Bodybuilding Chad branded as trash for having standards on Tinder
- Thread starter porscheguy
- Start date
VNvet
Kingfisher
tomtud said:
I don't reward bad behavior nor associate with people I don't enjoy being around. Waste of my male energy, waste of time, and it always brought bad vibes. Couldn't even enjoy it.
I used to be extra rough with the women I couldn't stand, but women like rough sex, so it was just rewarding them.
The reward is short term. You banged her. The best outcome you can get from that is not caring for her after the bang. Make her feel like a used condom. That's your reward. Women become more attached after sex, especially if it was good. Neglecting them will be their punishment.VNvet said:
Meliorare93
Robin
Somebody should learn him the benefits of honoring law 38 !
I find his picture (him naked in his white underwear in a bathroom selfie) to be distasteful. The dude honestly should put some more clothes on, and do a beach pic or something. This is just not a "Chad".
Thrill Jackson said:
What about discriminating based on their bone structure or IQ? Or on established (and statistically valid) undesirable traits that are linked to their group? You aren't allowed as an individual to say "I'm just not interested in any of you"?
IveBeenFramed said:Manbeline said:The fact that his profile got not only an emotional response, but an article made of it means he did a job well done. The moment a woman is emotionally invested in you, you win. End of story. I do not use any dating app, but if I did, I would have no problem doing something similar just to rouse a response. I'd get more messages than most men who put how they like dogs/ cats, walks on the beach, etc.
Btw, here is the writer of that article:
May bang. Picture magic and not seeing the rest of her body makes me skeptical.
More accurate pic:
Fuck's sake. Why is it always the teeth!?
Abelard Lindsey
Woodpecker
I agree with one of the posters here that the "black guy" statement is racist. Everything else that "Kirk" said is valid.
However, there is a more polite way of stating things than he did. For example, if I were on tinder, my add would say the following:
1) No kids
2) Please be HWP.
3) Please be D/D free.
However, there is a more polite way of stating things than he did. For example, if I were on tinder, my add would say the following:
1) No kids
2) Please be HWP.
3) Please be D/D free.
Thot Leader said:
So all blacks have the same IQ and the same bone structure?
No of course not. All your arguments are falling flat. Please stop embarrassing yourself.
Manbeline said:
When did I say being racist is not a negative for women?
Being racist is a negative for anybody, period.
EDIT: I'm not going to keep responding to all your people arguing for this guy's desire but please know the difference between having a PREFERENCE (ex:"I prefer white girls, not into black girls) and being RACIST (ex: "I will never date a black girl")
If you all can't understand that then we will just be running in circles.
He's not saying that, Thrill. He is telling you that everyone has a preference for something. Having a preference for not one category of people does not make it worse than if anyone chose the others. We all have the right to choose who we want to be. Humans are fickle creatures. You yourself I could estimate have a lot of preferences for who you rather be with. There is no moral high ground in the dating world. We wear different shoes, like different bands, and some of us enjoy women of certain cultures. I will never understand why someone would go after Filipino women, but I respect their decision. Much as I respect someone who do not like said women. When you say someone is racist, it destroys the conversation.Thrill Jackson said:
Having preference is fine but totally canceling out a whole segment of girls, especially on traits she has no control over is quite dumb. When men speak in absolutes about pussy it just screams to me a lack of experience with lots of types of women. Once you fuck girls of all types and backgrounds you quickly learn that all pussy is pink and all girls be crazy.
The only real traits to be selective with in aside from aesthetic features you may find more desirable class and culture. Aside from those two no girl is offering you anything unique. Environment can play a factor as men will typically fuck what is around then and what they can have access too. You dump any guy in the middle of a city China he is going to have to learn to like Chinese girls real quick or he ain't getting no play.
But to speak in absolutes, very silly.
When dudes box themselves in to near fetish levels of race for only certain types of girls they will always nosedive in quality to stick with the they like. The classic example is yellow fever dudes who have no qualms fucking ugly Asian girls as that is just what they know.
If a dude claims he doesn't like black girls for example and you put him in a bar with ugly white girls and hot black girls what is he going to do? If you live in reality you're going to go after hottest girls you can get traction with. So there is nothing wrong finding more traits desirable (for example maybe you find very nice hair as a trait you like, some girls of different backgrounds will have very nice hair relative to others) and then building a preference. But, it isn't absolute and thier is grey to it all.
The only real traits to be selective with in aside from aesthetic features you may find more desirable class and culture. Aside from those two no girl is offering you anything unique. Environment can play a factor as men will typically fuck what is around then and what they can have access too. You dump any guy in the middle of a city China he is going to have to learn to like Chinese girls real quick or he ain't getting no play.
But to speak in absolutes, very silly.
When dudes box themselves in to near fetish levels of race for only certain types of girls they will always nosedive in quality to stick with the they like. The classic example is yellow fever dudes who have no qualms fucking ugly Asian girls as that is just what they know.
If a dude claims he doesn't like black girls for example and you put him in a bar with ugly white girls and hot black girls what is he going to do? If you live in reality you're going to go after hottest girls you can get traction with. So there is nothing wrong finding more traits desirable (for example maybe you find very nice hair as a trait you like, some girls of different backgrounds will have very nice hair relative to others) and then building a preference. But, it isn't absolute and thier is grey to it all.
Aurini
Ostrich
Scott said:IveBeenFramed said:Manbeline said:The fact that his profile got not only an emotional response, but an article made of it means he did a job well done. The moment a woman is emotionally invested in you, you win. End of story. I do not use any dating app, but if I did, I would have no problem doing something similar just to rouse a response. I'd get more messages than most men who put how they like dogs/ cats, walks on the beach, etc.
Btw, here is the writer of that article:
May bang. Picture magic and not seeing the rest of her body makes me skeptical.
More accurate pic:
Fuck's sake. Why is it always the teeth!?
It's not the teeth that bother me; it's the lie present in the first picture.
I don't expect a real-world woman to have the synthetic perfection of an airbrushed starlet; I look more to her inner virtue than her outer beauty. Physically, this woman is well within the acceptable range for "marriage potential" - that is, she's hot enough to inspire my masculine instincts.
The lie of the above photo tells a darker reality, however. She is manifesting herself on the internet as a goddess - beautiful, blonde, and brilliant. But every morning when she looks in the mirror, she sees herself as she truly is; and out of spite tries that much harder to be something she's not. Painting herself up this way is destroying her from the inside out.