Suits said:
Zelcorpion said:
Evolution knows that women like that are a danger to the survival of the species.
No, they are not.
Evolution is concerned with populations as a whole. Every population has individuals who make unwise decisions that result in untimely death (although from an evolutionary standpoint, her death wasn't untimely, as her daughter was already 16 and very capable of carrying on her genetic lineage).
1 in 1000 women dying by selfie would not constitute a thread to the species.
Even 12 year olds with an uncontainable genetic drive to leap from tall buildings without safety apparatus wouldn't be a danger to the survival of our species.
A contagious disease that killed off people before they could procreate would be a threat to the survival of the human species.
We don't need to exaggerate everything just to make it fit our predetermined theory on why women using social media is the worst thing that has ever happened to mankind.
NO reason to be the Dick of the Internet about it.
Of course we should not over-dramatize it. What I meant that women as a rule are far more careful in their behavior in terms of dares, physical activity, dangerous hobbies, unmotivated jumps, thrill-seeking etc.
If at one day in history women behaved all like that starting in puberty as men do, then this would take a cut in the human population. And obviously in our current population levels - 80% of humanity could jump off a cliff and as a species we would hardly feel a thing - survival would not be impacted - though it may depend which 80% takes the fall - heh.
Such dangerous behavior was at best dangerous to the tribe in the distant paths - and even then mostly regarding combat-age productive men or fertile women. (aside from children - those 2 groups were the most important for the little tribe)
