5 Reasons Why You Should Never Experiment With Casual Sex

paternos

Woodpecker
Catholic
If only you would tackle male culture as much as you tackle feminism... We would be living in a completely different world! Roosh has apparently changed, but his audience not so much. As much as I hate feminism, it isn't exactly it's fault that secular men are whores. This has been the case since before feminism or even the 70s sexual revolution. The first Playboy edition was lauched in the early 50s, a time where double standards were still very strong, most women were still highly expected to be virgins while promiscuity among men was not only accepted but even encouraged. Promiscuous men are not whores or whoremongers anymore but "womanizers", "chads", etc. It is ridiculous to blame women for secular men being whores. Porn was created by and for men. Men make up 70% of porn consumers. Depravity and promiscuity are rampant, encouraged and deeply rooted in male culture much more than they are in female culture. Promiscuity among women is only recently starting to become accepted. I've come across statistics that show that men apparently also cheat on at higher rates than women. The double standards when it comes to promiscuity is not only pathetic but also useless. You're never gonna have a christian society or traditional women as long as promiscuity among men is accepted, because it is an inevitable outcome that a time will come where rates of promiscuity are also gonna increase among women in such society
You're spot on.

I just read this great article by Roosh and AnonymousBosch


It covers the inversion of values. In popular culture everybody always takes the 60s as the cultural revolution and as that might be true this is part of a much larger trend as is described well in these articles.

The vision on masculinity has been highly sexualized which is ajewish subversion of healthy desire.

I think it goes back to the 18th century with the French revolution and the life of Casanova.

And the popularizing of the condom in the 1930s in production is a big sign promoting this hookup culture.

The inversion of values is the rule we are currently in. I personally think we are currently under jewish spiritual and political rule. It's the opposite of christ, it's the high priests persecuting Jesus still today. They killed him in the flesh and now they want to kill Christ in our minds.

Just reading on it:
In March 2013, philanthropist Bill Gates offered US$100,000 grants through his foundation for a condom design that "significantly preserves or enhances pleasure" to encourage more males to adopt the use of condoms for safer sex.

The rulers are promoting sickness and it poses a huge challenge for men and women to follow Christ in these times as the devil is close.

Anyhow I totally agree with you that bashing women (or men) has no value. In the end we are both heavily conditioned to the system and we both need to break free.
 

messaggera

Pelican
Woman
Other Christian
What you are doing in your post is just showing your resentment to women and society.

No. I do not resent women and society, because I am not of this world. But I do have sorrow for and do pray for those lost souls.

My post was in reference to a conversation about secular women and society.

I should not, but will entertain by asking if you would be so kind to clarify your post:

think you shouldn't blame women and society for your own weakness.

What would my weakness be in your opinion?

May peace be with you Christian brother.
 

triplechoc

Pigeon
Woman
Orthodox
You're spot on.

I just read this great article by Roosh and AnonymousBosch


It covers the inversion of values. In popular culture everybody always takes the 60s as the cultural revolution and as that might be true this is part of a much larger trend as is described well in these articles.

The vision on masculinity has been highly sexualized which is ajewish subversion of healthy desire.

I think it goes back to the 18th century with the French revolution and the life of Casanova.

And the popularizing of the condom in the 1930s in production is a big sign promoting this hookup culture.

The inversion of values is the rule we are currently in. I personally think we are currently under jewish spiritual and political rule. It's the opposite of christ, it's the high priests persecuting Jesus still today. They killed him in the flesh and now they want to kill Christ in our minds.

Just reading on it:
In March 2013, philanthropist Bill Gates offered US$100,000 grants through his foundation for a condom design that "significantly preserves or enhances pleasure" to encourage more males to adopt the use of condoms for safer sex.

The rulers are promoting sickness and it poses a huge challenge for men and women to follow Christ in these times as the devil is close.

Anyhow I totally agree with you that bashing women (or men) has no value. In the end we are both heavily conditioned to the system and we both need to break free

This article is great. I personally first became aware of the inversion agenda through the whole trans thing, then I noticed that everything is becoming inverted, all values, and that we are being taught to stay as far away from nature as possible. I've come across many denunciations about a jewish finger on this whole thing but I'm still not sure if they are true, cause I'm bit ignorant on the topic and also cause I've come across many christians who claim that these denunciations are wrong. For instance, theres a pastor called Scott Lively who has made a pretty convincing point about, as strange as it may sound, how anti-semitism is part of a homosexual agenda to destroy jewish (and therefore christian) values. So I'm pretty lost on this subject
 

paternos

Woodpecker
Catholic
No. I do not resent women and society, because I am not of this world. But I do have sorrow for and do pray for those lost souls.

My post was in reference to a conversation about secular women and society.

I should not, but will entertain by asking if you would be so kind to clarify your post:



What would my weakness be in your opinion?

May peace be with you Christian brother.
Hey brother,

Ofcourse I can't look in your soul, and I don't know your weakness, I just see a few lines by you written down here and react (and probably interpret too much)

I think I react to you a frustration I have for some time of men blaming women for their sins. Blaming their promiscuity and that we as men should keep them in the kitchen and take care of the children.

Women are subverted too. And I see them miss Maria Magdalena in their lives. I love the churches in Spain and Italy where Maria is such a big part of christianity.

I'm just not into the trad catholic movement (not saying you are part of that). To me it feels as a new LARP game trying to be strong. While i now know I meet christ in my weakness. Instead of acting all cool and strong I go on my knees today.

I think the times are not optimal, sin is being sold in every internet page, in every TV channel, on every bill board. And men and women are sensitive to that.

But there is light for all of us. And I see many women desiring the light, desiring Maria in their lifes, I just strongly belief we can only do our part and by doing that we can move the world. Not by hubris. But by seeing a good believer is always a greta inspiration to me.

Anyhow, my post attacking you, said more about me than about me than about you. (as it always does, as they were my words)

Have a good night brother,
 

gent

Sparrow
Catholic
If only you would tackle male culture as much as you tackle feminism... We would be living in a completely different world! Roosh has apparently changed, but his audience not so much. As much as I hate feminism, it isn't exactly it's fault that secular men are whores. This has been the case since before feminism or even the 70s sexual revolution. The first Playboy edition was lauched in the early 50s, a time where double standards were still very strong, most women were still highly expected to be virgins while promiscuity among men was not only accepted but even encouraged. Promiscuous men are not whores or whoremongers anymore but "womanizers", "chads", etc. It is ridiculous to blame women for secular men being whores. Porn was created by and for men. Men make up 70% of porn consumers. Depravity and promiscuity are rampant, encouraged and deeply rooted in male culture much more than they are in female culture. Promiscuity among women is only recently starting to become accepted. I've come across statistics that show that men apparently also cheat on at higher rates than women. The double standards when it comes to promiscuity is not only pathetic but also useless. You're never gonna have a christian society or traditional women as long as promiscuity among men is accepted, because it is an inevitable outcome that a time will come where rates of promiscuity are also gonna increase among women in such society
The thing is that men are that way by nature. I think it was Fr. Josiah Trenham who said that God made men dependent on women in a way after the fall by increasing their sexual desire, similar to how women are subjected to men due to their weaker physical strength.

Not making excuses and I will certainly teach my son the value of chastity as Roosh lays on in this article. But women are criticized more harshly for promiscuity for the same reason that men are criticized more harshly for being weak. It's not entirely a double standard.
 

paternos

Woodpecker
Catholic
This article is great. I personally first became aware of the inversion agenda through the whole trans thing, then I noticed that everything is becoming inverted, all values, and that we are being taught to stay as far away from nature as possible. I've come across many denunciations about a jewish finger on this whole thing but I'm still not sure if they are true, cause I'm bit ignorant on the topic and also cause I've come across many christians who claim that these denunciations are wrong. For instance, theres a pastor called Scott Lively who has made a pretty convincing point about, as strange as it may sound, how anti-semitism is part of a homosexual agenda to destroy jewish (and therefore christian) values. So I'm pretty lost on this subject
Just reading about him, never heard of him before, but he seems a bit gay obsessed..

Not that it's not sin, but seems like a very strange position to me. And I see nothing in the bible which supports this amount of focus. (you have a good sound clip to listen to)

To me the bible makes more sense when I allow myself to call out the jews.

Like in John 18:28-40 - Jesus Before Pilate

And they are not the real jews, they are the high priests in the nice robes, the money changers, and actually not a lot changed in 2000 years.

And i think we should take this with a bit of freedom, but we see many jewish organisations
- promoting immigration, which destroys communities
- promoting LGBTisms, which kills marriage and promotes debauchery
- anti-catholic-christian - constantly outlining pedophile priests (https://www.jweekly.com/2006/10/20/jewish-filmmaker-delves-into-pedophile-priest-scandal/)
- promoting climate change - making the temperature of the weather our new god

Seems we are in a cultish society which does everything to denounce the real god and christians. (so nothing is different in 2000 years!)

The Bible is highly relevant today.

And the modernist movement just says: Ah well what is written on Jews in the Bible is just old-fashioned.

Well to me it's simple. Is the Bible a holy book?

If the answer is yes, better read it well and take it seriously what is written.
 

triplechoc

Pigeon
Woman
Orthodox
The thing is that men are that way by nature. I think it was Fr. Josiah Trenham who said that God made men dependent on women in a way after the fall by increasing their sexual desire, similar to how women are subjected to men due to their weaker physical strength.

Not making excuses and I will certainly teach my son the value of chastity as Roosh lays on in this article. But women are criticized more harshly for promiscuity for the same reason that men are criticized more harshly for being weak. It's not entirely a double standard.
This is a narrative that has immensely helped the destruction of society. Higher sexual desire does not inevitably equate promiscuity. You can have normal sex with your wife and as a rational human being, as oppose to an irrational animal, you can also control yourself. Even more so being the case that men are stronger than women. Instead, secular men (not saying this is your case) have been for a long time engaging in unnatural depravity that is not in their nature and promiscuity and saying things like "We can't help ourselves!", "Thats how men are!" to justify it. This narrative is now deeply rooted in society. The bible makes it clear that men should only have sex with their wives and that whoremongers and adulterers will not inherit the kingdom of God. God would not demand from men something they aren't capable of doing. Either men are judged as harshly as women for promiscuity or none are. Female whores feed male whores and vice versa. If you're not having sex with your wife and you are not having sex with promiscuous women, then who are you having sex with?

1 Corinthians 7:1-40

Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband. The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Do not deprive one another, except perhaps by agreement for a limited time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control. ...
 

triplechoc

Pigeon
Woman
Orthodox
Just reading about him, never heard of him before, but he seems a bit gay obsessed..

Not that it's not sin, but seems like a very strange position to me. And I see nothing in the bible which supports this amount of focus. (you have a good sound clip to listen to)

To me the bible makes more sense when I allow myself to call out the jews.

Like in John 18:28-40 - Jesus Before Pilate

And they are not the real jews, they are the high priests in the nice robes, the money changers, and actually not a lot changed in 2000 years.

And i think we should take this with a bit of freedom, but we see many jewish organisations
- promoting immigration, which destroys communities
- promoting LGBTisms, which kills marriage and promotes debauchery
- anti-catholic-christian - constantly outlining pedophile priests (https://www.jweekly.com/2006/10/20/jewish-filmmaker-delves-into-pedophile-priest-scandal/)
- promoting climate change - making the temperature of the weather our new god

Seems we are in a cultish society which does everything to denounce the real god and christians. (so nothing is different in 2000 years!)

The Bible is highly relevant today.

And the modernist movement just says: Ah well what is written on Jews in the Bible is just old-fashioned.

Well to me it's simple. Is the Bible a holy book?

If the answer is yes, better read it well and take it seriously what is written.
Yeah when I first heard of him he seemed obsessed to me as well, but after lurking for many years in certain male supremacist and certain feminist spaces, and a bit of history learning, some of his points started to make sense to me. But then again, so does some of the anti-jews instances, for example a documentary called Marching to Zion, which was very interesting
 

Roosh

Cardinal
Orthodox
It means that you can have sex without becoming addicted or obsessed. Some people can drink moderately, but others cannot control their drinking. Similarly, people have different reactions to sex. I can't judge you, because your consequences might be different from mine.

I wish all men were as I ...
Are you suggesting that there is a "moderation" to sex outside of marriage? If so, can you detail your beliefs and also explain where you learned them from?
 

aplr

Chicken
Woman
Catholic
By his grace God oriented your natural geniusness to him, thats why these baddass articles! I wish you were famous in the "nofap" subs on reddit
 

Elicola

 
Banned
Are you suggesting that there is a "moderation" to sex outside of marriage? If so, can you detail your beliefs and also explain where you learned them from?
I learned from Paul that it is best to remain single: "he who marries the virgin does well, but he who does not marry her does even better."

Marriage is the institution that moderates sex. But as Groucho Marx said, who wants to live in an institution?
 

messaggera

Pelican
Woman
Other Christian
This is a narrative that has immensely helped the destruction of society.

No. What “immensely” helped the destruction of societies (you are referring to) is when the Ten Commandments stopped being acknowledged by Christian nations; and replaced with the most unthinkable immoralities as civil rights.
 

Elicola

 
Banned
Are you suggesting that there is a "moderation" to sex outside of marriage?

No, I'm agreeing with you. People experience grace and sin differently. For example, there are gays and heterosexuals with a heavy sex drive, and there are asexuals who do not desire sex. It is obviously easier for an asexual to remain single and celibate.

I discussed chastity with a nun, who explained that nuns or not supposed to have deep friendships that displace their devotion to God. It makes me think about men who purchase sex. This is bad in every religion, and even among atheists. But I wonder how much worse this can be than wasting your whole life chasing transient relationships in a Sisyphean cycle. Ironically, a monogamous gay marriage might be less spiritually distracting than a hedonistic PUA lifestyle.

Groucho once offered show tickets to a priest. But the priest declined, saying that he was having dinner with his mother. Groucho said "I thought you guys weren't allowed to have mothers!"
 

infowarrior1

Peacock
Protestant
Incels don't realize they have been kept from fornication. But on the other hand the Evil One has planted in their minds a sense of victimization and envy of the Chads who seem to be enjoying the abundance of fornication.

Hence Elliot Rodger. Hence PUAhate. All haunted by their own frustrated desires for fornication and influenced by demons who whisper into their ears of missing out on sin and to direct their hatred to those who do manage to successfully sin.

I notice that the word "Seething" also describes the action of demons when confronted with Truth,Goodness and Beauty. Those fallen Men and women seethe when they don't get the fornication they want.

If only more of them come to know the Lord Jesus Christ.
 

infowarrior1

Peacock
Protestant
Yes. I agree with you it is very stupid for one to complain about sexual objectification while sexually objectificating oneself. Or complain about promiscuity while participating in hook up culture. I would like to give an insight on some of the reasons women are caught up in this trap and my own testimony, but that would require time and better articulation and english skills

Dressing immodestly and then turning around and accusing the Men of being perverts seem to be a phenomenon in the West.

I do wonder if there isn't a degree of projection there.
 

infowarrior1

Peacock
Protestant
Well said, now if every youth could read these words, and learn from them. The youth today are filled with wicked messages from the music industry, movies, and things they call entertainment but are leading them towards a life of sin and regret.
Philippians 4:8

I think that whatever involves the inversion of values or is wicked doesn't fit the descriptions of whatever is "honorable,right, pure and lovely". The classic LOTR Trilogy especially in the Books for example fits that description.

Also this is also good:






 
Top