Author explores how little women know about their own fertility

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Reactionary Tree

Pelican
Gold Member
As for how/why American women don't know this, it's because their hamsters have been caffeinated with the you-go-girlisms of third wave feminism. They are willfully ignorant. I was in Manila a couple months ago and those broads know about their biological clocks. So how do Filipinas know this basic fact but American women don't? You would think being on their smart phones all the time they could Google it real quick. They have literally hamster rationalized away facts and truths because it allows them to keep doing what they are doing. They are not creatures of logic. That's why we say they think with their lizard brains. They are creatures of emotion.
 

Days of Broken Arrows

Crow
Gold Member
Yes, the "carousel" is one reason women live in fantasyland about their fertility. But there is a bigger reason.

It's that women are being lied to on a mass scale, because that benefits a whole lot of people financially. Women are pawns in a larger game. Let me count the ways:

* Schools lie to them so girls can become future workers and consumers, not mothers.
* Parents lie to them because it's now a status symbol to have a "corporate daughter" instead of a grandkid.
* Corporations lie to them because they need them as worker bees.
* TV and radio lies to them because they want that valuable single-woman ad revenue.
* Churches lie to them because women are the main church-goers and they need them in the pews.
* Movies lie to them because women are the majority of movie-goers and they need the box office receipts.
* Older women lie to them because they religiously believe the messages of these movies and TV shows and don't know any better.
* Doctors lie to these women because if they don't, the women will throw tantrums and file complaints.
* Men lie to them because if men don't these women throw insane tantrums and the men won't get laid.
* Colleges can't tell them the truth because if they do, the women will scream and find the truth "triggering" and demand trigger warnings.
* Do I have to even say why all the feminist blogs and talk shows like "The View" lie to these women?

So America has developed a breed of woman who you can't talk to honestly about her own biology (this goes for obesity too). One step forward; ten steps back. All of our so-called progress, it seems, have landed us in the distant past, when women needed to be "shielded" from society.
 
Days of Broken Arrows said:
Yes, the "carousel" is one reason women live in fantasyland about their fertility. But there is a bigger reason.

It's that women are being lied to on a mass scale, because that benefits a whole lot of people financially. Women are pawns in a larger game. Let me count the ways:

* Schools lie to them so girls can become future workers and consumers, not mothers.
* Parents lie to them because it's now a status symbol to have a "corporate daughter" instead of a grandkid.
* Corporations lie to them because they need them as worker bees.
* TV and radio lies to them because they want that valuable single-woman ad revenue.
* Churches lie to them because women are the main church-goers and they need them in the pews.
* Movies lie to them because women are the majority of movie-goers and they need the box office receipts.
* Older women lie to them because they religiously believe the messages of these movies and TV shows and don't know any better.
* Doctors lie to these women because if they don't, the women will throw tantrums and file complaints.
* Men lie to them because if men don't these women throw insane tantrums and the men won't get laid.
* Colleges can't tell them the truth because if they do, the women will scream and find the truth "triggering" and demand trigger warnings.
* Do I have to even say why all the feminist blogs and talk shows like "The View" lie to these women?

So America has developed a breed of woman who you can't talk to honestly about her own biology (this goes for obesity too). One step forward; ten steps back. All of our so-called progress, it seems, have landed us in the distant past, when women needed to be "shielded" from society.

Pump and dump, comrade. That's all these 21st century western/westernized women are worth.
 

Phoenix

 
Banned
I've always thought this - which is more contemptible, the pregnant teenager or the middle-aged childless woman?

It's definitely the latter. I actually feel respect now when I see a young girl with a child. At least she has reproduced. You won't see her moaning about being alone and pictures of her pets on facebook.
 

infowarrior1

Crow
Protestant
DrewP said:
Almost all the mid-20's women I know laugh at the idea of finding a husband, and say they don't really care about relationships at this point. It's so typical nowadays that we tend to forget what an insane mindset that is. These women have already peaked; their most attractive and fertile years are now entering the rearview mirror; yet they scoff at the idea of even beginning to utilize their attractiveness and fertility for its most meaningful purpose. It's sad, because many of them will probably slip through the cracks and end up old, lonely, and regretful. Feminism has brainwashed an entire generation of women that starting a family... probably the #1 source of joy and happiness for previous generations of women... should not be a priority, while forcing one's way into some mediocre career is the most important thing in the world and should never ever ever ever ever be sacrificed even a tiny bit for any reason, especially a man. This is already creating some nasty consequences, and it will only get worse.

If there is an evil shadowy Elite. They have just implemented a brilliant idea of depopulation. And if western society does not go extinct this will be the result:

I hear the boundless fainting of feminists once they realize this

The Return of Patriarchy

http://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/20/the-return-of-patriarchy/


God has the last laugh I'd say :laugh:
 

infowarrior1

Crow
Protestant
Phoenix said:
I've always thought this - which is more contemptible, the pregnant teenager or the middle-aged childless woman?

It's definitely the latter. I actually feel respect now when I see a young girl with a child. At least she has reproduced. You won't see her moaning about being alone and pictures of her pets on facebook.

Even better if there is a Father to raise that child.
 

Easy_C

Peacock
The entire message of the system is entirely focused on pushing women to get out there and start having as much risky sex as possible.


I've got a sister in law who, it turned out, doesn't even know what fallopian tubes are despite having been through the entire "comprehensive" sex ed program offered by America's fantastic public school system.

You read that right. She doesn't even understand basic female anatomy, but she damn sure learned how to use every birth control method under the sun.
 

Sonsowey

Hummingbird
Gold Member
t’s too painful to wonder what would have happened if that first gynaecologist had sat me down calmly and opened up some informative graphics to show how women’s fertility drastically declines with age – beginning at around 32, more rapidly after 37, then precipitously at 40. The way a doctor might explain to you the risk of smoking by showing you a picture of blackened lungs, or describe the effects fat has on arteries, often leading to heart attacks: simple medical facts, presented in an objective manner, without judgment or guilt or some hidden cultural agenda.

Sadly, all this is missing from the discussion on women’s fertility.

This is crazy. She never once in her life wondered about this? Never checked wikipedia? Or read a book about this?

All this information is publicly available. Does this author not read?
 

El Chinito loco

 
Banned
Other Christian
Gold Member
‘So, I read somewhere that you shouldn’t start trying to conceive until you’ve been off birth control for a while,’ I said to the gynaecologist. ‘How long should I be off the Pill before I start?’

‘Well, I wouldn’t wait if I were you. You don’t have much time,’ she said snidely.

Ouch. I looked up from my note pad, where I’d been scribbling notes from our conversation, like ‘get a mammogram’ and ‘start taking pre-natal vitamins’. I’d been in the woman’s office for about 10 minutes and it felt like she was being… well, kind of a bitch.

‘Excuse me?’ I said. I felt like I’d gone to buy lipstick at a cosmetics counter and been offered plastic surgery.

‘You’re almost 41. You don’t have time to wait,’ she said again with a grim look in her eyes. I still wanted to know whether trying to conceive immediately after stopping the Pill could raise the chance of birth defects. (I later learned that that’s patently false – a woman’s fertility is often higher right after she goes off birth control.) But her comment was said with such finality, such disdain – and no actual medical facts to accompany it – that I just took my mammogram script and high-tailed it out of there.

I didn’t heed her advice. I suppose I was still fixated on the ‘first comes love, then comes marriage, then comes baby in a carriage’ thing – and I waited half a year until the month of my wedding to have unprotected sex. Lo and behold, a week or two after the nuptials, I discovered I was pregnant. Huzzah! I wanted to throw the positive pregnancy test in that smug gynaecologist’s face and say: ‘Who you callin’ old now, girl?'

But before I could make it to a doctor (a different one), I miscarried. Then I got pregnant again, then miscarried again. Over the next three and a half years, I moved from natural conception to assisted reproduction and IVF, and subsequently learned everything I never wanted to know about pregnancy, miscarriage, age and fertility. Alas, it was too late for me. Sure, I’d gained all this knowledge about the speed of fertility decline but, at 43, I was getting too old to have a baby.


It’s too painful to wonder what would have happened if that first gynaecologist had sat me down calmly and opened up some informative graphics to show how women’s fertility drastically declines with age – beginning at around 32, more rapidly after 37, then precipitously at 40.

:laugh:

She basically calls the well intentioned gynecologist a bitch and goes through a whole litany of hamster rationalizations. Then at the very end she still blames the gynecologist again for her own poor judgement and lifestyle choices after she shits out multiple dead fetuses swimming in her polluted womb.

I'm guessing in actual reality and not the delusional version the gynecologist wasn't really snarky or a bitch at all but simply laid down the truth which she didn't want to hear. This cunt interpreted it all as being bitchy and snarky because it was the bitter pill and not the "independent womyn grrrl power 4ever babies at age 40 and beyond" reality.
 
Sonsowey said:
t’s too painful to wonder what would have happened if that first gynaecologist had sat me down calmly and opened up some informative graphics to show how women’s fertility drastically declines with age – beginning at around 32, more rapidly after 37, then precipitously at 40. The way a doctor might explain to you the risk of smoking by showing you a picture of blackened lungs, or describe the effects fat has on arteries, often leading to heart attacks: simple medical facts, presented in an objective manner, without judgment or guilt or some hidden cultural agenda.

Sadly, all this is missing from the discussion on women’s fertility.

This is crazy. She never once in her life wondered about this? Never checked wikipedia? Or read a book about this?

All this information is publicly available. Does this author not read?

Granted she has a piece of technology unfathomable to great thinkers (men) of the past which she implements to take pictures of food, communicate about where/when to devour said food and scroll for cock.
 

El Chinito loco

 
Banned
Other Christian
Gold Member
Sonsowey said:
t’s too painful to wonder what would have happened if that first gynaecologist had sat me down calmly and opened up some informative graphics to show how women’s fertility drastically declines with age – beginning at around 32, more rapidly after 37, then precipitously at 40. The way a doctor might explain to you the risk of smoking by showing you a picture of blackened lungs, or describe the effects fat has on arteries, often leading to heart attacks: simple medical facts, presented in an objective manner, without judgment or guilt or some hidden cultural agenda.

Sadly, all this is missing from the discussion on women’s fertility.

This is crazy. She never once in her life wondered about this? Never checked wikipedia? Or read a book about this?

All this information is publicly available. Does this author not read?

This really does illuminate how far mainstream feminism has rotted away the brains of American women. I don't know a damn thing about babies or pregnant women. Even in my blissful ignorance I knew about the biological clock and the role age plays in fertility way back in high school. The whole biological clock mantra is mentioned all the time in movies and on mainstream tv too.
 

Sonsowey

Hummingbird
Gold Member
I guess I perhaps am unusual in that I look things up.

I have spent time reading for pleasure different studies about the "biological clock". Lots of different studies in different places and times have found very different results for the probability of conception at different ages, and the probability of different birth defects as well. They all, however, show the same trend.
 

It_is_my_time

Crow
Protestant
It seems at least once a week I am again reminded of how clueless most western women are to anything not related to TV or Celebrity Gossip.

Unreal. How can you have such little understanding of your own body.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top