disgusting... the guy with the napoleon complex in black escalated the situation.
Recently in Texas, Castle doctrine applied according to police, dude walking freely but video just went viral, things may change.
This link explains everything
The cuck was having an affair with the wife. She was playing games withholding the son from the guy in teal. Maybe a planned murder.
Recently in Texas, Castle doctrine applied according to police, dude walking freely but video just went viral, things may change.
If someone pulled a gun on me and I thought I had a good opportunity to grab it away I might go for it. Since they had a gun pointing at him threatening him illegally they are at fault. It was a threat to him and an unjustifiable threat at that. He attempted self defense and failed. But they were the aggressors. By what right does someone threaten someone else with a gun.Even if this guy is just a low-iq racist, the part no one has explained is this one:
To me, this is the only relevant piece of information. Someone grabbing a gun from my hands is a direct danger to my life. The attacker could easily turn my own weapon against me, not to mention I wouldn't an attacker take my gun. If the gun accidentally discharges during a struggle then that's on the attacker.
Really, the trial (I will watch after T-day) seems to be nothing more than character defamation, and not actual legal reasoning as far as rights are concerned.
Both men had a right to be on that street, although the Arbury was trespassing that is still not a serious crime. Trespassing does create reasonable suspicion, but it's certainly not illegal to ask someone a question.
If Arbury simply ignored the White guys without talking to him or rushing at them, then Arbury would be 100% in the clear. But since he lunged, it's certainly impossible to judge how the defender reacted with the gun.
The precedent set here is do not help your Neighbors, do not defend their property, and do not defend yourself. Seems like the state wants Whites to be just good farm animals and wait patiently for their turn.
I fully admit that I could be missing something here, feel free to attack the above because I am curious.
There is a difference between a cop pointing a weapon at someone versus a citizen pointing a weapon. If an average citizen for some reason was pointing a gun at me I would feel threatened. While I wouldn’t be happy to find myself in a situation to have a cop point a weapon at me I would cooperate with the cop. The citizen I might try to attack if I felt that the threat was mortal. If Aurbury had had a gun and pulled it firing and killing the assailants would you consider that a crime. I wouldn’t.Much more complicated than that I'm afraid. Watch the video, the man with the gun is clearly attacked before the first shot goes off. If you did that to a cop, you'd be dead as well. People have a right to self-defense. The problem, however, is that apparently these guys were yelling at Arbery to stop or die, which requires serious grounds to justify such a command, and it appears the Michaels had no such justification to imprison someone like that. Being shady is not enough to reasonably imprison someone.
There is a difference between a cop and a citizen. Profoundly so. If a cop were accusing me of a crime with a drawn weapon, i would cooperate even though it is clearly a case of mistaken identity. If a citizen had the gall to do so and threatened me with a weapon I would not like that at all.This is your false premise. There is no meaningful difference between a cop and a citizen, and the fact that people think there is a difference is a major problem that will be corrected by God's iron laws of the universe as our civilized world collapses under the weight of its own sin.
God judges us all equally, therefore we know there is no meaningful moral difference between a cop or any other citizen. There is no difference between a king and a beggar, all are judged the exact same way by God. Therefore, a king has no more right to enact or enforce law than a beggar. This is biblical truth whether or not anyone wants to accept it.
It is good to be back, thank you for your replies, I too do not bother to argue or debate these issues anywhere else because this is one of the last places on the net where people are rational and God-fearing. So for this reason I know my words will not merely bounce off of you.
This is also why the expectation of model behavior is so high with cops compared to citizens.There is a difference between a cop and a citizen. Profoundly so. If a cop were accusing me of a crime with a drawn weapon, i would cooperate even though it is clearly a case of mistaken identity. If a citizen had the gall to do so and threatened me with a weapon I would not like that at all.
One thing that was never discussed was the presence of armed protesters outside the courthouse.
I didn’t see the exact testimony, but I thought stuff had been stolen from the construction site previously, which is why the cameras were there. Arbery apparently didn’t take anything on this fateful day though. I don’t think these guys were some lynch mob like the media wanted to portray, they just took the whole vigilante thing too serious. I mean, come on, they were bearded old rednecks in pickup trucks and a shotgun, chasing a black man. The fact that even while filming this, none of them had the sense to contemplate the optics of this, just shows they are more stupid than blood thirsty.Has anyone watched any of the testimony? The state prosecutor in her closing argument says they know Aubrey was in the house.
But the person that owns the house was on tv and told police nothing was stolen.
These people decided in their minds that someone was doing or did certain things. Even when the property owner said that nothing happened. Other than people snooping around.
How people on here cannot understand that these people were F'd in the head...blows my mind.
I think the dad was a cop in the DA office for like 30+ years. So they were not even uneducated rednecks. The dad knew the laws and thought he was following them.I didn’t see the exact testimony, but I thought stuff had been stolen from the construction site previously, which is why the cameras were there. Arbery apparently didn’t take anything on this fateful day though. I don’t think these guys were some lynch mob like the media wanted to portray, they just took the whole vigilante thing too serious. I mean, come on, they were bearded old rednecks in pickup trucks and a shotgun, chasing a black man. The fact that even while filming this, none of them had the sense to contemplate the optics of this, just shows they are more stupid than blood thirsty.