Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Elipe" data-source="post: 1535034" data-attributes="member: 17998">What's also especially weird about this notion that Paul was a male feminist is how Paul, when he was Saul, treated Christians. The man killed many Christians and dragged them off to be stoned. So it's not like Paul had this sensitive modernist outlook on life before he converted. This was, to use a C.S. Lewis expression, a man with a chest. Paul's testosterone level would put probably 99% of men living today to shame. He was a man of a Pharisaic and Roman background, two backgrounds that clearly were not feminist in their outlook (remember the woman being dragged before Jesus to be stoned for adultery?).So you would have to basically argue that Paul became a feminist when he converted, and to do that you would have to show that feminism is Christian doctrine. You can't, though. That's why they have to play all these stupid word salad games with Scripture to convince you that feminism is Christian.Paul would basically have to go from this:<img src="https://www.startpage.com/av/proxy-image?piurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmelmagazine.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F01%2F66f-1.jpg&amp;sp=1635211686Tf1a248d8432fd470fc03a8043989ef6fe7ea5b45f887fe801f6db135e8371814" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="width: 186px" />To this:<img src="https://www.startpage.com/av/proxy-image?piurl=https%3A%2F%2F64.media.tumblr.com%2F19f5184328f609b8c71db7f08235f782%2Fc1724c9fa45bd45b-ae%2Fs500x750%2Ff9768150d88cf05cdb21028109296df976172cc6.jpg&amp;sp=1635211818T771f91f3ed1bbafc4d1ee2aaba73ae3448b9b1a1912b8b9d7e246507bfe7855b" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="width: 186px" />Bit of humor there, but you just don't see this whiny male feminist crap in the tone of Paul's writing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Elipe, post: 1535034, member: 17998"] What's also especially weird about this notion that Paul was a male feminist is how Paul, when he was Saul, treated Christians. The man killed many Christians and dragged them off to be stoned. So it's not like Paul had this sensitive modernist outlook on life before he converted. This was, to use a C.S. Lewis expression, a man with a chest. Paul's testosterone level would put probably 99% of men living today to shame. He was a man of a Pharisaic and Roman background, two backgrounds that clearly were not feminist in their outlook (remember the woman being dragged before Jesus to be stoned for adultery?). So you would have to basically argue that Paul became a feminist when he converted, and to do that you would have to show that feminism is Christian doctrine. You can't, though. That's why they have to play all these stupid word salad games with Scripture to convince you that feminism is Christian. Paul would basically have to go from this: [IMG width="186px"]https://www.startpage.com/av/proxy-image?piurl=https%3A%2F%2Fmelmagazine.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2021%2F01%2F66f-1.jpg&sp=1635211686Tf1a248d8432fd470fc03a8043989ef6fe7ea5b45f887fe801f6db135e8371814[/IMG] To this: [IMG width="186px"]https://www.startpage.com/av/proxy-image?piurl=https%3A%2F%2F64.media.tumblr.com%2F19f5184328f609b8c71db7f08235f782%2Fc1724c9fa45bd45b-ae%2Fs500x750%2Ff9768150d88cf05cdb21028109296df976172cc6.jpg&sp=1635211818T771f91f3ed1bbafc4d1ee2aaba73ae3448b9b1a1912b8b9d7e246507bfe7855b[/IMG] Bit of humor there, but you just don't see this whiny male feminist crap in the tone of Paul's writing. [/QUOTE]

Verification