Alex Jones says men need to be more Alpha

[Double Salad]

The only person I can tolerate listening to is Alan Watt.

Free Audio Blurbs

He gave up doing his radio show back in October.

 

[Justice Beaver]

This was legendary.

 

[vinman]

highly recommend tarpley book 9/11 synthetic terror made in the usa. best takedown of 911 ive ever read. i like the guy alot even though im a libertarian. His position on 1% wallstreet tax is brillant and he is one of th only people discussing the quadtrillion derivative bubble.

Max Keiser talks about the derivatives market a lot. I try to catch him whenever I can.

 

[cardguy]

My two favourite Max Keiser rants!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZoQrYa_NKQQ&t=3m10s

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03HHqPa2Zso&t=13m0s

He is a former banker by the way.

 

[la_mode]

Best Jones video on youtube was at some political convention in 2008 when he started asking random people "Are you part of the New world order!" in his crazy voice.

Very entertaining.

 

[la_mode]

There's a lot of material out there saying he's a CIA double-agent, and only does this stuff to engage the loony bin. Wouldn't be surprising either way.

 

[cardguy]

I heard he is a CIA triple-agent.

 

[BIGINJAPAN]

The thing that pisses me off about this forum is the claim of so many guys here being " red pill" and they clearly are not.

AJ is a polarizing figure, no doubt about it. But he shines so much light on what is going on in the world and America.

Being Red pill IMHO is being red pill about everything. It doesn't start and stop with women and if you can't see how it all ties in with the government. media, corporations and BANKING, you are still missing about 95% of what being red pill is.

I would really like to encourage people when they post about something on this forum that runs contrary to what most people believe, that other posters don't immediately jump down their throats and claim conspiracy theory. Look into it yourself. Don't just start defending your position because you were taught something else. Think back and question all the things you were taught in school and by your parents.

If I just went with what I was told growing up I would not be in the position I am in today. Which to me is a very enviable position for most people.

I found AJ through peter schiff who was my original brokerage firm that handled my original investments besides real estate. Because of those guys I was buying gold and silver well under a 1000 bucks and silver well under 10 bucks as well. Not to mention AJ has had a lot of guests on there that are big on nutrition. Even though I was pretty healthy in my 20's, now at 32 I have twice the energy as I did back then because of his guests. Most notably Dr. Wallach.

One of the things AJ does great is getting information out about who is FUNDING this shit. Feminism, communism and the gay mafia would have no footing in our society if the BANKS weren't funding it. So keep some of that shit in mind when we are discussing issues at hand

steps down from soapbax

 

[magellan]

My biggest problem is discerning fact from fiction when reading main stream news sources and alternative sources. How could I possibly determine that on my own? That's why news sources exist in the first place. Case in point: 9/11. I've read arguments on both sides about how the towers collapsed, both sound logical and factual to me, but I have no engineering background, don't know shit about demolition, etc. so how could I possibly know?

 

[LeBeau]

I think the reason why people are quick to write off guys like Alex Jones, and a reason I don't take him very seriously, is that rather than look at news, history, etc. on a case by case basis, and try to get at the truth, he immediately jumps to conspiracies/explanations that fit his agenda.

Which really dilutes the impact of exposing any ACTUAL conspiracies.

For example, his conduct soon after the Boston Marathon bombings, when very little information was available:

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout...boston-marathon-bombing-family-231742713.html

"Our hearts go out to those that are hurt or killed," Jones wrote. "But this thing stinks to high heaven #falseflag."

Jones predicted "they’re going to blame it on the Tea Party.”

Jones led the charge in perpetuating another conspiracy theory, tweeting a link to a strategically-edited YouTube clip of a "Family Guy" episode that he claimed "predicted" the Boston Marathon attack.

Furthermore, most of the "evidence" that conspiracy theorists use is easily defeated using basic logic, human psychology, and understanding of organizations and power structures.

The easiest example, if you were trying to pull off a crime, regardless of the size, incentive, or gain, would you leave breadcrumbs of cryptic evidence scattered in movies, tv shows, newspapers, logos/symbols, etc.?

Now I don't believe the official stories behind Roswell or the JFK shooting for example, but that's based on analysis of evidence/claims. But at the same time, I don't immediately jump to the opposite conclusion, or the most outlandish one either.

 

[kosko]

My biggest problem is discerning fact from fiction when reading main stream news sources and alternative sources. How could I possibly determine that on my own? That's why news sources exist in the first place. Case in point: 9/11. I've read arguments on both sides about how the towers collapsed, both sound logical and factual to me, but I have no engineering background, don't know shit about demolition, etc. so how could I possibly know?

Go research: Engineers for 9/11 Truth. They will give you a good break down in that very subject by not even focusing in the Twin Towers (not politically palatable) and focus on building 7. Case in point it was impossible for all three buildings to come down they way they did structurally, naturally, from fire. It's the best sound argument against the bulllshit official story that uses logic to 100% prove that the narrative presented that day makes no sense.

 

[Beyond Borders]

It doesn't surprise me at all to see anti-government guys picking up on manosphere principles.

It's in the best interest of those in power to see men become more effiminate and docile, as it is the masculine men who would rise up and take power if there was ever a revolution. Men become restless first (whether justly or not), men fight these battles, and new men take charge. The Way of Men refers to this dynamic a lot.

So the government has a strong incentive to encourage a bitch-made population. Someone calling for opposition to the guys in charge is bound to stumble upon that concept sooner or later and see it as a possible salvation.

 

[cardguy]

My biggest problem is discerning fact from fiction when reading main stream news sources and alternative sources. How could I possibly determine that on my own? That's why news sources exist in the first place. Case in point: 9/11. I've read arguments on both sides about how the towers collapsed, both sound logical and factual to me, but I have no engineering background, don't know shit about demolition, etc. so how could I possibly know?

Go research: Engineers for 9/11 Truth. They will give you a good break down in that very subject by not even focusing in the Twin Towers (not politically palatable) and focus on building 7. Case in point it was impossible for all three buildings to come down they way they did structurally, naturally, from fire. It's the best sound argument against the bulllshit official story that uses logic to 100% prove that the narrative presented that day makes no sense.