Big picture playbook and analysis

Ironside

Robin
I’m well aware but There is a reason I recommend that CoA regardless
I get the point you are trying to make - but it comes from a point where you actually still believe there's some compromise to be made with these people.
If Americans gave away 49 of 50 states to non-whites, within 20 years there would be mobs forming at the gates of the White Republic of Utah demanding entry.
If white people abandoned all of Europe, the Americas, and Oceania and formed a chain of islands made out of garbage in the Pacific - within 10 years there would be endless articles about how it is 'unfair' that the floating garbage schools of the white pacific islands of 'Fuckofflandia' are 'conveying an unfair advantage'.
If white people went off and colonized Mars and left Earth, within 100 years you'd get radio broadcasts proclaiming Mars is 'racist' and how the original inhabitants of Mars were actually diverse Humanoid-Martians, and within 200 years you'd get kamikaze space shuttles that were flung from Earth unto Mars filled with migrants that would risk life and death to be 'oppressed'.
You can't run from these people. Any weaseling in linguistics is doomed to failure. The only word they understand is 'no'. And then if they press it's 'no' backed up with a gun. That's it.
 

Easy_C

Crow
Nobody is advocating compromise. The point is that they can be convinced to split (are largely already advocating for it themselves) and it's far easier for us to deal with them separated than it is when they're within the same borders. Both of their grass roots faction are utterly convinced they are just being held down by white Republican voters so sometimes the best solution is to borrow from ju-jitsu and accelerate the momentum they already have.
 

Ironside

Robin
Nobody is advocating compromise. The point is that they can be convinced to split (are largely already advocating for it themselves) and it's far easier for us to deal with them separated than it is when they're within the same borders.
That's the thing though - they can't be convinced to split. Look at 'CHAZ' as a perfect example - it was a proclaimed autonomous zone that:
Relied on power from systems built by white people
Food supply from systems built by white people
Sanitation from systems built by white people (and when such systems were overloaded, they asked for help in regards to sanitation....which was again provided by white people)
When someone was injured, they literally demanded emergency services to help them (again paid for by white people)
The entire structure they set up was overtly hostile to white people though.
 

Easy_C

Crow
Of course. The alternative is to have them all within our own borders, fully backed by federal law enforcement and given immunity for violence while you get persecuted if you defend yourself. Much better to have a clearly defined border where they can run their own territory into the ground.


This should have been done a long time ago because that would have clamped down on their ability to spread it to new locations. Had this been done when the idea was first pushed for in the 90's there would be no blue Colorado, Blue North Carolina, or purple Texas.

The grassroots don't need to be convinced to split either.They already want to. The blacks are openly demanding to have a black state, and leftists think the West Coast is just being held back by the stupid Rednecks in flyover states (and they they proceed to spout off about how big California's GDP is and how Red States supposedly receive more federal aid than they pay in taxes).
 
Last edited:

Ironside

Robin
Of course. The alternative is to have them all within our own borders, fully backed by federal law enforcement and given immunity for violence while you get persecuted if you defend yourself. Much better to have a clearly defined border where they can run their own territory into the ground.


This should have been done a long time ago because that would have clamped down on their ability to spread it to new locations. Had this been done when the idea was first pushed for in the 90's there would be no blue Colorado, Blue North Carolina, or purple Texas.

The grassroots don't need to be convinced to split either.They already want to. The blacks are openly demanding to have a black state, and leftists think the West Coast is just being held back by the stupid Rednecks in flyover states (and they they proceed to spout off about how big California's GDP is and how Red States supposedly receive more federal aid than they pay in taxes).
This is the problem I stated earlier - if such measures went into effect - if there was some west coast hyper-liberal New California Republic formed, as well as some 'New Afrika' state - the NCR would immediately start blaming the 'rednecks' or Mormons nearby for any and all problems they faced. And likewise with some 'New Afrika' state - they would immediately blame their white neighbours for any and all problems. So then what, give up more territory? Like I said they will eventually be at the gates of the White Kingdom of Wyoming blaming them for every one of their problems.
You will never be at peace if you think you can actually listen and compromise with their demands - and what you are suggesting is 100% a compromise which will lead to further degregation.
I'm not saying we need to remain close together, not at all - we do need to seperate - but we also need to abandon this mindrot idea that we're somehow responsible for them.
Oh God I'd be a Legate wouldn't I?
 
Last edited:

Easy_C

Crow
I'm not saying we need to remain close together, not at all - we do need to seperate - but we also need to abandon this mindrot idea that we're somehow responsible for them.
Of course. My line of thought is somewhat along the lines though,that this sort of thing would be much easier to deal with if we disposed of the illusion that their values, identity, and way of life have anything in common with the rest of us.
 

Max Roscoe

Woodpecker
So what is coming next? Coronavirus was all played out a couple of weeks ago, and it was a convenient switch to rioting over statues of white people, which is getting pretty old now. Now that we are in to summer, it's a bit hot to keep up the nonstop rioting, though the western states seem to be doing their best. Coronavirus is somehow still occupying almost all the news.

But attention spans are short, and how much can the media really talk about this illness? I mean, they can start reading the names of everyone who supposedly died from it I suppose, but there is very little to be said that hasn't been said already and I can't see this dominating the news through November.

So what's next? I think there will have to be something to keep voters distracted from late summer to fall, when we will be in real flu season and people can start freaking out about coofing again. My thought is some new scandal about Trump, maybe even more impeachment hearings. Surely, with all his TV appearances, there is film of him saying something SUPER offensive or evil that we haven't seen yet. He does thankfully seen immune to sex scandals. Another thought is a false flag they would use to try to trick Trump into starting a war.
 

Pooch32

Sparrow
So what is coming next? Coronavirus was all played out a couple of weeks ago, and it was a convenient switch to rioting over statues of white people, which is getting pretty old now. Now that we are in to summer, it's a bit hot to keep up the nonstop rioting, though the western states seem to be doing their best. Coronavirus is somehow still occupying almost all the news.

But attention spans are short, and how much can the media really talk about this illness? I mean, they can start reading the names of everyone who supposedly died from it I suppose, but there is very little to be said that hasn't been said already and I can't see this dominating the news through November.

So what's next? I think there will have to be something to keep voters distracted from late summer to fall, when we will be in real flu season and people can start freaking out about coofing again. My thought is some new scandal about Trump, maybe even more impeachment hearings. Surely, with all his TV appearances, there is film of him saying something SUPER offensive or evil that we haven't seen yet. He does thankfully seen immune to sex scandals. Another thought is a false flag they would use to try to trick Trump into starting a war.
California went into lockdown again. Covid fear is critical for the Democratic strategy of committing mass mail ballot fraud for the election so I’d imagine they will keep double and triple downing on it.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
War
It's not even a suggestion or a thought at this point. It just hasn't yet gotten to the point where people feel it personally.
There's really no need to complicate things. Pick a white state with a strong secessionist movement and join up. It's probably one of the quickest ways to "buy in" to any organised form of protection with people who are more or less on the same page as you (even if they're not open about the demographics issue).
 

It_is_my_time

Hummingbird
separation has an intrinsic problem: they want to impose their tyranny upon us. And once separate, they need only leverage their goal with an alliance with US enemies like China, Iran, or other obvious states. Either war results in their defeat, or ours. That’s clarity, but it ain’t peaceful.
Iran doesn't want to attack Americans, especially not Americans who would separate from the empire that is attacking them. Iran would be allies with the separation state.

China on the other hand is an unknown and a terrifying possibility.
 

durangotang

Pelican
There's really no need to complicate things. Pick a white state with a strong secessionist movement and join up. It's probably one of the quickest ways to "buy in" to any organised form of protection with people who are more or less on the same page as you (even if they're not open about the demographics issue).
The question of succession was answered in 1865. Then again, they didn't have much of a diversity problem back then and it was mostly whites wanting to rule and impose their will on other whites. The split is not so much by states, but urban vs rural. Outside of Portland, even pozzed Oregon is mostly conservative. The same is true of California or New York. It's a tough call on how things will go down, because each state is pretty much itself dominated by a liberal city that doesn't find itself at odds with the prevailing philosophy of the ruling elite in Washington D.C. If there were to be any succession movements, they won't be over a philosophical difference regarding political correctness, rather it will be economic. Leaving the union would be an economic disaster for most states, however, and the ensuing military conflict would render it a pointless exercise from a financial perspective. I can't see how the USA continues in it's current form if the dollar collapses, and yet I can't see how it would split up either. This is especially true as woke Millennials take the reigns of power, if anything the state capitals will be asking for assistance from the feds to put down racist insurrections in the countryside.
 

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
Secession isn't viable, but you push for it anyway because it sets the tone of the relationship. Without a secessionist mindset then federal globohomo tyranny becomes a "meh, watcha gonna do" type situation. With a secessionist mindset people want to fight federal intervention far more savagely, and they'll elect men who are far more hostile to the globohomo regime rather than "go along to get along" type Republicans.

Boost it enough and you start being able to create shadow-governing bodies including enforcement. Ugly times are coming your way. The more you grapple with them on your own terms the better.
 

hervens

Sparrow
To go back to the "Big Picture Playbook and Analysis" for a bit, I think it's important to constantly remind ourselves who the real enemies are.
They're not the blacks or the left, or the liberals, or the lbgtq. Sure, they're profiting from the situation (at least for now) but the real enemies are the hidden governments at the top. The Gates, The Soro's, the CCP, the Rothschilds etc. and all the companies and government officials they manage. They are very very satanic and capable of the worst filth imaginable. The left only has power because they give it to them.

That's why I personally think separation would do nothing but postpone the inevitable by a few decades at best. The separated state would eventually get infiltrated and bring about the same situation we have now. They want the whole world, not just the left wing and the blacks.

Every time I hear about a group of BLM or other "diversity" activists, I only feel love and mercy. I know their intentions are probably good, but they're unknowingly being manipulated and used up by the various media outlets to help advance the illuminati's long range agenda, often at the sake of their own happiness and life satisfaction.
 
Last edited:

Leonard D Neubache

Owl
Gold Member
They're all "real enemies".

The idea that some black dude about to shoot you for saying all lives matter is "not the real enemy" is laughable nonsense. You're still trapped in pretending that this is all academic. All something to be debated on the internet and switched off at the power point when you have other stuff to do.

I hope you're somewhere safe, I really do, but everyone who organises to do you harm is the real enemy, whether they're a clinically retarded ghetto thug whose plan is five seconds old or a billionaire sociopath jew whose plan is 5 centuries old.

The inevitable conclusion of your premise is that the billionaire sociopath jew is not your real enemy either.

Why does he have the agency to be a purveyor of evil rather than it's unwitting pawn while the street thug is just an innocent, well meaning fool? Surely the billionaire sociopath jew is a victim of satan, just the same?
 

hervens

Sparrow
The inevitable conclusion of your premise is that the billionaire sociopath jew is not your real enemy either.

Why does he have the agency to be a purveyor of evil rather than it's unwitting pawn while the street thug is just an innocent, well meaning fool? Surely the billionaire sociopath jew is a victim of satan, just the same?
Thankfully I'm not affected by the riots where I'm located, so I can analyse the situation a bit more cool headed.

To get back to what you were saying, the power balance is not the same. The sociopath jew has power to influence cultures and societies. The street thug doesn't, but they're being used to fuel tension and division in this nation like never before. In any fair and just society under good leadership these riots would've been stopped almost instantly.. but it hasn't, and purposely so. Sure, the thugs are playing their part well, but under a fair government dealing with criminals is not insurmountable, nations have been doing it for millennia. Dealing with an invisible satanic monarchy that has infiltrated almost every aspect of modern government is a different story.

My point is, if you want any lasting solution to this you first have to target and find a way to challenge the ones at the top, and the rest should be a lot easier to deal with.

In the case of a separation, even if it were feasible, the liberals and the blacks at the bottom can be convinced to go along with it, but globalhomo will never be on board and would do everything possible to stop it. They would rather start WW3 than see a strong christian conservative state come to fruition.

I think maybe the best course of action at the moment is to cluster in the suburbs with like minded individuals and try to live a just life. A community small enough to not attract the attention of the globalists, but big enough to allow you to work, raise a family and run a normal life.
 
Last edited:

budoslavic

Peacock
Gold Member
Cross post from the Trump Thread.

Maximo Alvarez, President of Sunshine Gasoline: "Don't be useful idiots."


Alvarez, the President of Sunshine Gasoline, said the American Dream is at risk of being destroyed by the Left using the same tactics he saw the Communists use in Cuba when he was just 11 years old.

“We come over here, in my case because my parents chose that I would not be indoctrinated by the communist country, by the totalitarian country, by the totalitarian regime. They don’t educate children. Absolutely not. And this is something that we need to understand. What is happening in our backyard today, I experienced as an 11-year-old. I remember vividly all the promises that a guy named Castro gave, and how 99 percent of the people swallowed the pill,”

“It took many years later, after I read somebody named Saul Alinsky, that I realized that all those people were nothing but useful idiots. I remember Castro while in the mountains being interviewed and asked if he was a communist. He went crazy. … He was going to save Cuba. I remember how he promised to the farmers, to the wahitos that you’re going to own the land. I remember all the promises that we hear today about free education and free health care and free land,”


Alvarez reminded people that Fidel Castro abolished the police, the military and even took over the Catholic church. The immigrant’s dad, however, saw through Castro’s words because he experienced the same thing under communist Spain. Alvarez’s father saw parallel’s between Castro and his home country.

The businessman explained that the left uses fancy terms and promises to try and indoctrinate others. It’s the same tactics he saw in Cuba.

He also said the leftists rioting in the streets aren’t really socialists, they’re communists.

“Never forget about my dad who only had a sixth-grade education, but I think he was the greatest philosopher I ever met. He used to tell us how lucky he was because he was able to come from Spain to Cuba. And then he came from Cuba to [the] United States and he saw me graduate from college, and that was the biggest prize he ever had. And he said, ‘Don’t lose this place because you’re never going to be as lucky as me. Because if you lose this place, you have no place to go,’”

“So with that, please keep that in mind. And please, people, explain that to our young people who are demonstrating out there. Don’t be useful idiots, Please understand what’s happening in our country. See what happens to our parents and see what is happening to America today.”
[/QUOTE
]

 
Top