Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="JayJuanGee" data-source="post: 458261" data-attributes="member: 5330">Thank you for that explanation.&nbsp; At some point, i may need to look into Jaxx as a potential storage location.. At some point, I may need to consider Kraken and/or Poloniex accounts too, but since I currently have 10 BTC related accounts, I am not necessarily inclined to just add without giving some considerations regarding whether I could be potentially advantaged by creating such accounts, versus how much time and and cumbersomeness to set up such accounts.I agree that regarding ETC, there seems to be quite a bit of lacking of support that seems to be slowly changing in the direction of adding more ETC support (for example it took a little bit of time before Bitfinex actually added ETC), yet in the long term, we cannot be sure regarding some of those adoption and building developments.One thing that I had read, which makes quite a bit of sense, is that some of the exchanges that fail and refuse to add ETC support (but had ETH support prior to the hardfork) are likely pocketing those ETC proceeds.... so there could almost be a legal (and of course moral) obligation for services to recognize ETC in the event that the service had recognized ETH prior to the ETH hardfork.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="JayJuanGee, post: 458261, member: 5330"] Thank you for that explanation. At some point, i may need to look into Jaxx as a potential storage location.. At some point, I may need to consider Kraken and/or Poloniex accounts too, but since I currently have 10 BTC related accounts, I am not necessarily inclined to just add without giving some considerations regarding whether I could be potentially advantaged by creating such accounts, versus how much time and and cumbersomeness to set up such accounts. I agree that regarding ETC, there seems to be quite a bit of lacking of support that seems to be slowly changing in the direction of adding more ETC support (for example it took a little bit of time before Bitfinex actually added ETC), yet in the long term, we cannot be sure regarding some of those adoption and building developments. One thing that I had read, which makes quite a bit of sense, is that some of the exchanges that fail and refuse to add ETC support (but had ETH support prior to the hardfork) are likely pocketing those ETC proceeds.... so there could almost be a legal (and of course moral) obligation for services to recognize ETC in the event that the service had recognized ETH prior to the ETH hardfork. [/QUOTE]

Verification