Black attacks on Asians

Easy_C

Peacock
Too much to ask for sure.

You are asking that a bunch of people on the internet give up their false sense of superiority for having being born with a certain color of skin. They can pretend to share the accomplishments of people who did things that they didn't just because they happen to share the same skin color.
And there’s a difference between “historically” and “post CIA-managed social engineering”. Currently the stats are a several orders of magnitude skewed in favor of black on white crime.

Not that I really agree with either reductionist “side” about the solution. My opinion is that the single best thing you could do to help the black community is to nuke Hollywood.
 

Elipe

Kingfisher
Investigators saying there wasn't a racial motive


They've been trying to paint an association between "inceldom" and white supremacism for years. Basically, since it's so hard for them to find actual, real cases of white supremacism in the year 2021, they're trying to create a dogwhistle for white supremacism that can pretty much apply to almost any white person that opposes globohomo thanks to the way they've crashed the dating market. It's not that they're claiming that incels are white supremacists, but that white supremacists are incels, but they'll word it in such a vague, bait-and-switchy way that will just happen to cause the average useful idiot to associate inceldom with white supremacism.

Which also has the side effect of driving those useful idiots even harder to things like homosexuality because if women aren't taking their virginity... well, there's a certain subpopulation that certainly has less qualms about that.
 
I think its safe to say that all race groups throughout their history have been barbarian savages.

Asians:

Genghis Khan and Mongolians raping and pillaging much of China
Japan's culture of Kamakazis and raping and pillaging China
Chinese empires doing barbaric things to other Chinese empires
etc...

The Americas:

Aztecs raping and pillaging tribes and sacrificing them daily by cutting heads off and eating human hearts
Mayans same as the Aztecs
Incas same as the Aztecs
North American Indian tribes always at war with each other
etc...

Europeans:

Raping and killing each other in the form of WWI and WWII
The Spanish and Portuguese raping and pillaging the Americas.
Raping and pillaging Africa for resources
Slavery of Africans
Americans killing each other in the American civil war
etc...


Blacks:

Africans killing and raping each other
Slavery of Africans
African tribes going to war with other African tribes and killing them for food.
etc...


Arabs:

ISIS vs Al Qaeda vs. Taliban etc...
Cutting people's heads off in the capital of Saudi Arabia till this day for sorcery and witchcraft and for watching porn
Persian Empire and their atrocities
Ottoman Empire and their atrocities
Invading and pillaging Spain for over 600 years
etc...

Humans are fucked up!
At least internally. Europeans ruthlessly cutting off criminals actually made their own societies more livable:

Nothing like sending Bandits to chop chop square to solve the problem.

Large scale mass violence on the other hand sure. But even that has changed.
 

911

Peacock
Gold Member
Say what you want I still blame (((the Jews ))) for all of this

The most important factor for violent crime, gang activity and social mayhem in general is the absence of a father in young men's lives. This is a proven fact, the foundation of the modern sociology of criminology.

The social-science evidence is in: though it may benefit the adults involved, the dissolution of intact two-parent families is harmful to large numbers of children. Moreover, the author argues, family diversity in the form of increasing numbers of single-parent and stepparent families does not strengthen the social fabric but, rather, dramatically weakens and undermines society


And the fact that blacks in America today have the highest rates of single mother households in the history of civilization is no accident, it is the result of social engineering, from the 1960s "Great Society" which literally paid women to live alone, to the 1990s crack epidemic to gangster rap. Another interesting fact: rap studio owners like Lyor Cohen, Rick Rubin and Russell Simmons (pic below) invested in private prison system while launching and promoting gangster rap:

gettyimages-166952968_wide-d04eb8a287b96bf8165f990ff6672d4b579c1b50.jpg


“Between the late 80’s and early 90’s, I was what you may call a “decision maker” with one of the more established company in the music industry. I came from Europe in the early 80’s and quickly established myself in the business. The industry was different back then. Since technology and media weren’t accessible to people like they are today, the industry had more control over the public and had the means to influence them anyway it wanted. This may explain why in early 1991, I was invited to attend a closed door meeting with a small group of music business insiders to discuss rap music’s new direction. Little did I know that we would be asked to participate in one of the most unethical and destructive business practice I’ve ever seen.

The meeting was held at a private residence on the outskirts of Los Angeles. I remember about 25 to 30 people being there, most of them familiar faces. Speaking to those I knew, we joked about the theme of the meeting as many of us did not care for rap music and failed to see the purpose of being invited to a private gathering to discuss its future.
Among the attendees was a small group of unfamiliar faces who stayed to themselves and made no attempt to socialize beyond their circle. Based on their behavior and formal appearances, they didn’t seem to be in our industry. Our casual chatter was interrupted when we were asked to sign a confidentiality agreement preventing us from publicly discussing the information presented during the meeting. Needless to say, this intrigued and in some cases disturbed many of us. The agreement was only a page long but very clear on the matter and consequences which stated that violating the terms would result in job termination. We asked several people what this meeting was about and the reason for such secrecy but couldn’t find anyone who had answers for us.

A few people refused to sign and walked out. No one stopped them. I was tempted to follow but curiosity got the best of me. A man who was part of the “unfamiliar” group collected the agreements from us.Quickly after the meeting began, one of my industry colleagues (who shall remain nameless like everyone else) thanked us for attending. He then gave the floor to a man who only introduced himself by first name and gave no further details about his personal background. I think he was the owner of the residence but it was never confirmed. He briefly praised all of us for the success we had achieved in our industry and congratulated us for being selected as part of this small group of “decision makers”.

At this point I begin to feel slightly uncomfortable at the strangeness of this gathering. The subject quickly changed as the speaker went on to tell us that the respective companies we represented had invested in a very profitable industry which could become even more rewarding with our active involvement. He explained that the companies we work for had invested millions into the building of privately owned prisons and that our positions of influence in the music industry would actually impact the profitability of these investments. I remember many of us in the group immediately looking at each other in confusion.

At the time, I didn’t know what a private prison was but I wasn’t the only one. Sure enough, someone asked what these prisons were and what any of this had to do with us. We were told that these prisons were built by privately owned companies who received funding from the government based on the number of inmates. The more inmates, the more money the government would pay these prisons. It was also made clear to us that since these prisons are privately owned, as they become publicly traded, we’d be able to buy shares.

Most of us were taken back by this. Again, a couple of people asked what this had to do with us. At this point, my industry colleague who had first opened the meeting took the floor again and answered our questions.

He told us that
since our employers had become silent investors in this prison business, it was now in their interest to make sure that these prisons remained filled. Our job would be to help make this happen by marketing music which promotes criminal behavior, rap being the music of choice.

He assured us that this would be a great situation for us because rap music was becoming an increasingly profitable market for our companies, and as employee, we’d also be able to buy personal stocks in these prisons. Immediately, silence came over the room.“

 

Castelnau

Kingfisher

Asian Americans are flocking to gun stores to arm themselves for self-defense amid the rise in anti-Asian hate crimes.

Sometimes rightwing orthodoxy is as annoying as leftwing orthodoxy.

In what scenario is owning a gun going to prevent the recent spate of attacks by mostly black men? How is a gun going to protect you against sneak attacks?

Black hoodlum pushes old asian man to the ground seriously injuring him. Old asian man or one of his kids shoots the black hoodlum in retaliation and he dies. Now George Floyd 2 happens, msm predictably lies and says asians killed black guy for no reason. 2 minute hate cycle against asians and how they're the new whites. Blacks and white antifa allies riot and loot all the asian businesses and kills a bunch of asians. This is actually what happened in the LA Riots because of a asian convinence store owner shooting black minor Latasha Harlins.

But Breitbart and other rightwingers just want to celebrate people buying guns. Its actually very tragic we love in a country where people have to buy guns for self-defense. And glorifying women with guns like the con right does with Dana Loesch is a abomination.
 

Dusty

Peacock
Gold Member



VDARE-asian-woman.jpg

Ann Coulter: Asian Female Writers, Activists—Asian Women Are Too Damn Hot!

thumb_ann.jpg

Ann Coulter
03/24/2021
A+
|
a-
Earlier (March 2019): This Week in Asian Women
I was at law school when I first noticed the phenomenon of liberal women pretending to be outraged as a cover for bragging. Average-to-ugly girls would work up feigned indignation about how a guy had “sexually harassed”them that day, then launch into a 20-minute retelling of some compliment they’d received. A man talked to me! I think he likes me … Let’s see, how do I work this into conversation for the rest of the week?
But it’s a peculiar reaction to mass murder.
Now that a white supremacistmass shooter (check that, turns out he was a radical Islamic Syrian refugee!) has committed a different mass murder in Boulder, Colorado, will we see hippies on TV, denouncing the assumption that Birkenstock-wearers are all sex gods?
No, of course not! Only liberals would think an appropriate response to an infamous crime is to talk about how sexually desirable they are. Liberalism makes everybody stupid.
Thus, for days after the fatal shooting of six Asians and two whites at massage-cum-sex spasin Atlanta, Asian activists and professors blanketed the airwaves to demand that white men STOP treating them like sex objects—whom they fantasize about, they want, they covet. Newspapers were chock-a-block with first-person accounts of Asian women being salivated over by white men.
Christine Liwag Dixon modestly began her tale of oppression for The Washington Post’s “The Lily”:“When I was 16, a boy I thought was my friend said, ‘I can’t figure you out. Asian girls are either smart or hot. But you’re both.’” She’s older and married now, but still cherishes this comment from high school.
Amid her recitation of other compliments she’d received over the course of a lifetime—some stupid, some vulgar, and some, I’d wager, completely fictional—Liwag Dixon remarked, “It no longer surprises me, but it still hurts.”
Well, naturally. Who wouldn’t be hurt to be called both smart AND hot?
Among the distressing compliments detailed by Liwag Dixon, she reports that she was often called “exotic.” (I will NOT link to the scene in “NewsRadio,” where Beth explains the meaning of words like “cute,” “beautiful” and “exotic.”)
Professors of color were prepared with scholarly opinions about how tantalizing Asian women are. Elaine Kim, professor emeritus in Asian American studies at the University of California, Berkeley, told the Associated Press that the Atlanta shooter probably had “an addiction to fantasies about Asian women as sex objects.”
However that may be, these particular spas were known as fronts for prostitution, which may also have put the idea of sex in the shooter’s head.
Another Berkeley professor, Catherine Ceniza Choy (Ethnic Studies), conveyed that the shooting “echoes a long-running stereotype that Asian women are immoral and hypersexual.” Ellen Wu, a history professor at Indiana University, confirmed that “from the moment Asian women began to migrate to the U.S., they were targets of hypersexualization.”
It all had a familiar ring …
HEY! Anybody remember the Duke lacrosse rape hoax?
Before the gang rape of a black stripper was exposed as a complete fraud—though well after three white families had their pockets emptied and their names dragged through the mud—an enormous amount of the commentary centered on white men’s lascivious interest in black women. (So of course the gang rape had to be true!)
The Duke lacrosse case “fed the stereotype that black women are hypersexual and readily available,” as the Associated Press put it. The article quoted a number of black coeds on how white guys just can’t keep their hands off African American ladies:
“The young black women can almost finish each other’s stories.
“They go to a party, a concert, a nightclub. Twenty-somethings of all colors are flirting and dancing. And then it happens.
“Inevitably, a woman says, a white man asks her to dance erotically while he watches. Or he grabs her rear end. Or asks for sex, in graphic detail, without bothering to ask her name.”
A black Duke coed, Audrey Christopher, complained to the Durham Indy that “at one of the quad parties, it was me and another black female friend, and these white guys immediately told us how they liked hanging out with black girls because white girls are sheltered and we’re more free …”
Again, the professors of color weighed in. Rebecca Hall(Surprise! Also Berkeley) said of the Duke gang-rape charges, a “black woman is somebody who has excess sexuality … it’s excess sexuality that white men are entitled to.” Duke professor Mark Anthony Neal said: “The message that men get about black women is these are women that are available to them, that they have easy access and their sole purpose is to serve their pleasure.”
To the extent that their argument isn’t simply that black women are hot, hot, hot, but that white men feel entitled to pillage black bodies, that’s not borne out by the data. According to FBI crime statistics, approximately 15,000 to 30,000 white women are raped by black men every year, while, on average, zero black women are raped by white men. (The department uses “0” to denote fewer than 10 victims.)
Nor, of course, was the rapacious white male theory supported by the facts of the very case they were discussing.
We don’t have a lot of women mass shooters, so it’s hard to flip the script. But maybe, in the future, whenever a white man is falsely accused of rape (Steve Pagones, the Duke lacrosse players, a fraternity at the University of Virginia) or murder (Darren Wilson, Jake Gardner, Staten Island police officers), white men should fan out across the airwaves to talk about how damn sexy they are.
Until then, I’m begging you, white men, please, for the love of God, STOP turning liberal women into your sexual fantasies!!!
 

Slide-Rule

Sparrow
I've seen that same list, used to show the stages of White genocide...

All I can really say, to anyone in the US government, or institutions or individuals imagining or even planning any sort of genocide, to Whites, Asians, Blacks, or anyone else made in the image and likeness of Almighty God, in the USA:

Please, For the Love of the Almighty Trinity: DON'T.

You will regret any sort of genocide the instant you start it.

I don't say that asking for mercy in the future.

The Demon of War goes by many names, Ares, Mars, Huītzilōpōchtli, Tyr, and many others, it is the same monstrosity... If you call upon that Demon, it won't leave until its lust for blood, smoldering ruins, tears, and terrified cries for mothers as people bleed out alone on the hard ground has been satisfied.

I say that because genocide is really hard when your victims decide to turn around and shoot you in the head with a 12-gauge shotgun. It's really hard to round up people when you're met with a hail of semi-automatic gunfire from their home ("You're going to die one day anyways, might as well take at least one of these scum down with us...") It's really hard to order someone to kill another innocent person when the person carrying out that order doesn't know if their own children will be coming home from school or not, or if their parents will be alive by day's end or not...

With the sheer number of guns in the USA, the odds are not in the favor of people trying to commit genocide in America, and I hope it stays that way.
 

Elipe

Kingfisher
With the sheer number of guns in the USA, the odds are not in the favor of people trying to commit genocide in America, and I hope it stays that way.
They are currently trying to run around the 2nd Amendment by using the courts to break it, because the 2nd Amendment only says that Congress cannot make laws regarding keeping and bearing arms, but they're trying the loophole of going through the other branches of government.

The time is rapidly coming when even half-heartedly pretending to comply won't be enough.
 

Arado

Pelican
Gold Member



Sometimes rightwing orthodoxy is as annoying as leftwing orthodoxy.

In what scenario is owning a gun going to prevent the recent spate of attacks by mostly black men? How is a gun going to protect you against sneak attacks?

Black hoodlum pushes old asian man to the ground seriously injuring him. Old asian man or one of his kids shoots the black hoodlum in retaliation and he dies. Now George Floyd 2 happens, msm predictably lies and says asians killed black guy for no reason. 2 minute hate cycle against asians and how they're the new whites. Blacks and white antifa allies riot and loot all the asian businesses and kills a bunch of asians. This is actually what happened in the LA Riots because of a asian convinence store owner shooting black minor Latasha Harlins.

But Breitbart and other rightwingers just want to celebrate people buying guns. Its actually very tragic we love in a country where people have to buy guns for self-defense. And glorifying women with guns like the con right does with Dana Loesch is a abomination.

Sounds like that would have the impact of putting Asians and conservative whites on the same side. It's one thing to (like now) pretend that anti-asian sentiment is because of Trump and white supremacy.

It's a different story if the media turns anti-Asian in the story you describe above - in that case it's much harder for Asians to portray themselves as the victim and anti-thug sentiment among them will skyrocket and go public (while now they only speak the truth behind closed doors).

This incident also making the rounds on social media today.

 
Last edited:
Top