Home
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
BATTLE OF TORONTO: August 15, 2015
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AnonymousBosch" data-source="post: 828106" data-attributes="member: 5255"><p>Yeah, it's the same appeal to faux-morality you'll see from the UK and Australia when they him, and others down. What they mean is 'anyone who challenges our controlling political narrative'.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Roosh had already been under sustained media attack by the US and Canada before this. The US had Free Speech protections that hadn't been undermined enough yet to have been able to ban him entry - though I'm sure a Hillary Victory would have removed those. Canada had politicians attempting to ban him from various Canadian cities and much discussion by Mathieu Bouchard, a Constitutional Lawyer, on the possibility of CBSA Agents (Canada Border Services Agency) denying him entry around the time of they hysteria in Toronto and Montreal. Given how often this thought was seeded, I suspect if Roosh had every shown any desire to return to Canada in 2016, this would have come into play.</p><p></p><p><strong>Our mistake was in thinking the Feb 2016 drama was a 'Worldwide' Meetup Outrage. Looking back on it, <em>it wasn't</em>, it was <em>four specific countries with strongly anti-male, governments who regularly enact extreme feminist social policies</em>, and everything that happened to Roosh since flows from that realisation.</strong></p><p></p><p>Even the proposed EU Ban came via the UK, with Batshit Feminist Mary Honeywell leading the charge there.</p><p></p><p>But why not, say, Sweden? Why does the pattern of spontaneous grassroots petitions with the same talking points barely get any traction in, say, Stockholm, versus the huge reactions in Glasgow or Melbourne, when it's a much more Feminist Country?</p><p></p><p>So, whilst you might ask "Why did lame NZ soyboy celebrity Jemaine Clement get <strong>so</strong> triggered on Social Media over Roosh?" I think the answer lies in the question "Why was the Australian Government apparently-involved in setting up Trump for Future Impeachment?"</p><p></p><p>I might need some help.</p><p></p><p>If anyone is familiar with posting on 8Chan; is familiar with /qresearch/; practices good Opsec; and wouldn't mind throwing a message up there for me, hit me up privately.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AnonymousBosch, post: 828106, member: 5255"] Yeah, it's the same appeal to faux-morality you'll see from the UK and Australia when they him, and others down. What they mean is 'anyone who challenges our controlling political narrative'. Roosh had already been under sustained media attack by the US and Canada before this. The US had Free Speech protections that hadn't been undermined enough yet to have been able to ban him entry - though I'm sure a Hillary Victory would have removed those. Canada had politicians attempting to ban him from various Canadian cities and much discussion by Mathieu Bouchard, a Constitutional Lawyer, on the possibility of CBSA Agents (Canada Border Services Agency) denying him entry around the time of they hysteria in Toronto and Montreal. Given how often this thought was seeded, I suspect if Roosh had every shown any desire to return to Canada in 2016, this would have come into play. [b]Our mistake was in thinking the Feb 2016 drama was a 'Worldwide' Meetup Outrage. Looking back on it, [i]it wasn't[/i], it was [i]four specific countries with strongly anti-male, governments who regularly enact extreme feminist social policies[/i], and everything that happened to Roosh since flows from that realisation.[/b] Even the proposed EU Ban came via the UK, with Batshit Feminist Mary Honeywell leading the charge there. But why not, say, Sweden? Why does the pattern of spontaneous grassroots petitions with the same talking points barely get any traction in, say, Stockholm, versus the huge reactions in Glasgow or Melbourne, when it's a much more Feminist Country? So, whilst you might ask "Why did lame NZ soyboy celebrity Jemaine Clement get [b]so[/b] triggered on Social Media over Roosh?" I think the answer lies in the question "Why was the Australian Government apparently-involved in setting up Trump for Future Impeachment?" I might need some help. If anyone is familiar with posting on 8Chan; is familiar with /qresearch/; practices good Opsec; and wouldn't mind throwing a message up there for me, hit me up privately. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Home
Forums
Other Topics
Off topic discussion
BATTLE OF TORONTO: August 15, 2015
Top
