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2019 05:13 PM by Rush87.)
11-02-2019 05:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Rush87's post:
Teedub, infowarrior1, Handsome Creepy Eel
RIslander Offline
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,735
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 36
Post: #205
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
As much as I find the Mormon faith to be a bit out there I've never met one I didn't like.

“There is no global anthem, no global currency, no certificate of global citizenship. We pledge allegiance to one flag, and that flag is the American flag!” -DJT
11-02-2019 05:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like RIslander's post:
RDF, VNvet, Handsome Creepy Eel
Mr. Roper Offline
Banned

Posts: 3
Joined: Nov 2019
Post: #206
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 04:48 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  Same selection rules still apply to girls of faith. Knowing countless women from church, they aren't as wholesome as the impression they give out. It's akin to guys going abroad to find a girl. On the surface, the pleasant demeanor is refreshing, but once you peel back the layers, alot of similar issues arise.

One of the biggest marriage risks are probably Church women cause they grew up having their sexuality suppressed.

What makes these otherwise smart men think religion is somehow going to undo millions of years of evolution? It never will. There's no difference between a Christian woman, an atheist woman, or any woman of any race or culture. They all have the alpha fuck, beta buck program hardcoded into their brains.

Ned Flanders ain't changing shit! mrgreen
11-02-2019 05:14 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Easy_C Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 4,216
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 28
Post: #207
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Quote:Reading some of this churchy beta male bullshit makes me cringe. Locking eyes with your wife as your bodies and souls intertwine as you're making love????? Fuck off lmao. How the fuck did you pussies revert back to game infancy where you write poems and send flowers to bitches?

Think we found the pissed off MGTOW. If the post above mine is any indication he's not really capable of thinking outside of reciting PUA slogans....which isn't actually redpill. It's still NPC behavior.

I hate poetry myself (William Blake excluded), but guys like this one don't understand why it doesn't work for them. It's the same reason some of that corny day game shit works for some guys but not others.

I can do that kind of shit when I feel like it and it works for me because I know she'll like it she's going to love it and because I'm doing it because I enjoy it. Other guys do it because they're trying to make the woman like them.

See the difference? How you do it is more important than what you do when it comes to women regardless of their religious devotion or lack thereof.


Quote: I don't know the route I'll go, but I think a turn to faith rather than fringe politics is better for my soul and mental wellbeing. Perhaps there's somewhat of a Christian revival movement in the West of which Kanye is a small part of, or perhaps those missionaries was Devine intervention.

My suggestion: try honoring the holy mother's request she made when warning us about Frankism/Communism and pray the Rosary every single day. Just try it for a week.

Quote:Same selection rules still apply to girls of faith. Knowing countless women from church, they aren't as wholesome as the impression they give out. It's akin to guys going abroad to find a girl. On the surface, the pleasant demeanor is refreshing, but once you peel back the layers, alot of similar issues arise

That's why you make sure to carefully and dispassionately observe actions, not words or demeanor.
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2019 06:42 PM by Easy_C.)
11-02-2019 06:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Easy_C's post:
Leonard D Neubache, N°6
questor70 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,285
Joined: Jan 2017
Reputation: 20
Post: #208
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Ah, but remember, despite his personality, below the chin he looks like he belongs in Magic Mike.

[Image: hqdefault.jpg]
11-02-2019 06:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like questor70's post:
Mr. Roper, infowarrior1
Mr. Roper Offline
Banned

Posts: 3
Joined: Nov 2019
Post: #209
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
[Image: final-Copy.jpg]
11-02-2019 07:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Mr. Roper's post:
Mark Fletcher, Latan
Cattle Rustler Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,494
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 108
Post: #210
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Roosh,

Would it be possible for you to give forum members a time period to delete their forum posts? I remember you allowed us once before, for 7 days and many forum members would appreciate it if you did it again.

It would be a win-win situation. Adulterous non-Christian content would be removed for the most part. In addition, members who do not wish to be associated with the forum any longer can distance themselves or practically erase their existence. Everyone can continue on with their life without drama for the most part (aside from those wishing to meltdown).

Cattle 5000 Rustlings #RustleHouseRecords #5000Posts
Houston (Montrose), Texas

"May get ugly at times. But we get by. Real Niggas never die." - cdr

Follow the Rustler on Twitter | Telegram: CattleRustler

Game is the difference between a broke average looking dude in a 2nd tier city turning bad bitch feminists into maids and fucktoys and a well to do lawyer with 50x the dough taking 3 dates to bang broads in philly.
11-02-2019 10:27 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Cattle Rustler's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, Latan, infowarrior1, zoom
Easy_C Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 4,216
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 28
Post: #211
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
[Image: hqdefault.jpg]
11-02-2019 10:29 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Cattle Rustler Offline
Crow
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 6,494
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 108
Post: #212
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 10:29 PM)Easy_C Wrote:  [Image: hqdefault.jpg]

I appreciate the hospitality my fellow Christian brother, but I'm asking because I care for the other members. May not like their stances or opinions, but always gotta think beyond yourself. Hugs not bullets, the Christian way.

Hope the NSA, or whatever 3 letter agency you claim to work for, is treating you well with that OPSEC of yours.

Cattle 5000 Rustlings #RustleHouseRecords #5000Posts
Houston (Montrose), Texas

"May get ugly at times. But we get by. Real Niggas never die." - cdr

Follow the Rustler on Twitter | Telegram: CattleRustler

Game is the difference between a broke average looking dude in a 2nd tier city turning bad bitch feminists into maids and fucktoys and a well to do lawyer with 50x the dough taking 3 dates to bang broads in philly.
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2019 10:42 PM by Cattle Rustler.)
11-02-2019 10:41 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Cattle Rustler's post:
RoastBeefCurtains4Me, Mark Fletcher, infowarrior1, Rocha, Latan, RDF
Easy_C Offline
Crow
*****

Posts: 4,216
Joined: Oct 2014
Reputation: 28
Post: #213
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
. I was referring to our angry MGTOW guest.

I don’t suggest that those who act out of good faith be banned, and your accusation of me working for the intelligence agencies is rather bizarre given that I consistently draw attention to topics that a real agent would seek to deflect from.

I’ve also been here longer than you have and was one of the forums first advocates against the hookup lifestyle and for establishing solid marriages. Neither is something I would have done were I an intelligence asset....let alone have done so when it was an unpopular stance to take.

Unsolicited advice: I know you misinterpreted but you shouldn’t just jump to accusing people of being CIA agents without....you know...bothering to look at post history and reps or anything of that sort. Otherwise you risk looking like a raging moron should you accuse someone who obviously isn’t.
(This post was last modified: 11-02-2019 11:21 PM by Easy_C.)
11-02-2019 11:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,890
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 210
Post: #214
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Based on the time stamping I'm not sure that EC was referring to you, CR. And the alphabet soup agencies are not threatened by us and never were. We just liked to believe otherwise because it made us feel important.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
11-03-2019 12:10 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
infowarrior1, VNvet, Handsome Creepy Eel, rotekz, Enigma, Teedub
Roosh Offline
Eagle
*******

Posts: 19,209
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 419
Post: #215
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 12:26 PM)Leonard D Neubache Wrote:  The kind of behavior that went on display back in June caused me to finally accept that demonic influence is real and powerful, and it hardly takes for Roosh to institute a rule that nobody was breaking in the first place to trigger a kneejerk demonically driven rejection from a number of members who are acting like vampires being exposed to a Holy Cross.

It would have been the case that if Roosh had decided to follow buddha and instituted a raft of rules centering around buddhism that he wouldn't have come under half the fire he has from the people so grossly afflicted here, because like all the afflicted from the horned transvestite to the "neo-masculine" casual sex addict they seem to be highly tolerant of every religion except one, and that's how you know it's the only real deal out there.

Everyone whose response to Christ is to recoil violently from him is a thrall to evil and as such they will be guided toward the service of evil no matter how good their intentions are. This is why they continue to plead for the "unfortunate" fate of the young men who might otherwise have come to this forum and been indoctrinated into what was until recently functionally a low level sex cult.

It has been quite a spiritual education for me as well. In June I didn't understand the extent of the forum anger, but now I do, and feel sympathy for those men steeped in sin who--in some cases--are clearly under demonic influence. You don't get out of it easily, and many of these men will remain in rebellion for many years or decades to come. Nonetheless, we can't have a community united under Christ with men who outright refuse Him in anger.

God gave us free will, so there is nothing you can really do for these people. What they should really be concerned about is that their anger has come about without any direct preaching. I'm not telling people how to live, or to accept God. It's a simple matter of not visiting this site anymore. But they have to try and falsely accuse or malign me, similar to the behavior of SJWs. When someone is steeped into darkness, just a hint of the light causes a vicious reaction. May the Lord have mercy on them.

Roosh
http://www.rooshv.com
11-03-2019 12:40 AM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 19 users Like Roosh's post:
VNvet, 911, Leonard D Neubache, Kingsley Davis, Enigma, Aquarius, infowarrior1, rotekz, Captain Gh, Polniy_Sostav, Jones, Sword and Board, Dismal Operator, open source, wwtl, MdWanderer, Sosa, Tom Slick, Samseau
infowarrior1 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 1,750
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 10
Post: #216
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
In this age of seeking the truth. I counsel people to read those books:
https://www.amazon.com/Thought-Reform-Ps...B006M9RZQA

https://www.amazon.com/Destroying-World-...0805065113


http://www.apologeticsindex.org/7715-ide...l-totalism


Destructive cults are traps that seek to turn people away from God by keeping them in false paradigms and destructive abusive groups. Many a Soul have been lost due to the depravities of destructive cults.

No one is immune to being trapped in one.
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2019 12:53 AM by infowarrior1.)
11-03-2019 12:51 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[email protected] Offline
Pelican
****

Posts: 1,307
Joined: Feb 2016
Reputation: 20
Post: #217
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
These things happen. People have experiences, change and move on to different things.

People react to grief in different ways. Some cry others get angry and lash out. The forum used to be an accelerationist movement of truth bombs and shitlording but now the torch will pass on somewhere else. I will still lurk here to get scraps of information.

I think the truth is we've relied on Roosh too long and let him unfairly shoulder the burden and consequences of hosting. If we value truth we have to put work in. Otherwise /pol will become the only arbitor of truth and that will easily be subverted.
11-03-2019 01:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes [email protected]'s post:
infowarrior1
N°6 Offline
Ostrich
****

Posts: 2,543
Joined: Jun 2013
Reputation: 26
Post: #218
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 05:11 PM)Rush87 Wrote:  Finding a faithful wife is at the core of almost every man. I don't think it's an inherantly 'wrong' reason to join a church. If I were to hazard a guess, I would say that almost every single person who joined this forum pre-2016, joined as a means to become more successful with women, but to ultimately find 'A' good woman.

Don’t let anyone in a church make you believe that it’s wrong to look for a wife in an assembly. The powers that be will be quick to quote “be ye not unequally yoked with an unbeliever”, if you found a wife outside of the church.

Likewise don’t allow the Sparrows and the new Faith Militant in this forum tell you that you don’t need Game in church just because they happened to get married with their Game knowledge pre-2016. Look at a map showing divorce rates in the US. The southern Bible Belt has high rates.

Be wise as a serpent but gentle as a dove. It’s surprising how many men here are regressing to idealistic doves.

Don't spend all your energy on sex and all your money on women; they have destroyed kings. (Proverbs 31:3 GNB)
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2019 01:45 AM by N°6.)
11-03-2019 01:37 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 5 users Like N°6's post:
Handsome Creepy Eel, infowarrior1, Rush87, Captain Gh, TooFineAPoint
Leonard D Neubache Offline
Owl
******
Gold Member

Posts: 11,890
Joined: Mar 2016
Reputation: 210
Post: #219
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-03-2019 01:37 AM)N°6 Wrote:  ...

Likewise don’t allow the Sparrows and the new Faith Militant in this forum tell you that you don’t need Game in church just because they happened to get married with their Game knowledge pre-2016. Look at a map showing divorce rates in the US. The southern Bible Belt has high rates.

...

See, this is what I'm referring to. We've had a bevy of members claiming that the "New Faith Militant" are denouncing "Game" entirely and calling for men to develop total amnesia on female behaviour. Oddly they never seem to quote any of these calls to blue-pilling on women because literally nobody is saying that.

Game is nothing but repackaged masculine virtue minus the social responsibility that comes with patriarchy. As if the young men of the West are doomed unless they learn how to access dozens and dozens of women as cumdumpsters.

It's proven to be a teenage concept in society riddled with delayed adulthood.

God demands of Man responsibility. God demands of Woman vulnerability. These are their curse and blessing alike. Libertianism is to Man as Feminism is to Woman.
11-03-2019 02:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 10 users Like Leonard D Neubache's post:
VNvet, infowarrior1, rockoman, rotekz, Enigma, 911, doc holliday, Sword and Board, Teedub, wwtl
RIslander Offline
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,735
Joined: Dec 2013
Reputation: 36
Post: #220
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
Are we actually using references from a poorly written fantasy TV show now to describe real life scenarios?

“There is no global anthem, no global currency, no certificate of global citizenship. We pledge allegiance to one flag, and that flag is the American flag!” -DJT
11-03-2019 02:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Latan Offline
Pelican
****

Posts: 1,061
Joined: Jul 2014
Reputation: 10
Post: #221
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 10:27 PM)Cattle Rustler Wrote:  Roosh,

Would it be possible for you to give forum members a time period to delete their forum posts? I remember you allowed us once before, for 7 days and many forum members would appreciate it if you did it again.

It would be a win-win situation. Adulterous non-Christian content would be removed for the most part. In addition, members who do not wish to be associated with the forum any longer can distance themselves or practically erase their existence. Everyone can continue on with their life without drama for the most part (aside from those wishing to meltdown).

This.

I also made many posts promoting promiscuity.
I'd really like to have the opportunity to erase them, as they link me to a darker past and don't belong anymore in this forum.
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2019 03:58 AM by Latan.)
11-03-2019 03:53 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like Latan's post:
Nineteen84, zoom
d'Aversa Offline
Sparrow

Posts: 112
Joined: Oct 2019
Reputation: 3
Post: #222
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 12:22 PM)arafat scarf Wrote:  With due respect, there is a chapter called Sex in your Game book and it clearly explains the techniques for having sex with girls under conditions that are outside of matrimony.

The chapter's conclusion, starts with this:

snip

Cut it anyway you want, but this is explicit advice for having sex with loose girls who are 'available', which means that you see it fit to personally profit off advice for fornicators. I respect your turn of faith, but you are clearly lining your pockets with a detailed field manual on how to sin.

Your current position on this is analogous to a bank robber who writes books that give good financial advice on how to manage wealth while also selling step-by-step advice on how to perform heists. This bank robber insists that heists are bad and ruinous and that anyone who does heists is stealing and acting against God's will.... but just in case you want a manual on how to do heists, here it is!

It's a chapter in the whole book. It's not a manual on how to sin, it's a book about women, their psychology and how to interact with them. Sex is a part of this interaction. It's up to you how you use this knowledge. There are people who use technical knowledge of chemistry to build bombs, but it doesn't mean the books should be pulled or that their authors publish them in bad faith.

Also you're using false dichotomy with your example. It'd be more accurate to say that an ex-robber slips a tutorial of lock-picking in his legitimate book, or something like that. You talk of doing something in bad faith, but you're nitpicking just for the sake of being contrarian.
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2019 06:07 AM by d'Aversa.)
11-03-2019 06:07 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 2 users Like d'Aversa's post:
VNvet, Teedub
pitbullowner Online
Robin
*

Posts: 233
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 1
Post: #223
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-01-2019 06:05 PM)wwtl Wrote:  The Bible is full of truths countering the Blue Pill. It literally commands you to not put women on a pedestal.

Yup Proverbs 31:3 is proof of this
https://imgur.com/a/dsGfDxq

Your actions speak louder than your words, son.
-My father, R.I.P.

My newly crafted Twitter handle
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2019 07:16 AM by pitbullowner.)
11-03-2019 07:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Polniy_Sostav Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 736
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 6
Post: #224
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 09:53 AM)Enhanced Eddie Wrote:  Trad is looking for a wife near where your own roots are.
So if a woman is trad she'll also look for a husband from near where her own roots are.

I respectfully disagree , if you were raised as a christian from early age yes , if not , then you can find someone from other horizons and build "together" a christian family.
There is actually nothing wrong with building a family with christian women from another country than your birth country.
11-03-2019 08:06 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Polniy_Sostav Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 736
Joined: Apr 2017
Reputation: 6
Post: #225
RE: New anti-blasphemy rule (effective November 1)
(11-02-2019 10:44 AM)Days of Broken Arrows Wrote:  
(11-01-2019 10:12 PM)Sadstate Wrote:  Go ahead and get married you pussies, cause this is what's in store for you.

See the cluster of traits on the left hand side? You know, the ones that 'God' always preaches? Goodness, good father, good husband, loyalty, intellience? Women despise that, so enjoy literally being cucked for the narcissistic clowns on the right.

It's not degenerate society, it's not social media, it's not the left, women have always been like this. With hypergamy greater than ever, it's the worst time to abandon game.

[Image: 8-Figure1-1.png]


If you decide to get married in an age where whoredom is at an all time high, I wish you the best, but to me it's a mistake.

Completely untrue. I'm going to reiterate some things I already wrote on this forum, which disappeared when various sections were moves and/or taken down.

If you find a nice girl from a good family at a young age and stick with her, the odds of getting divorced are small. Virtually every high school and college couple I knew are still married.

And while I know anecdotal evidence can't be trusted, I also can't ignore what my own eyes and experiences are telling me. I'm talking about people who met in 1990. Lots of them.

The problems come in when people don't commit in high school or college and then find themselves in the singles market. Most people were not built to bounce around from relationship to relationship. You get jaded. And hateful.

The media sells people in this idea of single-dom in the city. It's a nice idea. It makes for amusing TV programs. But it makes for a lousy life.

A lot of the problems with my ex and I came about because we met when we had an average age of 30, and both brought our attitudes of mistrust and suspicion to the table. Had we met at 20 this would not have happened because we didn't yet have the experiences that caused us to mistrust and be suspicious.

If this forum morphs into anything, it should be giving young men this advice. Get in on the ground level. It really doesn't get better. In fact it gets worse. Parents, teachers, and the media tell you that you "need experience." But the experiences you will get are like the ones I had: Losing a house, your wife, and your confidence.

They're selling you lies. As I've said many times here before, if you're a young guy odds are you already know the girl you should marry. You're not paying attention to her. She's the one who is sweet, not sexy. She's quiet, not outgoing. She's on the all-girls hall of her dorm in the study lounge. Seek her out, have lunch with her, and don't dump her for the sexy ones as some of us foolishly did. It'll pay off in the end.

100% agreed.
How many times have I heard " I am too young for this" , "I still have time before to think about it" , " We are not in the middle ages , let's enjoy my youth" etc...

Building a family is seen as an obstacle for many people instead of being seen as something helpful .
examples (non-exhaustive list)

- If I had a family ( husband/wife + kids) I couldn't travel how much I would like
- If I had a family I would not be able to go out
- If I had a family I would not be able to hunt for girl (or men) etc

Basically globohomo elements ( going out in a consumerist fashion , travelling without cultural goals , drinking without moderation etc ) have replaced the few christian elements which could help the youth to be more structured in head - consequently building little by little a society without idea of the "common good" ( catholic social teaching)
11-03-2019 08:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 6 users Like Polniy_Sostav's post:
Syberpunk, RoastBeefCurtains4Me, 911, Leonard D Neubache, Teedub, Samseau
Post Reply 


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread: Author Replies: Views: Last Post
  November 3 In Seattle Twigg 12 1,985 11-07-2019 11:49 AM
Last Post: Salinger
  Is Neanderthal DNA the reason why Europeans rule the world? Trumpian 320 30,730 07-04-2019 01:06 AM
Last Post: 911
  The John F. Kennedy (JFK) assassination thread - 22 November 1963 Mercenary 212 76,876 01-06-2019 05:41 PM
Last Post: Max RNR

Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication