A Girl That Has Been Raped

Status
Not open for further replies.

ersatz

Woodpecker
basilransom said:
Timoteo said:
This kind of thing has nothing to do with looks. People tend to associate rape/molestation with the looks of the victim, but it isn't about attraction. There are dudes that will break into an old lady's house, rob her, then rape her too. With molestation, it's more about opportunity and the personality of the victim, and not whether she's cute or not.

Rape has everything to do with looks, almost. If it weren't, we would see old ladies raped at the same rate we do young ones. But we don't. Women aged 12-17 years old and 18-24 years old are each about a third of rape victims, at the time of the rape. Women 25+ are only 16.6% of rape victims. It's a feminist myth that rape is not about sex. To a large extent it is.

They have this whole complex of how natural urges can never truly lead us astray, so it must be something else responsible. In reality, our evolutionary ancestors were murderers, rapists and thieves, so nothing is really out of bounds "naturally."

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/210346.pdf

Your math only covers %82.6 of rape victims. What are the missing %17.4? Men? Children?
 

Timoteo

Crow
ersatz said:
basilransom said:
Timoteo said:
This kind of thing has nothing to do with looks. People tend to associate rape/molestation with the looks of the victim, but it isn't about attraction. There are dudes that will break into an old lady's house, rob her, then rape her too. With molestation, it's more about opportunity and the personality of the victim, and not whether she's cute or not.

Rape has everything to do with looks, almost. If it weren't, we would see old ladies raped at the same rate we do young ones. But we don't. Women aged 12-17 years old and 18-24 years old are each about a third of rape victims, at the time of the rape. Women 25+ are only 16.6% of rape victims. It's a feminist myth that rape is not about sex. To a large extent it is.

They have this whole complex of how natural urges can never truly lead us astray, so it must be something else responsible. In reality, our evolutionary ancestors were murderers, rapists and thieves, so nothing is really out of bounds "naturally."

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/210346.pdf

Your math only covers %82.6 of rape victims. What are the missing %17.4? Men? Children?

I never stated that rape isn't about sex. What it ISN'T about is ATTRACTION. You list statistics about the AGE of victims, but where are the statistics about the supposed attractiveness of victims? That's my point.
 

Giovonny

Crow
Gold Member
Girls who have been raped or molested at a young age are very gameable.

Their personal boundries may be very loose and undefined. They might be very promiscious as a way to take control or "own" their sexuality. They might seek out sex with older men as a way to "re-create" the molestation, but this time on their own terms. They might seek out "bad boys" or self destructive men because they feel like damaged goods and they want someone who they can relate to. They often get turned on by being treated bad because their self worth is so damaged that they don't respect a man who is nice to them.

There is a reason why pimps target these girls. There are very susceptible to Game.
 

Caligula

Ostrich
Timoteo said:
ersatz said:
basilransom said:
Timoteo said:
This kind of thing has nothing to do with looks. People tend to associate rape/molestation with the looks of the victim, but it isn't about attraction. There are dudes that will break into an old lady's house, rob her, then rape her too. With molestation, it's more about opportunity and the personality of the victim, and not whether she's cute or not.

Rape has everything to do with looks, almost. If it weren't, we would see old ladies raped at the same rate we do young ones. But we don't. Women aged 12-17 years old and 18-24 years old are each about a third of rape victims, at the time of the rape. Women 25+ are only 16.6% of rape victims. It's a feminist myth that rape is not about sex. To a large extent it is.

They have this whole complex of how natural urges can never truly lead us astray, so it must be something else responsible. In reality, our evolutionary ancestors were murderers, rapists and thieves, so nothing is really out of bounds "naturally."

https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/210346.pdf

Your math only covers %82.6 of rape victims. What are the missing %17.4? Men? Children?

I never stated that rape isn't about sex. What it ISN'T about is ATTRACTION. You list statistics about the AGE of victims, but where are the statistics about the supposed attractiveness of victims? That's my point.

How would you even collect statistics on attractiveness of victims? It's very hard to do.

Rape is about sex and sex is, to a large extent, about attraction. There will always be outliers who are attracted to surprising things. While there are common attractiveness traits, there will always be an aspect of attractiveness that's in the eye of the beholder and therefore impossible to account for in statistics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top