20-minute neighborhoods / 15-minute cities

[chestmilk]

It sounds appealing in theory, but of course our social engineering overlords have ulterior motives behind it all.

Agree - like all things, can be eventually used for nefarious reasons. The appeal can be found if you're into new urbanism, trad architecture, etc. Basically, cities aren't going away so they might as well not be the dystopian hellscapes found today but instead promote a healthy civic life. Back to the old ways - ie a city you'd want to walk around in that isn't infested with globohomo and the evils of modernity. I still wouldn't want to live in a city if this were the case but otherwise I'm all for it "in principle" but definitely not as to how it will be in practice.

I did some digging on specifically on the 15 min city. This appears to be the originator of the idea: https://twitter.com/FractalCities

Reading over this person's views:
- Against the mRNA vaccines
- Against vaccine passports, digital ID's etc

OTOH this isn't a US boomer conservative either and is more of a secular humanist - ie interested in refugees, etc. But my globalist radar isn't going off, just a misguided liberal, although others who want to look at this account may beg to differ or think astroturfing is involved and that's fair.

The rub is that the WEF, a conduit of Satan's corruption of the world, got interested in this idea and hence the valid reason to not want to be part of it. It will NOT give us a thriving civic life with a place worth caring about that informs us of our civilization's values (even if they were good, which is far from the case now). The idea will instead be, as better described above than I can, used to marginalize, atomize, and control.

 

[Mrredsquare]

WHEN HISTORY RHYMES​

 

[Zagor]

Without quoting anyone, I would like to add something regarding forming communities. Some posters remarked that the problem with forming communities is because of dependence on cars or poor urban planning, but I would disagree. For me it mainly a cultural/economical issue. As someone who lives in Croatia, it’s easy to see why there are genuine communities within neighbourhoods here as opposed to somewhere like the US - most people in Croatia have generational homes / apartments. There’s not much workforce mobility, most people inherit homes form their parents and continue to live there, they neighbours do the same and that way a tightly knit community is formed. And even if some children relocate, the house will usually stay in the family. Now compare that with the US where a lot of people first of all don’t own their property and therefore are not bound to any location, and secondly they change their location frequently in search of job opportunities. How are you going to form a community if you have no roots anywhere? And that’s just how powers that be want us, a rootless, toothless cosmopolites.

 

[Virgil]

Without quoting anyone, I would like to add something regarding forming communities. Some posters remarked that the problem with forming communities is because of dependence on cars or poor urban planning, but I would disagree.

Car dependence in America has been directly tied into single-family suburbs, strip malls and big box stores. All of these factors together combined to make the stereotypical "American dream" lifestyle. It was sustainable as long as families could afford their houses and cars with only the father working, and that formed a foundation for a feeling of community or belongingness in its own way. Fast forward fifty years later with worsening economic conditions and the breakdown of the traditional family and you see why car dependence has become an impediment into preserving community (and by extension morals and culture).

Agree - like all things, can be eventually used for nefarious reasons. The appeal can be found if you're into new urbanism, trad architecture, etc. Basically, cities aren't going away so they might as well not be the dystopian hellscapes found today but instead promote a healthy civic life. Back to the old ways - ie a city you'd want to walk around in that isn't infested with globohomo and the evils of modernity. I still wouldn't want to live in a city if this were the case but otherwise I'm all for it "in principle" but definitely not as to how it will be in practice.

This is one of the issues that the dissident Right needs to care about and propose an alternative, just as with environmental issues (not all of which are fake globalist propaganda).

This is probably one point I disagree with the majority of the forum members: making everyone go full anprim and abandon their city dwellings and 9-5 jobs will cause nationwide chaos. The problem is not the existence of cities per se, but rather all the social engineering schemes employed by the Western powers. Or else we would say that Chinese and Japanese culture no longer exist in Beijing and Tokyo

 

[Mrredsquare]

 

[Kurchatov]

Everything comes closer to you, more accessible, more easy; less and less need for movement on an increasingly narrow scale .. In the end (which is not clear when it will be) will come in you.. They continue to build a replacement for Creation. 15-minute -> 5-minute -> all online from the home with one numeric identifier -> implanted. The Metaverse + Internet of everything (or any of the other names of the global hive organism that they are undoubtedly targeting).

There is nothing fantastic and (conspiratorial-)theoretical. They are working on it without stopping. When they will do it, whether they will succeed, maybe they will not succeed, or they will meet huge resistance, etc., is another matter. Intentions, plans and work are in place.

I did some digging on specifically on the 15 min city. This appears to be the originator of the idea: https://twitter.com/FractalCities

Reading over this person's views:
- Against the mRNA vaccines
- Against vaccine passports, digital ID's etc

OTOH this isn't a US boomer conservative either and is more of a secular humanist - ie interested in refugees, etc. But my globalist radar isn't going off, just a misguided liberal, although others who want to look at this account may beg to differ or think astroturfing is involved and that's fair.

Maybe "the creator of the specific idea of a plan for the already set development," or something like that. But the creator of the idea itself is certainly not, at least I do not believe. The date of his picture is very interesting.

2014 is very interesting and special year, for example:

"On October 16, 2014 at the office of the Russian Venture Company (RVC), an expert seminar "The Neuronet Roadmap" was held with the participation of Stephen Dunn, director of Starlab Neuroscience Research; Karen Casey, creator of the Global Mind Project; Randal A. Kuhne, CEO of the Science Foundation Carboncopies.org and the founder of NeuraLink Co.; Mikhail Lebedev, Senior Researcher An employee at the Neuroengineering Center of the Department of Neurobiology at Duke University Medical Center (M. Nicolelis Laboratory); Evgeny Kuznetsov, Deputy General Director of RVC. The seminar was conducted by the co-founders of the Russian Neuronet Group Pavel Luksha and Timur Shchukin, as well as the head of the RVC Innovation Ecosystem Development Service Georgy Gogolev.

On behalf of the ASI [Agency for Strategic Initiatives], the group "Designers of Communities of Practice" prepared a report on future neural markets. On July 1, 2015, the first report on the National Technology Initiative (NTI), a long—term program that should ensure Russia's leadership in global technology markets by 2035, was presented to the President of Russia. The day before, in May of the same year, Neuronet was present among the 9 NTI markets discussed during the next "Foresight Fleet". ASI and RVC should conduct an examination of the NTI roadmap for the Neural network market and coordinate it with federal executive authorities by January 1, 2016.
..
Expected stages of development
Ideas about the stages in the development of the Neural network differ for obvious reasons. So, according to M. Lebedev, connecting the brain to global networks will be available to rich people by 2020, in another 5 years the Neural network will become a publicly available commodity, and by 2030 this topic will already lose scientific interest. From the point of view of Maxim Patrushev, Director of the Chemical and Biological Institute of the Baltic Federal University, the Neural Network will replace the Internet by 2035 at most. Raymond Kurzweil promises a hybridization of thinking after 2030. Hans Moravek expects the human brain to be connected to an artificial apparatus at the time of the technological singularity in 2045.

In Pavel Luksha's presentation at the expert seminar "Neuronet Roadmap" at RVC in October 2014, three stages were identified on the way to the Neuronet: 1) Biometrinet (pre-Neuronet) — from 2014 to 2024; 2) the origin of the Neural Network — from 2025 to 2035; 3) the emergence of a full—fledged Neural Network - after 2035. The stages of the formation of the Neural Network proposed in the report on neural markets developed for ASI are considered below.

First stage (2015-2020)
At the first stage, the sprouts of the future network appear unevenly. The human connectome is generally compiled, scientists are busy creating a universal connectome. Modeling of the brain as a whole has not yet been completed, but entire sections of it have already been modeled. The main trend of the first stage is the spread of wearable devices with biofeedback (biofeedback), household appliances are connected to the Internet of Things everywhere, augmented reality systems are being distributed. The bit depth of analog-to-digital converters is increased to 32 bits, which allows you to increase the dynamic range of interfaces. The problem of electricity transmission through the wearable computer network is being solved. Wearable devices accumulate arrays of big data, an independent niche of biometric BigData appears.

The first samples of artificial muscles are emerging, bioprostheses and exoskeletons are used to restore and enhance human abilities. Voiceless communication projects like Silent Talk have been completed. Bioelectronic (English) Russian medicine is beginning to crowd pharmaceuticals. Wearable devices are used in psychotherapy and group work. Business schools teach management of the simplest mental states (relaxation, concentration of attention).

Intelligent personal software agents are gradually spreading and improving. Neurotechnologies are entering the pet market because there are fewer legal restrictions on the introduction of new solutions. The experience of cooperative interaction (crowdsourcing, joint consumption) is gradually accumulating in the economy, and the software for collaboration is being improved.

Second stage (2020-2030)
There is a Neural Network prologue consisting of two directions. Firstly, it is a "biometric Web" as a network of devices that read the physiological parameters of a person. Brain mapping has already been completed, scientists have switched to modeling individual mental processes first, then to recreating mental states. Researchers are also interested in the evolution of the human brain and "neurogenome". High-temperature superconductors have dramatically reduced the cost of magnetoencephalography (MEG), neurointerfaces become inconspicuous, penetrate into the human body, and it becomes possible for them to interact with the unconscious. Augmented reality systems transmit not only images, but also sounds, smells, and tactile sensations. The cheapness of neural interfaces turns them into a generally accepted standard of human-computer interaction. There is a market for the sale of data on behavioral strategies, their suppliers are manufacturers of software for wearable devices.

Many body systems can be artificially duplicated: the immune system, peripheral nervous system, maintenance of blood composition, etc. The list of studied natural altered states of consciousness is being updated. There are automatic stimulators of states (at the same time, they support not only the functions of relaxation or increasing concentration), the exchange of emotions is used in group psychotherapy, accelerated learning systems have been created. Semantic translation (English) of Russian is implemented, the first precedents of the description of nervous semantics appear. The emergence of electronic biological standards for working with data and protocols adapted to subcellular processes is possible, the use of quantum cryptography is not excluded.

Secondly, we are talking about the "collaborative Web" — an organizational model that can involve a person with any competencies in an orderly, purposeful communication. Thanks to standardized APIs, various social networks are integrated into what can be described as a "Network of Networks". Traditional control systems no longer cope with processing the variety of signals generated by the Internet of Things. The methodology of soft systems (Eng.)rus. and organizational flexibility (Eng.) Rus. are in vogue, the role of the computer as a mediator is growing in interaction support systems (Eng.) rus. Computer expert systems are used for risk management. The first experiments of the Neural Network are being conducted, the creation of neurocollectives is in demand in massively multiplayer online games.

The third stage (2030-2040)
At this stage, full-fledged foci of the Neuronet arise and gradually spread. Scientists accept the thesis about the sociality of consciousness, thinking and the psyche, as a result of which they move from modeling the brain to modeling collectives. Attempts are being made to assemble a model of hybrid intelligence. Sensors are approaching nanoscale, in addition to robots of ordinary size, collectives of quasi-living micro robots are emerging. Neurointerfaces based on MEG (magnetoencephalography) are as common as they are today[when?] mobile phones. Electronic devices are beginning to experience competition from optogenetic subcellular interfaces.

Many professional activities are carried out in altered states of consciousness, and artificial types of such states are constructed. The semantic web is supplemented by "biosemantics" (it means semantic analogues of the activity of biosystems). Protocols for the transmission of "raw" neural data are emerging, the first precedents of neural communities are emerging. The basis of such communities is the exocortex and people, collectives and intellectual agents united around it. In neurocollectives, it becomes possible to directly transfer experience through the attunement of people, the creation of artificial experience. The neural network helps in resolving individual and group conflicts.

The fourth stage (after 2040)
The neural network covers the entire field of communications

Нейронет — Википедия

ru.wikipedia.org

Pavel Luksha is VIP "neuro"person.

itWeek

Издание itWeek ежедневно на портале и еженедельно на страницах бумажного номера информирует читателей об актуальных информационных и коммуникационных технологиях, продуктах и решениях и опыте их практического использования предприятиями всех масштабов и отраслей. Издание рассказывает о важнейших...

www.itweek.ru

Neuronet (NeuroWeb) will be the next generation of the Internet
(17.10.2014)

Many participants of the international seminar held last night on the territory of the Russian Venture Company (RVC) are sure of this.

And Pavel Luksha, Ph.D. in Economics, professor at the Skolkovo Business School, Director of Global Education Futures, one of the co-founders of the Russian Neuronet Group, is most confident in this.

In his opinion, the possibilities of the current Internet are very limited. In particular, they do not allow direct transfer of life experiences and emotions from brain to brain. The neural network will allow you to raise the quality of communications to a whole new level.

In addition, it will dramatically increase the effectiveness of teamwork and open up new opportunities in the field of training.

Pavel Luksha believes that in the modern world a lot of problems arise due to the fact that people cannot agree with each other on the joint use of certain resources. The neural network – through the organization of a kind of “collective mind” - will help to solve these problems.

The neural network is the same as the World Wide Web. Only its “nodes” are not smartphones, tablets and laptops, but human brains “plastered” with inclusive or non-inclusive electronics.

From a technical point of view, the work of a Neural network is as follows: electrodes are inserted into a person's head in the right places, which can both record the activity of neurons in the human brain and affect these neurons. Instead of temporarily used and rather bulky electrodes, permanently sewn microimplants can be used. So-called non-invasive solutions are also possible, that is, solutions that do not require surgical intervention and outwardly look, for example, like a helmet put on the head of a neuronet user while the latter wishes to use the services of a Neuronet. The electrical signals taken from this “neural helmet” are encoded in a certain way and fed into the already existing wired or wireless structure of the high-speed Internet.

The roadmap for the development of the neural network for the period from 2014 to 2040 is shown below .

The main stages of the development of the Neural network
Source: Pavel Luksha. Presentation “Roadmap for the development of the Neural Network”, 2014

It shows that the Neural Network is preceded by Biometrinet (2014-2024), which is based on Internet communications using various biometric information from wearable devices. Strictly speaking, the explosive growth of the market of fitness gadgets that track various body parameters (temperature, pulse, pressure, motor activity, and so on) we are watching right now. In this sense, neurodensors can be considered as one of the types of bio-sensors.

The main stages of Biometrinet development
Source: Pavel Luksha. Presentation “Roadmap for the development of the Neural Network”, 2014

When Biometrinet becomes commonplace, the "Neuronet Offensive" will begin (2025-2035), during which communication protocols based on digital models of mental processes will be developed and approaches to organizing a “collective consciousness” capable of “brainstorming” and solving tasks that require the concerted efforts of many people will be found.

A full-fledged Neural network, according to the drafters of this roadmap, will arise only after 2035.

That's what they want to do. In general, with all the differences in the "projections", from 2020 it is expected that the rapid development of the "biometrinet" will begin. What happened in 2020, and it continues? "Virus", "huge need for digital identification systems", as we know and can hear from leaders around the world "the pandemic intensified the digital transformation", etc. Biometric data has increased (as in Russia, after presidential decrees, they now have a functioning unified biometric system, and it is working harder and harder.).. And by 2025 "according to forecasts" the rapid development of neuronet will begin. Klaus told Swiss media in 2016 that "within 10 years for sure" he will begin implantation. It simply repeats the decisions from the road maps (at the bottom of which is DARPA again).

The 15-minute city and 20-minute neighborhood are clearly part of this "cutting out physical interaction" and replacing it with digital. (By the way, it turns out that a 20-minute neighborhood is 5 minutes more than the entire 15-minute city of which the neighborhood is a part. )

I'm not afraid, so I don't need to reassure myself that all this isn't part of the familiar sinister plan. There is a Lord God Who is the Owner and decides everything in the end. The criteria are faith, striving for Virtue, love for the neighbor and so on. So the 15-minute reptiles can do whatever they're allowed to do, and in the end they'll get what they deserve, just like everyone else.

 

[bubs]

I think the resistance of a segment of the population against the 15min city in the US will be a return to multigenerational households. In order to afford to comply with the Globalist Green initiatives which will be too expensive for most to convert their vehicles and households to compliance, it will require several sets of income streams under 1 roof to not be forced out and into the box buildings of the 15min city. A good starting place would be to get your house paid off. But that still may not be enough if Green compliance and potential serious increase in property taxes doesn’t force all but the elite 1% off the land.

 

[Easy_C]

One thing I should say:

I've been working in some competing proposals that share some significant overlap with this idea, but the core difference is control. The 15 minute city is trying to create a series of identical "hives" (note the nature of the graphics used. It's a subtle reference to Masonic allegory) that are centrally controlled by algorithm and AI.

My solution is to try to create these smaller entities but use advances in micro-scale manufacturing and production technology to return as much productive capacity as possible to the micro level. You don't need to be creating screwdrivers at a factory in China, with materials shipped around the world twice, when the people just on my street could very easily make it here same day because one of us has a 3D printer with extra-tough material and the other has CnC equipment in their respective garages. You also don't need manufacturing for a lot of smaller metal or plastic parts that are used daily when this kind of technology allows production to occur locally. You'd only need larger manufacturing facilities for larger items (large household appliances, cars, etc) and all you'd need to produce most items in-town would be raw materials.

The goal would be to dramatically de-centralize economic power, restore local relationship-based commerce, and push regulatory practices down to a smaller level.

If you look at the two proposals you can see the core difference despite the seeming similarities. What they're doing is designed to create "pod people", while my proposal is attempting to decentralize decision making, politics, and commerce to the greatest degree that it is possible to do so (and in so doing dramatically reduce the amount of waste that is created. The more localized your supply chains the less waste and the less environmental damage)

 

[DanielH]

I think the resistance of a segment of the population against the 15min city in the US will be a return to multigenerational households. In order to afford to comply with the Globalist Green initiatives which will be too expensive for most to convert their vehicles and households to compliance, it will require several sets of income streams under 1 roof to not be forced out and into the box buildings of the 15min city. A good starting place would be to get your house paid off. But that still may not be enough if Green compliance and potential serious increase in property taxes doesn’t force all but the elite 1% off the land.

I can't think of any of my American friends, including some exceptionally based ones, who live in multigenerational households. I have Russian, Asian, and Greek friends who live in/ have lived in multigenerational households, but no Americans. There is just too big of a disconnect between the current generation raising children and their parents.

The American version of this which I've seen in several instances is parents financing a home or business for their children, but actually cohabiting? No.

Granted, when my stepfather dies, I will try to get my mother to live with us, but by then my son might even have moved out already. It would be better if parents would move in with their children when their grandchildren are still young, to help out. And it needs to happen like that - parents moving in with their children, instead of vice-versa, because both my generation and my parents' generations are too prideful and materialistic for it to work in the other direction. This seems to be a uniquely American phenomenon. Children don't seem to have those issues living with their parents in other cultures. In America, grandparents and their children seem to have issues with boundaries.

___

Just going off of who controls the money and governments of the world, I will resist the 15 minute city phenomenon because it will always end up looking more like this:

And less like this:

 

[Tardynox]

It sounds appealing in theory, but of course our social engineering overlords have ulterior motives behind it all.

In theory I love the idea of being able to walk or ride a train for all my daily needs. In urban and suburban Japan, for example, this is the norm. It annoys me that here in the southeast US I need to get in my car to do absolutely anything, but at least some soy-overdosing middle management social engineer isn’t manipulating my environment for his own purposes.

I agree, I pretty much have all my needs and most other things within 20 minutes of my house. Obviously the motivation behind the project is bad, but in theory it's great. I guess if you come from a very car-dependant region it seems far fetched but a large part of the world really already lives this way. Nevertheless I still wouldn't put my trust in a project like this when it comes from the WEF.

 

[bubs]

I can't think of any of my American friends, including some exceptionally based ones, who live in multigenerational households. I have Russian, Asian, and Greek friends who live in/ have lived in multigenerational households, but no Americans. There is just too big of a disconnect between the current generation raising children and their parents.

The American version of this which I've seen in several instances is parents financing a home or business for their children, but actually cohabiting? No.

Granted, when my stepfather dies, I will try to get my mother to live with us, but by then my son might even have moved out already. It would be better if parents would move in with their children when their grandchildren are still young, to help out. And it needs to happen like that - parents moving in with their children, instead of vice-versa, because both my generation and my parents' generations are too prideful and materialistic for it to work in the other direction. This seems to be a uniquely American phenomenon. Children don't seem to have those issues living with their parents in other cultures. In America, grandparents and their children seem to have issues with boundaries.

___

Just going off of who controls the money and governments of the world, I will resist the 15 minute city phenomenon because it will always end up looking more like this:

And less like this:

So are you saying that most 20-30 something’s would rather live in a 15 min city 10x10ft pod dwelling just to feel independent vs living with their parents in a big 5 bedroom house in the countryside to pool together their income and assets to fend off the Globalists agenda? On the other end of the spectrum, would be best for the 80+year old that now needs special care to sell their home and move in with their 40-60 year old children and helping pay for Green upgrades and a visiting nurse vs having all their assets wiped out going into a nursing home and the 40-60 year old children being forced out of their home and into a pod city.

 

[Bird]

 

[Easy_C]

So are you saying that most 20-30 something’s would rather live in a 15 min city 10x10ft pod dwelling just to feel independent vs living with their parents in a big 5 bedroom house in the countryside to pool together their income and assets to fend off the Globalists agenda? On the other end of the spectrum, would be best for the 80+year old that now needs special care to sell their home and move in with their 40-60 year old children and helping pay for Green upgrades and a visiting nurse vs having all their assets wiped out going into a nursing home and the 40-60 year old children being forced out of their home and into a pod city.

That type already does choose to live that way in New York City.

 

[ginsu]

That type already does choose to live that way in New York City.

its not only the younger generation but the older generation who doesnt want it, just ask boomers and grandparents to return back to a multi family generation home. They wont have it

 

[bubs]

its not only the younger generation but the older generation who doesnt want it, just ask boomers and grandparents to return back to a multi family generation home. They wont have it

I agree with the Sex in the City people wouldn’t have it, but I actually just saw an article yesterday stating that multigenerational house rose from 6% in US to 9% in last 20 years. Primarily the pointed the root cause for grandparents being able to help raise children due to the insane rising costs of Daycare, working mothers, single mothers etc. However my point was more about options going forward if they are trying to force people into the 15 min cities that I’d expect multi-generational households to really increase exponentially as a way to pool together income and resources to live outside of that communist cattle corral. I think 50% or more of US citizens would prefer suburban or rural living over 15 min city life given a method to beat the economic obstacles that the powers that be will use to force their hand.

 

[ginsu]

honestly multi generational households are just the best thing to do even outside of material considerations. Grandparents spending more time with their children and grandchildren promotes health and longevity. The fastest way to lose all sense of purpose and will to live is to be stuck in an elderly home surrounded by elderly people watching tv most of the day. Is it not one of the main goals in life to spend as much quality time with family as possible. This is the main regret most people have on their death beds, and yet western society arranges itself to make spending time with family an after thought

 

[Pete345]

 

[Enhanced Eddie]

The 15-minute city was already implemented during covid 3 years ago in a few countries. I was in the Philippines when the plandemic started and they restricted everyone to moving only within their suburb. Travel to other parts even of the same town was prohibited. They segmented my city so that everyone could access pharmacies and supermarkets without traveling more than 15 minutes. There were military and police checkpoints preventing me from leaving my suburb. I heard this was also done in Australia.

 

[M'bare]

It goes without saying, but I'm not buying into anything "they" are pushing..that's for sure. Who even needs to read what they have to say. If the WEF types, media, little hats, etc are pushing it, then you know it's going to be evil.


However I came across Wrath of Gnon on Twitter some time ago, and really like his thoughts on and things he shares regarding towns. He pretty much advocates for more traditional towns from back in the day, and to make them aesthetically pleasing. Human scale towns, that are self sufficient too.

Until it's our time -- revelations level of happenings and events (which may very well be on the way soon), then I think it's sound to work on building communities to live in, to commune with others and get around like minded people. I don't mean to slink away from the rest of society, and not be out in the mix, because I think we should.

We have to take care and perform our duties as required on earth, and our duties as believers in Christ. We know this. But I can't help but like the idea and hope to strive for something along these lines:

How to build a small town in Texas

Of all the questions I get on Twitter the most common is this: “How do you build a town?” We know how it used to be done, but these last two centuries we have forgotten how to do it.

wrathofgnon.substack.com

I don't know why he says "in texas." This could apply anywhere I think.


Most likely there will be no escape what's coming, but it sure would be nice to not be a part of the system, this beast system that's coming. We're commanded to reject it in fact. If we don't have some community to create your own system, how do we survive what's coming? I don't see how it's possible, but better to perish than be a part of what's on the horizon.

 

[bubs]

It goes without saying, but I'm not buying into anything "they" are pushing..that's for sure. Who even needs to read what they have to say. If the WEF types, media, little hats, etc are pushing it, then you know it's going to be evil.


However I came across Wrath of Gnon on Twitter some time ago, and really like his thoughts on and things he shares regarding towns. He pretty much advocates for more traditional towns from back in the day, and to make them aesthetically pleasing. Human scale towns, that are self sufficient too.

Until it's our time -- revelations level of happenings and events (which may very well be on the way soon), then I think it's sound to work on building communities to live in, to commune with others and get around like minded people. I don't mean to slink away from the rest of society, and not be out in the mix, because I think we should.

We have to take care and perform our duties as required on earth, and our duties as believers in Christ. We know this. But I can't help but like the idea and hope to strive for something along these lines:

How to build a small town in Texas

Of all the questions I get on Twitter the most common is this: “How do you build a town?” We know how it used to be done, but these last two centuries we have forgotten how to do it.

wrathofgnon.substack.com

I don't know why he says "in texas." This could apply anywhere I think.


Most likely there will be no escape what's coming, but it sure would be nice to not be a part of the system, this beast system that's coming. We're commanded to reject it in fact. If we don't have some community to create your own system, how do we survive what's coming? I don't see how it's possible, but better to perish than be a part of what's on the horizon.

I like that article it has a lot of good thoughts in it but the writer’s vision is the same as the globalist vision just with his own opinion on design inserted and still lacks individual choices on how a person wants to live, he just assumes everyone will be happy with his vision. My only counterarguments/suggestions for improvement:
1) They only give 1 housing option (center city which then is exactly same as forced WEF living/15min city. Perhaps have 3 housing options for choice (same price so there isn’t an elite class/serf class), Live in outer ring beyond the fields (most private furthest from neighbors but also least convenient), live in a ring along the outskirts of town center (some separation from the hussle of the inner-town but still allows some privacy and moderate convenience to town activities . 3) live in town center. This would still allow existing 3 options of home life as desired by the individual have but in a more structured way to be developed. I do like the small size of the community so even the people living in the ring the furthest out are still only a less than 1 mile /10 min. walk (or 3-4 min electric golf cart ride/horse ride) to town center.

I don’t like a train running thru the center of town. Sure it’s the most practical for convenience people and supplies dropped off centrally, but trains are noisy and annoying and IMO would decrease the quality of life for those in the town. No one wants to live next to the tracks. Run the train station outside of the community so it’s not disturbing the peace of the community as a whole.

I don’t understand the point about bringing in tourism for income. What is the drawl? Unless this town is on a beach, ski area, historical area etc this town is basically a glorified Amish community.

Final point. If this town is still in the modern world with wifi and all the electronic gadgets of modern world, human nature will still keep most people to be in isolation, choosing to spend their spare time fooling with their phones, playing video games etc. in their homes. Just look at college campus life today vs 20 years ago or more. 10k people on campus on a nice spring day and no one to be seen communicating or hanging outside anymore. Hussle to class (if not done remote) then hussle back to your dorm to get on your gadgets.