Big picture playbook and analysis

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
You want us to pick up guns and fight who...
I'm not saying the time is now and the place is where you currently are.

I'm saying that the time will come eventually and you should be very carefully deciding where you want to be when that time arrives.

The point I was trying to make was that the guys who were hyping the movement (often posting revolutionary memes) because they thought someone else far away was going to save the day and who are now looking to jump ship because it didn't work out are revealing themselves to be something other than the die-hard patriots they were LARPing as.
 

ginsu

Robin
What could explain the differences in USA and EU right now ?. Have ''they'' cucked the european union to such a degree that is it not necessary to increase the temperature right now ?. Or will we see somekind of conflict resembling america in the european union aswell soon.
 

Psalm27

Robin
Gold Member
What could explain the differences in USA and EU right now ?. Have ''they'' cucked the european union to such a degree that is it not necessary to increase the temperature right now ?. Or will we see somekind of conflict resembling america in the european union aswell soon.
They are still moving in tons of refugees from Africa and the Middle East but most of the EU is probably a few decades behind the US. In my hometown in Finland foreigners are still rare to see. Most are native white people, and this is in southern Finland where most of our migrants are located. The more east you go the whiter it gets until you are in Russia where there's a lot of muslims and they are growing fast.

We might see ethnic conflicts in Sweden, France, UK though.
 

An0dyne

Robin
So I'm sure you've all heard of this before: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_State_Project

I think if there's any hope of salvaging this mess, following a similar pattern would be the only option. We must use the enemy's tactics and seize control of the power structures for any meaningful chance at fomenting change. But this can be done in a way "innocent as doves" by following the structure allowed for within state regulations, and then using power to alter those regulations to our advantage.
 

Psalm27

Robin
Gold Member
World economic forum is advertising something called "The Great Reset".

The trailer Youtube advertises a world of chaos with people and at the end shows peaceful nature with no people. It seems to point very clearly to a depopulation agenda: https://www.weforum.org/great-reset
COVID-19 has accelerated our transition into the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. We have to make sure that the new technologies in the digital, biological and physical world remain human-centred and serve society as a whole, providing everyone with fair access
Fourth Industrial Revolution is basically internet of things, 5G/6G, social credit system ... this is the future surveillance grid and might be the mark of the beast system.

This global pandemic has also demonstrated again how interconnected we are. We have to restore a functioning system of smart global cooperation structured to address the challenges of the next 50 years. The Great Reset will require us to integrate all stakeholders of global society into a community of common interest, purpose and action
He is basically talking global governance here.

Read more here: https://www.weforum.org/great-reset/about
 

mbare

Woodpecker
Gold Member
It's really quite simple:

You can't have a democracy if you have "free press".

The so called free media is a oligarch power tool run by neo-bolcheviks.

Russia, Hungary, China all have in common that they have sympathetic or govt controlled media.

Illiberal democracy is the only future we have in which white people actually have democracy.
Unfortunately I think you're correct. Yuri talked about this in his interviews and lectures -- how a country can only be subverted if they're OPEN to the subversion. We've been wide open by pretending media and other influential areas like academia and hollywood are there for other purposes other than their main purpose, which is to destroy the country with subversion.
 
Historically, I do not think that armed guerilla rebellion is the way to go for right wing people, when fighting communists.

Can someone suggest to me where that worked out great?

Right wing people need the police and particularly the military to be on our side.

The historical playbook seems to be like this:

1. The creation of a violent left wing paramilitary group (Antifa, BLM, FARC)

2. The response of a violent right wing paramilitary group (SA, Falangists, Arkan's Tigers)

3. Foreign communist support for the local communist rebellion

4. Military support for the local right wing paramilitaries

5. Victory

Someone tell me that this is not what has happened?

Right wingers have the benefit of law and order and institutions, which is something that the majority of people prefer over the ad hoc anarchism of communists.

While militias definitely will play an important symbolic and heroic role, they will not decide the outcome. The victory would depend on the majority of the military joining the right wing forces.

Which is also why I would rather suggest that the best action for the thinking man patriot, would be to get involved in these areas. Police, military, national guard, reserves, volunteer firefighter, etc or any other institutions, which are associated with Law and Order.

That's where the real fight will be in the worst case scenario of secession or worse.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Defeating an entrenched Left wing occupation of your government short of a military coup is always going to come back to the same basic premise. Maximize squeeze. Minimize juice. I have optimism that this particular fight will be much faster than the previous iterations of the same battle. If the USSR had been forced to form under the same level of awareness we have now then its initial losses would have been far greater and it would have collapsed far more quickly. Back then for most people it was something that arrived in the night and for all intents and purposes was presumed to be able to last indefinitely, ergo there was little rebellion.

But thanks to millions of Western men being educated about things like supply chains and basic marksmanship we could bring a socialist government to a grinding halt very quickly at such time as we finally decided to intervene. Particularly in light of how top heavy the system is in terms of the number of people consuming rather than creating. Blue America for example would struggle to survive an entire winter of persistent blackouts.
 
Good point.

Russia was a backwater then compared to the more enlightened Western European countries, where the attempted communist uprisings failed (1917 Bavaria).

I do not belive that communist armed revolt is possible to succeed in Western Europe, because the lower classes are too well off, to want radical change. Western European lower classes simply ask for a little more in the current system, not an overturn.

The US is different, the presence of blacks and latinos bring an impoverished class of people into the mix. Nothing to lose, much to gain.
 

Ironside

Robin
Defeating an entrenched Left wing occupation of your government short of a military coup is always going to come back to the same basic premise. Maximize squeeze. Minimize juice. I have optimism that this particular fight will be much faster than the previous iterations of the same battle. If the USSR had been forced to form under the same level of awareness we have now then its initial losses would have been far greater and it would have collapsed far more quickly. Back then for most people it was something that arrived in the night and for all intents and purposes was presumed to be able to last indefinitely, ergo there was little rebellion.

But thanks to millions of Western men being educated about things like supply chains and basic marksmanship we could bring a socialist government to a grinding halt very quickly at such time as we finally decided to intervene. Particularly in light of how top heavy the system is in terms of the number of people consuming rather than creating. Blue America for example would struggle to survive an entire winter of persistent blackouts.
Correct. But there are far too many people that still believe this is a Republican vs Democrat issue, and not a Zionist vs Bolshevik one. The major point is to convince the conservatives that their opponents are not 'liberals' and 'democrats' but communists and bolsheviks.
 

ginsu

Robin
World economic forum is advertising something called "The Great Reset".

The trailer Youtube advertises a world of chaos with people and at the end shows peaceful nature with no people. It seems to point very clearly to a depopulation agenda: https://www.weforum.org/great-reset
There are hardly things more evil than planning in cold blood over population and then depopulation ( extermination ) as tools to help you gain power and then maintain power permanently ( they wish ). They pushed globalist industrialization the last 100 years throughout the world aswell as ''charity/philanthropy'' that caused the population boom. And at the same time directed society to becoming ultra consumerist and devaluing human life so that they can use the masses of zombies as weight to push for more power. Finally once the zombie masses have fulfilled their purpose and are becoming an annoyance/risk they move on to depopulation ( extermination ). The ruthless minds of these people ( they're more like demons ) terrify me. Using a background video of trash and ''scary'' climate disaster and riots, that they know very well they have orchestrated themselves and are now dangling in our faces to make us feel guilty and terrified enough to allow them to do anything they wish. The scariest and most dangerous thing in this world to me are psychopaths etc.
 
Last edited:

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Correct. But there are far too many people that still believe this is a Republican vs Democrat issue, and not a Zionist vs Bolshevik one. The major point is to convince the conservatives that their opponents are not 'liberals' and 'democrats' but communists and bolsheviks.
My opponents are anti-Christian, in deed and in sworn allegiance. They include republicans and democrats, conservatives and liberals. For example, I am against public schools but not against a public health system. The expression of European Christianity is not captured by any of the infantile and autistic modern isms which have sprung up to accommodate systems that lionize the blasphemous separation of God and State. Modern conservatism has been reduced to free markets and libertarian theory, both of which are gateways to luciferianism.

Your premise is flawed because it is based on a partisan attempt at deception. It is doomed to failure twice. Once because it is a lie and twice because it is easily disproven.

"Hey, Jimmy. Ironside says you're a communist."
"What? No. My parents fled communism. I just think that we can buy a few less fighter jets and put a bit more funding into health care."
"Yeah, that's not exactly communism. Come to think of it, that sounds pretty reasonable."

The capitalist/communist divide is just more jewish devilry demanding that European Christians take inherently immoral stances and then fight each other for their preferred brand of evil. It's garbage and I'll have no part of it. Jesus didn't force children into state-run indoctrination camps but neither did he take the loaf or bread and the fish and put it up for auction to the highest bidder while telling the rest to get a job.
 

Easy_C

Crow
Historically, I do not think that armed guerilla rebellion is the way to go for right wing people, when fighting communists.

Can someone suggest to me where that worked out great?

Right wing people need the police and particularly the military to be on our side.
Locals are. Something I've noticed about what's happening outside the city centers is that these pushes are being resisted by local law enforcement, bikers, and 3% working together.


One thing I have long predicted is that bikers would be a key force and have guessed that's why they've had such a huge target on their back from federal law enforcement. They're a relatively large group that is extremely anti-leftist and has a social world that is both the epitome of hierarchical right-wing instinct, extremely well suited to countering leftist behavior because they're both very good at enforcing quality control (they'll strip your patch and/or beat your ass if you harm the community or make everyone look bad) and don't really give a crap what those who hate them think (unlike normiecons). In addition they already have state level governance structures in place (Confederation of Clubs), strong lines of communication that are closer to prison comms than our internet reliance, and a massive ability to rapidly project force (they're heavily armed, the 1%ers generally have access to military grade arms including encrypted radios/jamming, and can mobilize very quickly).



Overall I'd be looking for the following criteria in an area to live in if you're worried about security issues
  1. Presence of "rule of law" LEOs who will allow and assist citizens to engage in self defense and community defense
  2. Economics that aren't just retail for retired people and includes some type of key production activity such as a plant manufacturing "third world" essentials that you need to live and survive in that environment (e.g. guns, outdoor clothes, farming equipment). You don't want to be living in a community that's just a gas stop along an interstate.
  3. Presence of a correctly aligned 1%er motorcycle club. Organized crime and cartel activity will become a significant factor in many areas and you want to be in an area where the local dominant organization is on your side. I won't name specific ones but it's not hard to figure out (they post their chapter locations publicly for the most part).
  4. Distance from well known deep state/smuggling hubs. A few examples would be Minneapolis (not coincidentally this started there), The I25 Corridor south of Wyoming, Arkansas, etc.
  5. Defensibility: Look at how easily organized groups from cities could move out there and how many avenues of approach you'd have to worry about. There's a few areas where only a few highways being shut down to vehicle traffic would completely cut off the ability of people from urban areas to move in certain directions due to natural barriers (water, steep mountains, etc).


[/QUOTE]
 

Ironside

Robin
My opponents are anti-Christian, in deed and in sworn allegiance. They include republicans and democrats, conservatives and liberals. For example, I am against public schools but not against a public health system. The expression of European Christianity is not captured by any of the infantile and autistic modern isms which have sprung up to accommodate systems that lionize the blasphemous separation of God and State. Modern conservatism has been reduced to free markets and libertarian theory, both of which are gateways to luciferianism.

Your premise is flawed because it is based on a partisan attempt at deception. It is doomed to failure twice. Once because it is a lie and twice because it is easily disproven.

"Hey, Jimmy. Ironside says you're a communist."
"What? No. My parents fled communism. I just think that we can buy a few less fighter jets and put a bit more funding into health care."
"Yeah, that's not exactly communism. Come to think of it, that sounds pretty reasonable."

The capitalist/communist divide is just more jewish devilry demanding that European Christians take inherently immoral stances and then fight each other for their preferred brand of evil. It's garbage and I'll have no part of it. Jesus didn't force children into state-run indoctrination camps but neither did he take the loaf or bread and the fish and put it up for auction to the highest bidder while telling the rest to get a job.
Oh I'm well aware, but the point is that conservatives are at least possible to talk to because they aren't completely ideologically brainwashed into destruction, they are simply brainwashed into greed. It's possible to inform conservatives of reality, but it is absolutely impossible to turn liberals and communists away from their chosen and indoctrinated beliefs.
The whole right wing/left wing nonsense and hordes of 'isms' and 'phobias' are simply the result of corrupted modernity. If you were to ask a man from 300 years ago if he was 'right wing' or 'left wing' he would look at you with perplexion and respond that he's a man and men don't have wings, and if he was forced to have wings he'd want two since a bird with only 1 wing isn't able to fly. If one were to say such a thing today people would assume they're mad.
 
Something else to consider: an armed insurrection or guerrilla movement can resist power, but must ultimately persuade the population of its aims to be successful. Thus, all war has a moral & spiritual component.

That leads to a Black Pill: most people are choosing the Big Lies and rejecting Truth. In fact, the Evil at work here is operating inverse to Christ: whereas His ministry is based on Love and Truth, Satan is bringing his world empire to fruition based on Fear and Lies (the coming "Great Reset").

The other significant challenge is the power of the global System. What was the Plandemic if not a silent totalitarian coup? We saw token resistance, at best. This is their most powerful weapon and why they will use the System to push the Mark.

The best we can do is System-distance to enhance moral autonomy and build our Faith for the upcoming persecutions. Some may escape by living in caves, forests, etc... but most of us will eventually be forced to pledge allegiance to Satan or God.

Thus, the White Pill is the privilege of martyrdom. We shouldn't fear death. "And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell." Matt. 10:28. God prevails and His greatness will be demonstrated in both small and big ways during these times.
 
Top