Abortion Activist Attacks Pro-Lifers

[Alan Partridge]

Don't need to watch. Title already slanted toward anti-choicers, or pro-jellyists.
Edit: I just don't understand how a rational player in the US or W Europe, who lives a condom-pinprick away from being fucked for life financially, could hate abortion.

It's a paradox, pumping and dumping girls is good...having kids is bad...but abortion is unthinkable and cruel.

Also, while that fat cunt might go on with a hamster attack....let's not forget "pro life" activists ironically bomb abortion clinics. So much regard for life huh?

How often has that happened? And how does that number compare with the estimated 60 million fetuses/babies that were killed since legal abortion's inception?

They don't view those as "people." They are "non-viable tissue masses" to them. Consequently, they do not count.

I find these arguments hilarious. It's almost the equivalent of:

"well, you know, there aren't just Muslim extremists, there are many Christian ones too."

"The comparison is totally lopsided."

"Yeah, but what about the Crusades?"

"The Crusades were fought between Christians and Muslims. Both sides killed about 10 thousand of the other . And it happened over 700 years ago."

"Yeah, well uh . . . RACISSSST!!!! MISOGYNIST!!"

 

[Renzy]

What's the forum consensus on knocking one of these bitches senseless?

The lady stealing the beach canopy physically attacked the cameraman and this demented whale physically attacked the cameraman.

Would it be wrong to knock a bitch on her ass if she physically attacked you when you were posing no threat whatsoever?

I'll go out on a limb here and say that if a woman wants to threaten like a man you're justified in answering like a man.

Edit: I didn't realize this discussion was going on in the beach canopy thread

Personally I think everyone has a right to defend themselves, irregardless of the gender of the attacker. And if the thieves in that canopy-video had been men, one of whom got physically confrontational when he got caught stealing, nobody would have given it a second thought had the cameraman decked him. But the thieves weren't men, they were women.

I think in situations like this it's better to take the other person down to the ground, hard enough to knock the wind out of them, but not so hard you hurt them. It "looks" a lot less violent than a man clocking a woman, no matter how much she might deserve it, and isn't going to leave her with black eyes she can cry into the camera with after the fact.

 

[JayNull]

i couldn't help myself

 

[LaCobra]

With those fat arms she can punch like James Toney

 

[Collide]

http://www.abc6onyourside.com/news/...onted-attacked-woman-33154.shtml#.U78I8LGoq6I

If you skip to the end of the video they interview the rat.

 

[...]

Don't need to watch. Title already slanted toward anti-choicers, or pro-jellyists.
Edit: I just don't understand how a rational player in the US or W Europe, who lives a condom-pinprick away from being fucked for life financially, could hate abortion.

It's a paradox, pumping and dumping girls is good...having kids is bad...but abortion is unthinkable and cruel.

Also, while that fat cunt might go on with a hamster attack....let's not forget "pro life" activists ironically bomb abortion clinics. So much regard for life huh?

How often has that happened? And how does that number compare with the estimated 60 million fetuses/babies that were killed since legal abortion's inception?

They don't view those as "people." They are "non-viable tissue masses" to them. Consequently, they do not count.

I find these arguments hilarious. It's almost the equivalent of:

"well, you know, there aren't just Muslim extremists, there are many Christian ones too."

"The comparison is totally lopsided."

"Yeah, but what about the Crusades?"

"The Crusades were fought between Christians and Muslims. Both sides killed about 10 thousand of the other . And it happened over 700 years ago."

"Yeah, well uh . . . RACISSSST!!!! MISOGYNIST!!"

Nice attempt to derail the thread, troll. If a fetus were a person, when why are they called fetus and not baby or child or boy or human? In fact, why should you care if they're killed......that means one less kid you have to support.

Better to have a dead fetus than an unwanted child or another kid on welfare.

And to answer your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Arson.2C_bombing.2C_and_property_crime

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Murders

:malehamster:

 

[Alan Partridge]

It's a paradox, pumping and dumping girls is good...having kids is bad...but abortion is unthinkable and cruel.

Also, while that fat cunt might go on with a hamster attack....let's not forget "pro life" activists ironically bomb abortion clinics. So much regard for life huh?

How often has that happened? And how does that number compare with the estimated 60 million fetuses/babies that were killed since legal abortion's inception?

They don't view those as "people." They are "non-viable tissue masses" to them. Consequently, they do not count.

I find these arguments hilarious. It's almost the equivalent of:

"well, you know, there aren't just Muslim extremists, there are many Christian ones too."

"The comparison is totally lopsided."

"Yeah, but what about the Crusades?"

"The Crusades were fought between Christians and Muslims. Both sides killed about 10 thousand of the other . And it happened over 700 years ago."

"Yeah, well uh . . . RACISSSST!!!! MISOGYNIST!!"

Nice attempt to derail the thread, troll. If a fetus were a person, when why are they called fetus and not baby or child or boy or human? In fact, why should you care if they're killed......that means one less kid you have to support.

Topics of this thread and video posted: female violence, female entitlement, abortion, religion.

Topics of my "trollish" post: female violence, abortion, religion.

'Fetus' is mostly used as a euphemism by the Feminists. They, by an unwritten law, NEVER use the word "baby" to ensure to dehumanize the human life growing in a woman's belly.

The fact is that at:

2 Months: the baby is developing a brain, eyelids, ears and has web-like fingers.

3 Months: the baby already looks like a miniature version of a newborn. It has a big head, toes and ALREADY has A DISTINCT SET OF FINGERPRINTS.

Here's some more Euphemisms For you:

Useless, Horrible, Illegal Quagmire of a War in Iraq with 1 Million Iraqis Dead= "Operation Iraqi Freedom."

Male-Bashing, Female Supremacist Nazi="Feminist."

On the other hand, there's purposely incendiary, character assailing language (usually used against people who's argument the attacker can't counter with any good points).

Pickup-Artist = "Date-Raping Misogynist."

Men's Right's Activist = "Promoter of Rape, Incest and Toxic Masculinity"

Says Something You, Dear Poster, Doesn't Agree with, yet is totally on-topic= "TROLLL!!!, HAMMSSTTTER!" *posts animated gif to accentuate the character assasination*

Better to have a dead fetus than an unwanted child or another kid on welfare.

And to answer your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Arson.2C_bombing.2C_and_property_crime

Then we should really abort everyone= poof, no more crime!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Murders

I counted about 35 attacks in the United States in 60 years. I think they were wrong to to do. On religious grounds, these attacks may have merit, but politically they've only made their cause seem sinister and barbaric. But again I ask, how do these 35 attacks compare to 60 million babies(or fetuses) aborted violently with a vacuum?

Abortion is a violent, evil expression of an immodest whore's need to be a Goddess on Earth. The woman has the power to destroy human life! Why do you think they don't want men to not have this power? Why are we not allowed to have so much as a male birth control pill much less a say in the abortion process?

 

[Comte De St. Germain]

How often has that happened? And how does that number compare with the estimated 60 million fetuses/babies that were killed since legal abortion's inception?

They don't view those as "people." They are "non-viable tissue masses" to them. Consequently, they do not count.

I find these arguments hilarious. It's almost the equivalent of:

"well, you know, there aren't just Muslim extremists, there are many Christian ones too."

"The comparison is totally lopsided."

"Yeah, but what about the Crusades?"

"The Crusades were fought between Christians and Muslims. Both sides killed about 10 thousand of the other . And it happened over 700 years ago."

"Yeah, well uh . . . RACISSSST!!!! MISOGYNIST!!"

Nice attempt to derail the thread, troll. If a fetus were a person, when why are they called fetus and not baby or child or boy or human? In fact, why should you care if they're killed......that means one less kid you have to support.

Topics of this thread and video posted: female violence, female entitlement, abortion, religion.

Topics of my "trollish" post: female violence, abortion, religion.

'Fetus' is mostly used as a euphemism by the Feminists. They, by an unwritten law, NEVER use the word "baby" to ensure to dehumanize the human life growing in a woman's belly.

The fact is that at:

2 Months: the baby is developing a brain, eyelids, ears and has web-like fingers.

3 Months: the baby already looks like a miniature version of a newborn. It has a big head, toes and ALREADY has A DISTINCT SET OF FINGERPRINTS.

Here's some more Euphemisms For you:

Useless, Horrible, Illegal Quagmire of a War in Iraq with 1 Million Iraqis Dead= "Operation Iraqi Freedom."

Male-Bashing, Female Supremacist Nazi="Feminist."

On the other hand, there's purposely incendiary, character assailing language (usually used against people who's argument the attacker can't counter with any good points).

Pickup-Artist = "Date-Raping Misogynist."

Men's Right's Activist = "Promoter of Rape, Incest and Toxic Masculinity"

Says Something You, Dear Poster, Doesn't Agree with, yet is totally on-topic= "TROLLL!!!, HAMMSSTTTER!" *posts animated gif to accentuate the character assasination*

Better to have a dead fetus than an unwanted child or another kid on welfare.

And to answer your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Arson.2C_bombing.2C_and_property_crime

Then we should really abort everyone= poof, no more crime!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Murders

I counted about 35 attacks in the United States in 60 years. I think they were wrong to to do. On religious grounds, these attacks may have merit, but politically they've only made their cause seem sinister and barbaric. But again I ask, how do these 35 attacks compare to 60 million babies(or fetuses) aborted violently with a vacuum?

Abortion is a violent, evil expression of an immodest whore's need to be a Goddess on Earth. The woman has the power to destroy human life! Why do you think they don't want men to not have this power? Why are we not allowed to have so much as a male birth control pill much less a say in the abortion process?

You are under the assumption the life has been granted to the fetus already. We have no proof that the fetus has yet to function completely yet. Unless you can provide scientific evidence that the fetus is alive and feeling then it's simply a mass of tissue. I have yet to see a single shred of evidence to that regard. Again I'm not exactly a fan of abortion(my opinion is they should be legal but socially taboo as I find it a sickening thought nonetheless), but I can't stand baseless accusations.

 

[teh_skeeze]

One of the most interesting conversations I ever had was with a pro lifer as I walked with my ex into the abortion clinic. Although the next time around I wasn't in the mood and said "God revealed himself to me in a dream and told me that the baby is the devil and I need to destroy it." The look of shock was priceless.

 

[Sawyer]

The traditional belief was that the new soul is in the room at conception.

Abortion should really be a States' rights issue. You can be for or against "choice" but I think it's irrational to not give the other the benefit of the doubt that the issue means as much to them as they say it does.

You're depriving people of living in a place that agrees with their very foundational beliefs -- the meaning of life itself.

But I guess if you're going to argue that the beginning of a completely innocent creature who is just like you once were can be vacuumed out or be stabbed in the spine with a pair of scissors, it's unlikely you're going to respect a full grown (and by default no longer so innocent) fellow human's earnestness of belief in matters they deem important.

This is why LEGAL abortion is wholly anathema to a Constitutional Republic. It sets at base a legal precedent of profound human disrespect within a system that cannot function without the foundational presumption of human dignity.

I tell pro-aborts you're welcome to have a clinic in your basement. Abort away. Roll around in dead fetuses if you need to. It's none of my business. Until it is. And making it legal is pretty much making it as much my business as it can possibly be. I own my fuckups. You own your fuckups. I won't ask you to legalize theft when I have to rob a bank to pay my bills and you don't ask me to legalize abortion when you can't figure out how not to make a baby when you don't want one.

Cattle Rustler -- this is a States' Rights issue. Let us be. We'll let you be.

 

[Quintus Curtius]

 

[Alan Partridge]

They don't view those as "people." They are "non-viable tissue masses" to them. Consequently, they do not count.

I find these arguments hilarious. It's almost the equivalent of:

"well, you know, there aren't just Muslim extremists, there are many Christian ones too."

"The comparison is totally lopsided."

"Yeah, but what about the Crusades?"

"The Crusades were fought between Christians and Muslims. Both sides killed about 10 thousand of the other . And it happened over 700 years ago."

"Yeah, well uh . . . RACISSSST!!!! MISOGYNIST!!"

Nice attempt to derail the thread, troll. If a fetus were a person, when why are they called fetus and not baby or child or boy or human? In fact, why should you care if they're killed......that means one less kid you have to support.

Topics of this thread and video posted: female violence, female entitlement, abortion, religion.

Topics of my "trollish" post: female violence, abortion, religion.

'Fetus' is mostly used as a euphemism by the Feminists. They, by an unwritten law, NEVER use the word "baby" to ensure to dehumanize the human life growing in a woman's belly.

The fact is that at:

2 Months: the baby is developing a brain, eyelids, ears and has web-like fingers.

3 Months: the baby already looks like a miniature version of a newborn. It has a big head, toes and ALREADY has A DISTINCT SET OF FINGERPRINTS.

Here's some more Euphemisms For you:

Useless, Horrible, Illegal Quagmire of a War in Iraq with 1 Million Iraqis Dead= "Operation Iraqi Freedom."

Male-Bashing, Female Supremacist Nazi="Feminist."

On the other hand, there's purposely incendiary, character assailing language (usually used against people who's argument the attacker can't counter with any good points).

Pickup-Artist = "Date-Raping Misogynist."

Men's Right's Activist = "Promoter of Rape, Incest and Toxic Masculinity"

Says Something You, Dear Poster, Doesn't Agree with, yet is totally on-topic= "TROLLL!!!, HAMMSSTTTER!" *posts animated gif to accentuate the character assasination*

Better to have a dead fetus than an unwanted child or another kid on welfare.

And to answer your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Arson.2C_bombing.2C_and_property_crime

Then we should really abort everyone= poof, no more crime!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Murders

I counted about 35 attacks in the United States in 60 years. I think they were wrong to to do. On religious grounds, these attacks may have merit, but politically they've only made their cause seem sinister and barbaric. But again I ask, how do these 35 attacks compare to 60 million babies(or fetuses) aborted violently with a vacuum?

Abortion is a violent, evil expression of an immodest whore's need to be a Goddess on Earth. The woman has the power to destroy human life! Why do you think they don't want men to not have this power? Why are we not allowed to have so much as a male birth control pill much less a say in the abortion process?

You are under the assumption the life has been granted to the fetus already. We have no proof that the fetus has yet to function completely yet. Unless you can provide scientific evidence that the fetus is alive and feeling then it's simply a mass of tissue. I have yet to see a single shred of evidence to that regard. Again I'm not exactly a fan of abortion(my opinion is they should be legal but socially taboo as I find it a sickening thought nonetheless), but I can't stand baseless accusations.

What is my baseless accusation? And to whom am I aiming it towards? Saying that a fetus is life is a "baseless accusation?" You really think so ill towards such a "notion"?

Anyway, I'm not interested in delving deeply into the morality of abortion topic in this thread. I don't know whether the OP would permit this. And I'm not sure how it's looked upon by the moderators. I'd be glad to discuss this with you via PM, if you like.

Have a good night, man.

 

[Azriel Odin]

If a fetus were a person, when why are they called fetus and not baby or child or boy or human?

Let's get one thing straight, when people talk about a fetus in conversations about abortion, they are referring to a human fetus. The fetus in question isn't some nebulous non-human entity.

To answer your question though, pro-choice people don't call them a baby, child, boy or what have you in order to keep them separate. It is an attempt to control language, something we see so many groups do these days.

 

[Comte De St. Germain]

I find these arguments hilarious. It's almost the equivalent of:

"well, you know, there aren't just Muslim extremists, there are many Christian ones too."

"The comparison is totally lopsided."

"Yeah, but what about the Crusades?"

"The Crusades were fought between Christians and Muslims. Both sides killed about 10 thousand of the other . And it happened over 700 years ago."

"Yeah, well uh . . . RACISSSST!!!! MISOGYNIST!!"

Nice attempt to derail the thread, troll. If a fetus were a person, when why are they called fetus and not baby or child or boy or human? In fact, why should you care if they're killed......that means one less kid you have to support.

Topics of this thread and video posted: female violence, female entitlement, abortion, religion.

Topics of my "trollish" post: female violence, abortion, religion.

'Fetus' is mostly used as a euphemism by the Feminists. They, by an unwritten law, NEVER use the word "baby" to ensure to dehumanize the human life growing in a woman's belly.

The fact is that at:

2 Months: the baby is developing a brain, eyelids, ears and has web-like fingers.

3 Months: the baby already looks like a miniature version of a newborn. It has a big head, toes and ALREADY has A DISTINCT SET OF FINGERPRINTS.

Here's some more Euphemisms For you:

Useless, Horrible, Illegal Quagmire of a War in Iraq with 1 Million Iraqis Dead= "Operation Iraqi Freedom."

Male-Bashing, Female Supremacist Nazi="Feminist."

On the other hand, there's purposely incendiary, character assailing language (usually used against people who's argument the attacker can't counter with any good points).

Pickup-Artist = "Date-Raping Misogynist."

Men's Right's Activist = "Promoter of Rape, Incest and Toxic Masculinity"

Says Something You, Dear Poster, Doesn't Agree with, yet is totally on-topic= "TROLLL!!!, HAMMSSTTTER!" *posts animated gif to accentuate the character assasination*

Better to have a dead fetus than an unwanted child or another kid on welfare.

And to answer your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Arson.2C_bombing.2C_and_property_crime

Then we should really abort everyone= poof, no more crime!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Murders

I counted about 35 attacks in the United States in 60 years. I think they were wrong to to do. On religious grounds, these attacks may have merit, but politically they've only made their cause seem sinister and barbaric. But again I ask, how do these 35 attacks compare to 60 million babies(or fetuses) aborted violently with a vacuum?

Abortion is a violent, evil expression of an immodest whore's need to be a Goddess on Earth. The woman has the power to destroy human life! Why do you think they don't want men to not have this power? Why are we not allowed to have so much as a male birth control pill much less a say in the abortion process?

You are under the assumption the life has been granted to the fetus already. We have no proof that the fetus has yet to function completely yet. Unless you can provide scientific evidence that the fetus is alive and feeling then it's simply a mass of tissue. I have yet to see a single shred of evidence to that regard. Again I'm not exactly a fan of abortion(my opinion is they should be legal but socially taboo as I find it a sickening thought nonetheless), but I can't stand baseless accusations.

What is my baseless accusation? And to whom am I aiming it towards? Saying that a fetus is life is a "baseless accusation?" You really think so ill towards such a "notion"?

Anyway, I'm not interested in delving deeply into the morality of abortion topic in this thread. I don't know whether the OP would permit this. And I'm not sure how it's looked upon by the moderators. I'd be glad to discuss this with you via PM, if you like.

Have a good night, man.

The baseless accusation was in the initial response when you said his argument was the equivalent of that stereotypical liberal bs, and I would find such an argument pointless because morals are subjective and each person has their own due to the lack of scientific proof towards either argument. Night

 

[Alan Partridge]

Nice attempt to derail the thread, troll. If a fetus were a person, when why are they called fetus and not baby or child or boy or human? In fact, why should you care if they're killed......that means one less kid you have to support.

Topics of this thread and video posted: female violence, female entitlement, abortion, religion.

Topics of my "trollish" post: female violence, abortion, religion.

'Fetus' is mostly used as a euphemism by the Feminists. They, by an unwritten law, NEVER use the word "baby" to ensure to dehumanize the human life growing in a woman's belly.

The fact is that at:

2 Months: the baby is developing a brain, eyelids, ears and has web-like fingers.

3 Months: the baby already looks like a miniature version of a newborn. It has a big head, toes and ALREADY has A DISTINCT SET OF FINGERPRINTS.

Here's some more Euphemisms For you:

Useless, Horrible, Illegal Quagmire of a War in Iraq with 1 Million Iraqis Dead= "Operation Iraqi Freedom."

Male-Bashing, Female Supremacist Nazi="Feminist."

On the other hand, there's purposely incendiary, character assailing language (usually used against people who's argument the attacker can't counter with any good points).

Pickup-Artist = "Date-Raping Misogynist."

Men's Right's Activist = "Promoter of Rape, Incest and Toxic Masculinity"

Says Something You, Dear Poster, Doesn't Agree with, yet is totally on-topic= "TROLLL!!!, HAMMSSTTTER!" *posts animated gif to accentuate the character assasination*

Better to have a dead fetus than an unwanted child or another kid on welfare.

And to answer your question: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Arson.2C_bombing.2C_and_property_crime

Then we should really abort everyone= poof, no more crime!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-abortion_violence#Murders

I counted about 35 attacks in the United States in 60 years. I think they were wrong to to do. On religious grounds, these attacks may have merit, but politically they've only made their cause seem sinister and barbaric. But again I ask, how do these 35 attacks compare to 60 million babies(or fetuses) aborted violently with a vacuum?

Abortion is a violent, evil expression of an immodest whore's need to be a Goddess on Earth. The woman has the power to destroy human life! Why do you think they don't want men to not have this power? Why are we not allowed to have so much as a male birth control pill much less a say in the abortion process?

You are under the assumption the life has been granted to the fetus already. We have no proof that the fetus has yet to function completely yet. Unless you can provide scientific evidence that the fetus is alive and feeling then it's simply a mass of tissue. I have yet to see a single shred of evidence to that regard. Again I'm not exactly a fan of abortion(my opinion is they should be legal but socially taboo as I find it a sickening thought nonetheless), but I can't stand baseless accusations.

What is my baseless accusation? And to whom am I aiming it towards? Saying that a fetus is life is a "baseless accusation?" You really think so ill towards such a "notion"?

Anyway, I'm not interested in delving deeply into the morality of abortion topic in this thread. I don't know whether the OP would permit this. And I'm not sure how it's looked upon by the moderators. I'd be glad to discuss this with you via PM, if you like.

Have a good night, man.

The baseless accusation was in the initial response when you said his argument was the equivalent of that stereotypical liberal bs, and I would find such an argument pointless because morals are subjective and each person has their own due to the lack of scientific proof towards either argument. Night

That wasn't in reference to abortion. It was in reference to her yelling "misogyinist" and ridiculously more "Racist" at those calm, non-violent protestors.

 

[Comte De St. Germain]

Topics of this thread and video posted: female violence, female entitlement, abortion, religion.

Topics of my "trollish" post: female violence, abortion, religion.

'Fetus' is mostly used as a euphemism by the Feminists. They, by an unwritten law, NEVER use the word "baby" to ensure to dehumanize the human life growing in a woman's belly.

The fact is that at:

2 Months: the baby is developing a brain, eyelids, ears and has web-like fingers.

3 Months: the baby already looks like a miniature version of a newborn. It has a big head, toes and ALREADY has A DISTINCT SET OF FINGERPRINTS.

Here's some more Euphemisms For you:

Useless, Horrible, Illegal Quagmire of a War in Iraq with 1 Million Iraqis Dead= "Operation Iraqi Freedom."

Male-Bashing, Female Supremacist Nazi="Feminist."

On the other hand, there's purposely incendiary, character assailing language (usually used against people who's argument the attacker can't counter with any good points).

Pickup-Artist = "Date-Raping Misogynist."

Men's Right's Activist = "Promoter of Rape, Incest and Toxic Masculinity"

Says Something You, Dear Poster, Doesn't Agree with, yet is totally on-topic= "TROLLL!!!, HAMMSSTTTER!" *posts animated gif to accentuate the character assasination*

Then we should really abort everyone= poof, no more crime!


I counted about 35 attacks in the United States in 60 years. I think they were wrong to to do. On religious grounds, these attacks may have merit, but politically they've only made their cause seem sinister and barbaric. But again I ask, how do these 35 attacks compare to 60 million babies(or fetuses) aborted violently with a vacuum?

Abortion is a violent, evil expression of an immodest whore's need to be a Goddess on Earth. The woman has the power to destroy human life! Why do you think they don't want men to not have this power? Why are we not allowed to have so much as a male birth control pill much less a say in the abortion process?

You are under the assumption the life has been granted to the fetus already. We have no proof that the fetus has yet to function completely yet. Unless you can provide scientific evidence that the fetus is alive and feeling then it's simply a mass of tissue. I have yet to see a single shred of evidence to that regard. Again I'm not exactly a fan of abortion(my opinion is they should be legal but socially taboo as I find it a sickening thought nonetheless), but I can't stand baseless accusations.

What is my baseless accusation? And to whom am I aiming it towards? Saying that a fetus is life is a "baseless accusation?" You really think so ill towards such a "notion"?

Anyway, I'm not interested in delving deeply into the morality of abortion topic in this thread. I don't know whether the OP would permit this. And I'm not sure how it's looked upon by the moderators. I'd be glad to discuss this with you via PM, if you like.

Have a good night, man.

The baseless accusation was in the initial response when you said his argument was the equivalent of that stereotypical liberal bs, and I would find such an argument pointless because morals are subjective and each person has their own due to the lack of scientific proof towards either argument. Night

That wasn't in reference to abortion. It was in reference to her yelling "misogyinist" and ridiculously more "Racist" at those calm, non-violent protestors.

Fair point it was a misunderstanding I guess. My bad.

 

[Bark]

Don't need to watch. Title already slanted toward anti-choicers, or pro-jellyists.
Edit: I just don't understand how a rational player in the US or W Europe, who lives a condom-pinprick away from being fucked for life financially, could hate abortion.

It's a paradox, pumping and dumping girls is good...having kids is bad...but abortion is unthinkable and cruel.

Also, while that fat cunt might go on with a hamster attack....let's not forget "pro life" activists ironically bomb abortion clinics. So much regard for life huh?

If the laws were different I would knock up every babe I could stick my dick into. I would especially pay attention to those women who gave me sons. I would sell the girl children at puberty.

 

[Alan Partridge]

Don't need to watch. Title already slanted toward anti-choicers, or pro-jellyists.
Edit: I just don't understand how a rational player in the US or W Europe, who lives a condom-pinprick away from being fucked for life financially, could hate abortion.

It's a paradox, pumping and dumping girls is good...having kids is bad...but abortion is unthinkable and cruel.

Also, while that fat cunt might go on with a hamster attack....let's not forget "pro life" activists ironically bomb abortion clinics. So much regard for life huh?

If the laws were different I would knock up every babe I could stick my dick into. I would especially pay attention to those women who gave me sons. I would sell the girl children at puberty.

Interesting stuff. I think I can speak for everyone here when I say that if you don't reply with some logical arguments, I can safely assume you're a feminist-sympathizer and a troll.

 

[puckerman]

I noticed that they guy did nothing in this video. I have a feeling that in a generation or two, this will change. Eventually, men will start fighting back against these bitches. I don't want to see it happen, but I will happen if things continue like this. And then the shit will really hit the fan.

 

[Bark]

Don't need to watch. Title already slanted toward anti-choicers, or pro-jellyists.
Edit: I just don't understand how a rational player in the US or W Europe, who lives a condom-pinprick away from being fucked for life financially, could hate abortion.

It's a paradox, pumping and dumping girls is good...having kids is bad...but abortion is unthinkable and cruel.

Also, while that fat cunt might go on with a hamster attack....let's not forget "pro life" activists ironically bomb abortion clinics. So much regard for life huh?

If the laws were different I would knock up every babe I could stick my dick into. I would especially pay attention to those women who gave me sons. I would sell the girl children at puberty.

Interesting stuff. I think I can speak for everyone here when I say that if you don't reply with some logical arguments, I can safely assume you're a feminist-sympathizer and a troll.

There is no difference between a contemporary guy wanting to pump and dump as many women as possible and me saying I would knock them all up if the laws were different. Given the current legal framework I am in the P&D camp but damn would I be ghengis khan.

I have already been through this where I knocked up this 4/10 on a ONS. When I was told she was preggo I maintained my previous position that it is a choice of the people personally involved to decide to have a kid or not. There is tragedy in the decision to terminate and for that reason its not mine to interfere in other peoples very difficult personal decisions.

Previously I had labeled myself pro-choice with the restriction that I didn't support interference in other peoples personal lives, where I now label myself pro life with a restriction that other peoples decisions are their own and I wish its never a decision they have to make. So wrap em up

Regarding the video: The guys were assaulted by a psycho and good on them that they were kind of beta because I probably would have reacted differently.

Alan Partridge: You speak for no one but yourself, besides I might be old enough to be your father. What's your moms name again.