Read The Forum Rules: We have a clear set of rules to keep the forum running smoothly. Click here to review them.

Post Reply 
The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
Author Message
Elmore Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 497
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 5
Post: #1
The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
I was going to post in the Argentina thread that The Economist (an article from which was the basis of that thread's OP) was half owned by the Rothschilds, and IMHO should always be treated with extreme suspicion, then discovered this article.

It's from 2015, and is perhaps drifting into the arena of the Tin-Foil-Hat, but felt it thought provoking enough to be worthy its own thread.

[Image: maxresdefault.jpg]



Make of it what you will...


Rothschild-owned The Economist’s 2015 cover full of unsettling symbols
The Economist is a well-known and quite prestigious London-based weekly news magazine, founded in 1843 by James Wilson, a Scottish businessman, economist and politician. It claims an average weekly circulation of 1.5 million in 2006, about half of which were sold in the United States.

The publication belongs to The Economist Group, half of which is owned by Pearson PLC via the Financial Times. The other half is owned by a group of independent shareholders, including the Rothschild banking family of England.

That the Rothchilds own part of The Economist accounts for why Vigilant Citizen (VC), the blogger who specializes in analyzing pop culture symbols and their hidden meanings, gives import to the magazine’s disquieting “The World in 2015” cover with a mushroom cloud from a nuclear bomb explosion, among other disturbing images. In VC’s words:

It [The Economist] is partly owned by the Rothschild banking family of England and its editor-in-chief, John Micklethwait, attended several times to the Bilderberg Conference – the secretive meeting where the world’s most powerful figures from the world of politics, finance business and media discuss global policies. The outcome of those meetings is totally secret. It is therefore safe to say that the people at The Economist know things that most people don’t.

Here is The Economist‘s 2015 cover (click to enlarge), followed by an analysis.

To begin, The Economist‘s 2015 cover is reminiscent of the eerie image on the album cover of The Beatles’ Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band (see below), which was a color photo taken in a studio of the four Beatles wearing band uniforms, surrounded by life-size cardboard cutouts of themselves in suits, as well as those of famous personalities, both living and dead.

The Beatles, of course, are in color, as are some of the cardboard figures, while other figures are in black and white (b&w). There doesn’t seem to be a discernible reason for why some are in b&w because they include people both dead (e.g., Karl Marx) and alive (e.g., Bob Dylan).

BLACK & WHITE FACES

The Economist‘s “The World in 2015” cover also has various figures in color and b&w, with one difference — only the heads and faces of some are in b&w, while their bodies are in color, which gives their faces a grey, drained-of-blood, walking-dead quality. The b&w heads are a majority, and they include both the living (Barack Obama) and the dead (Winston Churchill). Vigilant Citizen thinks that “those in black and white appear to be part of the elite (including the ISIS guy who probably works for them) and those in color are ‘outsiders’. Is this how the elite perceives the world?”

THE PIED PIPER

VC writes:

“The presence of the Pied Piper on this 2015-themed cover is downright unsettling. The Pied Piper of Hamelin is a German legend about a man who used his magical flute to lure away the children of the city of Hamelin, never to be seen again.

This folkloric figure dating from the Middle-Ages is said to represent either massive death by plague or catastrophe, or a movement of massive immigration. It also perfectly represents today’s youth being ‘lured’ and mystified by the ‘music’ of mass media. Conveniently enough, there’s a small boy right under the Piper’s flute.”

To reinforce the message of pop music’s seductive allure, there’s a drum set beneath the clueless little boy. One drum has stars and stripes (signifying American pop music); another is inscribed with “50th,” meaning what?

GAME OF PANIC

VC writes: “Right under the Pied Piper we see a young boy with dumbfounded look on his face. He is watching a game called ‘Panic’. The words ‘Federal Reserve’ and ‘Chi’ (which probably stands for China) are on top while the words ‘Green light!’ and ‘sis!’ (which probably stands for ‘Isis!’ or ‘Crisis!’) are at the bottom. The little boy watches as this twisted game of Plinko unfolds the same way the clueless masses watch powerlessly while various events unfold on mass media. As the name of the game states, the ultimate goal is to cause Panic around the world as crises are almost randomly generated by those who control the game. And that’s on a magazine cover owned by the Rothschilds.”

CROP DUSTER

In front of a sinister-looking Russian president Vladimir Putin is a small helicopter on which is written Crop-O-Dust — a reference to crop dusting, “the process of spraying crops with powdered insecticides or fungicides from an aircraft.”

Right under the helicopter is an Asian kid, eating processed noodles, made from wheat that the crop duster had sprayed?

And below the kid is “PANIC”!

.

CHINA

Next to the noodle-eating Chinese kid is a panda on steroids, wearing a China-flag Speedo while flexing its muscles — a clear reference to China gaining power. The panda dwarfs a sumo wrestler, signifying the eclipse of Japan by China.

The sumo wrestler holds an out-sized battery on which the polarities (+ and -) are clearly indicated. VC wonders if that’s a symbol for a switch in polarity in world power from the West to the East?

GHOST ON HOLIDAY

VC writes: “Emerging from behind Obama’s leg is a ghost reading a magazine entitled ‘Holiday’. Why is this ghost, which represents a dead person, planning a vacation? Does it represent the fact that the masses will be so impoverished that the only time they’ll be on a holiday is when they’re dead? Does it relate to the countless people who died while traveling in the past months? Creepy.”

TURTLE

VC writes: “Standing in front of everything else, gazing right into our souls is a turtle with emphasis lines around its shell. What does it represent? Will turtles make a huge comeback in 2015? Probably not.

An angry tortoise is the symbol of the Fabian Society, an extremely powerful organization that has been working for over a century towards the formation of a single world government. The philosophy behind Fabian socialism is basically the blueprint of what we call today the New World Order…..

The Fabian Society used to openly advocate a scientifically planned society and supported eugenics by way of sterilization. Its original logo was a wolf in sheep’s clothing … But I guess that was not the best way to conceal the wolf from the masses. [A turtle is so much better!]

Bringing forth a global system through small incremental changes is exactly what the world elite is currently doing.”

11.3 AND 11.5

VC writes: “The lower right side of the cover features some more cryptic symbols. There’s a pile of dirt on the ground and two arrows on which are inscribed 11.5 and 11.3. Are those dates to remember? Why are they next to a pile of dirt? If you look up these figures as coordinates, they point to somewhere in Nigeria. Displaying numbers that can only be truly understood by ‘those in the know’ is one of the occult elite’s favorite hobbies.”

ALICE IN WONDERLAND & THE CHESHIRE CAT

Standing to the right of the 11.5 (November 5?) and 11.3 (November 3?) arrows is Alice in Wonderland, who’s looking up at the Cheshire Cat on a tree branch. VC writes: “This iconic cat is known for disappearing entirely, leaving only visible its creepy grin. We therefore see another allusion to a world of fantasy, illusion and deceit as perceived by Alice – a representative of the masses. Along with the somewhat unnecessary inclusion of David Blaine – a magician – the cover mixes real world events with illusions.”

Note that the tree branch is coming from Obama’s leg — the man of fantasy, illusion, and lies.

THE LADY WITH NO ERMINE

To the right of Alice is a portrait that’s a reverse image of Leonardo da Vinci’s painting, The Lady with an Ermine (1489-1490), but without the ermine.

Leonardo da Vinci’s Lady with an Ermine (l); Economist 2015 cover’s lady without an ermine ®

The subject of da Vinci’s portrait is Cecilia Gallerani, the mistress of Ludovico Sforza, Duke of Milan, who was the painter’s patron. Ermines, aka stoats, are known for their purity. That, of course, means that The Economist‘s lady without an ermine is without purity.

SPIDERMAN

Then there’s Spiderman, the only reference to a movie or pop culture figure on The Economist‘s “World in 2015” cover.

Why Spiderman? Why not the even more popular The Hobbit? The worldwide box office total for The Amazing Spider-Man 2, which was released on May 2, 2014, is $708,996,336. In contrast, the third Hobbit movie The Battle of the Five Armies, which was released on Dec. 10, 2014, already has a worldwide box office of $804,256,417, and the movie hasn’t yet opened in China.

But wait!

Might The Economist‘s Spiderman be a veiled reference to Serco, the British-owned and UK-based global “outsourcing company” government contractor that has a spider as its logo? (H/t FOTM’s marblenecltr)

Serco operates public and private transport and traffic control, aviation, military weapons, detention centers, prisons and schools on behalf of its customers, among whom is the Obama administration. In July 2013, Serco was awarded a $1.25 billion contract to manage the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Obamacare. Serco is also one of the 55 contractors hired by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to work on the dysfunctional HealthCare.gov web site.

OTHER IMAGES

There are other cryptic images in The Economist‘s 2015 cover like the two-faced globe; the blonde woman with a strange head-dress; the strange thing (a piggy bank?) coming out of UK Prime Minister David Cameron’s suit jacket; and the Illuminati one-eye sign German Chancellor Angela Merkel is making with her hands.

Whatever the image, know that it’s there for a reason. The Economist had commissioned an artist to put together its “World in 2015” cover, which means much time and thought went into it. The images were selected for a reason, and each has an esoteric meaning known to The Economist but concealed from the rest of us.
12-05-2019 10:48 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like Elmore's post:
Teedub, N°6, Enigma
Elmore Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 497
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 5
Post: #2
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
Merkle's Illuminati sign & the presence of the Pied Piper, seem a reference to Germany's 'Migrant Crisis' that would unfold that year. Following orders from day one...
12-05-2019 10:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Seth_Rose Offline
Pelican
****
Gold Member

Posts: 1,146
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 29
Post: #3
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
I remember always hearing people say "The Economist is so neutral and objective!"

Viewing it only from the left-right perspective, it is relatively centrist. But on the globalist-nationalist perspective, it is hardcore globalist.

I used to subscribe the magazine during grad school as it was relevant to my program, but this bias and the Rothschild ownership put me off.

Blog - Twitter
12-05-2019 03:12 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Seth_Rose's post:
Elmore, Arado, 911, PixelFree
Elmore Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 497
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 5
Post: #4
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
They're absolutely not objective, yet they're perceived as some great unbowed institution. Everything you read in there should be taken with a grain of salt-beef.
12-05-2019 03:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Lunostrelki Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 467
Joined: May 2016
Reputation: 15
Post: #5
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
(12-05-2019 03:12 PM)Seth_Rose Wrote:  I remember always hearing people say "The Economist is so neutral and objective!"

Viewing it only from the left-right perspective, it is relatively centrist. But on the globalist-nationalist perspective, it is hardcore globalist.

I used to subscribe the magazine during grad school as it was relevant to my program, but this bias and the Rothschild ownership put me off.

The Economist has easy-to-read articles and I like the style of their magazine, but that's it.

The left-right dichotomy is a lie to cover up the real battle between good and evil.
12-05-2019 05:53 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Lunostrelki's post:
Mr. Wolf
Tail Gunner Offline
Hummingbird
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,861
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 48
Post: #6
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
If you are interesting in the topic of the Rothchilds and their ilk, read "The Killing of Uncle Sam: The Demise of the United States of America."

The book is quite disturbing. It chronicles the evolution of America's immigration policy in favor of the elites, from freedom-loving countries to autocratic third-world hell holes, among many other topics.

https://www.amazon.com/Killing-Uncle-Sam...1640070974
(This post was last modified: 12-05-2019 07:10 PM by Tail Gunner.)
12-05-2019 07:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes Tail Gunner's post:
Mr. Wolf
Arado Offline
Kingfisher
***
Gold Member

Posts: 973
Joined: Aug 2009
Reputation: 21
Post: #7
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
I always found the writing very dry - they make an attempt to seem like they are balanced but rarely give proper attention to the best arguments and facts from the nationalist perspective. The readers come away thinking they are open minded and "understand" ethno nationalists but only in the most superficial and condescending sense.
12-05-2019 08:18 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
OscarManheim Offline
Banned

Posts: 125
Joined: Dec 2019
Post: #8
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
They put those kind of pictures with clear globalist/illuminati imagery to satirize the whole subject or to make semi-red pill people believe they own that asset of the media while giving the illusion that other media outlets without the blatant symbolism are neutral, while of course, they own or have major influence regarding all MSM. ( and even most "alternatives")
(This post was last modified: 12-05-2019 11:04 PM by OscarManheim.)
12-05-2019 11:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
jeffreyjerpp Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 517
Joined: Jul 2016
Reputation: 13
Post: #9
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
(12-05-2019 07:07 PM)Tail Gunner Wrote:  If you are interesting in the topic of the Rothchilds and their ilk, read "The Killing of Uncle Sam: The Demise of the United States of America."

The book is quite disturbing. It chronicles the evolution of America's immigration policy in favor of the elites, from freedom-loving countries to autocratic third-world hell holes, among many other topics.

https://www.amazon.com/Killing-Uncle-Sam...1640070974

Can you go into more detail? This is very fascinating to me. I wonder how much immigration was a plot by (((them))) vs. just standard bad governance and entropy.
12-06-2019 12:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
RawGod Offline
Hummingbird
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 3,079
Joined: Jun 2012
Reputation: 35
Post: #10
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
The Economist is the house organ of the globalist establishment. It's where the lower echelons of that group go to find out their talking points, or at least to nod along and feel like they're part of the in crowd. The Atlantic is the same for cultural issues.

Dr Johnson rumbles with the RawGod. And lives to regret it.

I have had this sig since 2015 and received thousands of post likes; yet not one person has commented on my sig. Perhaps you're familiar with the work it parodies? Let me know!
(This post was last modified: 12-06-2019 12:14 AM by RawGod.)
12-06-2019 12:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like RawGod's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, Elmore, VNvet, Buck Wild
Elmore Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 497
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 5
Post: #11
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
Viewing The Economist as anything but a Rothschild owned, Globalist mouthpiece, is utter folly. I used to do so, which is why i think this crap needs to be highlighted.

[Image: 20191116_ldp502.jpg]

The world would be twice as rich if everyone who wanted to migrate were allowed to, by one estimate

Imagine you are offered a job at triple your salary. But first you must pass through a locked door, and someone with the key won’t open it. You might be willing to pay them to let you through. Whether this is fair or not is beside the point. They have the key and you don’t. If you gave them a portion of the increase in your wages, you would both be better off.

This is not a bad analogy for global immigration policy. When migrants move from a poor country to a rich one, they typically make three to six times as much money as before (see our Special report in this issue). If everyone who wanted to migrate were allowed to do so, the world would by one estimate be twice as rich. Yet this vast gain cannot be realised, because most would-be migrants are forced to stay where they are. The door is locked, and voters in rich countries hold the key.

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/1...ckthatdoor
12-18-2019 08:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 4 users Like Elmore's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, PixelFree, Tactician, TheBowery
Simeon_Strangelight Offline
Hawk
*******
Gold Member

Posts: 19,356
Joined: Feb 2014
Reputation: 219
Post: #12
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
< The same reports about expected technological unemployment of 40%+ within the last decades don't really make much sense unless by "making money" you mean endebting yourself more under the Rothschilds. It's not as if they are truly needed as a work-force or contributions. Even the US immigration was proven to be a net-negative since the 1970s according to Harvard economists. But they can never claim that.

The only thing that would happen with open borders is everyone reaching a Dickensian new base level of third-world poverty faster.
12-18-2019 09:15 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
VNvet Offline
Woodpecker
**

Posts: 495
Joined: Feb 2019
Reputation: 4
Post: #13
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
The CIA highly recommends that all applicants read The Economist - it's the top of their public reading list.

That fact alone tells you everything you need to know.

The cover is weird, but it got a lot of attention with the heavily shilled 11/3 Seattle predictions. Perhaps that was a distraction from the real meaning?

It looks like it's displaying the "Illuminati" political actors in 2015 with some famous actors from history - Merkel, Napoleon, Obama, Hillary, Cameron, Xi, Churchill, Spiderman, ISIS, etc.

The other stuff is probably inside jokes/messages to insiders, like you said.
(This post was last modified: 12-18-2019 11:23 AM by VNvet.)
12-18-2019 11:17 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 3 users Like VNvet's post:
Simeon_Strangelight, PixelFree, Jones
DarkTriad Offline
Ostrich
****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,419
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 15
Post: #14
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
(12-18-2019 08:57 AM)Elmore Wrote:  Viewing The Economist as anything but a Rothschild owned, Globalist mouthpiece, is utter folly. I used to do so, which is why i think this crap needs to be highlighted.

[Image: 20191116_ldp502.jpg]

The world would be twice as rich if everyone who wanted to migrate were allowed to, by one estimate

Imagine you are offered a job at triple your salary. But first you must pass through a locked door, and someone with the key won’t open it. You might be willing to pay them to let you through. Whether this is fair or not is beside the point. They have the key and you don’t. If you gave them a portion of the increase in your wages, you would both be better off.

This is not a bad analogy for global immigration policy. When migrants move from a poor country to a rich one, they typically make three to six times as much money as before (see our Special report in this issue). If everyone who wanted to migrate were allowed to do so, the world would by one estimate be twice as rich. Yet this vast gain cannot be realised, because most would-be migrants are forced to stay where they are. The door is locked, and voters in rich countries hold the key.

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/1...ckthatdoor

How can he not take into account that (via supply and demand) the value of the labor would drop, and both the immigrants and the natives would then be stuck with 3rd world wages in the new country?
12-18-2019 11:44 AM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
Tail Gunner Offline
Hummingbird
*****
Gold Member

Posts: 2,861
Joined: Jan 2012
Reputation: 48
Post: #15
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
(12-18-2019 11:44 AM)DarkTriad Wrote:  
(12-18-2019 08:57 AM)Elmore Wrote:  Viewing The Economist as anything but a Rothschild owned, Globalist mouthpiece, is utter folly. I used to do so, which is why i think this crap needs to be highlighted.

[Image: 20191116_ldp502.jpg]

The world would be twice as rich if everyone who wanted to migrate were allowed to, by one estimate

Imagine you are offered a job at triple your salary. But first you must pass through a locked door, and someone with the key won’t open it. You might be willing to pay them to let you through. Whether this is fair or not is beside the point. They have the key and you don’t. If you gave them a portion of the increase in your wages, you would both be better off.

This is not a bad analogy for global immigration policy. When migrants move from a poor country to a rich one, they typically make three to six times as much money as before (see our Special report in this issue). If everyone who wanted to migrate were allowed to do so, the world would by one estimate be twice as rich. Yet this vast gain cannot be realised, because most would-be migrants are forced to stay where they are. The door is locked, and voters in rich countries hold the key.

https://www.economist.com/leaders/2019/1...ckthatdoor

How can he not take into account that (via supply and demand) the value of the labor would drop, and both the immigrants and the natives would then be stuck with 3rd world wages in the new country?

They hide behind semantics. Yes, the average person would be twice as well-off, meaning everyone in the world would be twice as "wealthy" as today's average African or Chinese worker, but the living standard of the average person in the wealthy countries would drop markedly -- to twice the wage of today's average African or Chinese worker. So, why would wealth-creating nations partake in such an insane plan?

I would prefer a world-wide wealth tax that sent all proceeds to improve third-world nations over a plan that allowed open borders, which then turned every nation into a third-world country.
(This post was last modified: 12-18-2019 04:03 PM by Tail Gunner.)
12-18-2019 03:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
ilostabet Offline
Kingfisher
***

Posts: 741
Joined: Jun 2017
Reputation: 23
Post: #16
RE: The Economist, The Rothschilds, & Occult Imagery
Side point, but I thought of this because of what TailGunner said.

Ironically the 'aid' that is sent to Africa is a big part of the reason why the continent is in such deep shit constantly and why they end up migrating. It's not just the fact that most of the money ends up in the hands of blood thirsty tyrants who would otherwise have no means of subjugating the population or exterminating rival groups, be them ethnic or political, or that the goods they receive are then withheld from the people for political gain. It's worse than that: the 'aid' that actually gets to the people completely disrupts their internal productivity and their markets, it completely destroys the incentives to be productive, to the point where if you insist on doing a productive activity versus taking the aid you will end up destitute because no one will buy your products, cause no one works, which in turn will force you to turn to free stuff. This goes for food, clothing and everything else we send there.

Then of course, the poverty becomes entrenched. It's the welfare conundrum on a continental scale - and you really can't untie this from migration at all levels. Not only the aid itself but the message it sends: look at these folks, they have so much they send us all this stuff, I better get myself over there. This is what happened all throughout the 80s and 90s - which resulted in the population explosion and the first large waves of migration. And I'm sure the oligarchs knew these effects pretty well, just like they know welfare destroys the family and creates dumb obedient citizens.

Add to this all the 'environmental' efforts from corporations, that go there to plant trees and literally get people arrested to burn down their villages so they can plant the damn trees and then take pictures for marketing campaigns. And add to that the 'education' most secular sources take there: to which, thankfully, there is some backlash - because they are teaching them all the leftist things, but Africans are still resisting the sodomy indoctrination at least for now. So the majority of the 'help' the West thinks it's giving, it's actually helping to keep them destitute and promoting migration from those places to the source of the goodies. I would like to count out missionary work, but given that a lot of western Christianity is itself pozzed, it can't be a blank statement of positives anymore.

Non-local charity is one of the worst things ever invented, not only for the ones receiving because of incentives completely removed from proximate relations, but for the ones giving - people are literally not helping who they think they are helping and at the same time contributing to their own destruction. Natural law really is a beautiful, yet brutal thing, and no one can escape it. And this same dynamic is seen everywhere: progs think they help gays by entrenching them in the most vile and destructive behavior; they think they help women by 'liberating' them, and so on.

We made too many wrong mistakes. Yogi Berra
(This post was last modified: 12-18-2019 04:53 PM by ilostabet.)
12-18-2019 04:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Like Post Quote this message in a reply
[-] The following 1 user Likes ilostabet's post:
Tail Gunner
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Contact Us | RooshV.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Mobile Version | RSS Syndication