there used to be a thread collecting all of these. Also, SIF or not, guaranteed she'd be great in bed WB
Onto said:Jack198 said:Ok, I'm curious. Which work of Jung detailed this? I have to read it....
Quintus summarized it perfectly.
I'm not sure which of Jung's works goes into the concept of the Anima/Animas and Projection. If you google it there will be tons of websites that talk about it in depth. He died in 1961 so even though feminism has been slowly building since before women's suffrage, it hadn't reached the fever pitch in 1961 as it has today.
If you want to read a great book that takes both philosophical and psychoanalytic concepts and uses them in explaining modern day relationship types then definitely read Mark Dillof's "Awakening with the Enemy"
Jack198 said:Onto said:Jack198 said:Ok, I'm curious. Which work of Jung detailed this? I have to read it....
Quintus summarized it perfectly.
I'm not sure which of Jung's works goes into the concept of the Anima/Animas and Projection. If you google it there will be tons of websites that talk about it in depth. He died in 1961 so even though feminism has been slowly building since before women's suffrage, it hadn't reached the fever pitch in 1961 as it has today.
If you want to read a great book that takes both philosophical and psychoanalytic concepts and uses them in explaining modern day relationship types then definitely read Mark Dillof's "Awakening with the Enemy"
I never read any Jung, but you're right, there is a lot out there - here's a sample (from some tranny support group site, I presume). I think there is something to this theory. Sadly, I can see it used by defense attorneys to justify the actions of a child sexual predator. And yes, that's really what these selfish twats are, predators.
Onto said:Jack198 said:Onto said:Jack198 said:Ok, I'm curious. Which work of Jung detailed this? I have to read it....
Quintus summarized it perfectly.
I'm not sure which of Jung's works goes into the concept of the Anima/Animas and Projection. If you google it there will be tons of websites that talk about it in depth. He died in 1961 so even though feminism has been slowly building since before women's suffrage, it hadn't reached the fever pitch in 1961 as it has today.
If you want to read a great book that takes both philosophical and psychoanalytic concepts and uses them in explaining modern day relationship types then definitely read Mark Dillof's "Awakening with the Enemy"
I never read any Jung, but you're right, there is a lot out there - here's a sample (from some tranny support group site, I presume). I think there is something to this theory. Sadly, I can see it used by defense attorneys to justify the actions of a child sexual predator. And yes, that's really what these selfish twats are, predators.
First of all I would look at a different site such as one dedicated to Jungian theory, perhaps even wikipedia. Transgender's and homosexuals are a specific brand of psychological perversion so I wouldn't be using their websites as a source for knowledge.
Also, I don't see these female teachers as sexual predators. If they were sexual with a boy before they went through puberty than they certainly would be. Child sexual predators are often attracted to "innocence", specifically the acquisition and robbing of it.
Rigsby said:Cattle Rustler said:Because American men her age are beta bitch boys.
That's why the older broads come to us young bustas.
They know we can fuck em good and got energy left, no need for viagara.
How old are you exactly?
Jack198 said:I'm no expert on psych, but you are probably correct about the 'robbing the innocence' theory, particularly when very young children are involved.
In this case though, you and I disagree. At least in the US, an adult having sex with a 15 year old is usually considered crossing the legal age of consent and the adult perpetrating the act, male or female, knows it. The fact that so many of these people typically seek situations or employment which provide access to their targets (teachers, scout leaders, clergy, etc.) adds further to categorizing them as child predators.
I also dismiss the suggestion by too many people that this kind of thing is harmless to the development of young men. Mabe Jung or others wrote about that too; not sure.
Onto said:Jack198 said:I'm no expert on psych, but you are probably correct about the 'robbing the innocence' theory, particularly when very young children are involved.
In this case though, you and I disagree. At least in the US, an adult having sex with a 15 year old is usually considered crossing the legal age of consent and the adult perpetrating the act, male or female, knows it. The fact that so many of these people typically seek situations or employment which provide access to their targets (teachers, scout leaders, clergy, etc.) adds further to categorizing them as child predators.
I also dismiss the suggestion by too many people that this kind of thing is harmless to the development of young men. Mabe Jung or others wrote about that too; not sure.
I think the difference is I don't see 15 year olds as children. I remember being 15 and wanting to bang any woman I could, especially the hot teachers. That said I agree high school teachers should refrain from messing around with their students, but I wouldn't put them in the same catagory as child molesters.
What I offered was an explanation for this particular modern day phenomenon. Explanation does not mean justification.
...(never said it did, nor interpreted it that way).
National magazines put out their yearly list of top 10 heroes and the majority of them will be due to their work with children.
Modern day parenting espouses having children be part of the decision making process in all family matters including the important ones. Their lives sole purpose is for their children's "happiness".
This glorifying of children coupled with the efforts of maintaing their innocence for as long as possible is truly a modern day phenomenon that didn't exist as it is now 50 years ago and simply doesn't exist in other world cultures.
I see classifying high school students as children to be another manifestation of this perversion. This does't mean I advocate high school teachers being involved with students. There are more practical reasons against it.
puckerman said:From the age of about ten or eleven, the kids in these cases should have the pardon to power these adults. If the kids simply say it was okay, then the charges should be dropped.
He was willing.
I still have many issues with teachers of any age having sex with students of any age. Any teacher who has sex with a student should be fired immediately, and that applies to college professors as well.
Jack198 said:puckerman said:From the age of about ten or eleven, the kids in these cases should have the pardon to power these adults. If the kids simply say it was okay, then the charges should be dropped.
He was willing.
I still have many issues with teachers of any age having sex with students of any age. Any teacher who has sex with a student should be fired immediately, and that applies to college professors as well.
A 15 year old can't sign a contract - hell, they can't even drive a car and are barely old enough for a facebook account. Even if there were widespread public (or at least Hollywood and twittersphere masquerading as general public) support to legislatively adjust the laws (and these days, who knows - this just might become the next cause du jour), I'm not sure there would be a great way to introduce this "pardon power" without creating a societal impression that it's "game on!" for adults to start cruising the high school dances.
Cattle Rustler said:Rigsby said:Cattle Rustler said:Because American men her age are beta bitch boys.
That's why the older broads come to us young bustas.
They know we can fuck em good and got energy left, no need for viagara.
How old are you exactly?
22, been fucking older women since I was a freshman in HS.
Jack198 said:I also dismiss the suggestion by too many people that this kind of thing is harmless to the development of young men. Mabe Jung or others wrote about that too; not sure.