30 year old roastie gets pumped and dumped by Chad she met through Tinder and now wan

stugatz

Pelican
Catholic
re:roastie

Dmac_NrUYAUdGPa.jpg


From her Twitter feed, a more comprehensive body shot.

This candid picture definitely makes her look better than in Placer's picture (and the black dress is hiding her curves), but those arms don't lie. Sad!

WNB if sober. WB if eight sheets to the wind, and with video evidence.
 

MMM

Kingfisher
Dude: May I have sex with you?
SJW vagina: Shut up and ride me hard Chad!
SJW hamster: Silly Chad, those rules are for soy boys!
Shut up and ride me hard Chad!

Dude: May I have sex with you and ghost?
SJW vagina: Shut up and ride me hard Chad!
SJW hamster: Dayum, Chad, you're callin me out for the slore that I am. Shut up and ride me hard Chad!
 

MMM

Kingfisher
“I invited a guy from Tinder to my empty apartment on a snow day,” I said. “Let’s just assume you have blanket consent.”

She invited me from hook up app Tinder to her empty apartment on a snow day, didn't ask for commitment and allowed me to bang her. Let's just assume I have blanket consent to ghost.
 

torridon747

 
Banned
Nature is so beautifully cruel. Women that wield such intrinsic power in their youth and fail to learn from it suffer as they get older. And still they want more than the gift of being the most privileged group on the planet and still they don't suffer nearly as much as their failure male counterparts. Complaining with such indignation publicly and loudly about how much of a failure they are, in their entitled stupor not realizing how willfully they're explaining their own incompetence - being bested at a game they not only evolved to win, our culture shifted much to its own detriment to give them better odds for. It was a mistake to give women any more agency than nature afforded them. It was a mistake to leave time honoured traditions involving men and women behind. We know it, they're just figuring it out. Every day I see the pendulum swing a little more t'word "progressive" ideologies and by the grace of natural law and good timing I see it recoil just as far if not further back t'word traditionalism. I might not live to see things get back to normal but at least there are places left wherr these things aren't so insane.

Now women want to start movements against ghosting. 10 years ago a woman would complain about being ghosted. 20 years ago a woman would be embarassed she got ghosted, 50 years ago the father and family would make sure they didnt raise a slut and screen potential suiters. This insanity is unsustainable, there's a right way to do things and thankfully it's not so distant in our cultural memory. The more agency we give women - and make no mistake we give it to them - the more unhappy they are. If we can't control our women, it's weakness that will be exploited.
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
I just wanted to put this prediction in writing in case it comes up in the future.

She's 30 now. But my guess is that by 40 she's going to become a "late-life lesbian" like Cynthia Nixon, Meredith Baxter, and Carol Leifer.

But she won't do this quietly. No, she'll do it in a grand, sweeping manner, with editorials in every newspaper and magazine and a featured gay wedding announcement in The New York Times.

This generally seems to be the way hyper-sexual, maladjusted women go. And if anyone has her dating profile on file, I wouldn't be surprised to find she's already "experimented."

***

To summarize all my comments, I don't have any interest in regulating or even judging what people do with their personal lives. You wanna be gay or fuck 50 people on your own time? Have fun! You wanna sit home and get high? Go right ahead!

The problem comes when people who do these things assume the role of "sage" or "rule-maker" and try and tell the rest of us how we should live.

And that's what she's doing in two ways. First, by writing her idiotic tell-all in the most public of spaces, The New York Times, and trying to stretch the definition of "consent." And second, by having a teaching job in the humanities.

If you think her thoughts aren't filtering down to the teenage girls (and boys) who take her writing classes, you're living in fantasy land. I once had professors like this. But it was the age before the Internet, so I had no idea why I was always on their bad side. In retrospect, it's because I didn't kiss their asses over their perverse pseudo-feminist politics.

They would give high grades to substandard writers whose work reflected their politics and bad grades to really good writers who didn't toe their party line. There was little you could do about this in the Reagan Era, but I suspect now Generation Z will start calling such professors on their bullshit.

The good thing is that we now have the Internet. And what's on here stays on here. So, her future students and would-be lovers will find pages like this when they look up the name COURTNEY SENDER. And even if they try to dismiss all of this as partisan criticism or "sexism," it's still going to be lodged in a corner of their minds.
 
RE: 30 year old roastie

Days of Broken Arrows said:
If you think her thoughts aren't filtering down to the teenage girls (and boys) who take her writing classes, you're living in fantasy land. I once had professors like this. But it was the age before the Internet, so I had no idea why I was always on their bad side. In retrospect, it's because I didn't kiss their asses over their perverse pseudo-feminist politics.

They would give high grades to substandard writers whose work reflected their politics and bad grades to really good writers who didn't toe their party line. There was little you could do about this in the Reagan Era, but I suspect now Generation Z will start calling such professors on their bullshit.

The good thing is that we now have the Internet. And what's on here stays on here. So, her future students and would-be lovers will find pages like this when they look up the name COURTNEY SENDER. And even if they try to dismiss all of this as partisan criticism or "sexism," it's still going to be lodged in a corner of their minds.

Knowing this, I worked through 1/3 of a masters degree with a 4.0 GPA. I just wrote exactly the opposite of my true opinions--gotta subvert the system. I watched other right wingers go down in flames and get horrible grades over and over again tying to argue with the liberals. It was like watching a debate of 3 men vs. 30 women and everyone speaking at once, the lefties losing their cool and shouting. I remember very distinctly actually struggling to make the most absurd argument against my true opinion and then write that.. I could bang out an "A" paper in no time because I din't need to be logical, just agree with the professor's politics.
 

Easy_C

Peacock
Take a step back and looking at this Articl as a bell weather.

Content aside, the mere fact that a columnist would write PUBLICLY about her shitty one night stand, and a major paper would actually publish that piece shows how far we’ve fallen.

50 years ago very few women would dare even admit publicly that they had engaged in this kind of hookup, let alone write in specific detail about it on a global paper.
 

placer

Kingfisher
Protestant
There is an old piece of wisdom which summarizes this thread:

Proverbs 22:14 (NIV) said:
The mouth of an adulterous woman is a deep pit;
a man who is under the Lord’s wrath falls into it.

This woman is clearly adulterous, having slept with a Tinder match on the first date. She is upset that he did not contact her afterwards, so proposes to make it rape for a man to stop contact with a woman after having sex with her. She is not taking responsibility for her own decision to engage in adultery.

In a more civilized (read: God-fearing) society, we would have simply ignored the words coming out of this adulterous woman's mouth. Instead, our society ignores the traditional way of running a working society (that would be the commandants of God) and gives heed to what this woman says.

In a society where marriage meant something, this overweight woman would have settled for an overweight man and gotten married to him; she would be happy and not getting these kinds of idiotic rants published in major newspapers.

How our society has degenerated in the past 60 years.
 

trippin_squares

 
Banned
So does a stridently-feminist/socialist society eventually just devolve into a parody of itself? If these ridiculous proposals become law, that'll just encourage more chad-fucking by women and exacerbate the issues of sexual marketplace imbalance and the breakdown of a civilized America.
 

jeffreyjerpp

Kingfisher
Eugenics said:
Nature is so beautifully cruel.....This insanity is unsustainable....If we can't control our women, it's weakness that will be exploited.

Women are going to pay a terrible price for all of this, and soon.

Right now, they depend entirely on the globohomo corporate government structure to support them. Sort of like a bratty kid making faces and teasing while standing behind their big brother who keeps them safe no matter what.

All it takes is one large disaster of the types that are common throughout history (economic collapse, plague, famine, etc), and the big brother is instantly gone. What happens then?

Women will be totally dependent on men again, and like most of history, largely at their mercy. Except now most men know the awful truth about female nature, and the social norms that protected women before have been obliterated by the women themselves.
 

trippin_squares

 
Banned
I certainly hope that you are right in that women as a mostly global collective (because there are still small bastions of civilized resistance/ignorance of feminism out there) will get their comeuppance and realize that they cannot live in an advanced, stabilized civilization without correcting the massive imbalance in the sexual marketplace. I certainly hope that extremely promiscuous women will start looking around and seeing their futures as socially-deformed, used-up cat ladies, childless and without purpose in life, if they continue their carousel-riding habits (or if young, chaste women pick up these habits in the first place).

I hope you are right. Just a glimmer exists for this happening, I think, but it's still there.
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
jeffreyjerpp said:
Eugenics said:
Nature is so beautifully cruel.....This insanity is unsustainable....If we can't control our women, it's weakness that will be exploited.

Women are going to pay a terrible price for all of this, and soon.

Right now, they depend entirely on the globohomo corporate government structure to support them. Sort of like a bratty kid making faces and teasing while standing behind their big brother who keeps them safe no matter what.

All it takes is one large disaster of the types that are common throughout history (economic collapse, plague, famine, etc), and the big brother is instantly gone. What happens then?

This is a great comparison. Women>Globalist corporations = First grade girls>Teachers

You wonder why there is no shame in adult women acting like little girls -- being "tattle-tales" and running to authorities at the slightest provocation, and then breaking out the crocodile tears when they're caught lying.
 
Top