Give me something short and concrete that I can send them in response, preferably with hyperlinks attached that go to websites that won't be taken down
Look, the twitter poster is obviously a paid troll to place the possible locus of who originated the code elsewhere. Hence, the buzzword location 'Serbia'. Come on!!!! That tweet didn't even use correct grammar, let alone create a tweet that a fourth grader could comprehend. Classic misdirection.Weird. Why did the data scientist she refers to have a different image on linkedin from the real guy, but still kept the same name? She reverse image-searched and that photo was nowhere else. Is that something that could happen normally?
Thanks to "Russia collusion" there is a law/executive order in place that allows the sitting president to effectively go to war with those complicit in an attempt to commit a fraud like this.One thing I don’t get, if the courts rule one way, the millions of fraudulent ballots are indeed fraudulent, but then the states ignore the ruling and certify the fraud ballots, and declare Biden the winner, then what happens if this drags into January and February and both candidates are giving orders as if they are president. Obviously I’m not a lawyer, but there are so many ways this can break. How would a disputed election result get resolved?
Or I suppose a more likely situation is that neither candidate gets to 270 electoral votes, because some are disputed and not going to anyone. Then what?
I’ve seen reports that they are going as high as 37 cycles.Look up the Portugal court ruling m.
it references a French study which found that at 35 amplification cycles, 97% of samples (sample size of 72) were false positives and failed to produce Any culture.
The standard setting for the test in the US is 35.
In layman’s terms: the sensitivity for the test is dialed up way too high and is producing significant false positives.
Strongly disagree. Normies will not want to wade through 400 pages of memes, long videos, discredited claims, inspirational tweets, etc. I'm sure many of us here have friends/relatives that are reading the NYT/Post/etc and think "there's no evidence and Trump is just making this up."
Give me something short and concrete that I can send them in response, preferably with hyperlinks attached that go to websites that won't be taken down. I understand that the really juicy evidence is being saved by the courts but there has to be at least enough solid circumstantial evidence of anomalies that is clear enough to at least make obvious that something is wrong. That will go a long way towards at least opening their mind to whatever damning evidence Trump's team comes up with in the next couple of weeks.
I hope to see Romney and Ryan and other controlled opposition GOP types behind bars just as much as Democrats. If this is truly centralized, widespread corruption, it's impossible the people pulling the levers would benefit one party and overlook the other.
I have a feeling the last 4 years of GOP betrayal and opposition to Trump will make much more sense pretty soon.
Your disagreement is as irrelevant here as it is to a normie. Who cares what they want or don't want? You won't get many takers here.
The truth doesn't come easy. You have to make the effort yourself to find it, not to mention use your own critical thinking abilities to decipher it. It's not up to anyone else but you to find it and make it more concrete.
Many of us are adding value in this thread by building the puzzle. Be a part of that process and then use what you gather to have discussions with others.
There really isn't such a thing as a smoking gun any more but with much common sense, you can get pretty close. You and I aren't entitled to that information. You just need to make a better effort to seek it.
I don't believe so; my best guess is that Trump's legal team represents the Trump Campigan as a private entity and not the "Trump public office," which is separate. FOIA is for public/government records and data not private. If anyone knows for sure, please chime in.But even then they are obligated to provide that data to anyone who files a FOIA request, right?