Timoteo
Crow
Roosh said:Picture of girl:
![]()
Her article has to be fiction.
Jeeeeesus Christ...FOR REAL? So not only did this dude marry a slut, but an UGLY one? No wonder the guys would rather talk to him than fuck his wife. She's TORE UP.
Roosh said:Picture of girl:
![]()
Her article has to be fiction.
sylo said:Beta?
He 'cockblocks' all her prospects, and even has his competition trying to help him score. He makes better friends with the men than the would be cheating woman does, and it annoys her to no end. All while seeming extremely aloof. She even admits he is a flirt.
I say thats more alpha than beta.
RioNomad said:P Dog said:sylo said:Beta?
He 'cockblocks' all her prospects, and even has his competition trying to help him score. He makes better friends with the men than the would be cheating woman does, and it annoys her to no end. All while seeming extremely aloof. She even admits he is a flirt.
I say thats more alpha than beta.
No self-respecting man with a pair of balls would put up with that whorish cunt's shit. That guy is beta as beta gets. If he was anything but a chode he would never commit to that slut in the first place.
This x1000. No fuckin way any dude with some balls puts up with that. If he was really an alpha the bitch would know better than to be tryin to step out on him.
Roosh, Who bangs the fatties in the other countries you visit? Someones got to be. No?bengalltigerr said:Roosh, I'm pretty sure it's not just America, the same goes for UK and Australia.
el mechanico said:Roosh, Who bangs the fatties in the other countries you visit? Someones got to be. No?
Tuthmosis said:I want to add one observation I've made over the past few months:
I've noticed that there's an epidemic of unremarkable-looking, nerdy chicks on OKC calling themselves "polyamorous" and claiming to be in "open relationships." I mean, it's super-common. I can't help but think that all of this is somehow connected to that broader trend...
joehoya said:Tuthmosis said:I want to add one observation I've made over the past few months:
I've noticed that there's an epidemic of unremarkable-looking, nerdy chicks on OKC calling themselves "polyamorous" and claiming to be in "open relationships." I mean, it's super-common. I can't help but think that all of this is somehow connected to that broader trend...
You are 100% correct. In fact, this trend is at least 10 years in the making. I know a ton of geeky girls that are into polyamory. The one distinction I would make is that, for the most part, they are fucking around with guys either the same level or maybe 1 notch above their boyfriends. So you have a 4 girl, who is married to a 4 guy, and is banging a few other 4's and the occasional 5 on the side.
It is all a form of compensation for not being able to get and hold the high quality guys they THINK that they deserve. It reminds me of what my uncle used to say "I've never been with a 10, but I've had a 4 and two 3's." :twisted: The husband is so omega that he just takes it because he is afraid of losing what little pussy he is getting now. It is shocking how many times the husband was either a virgin, or had one other partner at most when they got into this relationship.
Now if the girl has some special attribute, like big natural titties, then you will see her being a booty call for some higher level guys. However, I don't really see them as truly polyamorous. They are just doing the polyamory thing because they can't score the guy they want. If that higher level guy wanted to LTR them and told them to cut the polyamory shit out, they would stop it in a heartbeat.
Roosh said:America: Where Ugly Girls Have Unlimited Sexual Choices
I weep for men who are there but hate it. When I come back this year, it will be a short enough time to where I can go without sex the entire period. I don't even want to interact with them. I don't want them to transform my mindset every night to once again preparing myself for stupid battles in the bar.
Roosh said:el mechanico said:Roosh, Who bangs the fatties in the other countries you visit? Someones got to be. No?
African dudes takes care of the fatties. Italian and Spanish dudes sometimes go for fatties but they do it more discreetly. The Africans wife up the fatties, take them to the mall and what not.
Local dudes bang fatties if they are fat themselves.
blurb said:Also, I don't know if it's just me, but whenever there's a couple where one person is fat and the other person is thin, it's almost always the guy that's thin and the woman that's fat. :huh: It seems to be more common to see a fat chic-thin man couple rather than a thin chic-fat man couple.
Perhaps the obesity rate is lower for men.
joehoya said:So you have a 4 girl, who is married to a 4 guy, and is banging a few other 4's and the occasional 5 on the side.
P Dog said:joehoya said:So you have a 4 girl, who is married to a 4 guy, and is banging a few other 4's and the occasional 5 on the side.
There's something completely wrong about rating men on a number scale like we do women. Men's attractiveness is not exclusively based on looks like it is for women. Different positions on the Alpha/Beta/Omega sliding scale are more appropriate.
joehoya said:P Dog said:joehoya said:So you have a 4 girl, who is married to a 4 guy, and is banging a few other 4's and the occasional 5 on the side.
There's something completely wrong about rating men on a number scale like we do women. Men's attractiveness is not exclusively based on looks like it is for women. Different positions on the Alpha/Beta/Omega sliding scale are more appropriate.
The exact same thing could be said for women. To quote my man Samuel Jackson from Pulp Fiction "Personality goes a long way". I have seen chicks that were just cool as hell to be around get a 2 point bump from their personality alone.
P Dog said:joehoya said:P Dog said:joehoya said:So you have a 4 girl, who is married to a 4 guy, and is banging a few other 4's and the occasional 5 on the side.
There's something completely wrong about rating men on a number scale like we do women. Men's attractiveness is not exclusively based on looks like it is for women. Different positions on the Alpha/Beta/Omega sliding scale are more appropriate.
The exact same thing could be said for women. To quote my man Samuel Jackson from Pulp Fiction "Personality goes a long way". I have seen chicks that were just cool as hell to be around get a 2 point bump from their personality alone.
A 9 who acts like a cunt is still a 9. One does not factor personality into the number you give them. Ever heard the saying "Any man who would date a bitchy 8 over a pleasant 7 is an idiot?" something like that. The 1-10 scale is for women and their looks alone.