BATTLE OF TORONTO: August 15, 2015
- Thread starter Roosh
- Start date
Back when I took Psych 101 in my first year at uni in 2003, there was an early portion of the course that focused on late 19th century/early 20th century diagnoses of 'hysteria' in women. This was explained as a parochial, sexist diagnosis, a discredited concept from a bygone era, akin to phrenology or alchemy. 'Hysteria' was not a 'feminine disease', but the legitimate psychological anguish of socially repressed, constrained women.
It is sadly dawning on me now that these old timey Victorian shrinks were not in the wrong at all. Rather than bogus, 'hysteria' is a real thing. From listening to the rambling of these SJWs, it is clear that, rather than merely emotional or illogical, these women are legit batshit insane. It would seem that mental disorder runs deep in womankind in a way it does not in men. It is a dark revelation.
It is sadly dawning on me now that these old timey Victorian shrinks were not in the wrong at all. Rather than bogus, 'hysteria' is a real thing. From listening to the rambling of these SJWs, it is clear that, rather than merely emotional or illogical, these women are legit batshit insane. It would seem that mental disorder runs deep in womankind in a way it does not in men. It is a dark revelation.
civpro said:
Yes, the root word "hyster" in hysteria means "womb" or "uterus." The same root word in hysterectomy which means having ones uterus removed. Women get hysterical and that has been known for a long time.
The best way to counter hysteria is for women to submit to a strong man who leads her and makes sure her hysteria does not get out of hand.
Also, take a look at the Atlantic article that says college students are (purposely?) being trained to be emotionally unstable (which I cover in this REBT/CBT thread).
Steve Sailer also wrote about the Atlantic article the other day.
http://www.unz.com/isteve/haidt-on-vindi...ctiveness/
civpro said:
I started a thread about this very topic.
"Histrionic Personality Disorder and Why You Should Know About It"
http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-49483.html
There appears to be something crazy in the water in Canada as two other speakers have had similar problems with hysterical protesting feminists in Canada as Roosh did.
http://www.avoiceformalestudents.co...mengos-lecture-at-university-of-ottawa-video/
http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/we-went-to-a-mens-rights-lecture-in-toronto
http://www.avoiceformalestudents.co...mengos-lecture-at-university-of-ottawa-video/
http://www.vice.com/en_ca/read/we-went-to-a-mens-rights-lecture-in-toronto
David Futrelle?
Oh, right, you mean the paedophile apologist who demanded that a film devoted to the real rape, mutilation and murder of 14 year old boys ought to be sold freely at gay sex shops.
One might note, in view of the current SJWpede clickturbating on petitions, the film itself is still being sold openly on Amazon.
Oh, right, you mean the paedophile apologist who demanded that a film devoted to the real rape, mutilation and murder of 14 year old boys ought to be sold freely at gay sex shops.
One might note, in view of the current SJWpede clickturbating on petitions, the film itself is still being sold openly on Amazon.
^^ Thank you so much!
*hug*
(no homo)
*hug*
(no homo)
I got back home last night and slept 16 hours straight. I'm up now and feel great. There will still be aftershocks in terms of random SJW campaigns like the Amazon thing, but the big battle in Canada is over. I look forward to going back to my "boring" life of writing, reading, etc.
I now declare an end to all Canada hostilities. I will definitely have to write a complete account of all this, maybe even in the form of a book. Thanks again to all the guys who helped, I won't ever forget it.
I now declare an end to all Canada hostilities. I will definitely have to write a complete account of all this, maybe even in the form of a book. Thanks again to all the guys who helped, I won't ever forget it.
HowardRourke said:
It's an example of outrageous misogyny because the woman reporting has less hair than I do - it must have been embarassing / infuriating to read that quote lol
Hey guys,
Here's a link to the Talk Radio AM640 segment they did on the Battle Of Toronto.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_5fIV89MokZQWkwTHJmUjFKajA/view?usp=sharing
The [simp] announcers were convinced of the following:
• The event did not happen
• The audio was "looped" in post-production
• Roosh may not even have been in Canada :exclamation:
Bravo! we have them exactly where we want them..
[attachment=27828]
Here's a link to the Talk Radio AM640 segment they did on the Battle Of Toronto.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_5fIV89MokZQWkwTHJmUjFKajA/view?usp=sharing
The [simp] announcers were convinced of the following:
• The event did not happen
• The audio was "looped" in post-production
• Roosh may not even have been in Canada :exclamation:
Bravo! we have them exactly where we want them..
[attachment=27828]
Attachments
HowardRourke said:
That sounds like a bunch of dudes arguing about the moon landing being fake on 'coast to coast' except thats the biggest talk radio network in Toronto (or at least it was when I was a kid).
If the Dean Blundell show was still on when roosh was in town, that would have been an interview for the ages or they would have at least been trolling that protest.
My summary of the talk itself can be found earlier in this thread. Here is an attempt to distill the Q&A session. I'm going to be a little more free with paraphrasing, rearranging material, and filling in gaps to flesh out some ideas, so this writeup will be less objective than my previous one. I've chosen to leave out details about the Canadian operations, personal details about Roosh, and a few other things.
Canada: There were a handful of questions about Canada. Someone asked if Roosh planned to come back, and he said no, because he had nothing left to prove beyond humiliating the establishment, which he had already done. Asked about problems in other countries on his tour, Roosh said that he had none. Asked if Canada is the worst country for straight men, Roosh said that he had thought that London was bad, but found that Canada was worse. He suggested that Sweden might possibly be a competitor.
Game & Travel: I suppose that there were one or two questions that could be interpreted as being directly about game. One Canadian attendee asked for advice for those on university campuses. Roosh acknowledged the problem, noting that the more formal education a woman has today, the less feminine she is. He basically recommended filtering out crazy feminists who can get you in trouble. So, he advised seeking out women in the university's nursing program, because they're more likely to be nurturing (a feminine characteristic). He also encouraged going for good-looking women, who are the safest bet, perhaps with the exception of white women, who can be dangerous. On a related note, another attendee asked whether the language barrier alone could stop the spread of radical feminism. (Stated differently, is it enough for one to move to a country where English isn't spoken to live well and find a good woman?) Roosh said that the language barrier is not enough. What is needed is some sort of cultural immunity. He said that, for example, Russia due to its culture will not degrade as much or as quickly as other countries. He advised actually going to and checking out a country in order to gauge the local conditions. One should find a place that will be good for at least the next ten to fifteen years. There, a man should focus on individual self-improvement, and then fight the battle as it comes.
Self-improvement: Someone recalled Roosh's remark about game being a path to enlightenment, noted that game does not seem to be necessary for some men, and asked what the common factor is for those who find their way in life by starting with game and those who find their way without starting with game. Roosh pointed to character traits: being free-thinking, independent, and resistant to authoritarian control. The people who exhibit these traits tend to be more open to enlightenment.
What we're up against: This last point played into something that Roosh hinted at in his talk, and about which he went into greater detail in the Q&A. All of the destructive policies and social movements that Roosh discussed seem to have a common goal, and that is to make people easier to control. Those in power work to destroy the family unit, the tribe, and people's sense of purpose. They make men and women distrust and fight against each other. The old bonds are replaced with food, cheap entertainment, and the iPhone. The consistent consequence is a reduction in the fertility of the native population (of whatever country is infected), which is then replaced with immigrants, who are cynically used to break down solidarity even more. In this way, people who would otherwise resist authoritarian control are rendered less effectual in their attempts, and thus become more easily controlled. After this is accomplished, a nation finally hits bottom and can be controlled from the outside, like Greece is today. The elites who push all of this are seeking their own common interest, which is to secure more power and wealth. To this end, they elevate themselves and other people who agree with them, such as reporters who are easy to manipulate.
(In short, then, the very traits that help us to begin to cultivate our masculinity and to enjoy life, that is, being free-thinking, independent, and resistant to authoritarian control, are the very traits that those in power are attempting to stamp out. We are the great threat, hence the strong response to Roosh among Canadian reporters and politicians.)
How to deal with all of this: Throughout his answers, Roosh reflected on lessons from his recent experiences that can help us men deal with what we're up against, and what will come our way.
"Having a business for yourself should be the goal of all of you here." One person asked about being antifragile. Instead of discussing the broader meaning of that term, which would have taken too long, Roosh gave a brief response about how a man can be antifragile in his own life: Make it so that there is no one person responsible for you getting money. Create a lifestyle where you have various sources for your income. Roosh has been able to survive because he has no one weak point. He had no employer for the Canadian SJWs to berate or boycott. The goal is to be one's own man, to be able to tell people to "fuck off" and "cry some more." Roosh himself is able to live well in Poland with expenses as low as $1,500 per month.
"A lot of you don't know how strong you actually are. You have power you don't even know. Those at the top make you think they're more powerful than they really are." Roosh advised, "If you attack someone, annihilate him. If you don't, he'll know how to fight." The Canadian SJWs erred in not destroying him in Montreal, because he was able to apply in Toronto the lessons that he had learned from the week prior. Their attack had made him stronger. He remarked on a similar phenomenon that has taken place over the past four years, beginning with attacks on him over his first work to gain widespread attention, Bang Iceland. In response to these attacks, his hands were shaking. This was followed by attacks on him over his work on Denmark and then Colombia. Finally, the SPLC came against him. At that point, his hand did not shake. All of the attacks had given him strength, and they would continue to do so as people went on to attack him for various Return of Kings articles and for his "How To Stop Rape" article.
Canada: There were a handful of questions about Canada. Someone asked if Roosh planned to come back, and he said no, because he had nothing left to prove beyond humiliating the establishment, which he had already done. Asked about problems in other countries on his tour, Roosh said that he had none. Asked if Canada is the worst country for straight men, Roosh said that he had thought that London was bad, but found that Canada was worse. He suggested that Sweden might possibly be a competitor.
Game & Travel: I suppose that there were one or two questions that could be interpreted as being directly about game. One Canadian attendee asked for advice for those on university campuses. Roosh acknowledged the problem, noting that the more formal education a woman has today, the less feminine she is. He basically recommended filtering out crazy feminists who can get you in trouble. So, he advised seeking out women in the university's nursing program, because they're more likely to be nurturing (a feminine characteristic). He also encouraged going for good-looking women, who are the safest bet, perhaps with the exception of white women, who can be dangerous. On a related note, another attendee asked whether the language barrier alone could stop the spread of radical feminism. (Stated differently, is it enough for one to move to a country where English isn't spoken to live well and find a good woman?) Roosh said that the language barrier is not enough. What is needed is some sort of cultural immunity. He said that, for example, Russia due to its culture will not degrade as much or as quickly as other countries. He advised actually going to and checking out a country in order to gauge the local conditions. One should find a place that will be good for at least the next ten to fifteen years. There, a man should focus on individual self-improvement, and then fight the battle as it comes.
Self-improvement: Someone recalled Roosh's remark about game being a path to enlightenment, noted that game does not seem to be necessary for some men, and asked what the common factor is for those who find their way in life by starting with game and those who find their way without starting with game. Roosh pointed to character traits: being free-thinking, independent, and resistant to authoritarian control. The people who exhibit these traits tend to be more open to enlightenment.
What we're up against: This last point played into something that Roosh hinted at in his talk, and about which he went into greater detail in the Q&A. All of the destructive policies and social movements that Roosh discussed seem to have a common goal, and that is to make people easier to control. Those in power work to destroy the family unit, the tribe, and people's sense of purpose. They make men and women distrust and fight against each other. The old bonds are replaced with food, cheap entertainment, and the iPhone. The consistent consequence is a reduction in the fertility of the native population (of whatever country is infected), which is then replaced with immigrants, who are cynically used to break down solidarity even more. In this way, people who would otherwise resist authoritarian control are rendered less effectual in their attempts, and thus become more easily controlled. After this is accomplished, a nation finally hits bottom and can be controlled from the outside, like Greece is today. The elites who push all of this are seeking their own common interest, which is to secure more power and wealth. To this end, they elevate themselves and other people who agree with them, such as reporters who are easy to manipulate.
(In short, then, the very traits that help us to begin to cultivate our masculinity and to enjoy life, that is, being free-thinking, independent, and resistant to authoritarian control, are the very traits that those in power are attempting to stamp out. We are the great threat, hence the strong response to Roosh among Canadian reporters and politicians.)
How to deal with all of this: Throughout his answers, Roosh reflected on lessons from his recent experiences that can help us men deal with what we're up against, and what will come our way.
"Having a business for yourself should be the goal of all of you here." One person asked about being antifragile. Instead of discussing the broader meaning of that term, which would have taken too long, Roosh gave a brief response about how a man can be antifragile in his own life: Make it so that there is no one person responsible for you getting money. Create a lifestyle where you have various sources for your income. Roosh has been able to survive because he has no one weak point. He had no employer for the Canadian SJWs to berate or boycott. The goal is to be one's own man, to be able to tell people to "fuck off" and "cry some more." Roosh himself is able to live well in Poland with expenses as low as $1,500 per month.
"A lot of you don't know how strong you actually are. You have power you don't even know. Those at the top make you think they're more powerful than they really are." Roosh advised, "If you attack someone, annihilate him. If you don't, he'll know how to fight." The Canadian SJWs erred in not destroying him in Montreal, because he was able to apply in Toronto the lessons that he had learned from the week prior. Their attack had made him stronger. He remarked on a similar phenomenon that has taken place over the past four years, beginning with attacks on him over his first work to gain widespread attention, Bang Iceland. In response to these attacks, his hands were shaking. This was followed by attacks on him over his work on Denmark and then Colombia. Finally, the SPLC came against him. At that point, his hand did not shake. All of the attacks had given him strength, and they would continue to do so as people went on to attack him for various Return of Kings articles and for his "How To Stop Rape" article.
deathtofatties
Kingfisher
Also relevant http://www.rooshvforum.com/thread-49947.html
Attachments
You know the "event did not happen" theme...
Roosh, take then up on that offer.
Announce a 25 city Canadian tour, but green screen it from Poland.
Boots on the ground take some photos, but imagine being talked about more than the Canadian PM for more than half a year.
Roosh, take then up on that offer.
Announce a 25 city Canadian tour, but green screen it from Poland.
Boots on the ground take some photos, but imagine being talked about more than the Canadian PM for more than half a year.
